well good morning lucia newman i'll bring a wristy arbitration hearing in dikshit case number we are being slashed 12 thresh 12. in a matter between one 4th and fall a b. claimants and the federal republic of germany as respondents. the presiding arbitration of what our young friend and bear button felt was represented by swedish attorney cuyahoga the federal republic of germany by sabina khan caught. vattenfall 24700000000 euros in damages. doesn't matter if a paul of a has adopted a law in the rose democratic way. it can still violate international obligations that the state has undertaken in the international treaty. or bristly it is for each individual state to decide whether a lot they want to sign such treaties were germany is trying to do in this arbitration is tricks ploy to fukushima disaster. to create a narrative that would be. it's wrong doing. you can put perfume on it but the bottom line here is that the international peace to govern this dispute. legally germany couldn't challenge a treaty it had already ratified but it could prove that the swedish energy giant had fai

were held in washington well good morning lesia and i'm i'm i open university i was just in hearing dikshit case number they are being slashed 12 fresh 12. in a matter of 3 and one button fall a b s claimants and the federal republic of germany s response. the presiding arbitrator was other john from a swedish attorney cuyahoga represented the claimant vattenfall and sabina conrad represented the federal repub. of germany. that involved train 4700000000 euros in damages as a consequence of the 13th amendment claimants lost their production licenses for the criminal plant and for doing and drumstick plant there was simply withdrawn. the dispute does not concern germany's right as such to face up to and rather this dispute concerns the manner in which germany has chosen to be implemented stay self-sufficient and to stay to prop to protect claimants investments in particular concerns jim his failure to pay any compensation at all. the heart and so most in this protection treaties is to provide protection against expropriation . the difficulty however when we talk about indirect expropriation i