but rather the fundamental philosophy of trying to rearm people with an education so that when the dillingerthe work force, they have an additional tool. >> to link the social and insurance for both programs designed and for 70 plus years functioning to arrive with the financial support when you lose your job that you have to be in as training of the first of all would work for some of the practical considerations that second, i don't think it contradicts the notion that you are suggesting and agree with the more education than you have today the better off you'll be in this economy. it's been at which the rest of this meeting or the two others on line at the c-span video library archive and searchable at c-span.org/videolibrary. >>> next special envoy to the middle east dennis ross gives his perspective on israel, iran and u.s. relations with the middle east peace spoke with walter isaacson at the aspen institute for an hour and 15 minutes. >> welcome everybody. it's good to have that our old friend dennis ross. this is a michelle smith and robert smith foundation round table so the middle

so why haven't had that moment of inspiration yet curious connective people are interested in dillinger and that he party manifesto and other books to do have a web site they can go to? >> we are also in addition to being an author i'm also a

john dillinger did time here in 1929. of 11 members of his gang. it's been through changes over the years, but it's still a prison with old school bars and old school convicts who don't want to be mistaken for inmates. >> convicts treat you the way you treat them. treat them with respect, they treat you with respect. inmates are the guys who talk bad about you, yell at you, swear at you. no matter how you treat them. treat them with respect and you don't get anything like that in return. isp is slowly going from convict to inmate, because we're getting a lot of younger kids in here who are not used to prison life. >> a convict's the one who minds his own business. he don't get off in other people's business. what he sees he keeps to himself. it's none of his business. inmates are one that would tell in a minute. they're rats. i'm a straight convict. i'm not an inmate. >> robert spears was your typical convict. he had done a lot of time. he had lived very distinctly by the convict code and he was very accepting of his situ

so why was dillinger rachel earlier, so this is an author's, rather than policy. i pointed this bookstore through much of my youth and middle years so i will tell the story a little bit, apply meant to be a writer and it was my ambition to be john mcphee basically. i wanted to be a very vivid literary nonfiction writer. and i started in the 80's by going down to the out of town news and by being a bunch of writers magazines and looking at how you become a free-lance writer. writers magazines are like bicycle magazines or cooking magazines to read the tell you the same thing over and over and over again and then they have to figure not a way to make you think it's different. and what they say in the writers magazines is right to the editor a letter and if he says yes go ahead and write an article. everything else is secondary. so i started doing that and while i was doing that, i got a job at the kennedy school writing teaching material for the faculty there and i did that until, did that the next 15 years in various ways, and i lived on douglas street and the case

these are productive dillinger of efforts to deny benefits, and to be discriminatory. let me -- i will bounce back and forth. let me go to wendell. >> in october, 2010, the president said citizens united decision, because it enabled these groups to keep their donors secret, was a threat to democracy itself. does he feel that by requiring his supporting suber pac to disclose the donors he basically removes the threat? >> the president's concern with the citizens united decision was broad and not just limited to that issue. it is an important point that you make that disclosure is important, and this president has been forcefully in favor of measures that would mandate disclosure despite unfortunately the uniform resistance by republicans in congress to those efforts. it is correct that as understand and we are reaching the boundaries of my understanding of how these new outfits operate the there is a distinction between those that are required to disclose the donors every month i believe and those that are not required to disclose at all. campaign officials and administ

restructure programs some examples 15.1 million in savings from restructuring the joint strike fighter by dillinger aircraft purchases so we can allow more time for the development and testing. 1.3 billion in savings from delaying the default of the army ground combat vehicle deutsch a contract in difficulties. 4.3 billion in savings from delaying the next generation of the ballistic missile submarines by two years for the affordability and management reasons. in addition we terminate selective programs, the block 30 version of the global talks which it cost the point is simply no longer cost-effective. the weather satellite program because we can depend on the existing settlements resulting in the savings of 2.3 billion. we have to maintain the ability to mobilize and regrow the force if we have to. that means we have to maintain a capable and ready national guard and reserve. one of the things we are doing is that the army is going to retain the man agreed officers and in co so they can be there with the experience and structure we need if we have to move quickly to regrow the force. the reserve

i want to focus on the circumstances in the context particular to california that showed housing dillinger irrational proposition 8 really is. first, there are four things that the first i want to talk about is that it imposes a special disability on gay people for reasons that california has disavowed and it doesn't intend to pursue any other arena. california regulates child rearing and parenting support from marriage and proposition 8 has nothing to do with trying to promote one family for raising children over another. besides that, california 12 deutsch govern children in every way. they will continue to recognize same-sex couples and opposite sex couples are the same purposes of family and child rearing in every way that matters. as the california supreme court held, proposition 8 didn't change any of that. it didn't talk about children and had nothing to do with the rights of gay people to perform and raise families. >> are we talking about a legal? >> we are talking about illegal but it's a very important legal. it does have great meaning. and i think on both sides of the table wou

restructure programs some examples 15.1 million in savings from restructuring the joint strike fighter by dillinger aircraft purchases so we can allow more time for the development and testing. 1.3 billion in savings from delaying the default of the army ground combat vehicle deutsch a contract in difficulties. 4.3 billion in savings from delaying the next generation of the ballistic missile submarines by two years for the affordability and management reasons. in addition we terminate selective programs, the block 30 version of the global talks which it cost the point is simply no longer cost-effective. the weather satellite program because we can depend on the existing settlements resulting in the savings of 2.3 billion. we have to maintain the ability to mobilize and regrow the force if we have to. that means we have to maintain a capable and ready national guard and reserve. one of the things we are doing is that the army is going to retain the man agreed officers and in co so they can be there with the experience and structure we need if we have to move quickly to regrow the force. the reserve

demobilization process, and finally the integrating them into their communities is that the district and dillinger level by the afghan and for afghans. the aprp is a nationwide afghan program. it provides insurgents with an opportunity to peacefully end permanently leave the battlefield and rejoin their communities with their dignity and honor intact. it is not a surrender program, nor is it an amnesty program for nor is it an amnesty program for the criminal behavior. any counterinsurgency strategy includes the non-military solution that reaches out to the insurgents with the goal of peaceful reintegration where everyone benefits. this program ambitiously seeks to deliver peace at the very local level. a cornerstone of this local approach is the resolution of grievances that led people to fight or become insurgence in the first place. it's accepted that the overwhelming majority of those fighting in the south and other areas are fighting for the mom ideological reasons. it becomes clear then that addressing the grievances can call them back into society. the aim of the aprp is to build trust and

have been engaged with them in the missile defense cooperation talks led by the secretary of state dillinger sure that used to represent the national labs here in the county she's been negotiating for quite some time since the spring of 2009, until now and the haven't reached agreement and in fact unfortunately the president medvedev made a statement not long ago saying the haven't borne fruit, but they're very concerned and feel if there is an agreement to share the that can't share operational capabilities which is a bit of a problem for us. that it could lead them to -- the russians themselves could consider withdrawing from the treaty of the just fine with obama last years we have a lot of work to do with russia, and i should finally had there's another dimension to the motivation here. which didn't leave us to withdraw the original bush plan, but there is a russia improvement aspect to the strategy, namely you may know if you follow this that as early as the spring of 2009, president obama and vice president biden have spoken about the russia reset strategy and when we came in their rel

next come 617 dillinger of the savings from the capping and investing in the six years surface transportation reauthorization. capping oco's importantly closes the back door on security spending. and then there are other categories. others the net savings of the 141 billion. it is a bit of a catch all. this includes the disaster adjustments program integrity and the general fund transfers for the transportation that are no longer necessary given that we are paying for them in the previous four. as a result of these proposals the debt service cost decreased by the total of $800 billion. finally, in that small are there are $176 billion of investments in short-term java initiatives that actually cut the other direction. these are investments. this is the remainder of the 354 billion of the job initiatives that aren't spent in 2012. i want to be clear that we do not count the sequester the total deficit-reduction. we believe that these questions about policy and have proposed that it be replaced by this larger more balanced package of deficit reduction. the bottom line is these efforts represent

isn't an unreasonable stance to take so it would have arms to build up over time and kendal law to dillinger enforced. >> i whimp the gentleman and yield five minutes to the gentleman from oklahoma and would ask him if he would yield for 15 seconds. >> i absolutely would. >> one thing i've seen a pattern of today is every question seems to be about the consumer financial protection bureau and nothing about people whose applications arrived in the senate after they were sworn in. >> thank you mr. chairman and that is where i want to land on. it's interesting to me that a lot of the conversations about could this be permissible is there a person out there somewhere obviously the statement for the bush administration there was an individual but consider this the bush administration didn't take that of vice. they took the advice of office over that and said that isn't appropriate. with this has done is for the political expediency of the president to make him look tough to fight against the allegations that you've been weakened in the past he has to get the election and look tough like i'm going

the federal communications commission dillinger rates the issues before it we recognize the potential impact on the transportation community and enhance today's hearing. however, out of fairness to the party involved in the proceedings i would ask the witness is to focus their comments today on the question at hand regarding the importance of gps as an element of transportation infrastructure and public policy consideration of the transportation community to protect that infrastructure. today's hearings serve as an opportunity to hear ideas for the best way forward given what we've learned about gps. where there are good engineers there may be a variety of solutions. and would be helpful for the technology to coexist because given the spectrum demand the problem of interference between the competing uses and various points along the spectrum isn't going away. so i would encourage the industry to find a way to safely coexist if possible i believe we can and must find a way to continue to encourage innovation in both the broadband and gps industry. finally before i recognize for the ope

. >> that is a good idea, another good reason to keep this committee dillinger.governor macdonald followed by governor nixon. >> thank you. first of all i think this is just turn affect the guard has exceeded the table with the other joint chiefs and the report with the president so that we have a direct blease and the commander in chief and will be a great representative for us and given the fact that so many of the medical and communications of the nation are finding capacities in the guard i think this is tremendous for the nation and i am appreciative of your good service. i had a question for administrator fugate. first we'll have a rash of national disasters last year both in the april trade allowed break and then what we call the earth wind and fire when we had an earthquake, hurricane and slump on fire all on the same week. i want to commend the communications on the phone with you with the secretary and people on the ground before, after those events particularly the hurricane was outstanding. the question i had was in the response afterwards, the public