as well as sponsoring their own team, dimension data is the technology company behind all the data collectednique to this epic race. they have been studying this tracking system for 15 years, 20 years. the big thing we have to deal with is that we are in the middle of nowhere, in the middle of the montaigne, the weather conditions can be horrific sometimes. so this is the main thing, to be able, logistically speaking, to track every day and give information in real—time. that is the most complicated thing. from data centre to road race, there is 20 kilometres to go, 20 kilometre wind speeds. the final is coming up. that was cat, reporting from the tour de france. now, i can guarantee you none of those riders had a bike frame anything like this. not only is this incredibly light, just 600 grams, but it's loaded with technology. and it's being developed here in rural england, just by the duckpond. yes, just past the hartney whitney village green in a converted cow barn, an ex—rolls—royce aerodynamicist has designed this revolutionary new frame. stuart abbott has embedded sensors inside it whic

for a ton of people's data, virtually every one of them will be unconnected to the prime and they are going to need to grapple with what protections should look like in that dimension, a lot of stuff about a lot of people without probable cause and under the government. other location records, we are not just talking cell phones. other records that in the government's-- sorry, the support are comprehensive chronicle of a person's movement. the whole of the person's physical movement over time. so these could be gps records collected by apps on our phone, information from smart watches, upload records to apple, automated license plate reader data that over the course of time, where everyone's cars are going. facial recognition capability, network to surveillance cameras, all of this starts to look like fertile ground for new types of fourth amendment challenges. but that is not all. the kind of lines being drawn, there will be other categorys of highly sensitive data that will need to be protected in the digital age. so that includes things like maybe a routing history online, or search query histories. in some sense that is information voluntarily given to google o

data analytics background. so my question is why would you prefer something that no adult uses of something that eggs essential on all-personality dimensions 0 of your life? the two reasons they gave are, well, it's hard. why did you ask students to memorize the pittsburgh phone book? that's hard. and then they say, on, well, we have introductory courses that don't let you do that with photo matt. have to come up with a better answer than that. >> talk you be technological advances that are in our future. like down the street we might have a new house printed by 3d we'll have robots policing us for safety, drones flying overhead, all these wild things happening. but what you sigh is mass machine intelligence ex's in manual and cognitive taxes so where are our skills most needed. >> a whole range of things. think but the -- the essential importance of creativity. very difficult for machine intelligence. pattern recognizes, anything that is done over and over again. it's not just moving box around a warehouse, already artificial intelligence is better then world's best oncologist and dermatologist and radiologist which i highly skilled, long

ton of people's data, virtually every one of them will be totally unconnected to the crime, and so courts are going to need to grapple with what protections should look like in that dimension where we're ensnaring a lot of stuff about a lot of people without probable cause under the government's current view. and then there are other kinds of location records. we're not just talking about cell phones. other records that in the government's -- or sorry in the court's telling constitute a comprehensive chronicle of a person's past movements. show the whole of a person's physical movements over time, so these could be gps records collected by apps on our phones, information from wearable devices, smart watches that upload records to apple or to fit bit, automated license plate reader data that over the course of time and space charts everywhere everyone's cars are going over time, facial recognition capabilities, networked to surveillance cameras, all of this starts to look like fertile ground for new types of fourth amendment challenges. but that's not all. the kind of lines now being drawn by the court, i think, fairly contemplate that there are going to be other kacategors

is looking at crime data and i want to get out of what you're doing and i read a new york times article from march 2018 detailing some of the leaf you provided to cities and dimensionsus very out in houston that are wrongly targeted under obama and using crime statistics to keep child musters out of neighborhoods with little children and that was discovered story but it's outside hud's mission and i want to applaud your continued efforts there to bring fairness to the cities around the country that are attempting to have housing in ways that are appropriate. i know there are more in the queue and i don't want to take all the time but if you have more comments -- >> you said the keyword which is fairness. in everything that we look at we need to take everybody's interview and what works for them and what we have started doing as a society is taking a group and their rights trump everybody else's. that is not the way america was designed and we have a duty to make sure we don't down that pathway. >> thank you. >> i'm happy to yield my time. >> i think my friend from west virginia. it's great to see you and great to see your ability to stay with us. thank you for comin