ernst and young china is remote weaker region with often limited access the agencies president direct messner, told us that none of its employees ever visited any of the project in china. it's standard procedure to lead the auditing to private, specialized companies. them divide, calling, want to go over these images and few play from the shifting the current guns, the technician, and um, and the type of quote from the condo and is your upgrade from opposite to different uh at the dock in to tyler season. and this is the loophole that apparently was exploited weeks after our visit to the chicken coop, the auditors sent the real coordinates of the company's address, claiming it was a mix up the wrong coordinates were not the own irregularities we came across. we found addresses and dates that don't check out the take file number b, z i a this is a recent photo. a source gave us the station is supposed to save more than a $120000.00 tons of carbon emissions per year. it collects gas that would otherwise be released during the oil extraction. the gas has been liquefied and load it onto trucks fo

the agencies president direct messner, told us that none of its employees ever visited any of the projects in china. they relied on the audits conducted by private companies. we only have 3 colleagues and the federal environment agency who deals with all of these projects, the tire, but they context the technical data in any detail uh and they contact satellite images either we cannot say for sure whether the auditing companies were in on the front but what we did find were many in consistencies in their reports. take this project, which was supposedly visited by auditors 7 times in their reports, they confirmed that the installation consisted of 6 big storage tanks and 12 generators. with satellite images and photos we acquired only ever show for tanks and for generators. is heights very unlikely. the inspector was on the side facing tanks. cons to be missing. so the inspectors didn't do their job. absolutely not. or even worse, the ordered firm should be suspended, been tied to elements within these companies to just become part of the deception that would be a worst case scenario. the g

the agencies president direct messner, told us that none of its employees ever visited any of the projects in china. they relied on the audits conducted by private companies. we only have 3 colleagues in the federal environment agency who deals with all of these projects, the type of a concept protecting code data and any detailed uh, and they context satellite images. either we cannot say for sure whether the audit and companies were in on the fraud. but what we did find were many in consistencies in their reports. take this project, which was supposedly visited by auditors 7 times in their reports, they confirmed that the installation consisted of 6 big storage tanks and 12 generators. with satellite images and photos we acquired only ever show for tanks and for generators. is how it's very unlikely the inspector was on the side facing tanks. cons be missing. so the inspectors didn't do their job. absolutely not. or even was the order time should be suspended. been type elements within these companies. so just become part of the deception that would be a worst case scenario. the german e