provisions on the shelling of this facility by, in fact, the ukrainian military facts in direct contact permanent representativesf russia to international organizations in vienna mikhail ulyanov mikhail ivanovich hello what can you say about this resolution? why does it not specify where the nuclear plant is being fired from? well i think this is a disgraceful document, this is not an attempt to offend the co-authors or those who voted for this unbiased evaluation of the content. this resolution does not really say anything about shelling. although this is the main problem today. she excites everyone in the report director general of the agency on the results of the visit to the zaporozhye npp explicitly said that the physical integrity of nuclear facilities. this is the main problem at the western station, there is nothing about it, but it says that the presence of russian military personnel and their specialists there, either eight or 10 people, creates a serious and direct threat to the safety of nuclear productions and civilian personnel, because i will add, by the way then, indeed the resolution is drawn up

thank you very much dmitry ipolyansky, the first deputy permanent representative of russia to the united nations, was in direct contactus from new york. here's the story of taking the wind from our right side dreaming of them anglos about it for so long that it's just hard to imagine when i was working in new york in 2011 i was talking to uh, then uh, vitaly ivanovich churkin, the permanent representative of russia to the un, the kingdom of heaven to them, too, this issue was eager to take away the legal adviser from russia. listen to what churkin said then. the right was not won in a lottery. this right was won in the second world war, indeed the role of the five permanent members is very important. uh, and uh, while, uh, that's what you noted the permanent members, the veto, and this speaks of the wisdom of those who wrote the charter of the united nations, because along with arithmetic, there is a certain political balance. and now, if this right of vet did not exist, then this is the political balance in the world. the right of the century would be violated, it gives uh, an extra uh, an extra damper and more than

fast forward to new york, first deputy permanent representative of russia to the un dmitry polyansky is in direct contactich we welcome you again, undulating talk about depriving russia of the right to veta about the reform of the security council has escalated again, let's hear what your colleague linda greenfield has to say, and you will comment. russia's war against ukraine is an attempt to dominate in its purest form. this war puts to the test the fundamental principles on which the un was founded and so our response to the crisis of confidence has been to defend the charter and hold russia accountable, some say it is cold war, that they don't want to take sides, that it's between ukraine and russia or the united states and russia, that's just not right. this is not a new cold war, it is not about a few countries. this concerns all of us it is about defending the un charter it is about peace for the next generation it is about protecting the principles of the un it is about service it is not about dominating the peoples of the world our response to russia’s flagrant violations cannot be a rejection o