ab at 346 katrero avenue and for a large project authorization >> good afternoon, commissioners diego sanchez i present a project proposing to demolish a auto use with up to 70 dwelling units and retail this project provides off-street parking look at the rear of the property the project is located open that wedding of katrero between 16 and 17 street an urban mixed use and bulk district. commissioners the project requires the following 3 actions first, you must adapt a motion from the general manager of the rec and park department 80 communication with the rec and park department that the address shadow cast on the frank square is not adverse to the square pursuant to the planning code you must grant a large section to allow the construction of the tall mixed use building included the modification of the rear yard usable planning some time for eyes other than dwelling unit and dwelling unit x important and last you must adapt the m m rp while included in the packet that was the language was left out of the draft motion to adapt a motion for that and we met with the planning commission and at

to thank the director of planning, john ram, who has been working with us as well as his staff diego sanchez and annemarie rogers who have worked to make this a workable piece of legislation here in san francisco. i also want to thank our city attorney's office and specifically the deputy city attorney john malumet who has been advising us on this piece of legislation. and we also want to thank the planning commission, which unanimously supported this piece of legislation. i want to thank my staff who has been working on this piece of legislation for quite sometime now, laura ling and i also want to thank hillary ronan, and i know that carolyn goosen as well. this piece of legislation actually came to us from community and there are a number of organizations that are responsible for helping us draft this piece of legislation. the san francisco human rights commission, the national fair housing alliance, the national housing law project, the ace legal referral panel, the national sen forefor lesbian rights and aids housing alliance. i also know the lgbt center has been involved ~. the hope is

>> diego rivera sanchez correct. >> so i i made more than 10 units ape have a permit application and ask those questions i could basically answer no with all of them and still go ahead with development; is that correct. >> that's correct. >> okay. just so that people don't get the wrong idea. this only happens with the permit application is filed so for example, if i filed and had a policy in place and submitted to time department i got my entitlements and built the building and flipped it the subsequent owner who wouldn't have to provide the information to the department; is that right >> that will be neeltd to provide for the occupancy for the legislation written now. >> but if i sold the cement a year later the new owner is not provided to provide that information. >> as it's written now correct. >> i don't know if that's something to take into account you, you know, you hear all the time buildings are being flipped is maybe the supervisors office can take a look at that. >> thank you commissioner moore. >> mr. sanchez isn't it stronger being part of the administrative cody hear i

>> diego rivera sanchez correct. >> so i i made more than 10 units ape have a permit application and ask those questions i could basically answer no with all of them and still go ahead with development; is that correct. >> that's correct. >> okay. just so that people don't get the wrong idea. this only happens with the permit application is filed so for example, if i filed and had a policy in place and submitted to time department i got my entitlements and built the building and flipped it the subsequent owner who wouldn't have to provide the information to the department; is that right >> that will be neeltd to provide for the occupancy for the legislation written now. >>