district. the middle of the road voters want to vote republican on barometers like the generic ballot and they will lean in favorability showing they are there and there is emphasis in that context and not just a direct line from the presidential election down to the congressional level. >> john? >> thank you, dave. >> mr. chairman, you and rob speak forcefully about there being no there there and the incumbents thinking donald trump is the boogie man. let me point out a couple things that increasingly the incumbent republicans who we never looked at before are vulnerable. darryl isa now has a strong opponent in a state where the field poll show last week hillary clinton leading donald trump by 30 percentage points. in new york, two upstate races where republicans retired, the nominees on paper should be shoe ins. they are having to work hard. are you spending more on incumbent retention this year than previous cycles? >> we have 247 members today and number of retireees. tled only make sense t

it really depends district to district.y discussion -- i never try to break the army get them to run. they have to want this end own heart and stomach. they have to understand what that means. it's not a part-time effort. they have to be willing to make a full commitment or they should i make any commitment. if they are not full-time, they will not be successful. they will lose a year of their life that could be better spent. it is about how you structure a campaign to reach out to voters with an effective message. what it takes to do that. which means you have to raise money and have a good team. that team to be good, solid volunteers and you can build from that. you have to be able to raise money, communicate effectively, and frankly a dear friend of mine who passed away, dave frohnmayer, these to sit down and write a paragraph about why you are running for office. one paragraph. not a treatise. handu can't in your own explained to yourself why you are running, you will never explained to an audience. i think that was alw

you also have the other dynamic effecting house races, the suburban district and how suburban districts think about donald trump. what we are seeing all over the country is that it is the suburban districts, the higher educated that are really put off by his rhetoric. we have both dynamics in nevada so there's so much potential to pick up those seats. as far as hillary clinton in nevada, presidential polling ebbs and flows and we have seen those ebbs and flows start when donald trump won the nomination after ted cruz dropped out, after his horrible remarks about the judge, his numbers tanks -- his number tanked. they went even further down after orlando. we are coming off the comey comments on clinton and we're headed into the republican convention. we are seeing pivot in the polling and after the conventions, you will see that surge once the general election dynamic settles in and we start to see what voters really think about donald trump and the contrast with hillary clinton. we feel very good about that contrast. reporter: even hillary clinton says she has a trust issue. how do you

the district court found the critical fact in our favor and that, so what the district court should have done, i mean it is. >> i think the question is relative, i think a couple of questions and that is that you are saying that the district court described in think it is described as a heightened cod station stander. but you're asking what should he has applied. it's pretty straightforward. and i think the confusion is that he did both, he applied the correct standard and he found all of the facts that lead to a section two violation and then he went and, that was enough. that was the senate factors, that is the only causation requirement. so then he instead of moving forward to the next step which would've been binding signing the violation he veered off the road into a new causation requirement because there is nothing more the district court needed to do other then apply the league of women voters test which he did and found those facts in our favor. i think the district court, the veering off the road really is exemplified by the district court reliance on the 2014 turnout data to e

and as -- and in terms of the case critical fact that the district court found, the district court did find that connection between vestiges and eliminated practices. for example, the district court said it's easy to see a connection between certain reasons for ending up in the incomplete queue and literacy. and the district court then found that african-americans, a vestige of discrimination is literacy, and the benchmark electoral practice which is same-day registration produces virtually no incomplete registrations, that is the ameal yourtive interaction that the league of women voters test shows us is a classic case of a section 2 violation. now, what caused the district court once you get to those three critical facts and we proved eight of the senate factors, what led the district court astray in not ruling in favor of plaintiffs? and the first thing that the district court did is it created a new causation requirement that's not been required in any section 2 case or any governing law. and that causation requirement instead of looking at the connection between the vestige, the e

by district, race by race and that's a wee look like are the data in those districts, district by district what's going on and everything is established in time.

by the district court are binding. errors in theical legal analysis in the district court's analysis of the united states intent claim that framed analysis. we have to start with the facts hb-589 the north acted tolegislature block as they began real political gain. the district court failed to take account of the fact that defendant's experts testified, in north carolina the best predictor of voting behavior is not party registration, but race. analysisproper intent would have required the district court to expressly consider passage of hb-589 was motivated in part by what the supreme court called the of race andend politics. the district court committed the failing to in analyze point of intent and claim. >> when you speak to the the tent claim, are you referring to the section 2? potential discrimination or theh amendment potential there anation and is difference? >> under the 14th amendment potentialn 2 discrimination it's the same standard and the united states is pressing its claim under the 2.se of section but t

in an assessment of dccc polling from over 20 districts in our original core battlefield districts, the dccc has seen an average eight-point shift for the democrat in the named head to head vote since 2015. that's an important point and that's real data. the generic democrat has also improved by an average of over five points against the generic republican. now in an assessment of presidential favorability in 40 swing seats in 2016, hillary clinton has a net advantage of nine points over donald trump on average. again, on those 40 swing seats across the country. in other words, we've seen positive movement in competitive house races. that happened without paid communications purely as a result of the national environment. we're optimistic for that growth to continue, just as it did today. the dccc has added five new races from our red to blue program and ten new candidates to our emerging races program that we announced just this morning. this brings the number of races in the top tier category to 48 races total. it's another exciting step in the right direction. and let me just say thi

>>translation services abe 2091 relayed these services for the district and the district has a goal of two weeks the goal is cut in half the pending on how you want to look at it. it is an incredible thing going a long way and it's a incredible thing to have to deal with that and there's been percentage increases over the years and the number of documents requested for that amount of research it is impossible even with my fuzzy math skills. in order to provide more translations it's a technical document and it needs to be handed over to somebody who knows a basic amount of the language and it's fun to listen to our translators at the cac meetings and it sounds very flip and i don't mean it but it is always the things that i take for granted as an english speaker listening to a translator having to stop and turn to him so he can explain in another language is very eye-opening. so more training is most definitely needed. >>>this is just a compilation this next slide of the different comment cards that we have received every month at our meetings we asked parents for comments and feedback

two districts that intrigue me are nebraska's second district and maine's second district. what do they have in common? they are the two states thattal loegt their electoral college votes by congressional districts and they are conceivably in play. now maine's second district is say rural working class white district where donald trump may have appeal and omaha is a white color diversifying district that might be uniquely poor for donald trump and a freshman democrat, the first democrat elected in nebraska since 1992. bruce polyquinn is the first republican to be elected to the house in maine since 1994. there's an interesting sim met tri to these districts. if a party manages to take both of them they'll have a good night. >> brad is way up in his polling if we can takes those -- mccain is an incredible candidate as well. i feel good about both of those seats. >> if you have a question, raise your hand. when the microphone comes to you, please tell us who you are. keep it snappy and if you can, let us know who you are addressing the question to. >> my name is ross aber hee

the district court found the critical facts in our favor and that is, so, what the district court is should have done is -- um -- the analysis -- think it's ion -- i a couple of questions. you are saying the district court i think what is described as a heightened causation standard. what she is asking is blah should he have applied. that's pretty straightforward. >> and i think the confusion is he did both. he applied the correct standard and he found all of the facts that lead to a secret -- section 2 violation and then he went -- and that was enough. that plus the senate factors, that is the only causation requirement. but then he instead of moving forward to the next step, which should have been find the violation, he veered off the road into a new causation requirement. there was nothing more that the district court needed to do other than ply the league of women voters test, which he did and found those facts in our favor. and i think the district court, the veering off the road really shall um -- um -- um -- exreply fied by the district court's reliance on the 2014 turnout dat

the district. so i'm in support of it. thank you. >> have we heard any objections from these folks of the land use change in the intervening years? >> no, sir, i have not heard any objections on this. >> okay, thank you. all right. we will close public comment. madam president, if you would like to offer these amendments, we can take them. >> so moved. >> moved by president breed. why don't we take those amendments. then send the item as amended to the full board with a recommendation as a committee report for full recommendation for july 26th. >> so moved. >> without objection, that will be the order. supervisor campos is not with us yet. so mr. krugs don't go away. item 5. >>clerk: 160556 [yerba buena community benefit district - annual report to the city - fy2014-2015] sponsor: kim >> the floor is yours. >> thank you, supervisor. >> you have your beautiful powerpoint right here. >> thank you very much. ms. moiven is running late. >> all right, why don't you call item no. 6. >>clerk: 160753 [civi

the district. so i'm in support of it. thank you. >> have we heard any objections from these folks of the land use change in the intervening years? >> no, sir, i have not heard any objections on this. >> okay, thank you. all right. we will close public comment. madam president, if you would like to offer these amendments, we can take them. >> so moved. >> moved by president breed. why don't we take those amendments. then send the item as amended to the full board with a recommendation as a committee report for full recommendation for july 26th. >> so moved. >> without objection, that will be the order. supervisor campos is not with us yet. so mr. krugs don't go away. item 5. >>clerk: 160556 [yerba buena community benefit district - annual report to the city - fy2014-2015] sponsor: kim >> the floor is yours. >> thank you, supervisor. >> you have your beautiful powerpoint right here. >> thank you very much. ms. moiven is running late. >> all right, why don't you call item no. 6. >>clerk: 160753 [civi

it really depends district to district. my discussion -- i never try to break the army get them to run. they have to want this end own heart and stomach. they have to understand what that means. it's not a part-time effort. they have to be willing to make a full commitment or they should i make any commitment. if they are not full-time, they will not be successful. they will lose a year of their life that could be better spent. it is about how you structure a campaign to reach out to voters with an effective message. what it takes to do that. which means you have to raise money and have a good team. that team to be good, solid volunteers and you can build from that. you have to be able to raise money, communicate effectively, and frankly a dear friend of mine who passed away, dave frohnmayer, these to sit down and write a paragraph about why you are running for office. one paragraph. not a treatise. if you can't in your own hand explained to yourself why you are running, you will never explained to an audience. i think that

>>translation services abe 2091 relayed these services for the district and the district has a goal ofwo weeks the goal is cut in half the pending on how you want to look at it. it is an incredible thing going a long way and it's a incredible thing to have to deal with that and there's been percentage increases over the years and the number of documents requested for that amount of research it is impossible even with my fuzzy math skills. in order to provide more translations it's a technical document and it needs to be handed over to somebody who knows a basic amount of the language and it's fun to listen to our translators at the cac meetings and it sounds very flip and i don't mean it but it is always the things that i take for granted as an english speaker listening to a translator having to stop and turn to him so he can explain in another language is very eye-opening. so more training is most definitely needed. >>>this is just a compilation this next slide of the different comment cards that we have received every month at our meetings we asked parents for comments and feedback a

>> it depends district by district.ould tell you donald trump is more popular than hillary clinton. in addition to that our members have their own unique identity because they are working in their districts. people know them. are veryorables strong. if you have been doing work in your district where voters know you. to link at easier democrat to hillary clinton because she is quintessential establishment than it is to link a republican to donald trump. they will try that. they will have some limited success but they are totally different styles of campaigning. >> it sounds like you are expecting candidates to want to distance themselves from trump. >> the candidates get to do whatever they want. cases we have members and candidates openly embracing the nominee. they are on television all the time. if that happens virtually every -- that happens virtually every time. you are seeing that in some cases with hillary clinton. >> what are some cases? >> you are seeing around the country where they are certainly shying away. n

after ten years; 55 regulate wts facilities in certain mission bay districts and p districts; 66 exempt certain telecommunications equipment accessory uses from height limitations; 77 allow screening elements for wts facilities to exceed height limits, consistent with existing height limit exemptions for antennas; 88 define and regulate temporary wts facilities; 99 allow the historic preservation commission to delegate determinations on applications for administrative certificates of appropriateness and minor permits to alter to planning department staff; and affirming the planing department's determination under the california environmental cohen absent. item 3, ordinance amending the planning code to 11 define wireless telecommunications services facilities; 22 create distinct wts facility land use controls and , among other things, require conditional use authorization for macro wts facilities in most article 2, 7 and 8 districts; 33 regulate micro wts facilities in all districts; 44 require that a wts facility's vu shall expire after ten years; 55 regulate wts facilities in certain

11 your district deserves a

district 7 like some of the other districts have seen the explosion of these crimes that supervisor wiener has described so eloquently, and so i also have had hearings at city hall around this issue, twice, and i continue to set up community meetings with our police captains and bring in other organizations into the meetings such as supervisor tang has done with sf safe and the da to have a discussion with the community members to see to not only talk about the problems but what do we see as potential solutions so through that mechanism we have been able to identify certain strategies that the community felt was the way to go. for instance they thought they needed more help from sf safe in the budget process i added more money into the budget. they said it would be really helpful to have some funding sources to purchase cameras if neighbors get a grant for it and promise to monitor it so there's money in the budget for that as a pilot project for district 7, so i think what i am getting at we're doing things -- i have been talking to our three different police captains that covers the dist

district 7 like some of the other districts have seen the explosion of these crimes that supervisor wiener has described so eloquently, and so i also have had hearings at city hall around this issue, twice, and i continue to set up community meetings with our police captains and bring in other organizations into the meetings such as supervisor tang has done with sf safe and the da to have a discussion with the community members to see to not only talk about the problems but what do we see as potential solutions so through that mechanism we have been able to identify certain strategies that the community felt was the way to go. for instance they thought they needed more help from sf safe in the budget process i added more money into the budget. they said it would be really helpful to have some funding sources to purchase cameras if neighbors get a grant for it and promise to monitor it so there's money in the budget for that as a pilot project for district 7, so i think what i am getting at we're doing things -- i have been talking to our three different police captains that covers the dist

court, northern district, case no. cv-15-5129-jcs; entitled paul walker v. city and county of san francisco; the lawsuit involves alleged americans with disabilities act violations. >> item 65 isordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by mery perez against the city and county of san francisco for $87,500; the lawsuit was filed on february 9, 2015, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-15-544024; entitled mery perez v. city and county of san francisco; the lawsuit involves a medical malpractice claim; other material terms of the settlement are that co-defendant dr. derrick lung is to pay $87,500.>>> item 66 is an ordinance ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by the people of the state of california against the city and county of san francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit will be filed in alameda county superior court; and be entitled people of the state of california v.san francisco public utilities commission and the city and county of san francisco;the lawsuit involves alleged viol

were this see cross district or the richmond district spirit with the sunset district?were the hunters point district? again, if it's about convenience, i think it's only fair for everyone in the entire city javaone in their neighborhood. or maybe five or six, like we already have in the mission. now, that's creating jobs i think probably we should open more. in those statistics >> thank you. i'm going to call some more cards. >>[calling names] >> good afternoon commissioner's. my name is lisa-in night when of the meetings i did ask ms. fong about it they had a doctor on site for consultation. she told me, no. in that case, why should it be our sore from the storefront that traffic issues the safety issues, i have a son. she has a breast cancer. she is controlling as she [inaudible] marijuana is not only the solution. other issue is, i really after i heal all this i really want to say this. this is not racist were color issue. i'm a chinese-american. i'm am yellow. but we all are humans and under one sky. this is [inaudible] from us. thank you. say, no. it is our future

i'm sure it is the southern district soma area and being up in the richmond district i cant leave the richmond to go to southern district to do anything. i would think they are aware of it but think they run to the the same problems, they responds to call for service and look to see if anything is reported stolen and dont fine anything and leave or tell the guy to dismantle the chop shop and he goes a half mile down the road and sets up the next day: >> so, if you have-if you come across someone who has 50 bikes either together or dismantled, if they dont match what is reported as stolen it is [inaudible] >> right and there is nothing more than i would thrike take the evident and book as evident and to see if can match owners but our hands are tied doing that. >> that is very helpful to know. >> i have a quick question. when you dismantle one of the larger chop shop operations or even the smaller ones and they move down the road, how does the word get out? how is the owner of the chop shop communicating to the larger customers? >> you know, i'll give a example. there was a fairly larg

the district called police on 1745 students. that number has since dropped to 184. >> that data was alarming. >> reporter: at a school board meeting, some credited our investigation before unveiling a new district-wide discipline policy that dramatically limits when his administrators should involve police. >> why'd you think it was important enough to make those changes? >> if we are suspending and inciting students and putting students on the path to prison, that is not keeping kids in school. >> bringing dangerous weapons to school are reason enough to contact law enforcement, but students using tobacco or profanity are now reasons not to call police. >> any time a student is suspended from school, expelled from a district or enters the justice system, they are less likely to dprajt from high school. >> reporter: some school districts contract with the san jose police departments. our investigation revealed that none of those schools has ever outlined the roles and responsibilities of those officers, even though the national

from california's 24th district, which is a very young district and a very white to district. both in presidential and it's an open house seat this year. do you think the youth or the fact that it's a white district will play-- relative-- which one do you think will be more important in the petitioner? >> i not enough of a housed nerd to know whose district that is. >> what are your thoughts. >> young voters are not the most reliable voters. maybe they will be this year. their turnout rate is not necessarily high, so i would look at the white population. >> it's a little hard because i don't know that much by the district, but i do think that the performance of young whites, which is obviously a subset of the white vote overall is going to quite right-- is going to be quite important because if you look at the difference between whites by generation is quite dramatic between white millennial's for example in white generation, so to the extent that a presidential election propel these white millennial's interaction in a district like that could be significant and tip the white

district. i'm here to speak regarding the property that the south park area that are owned by the grand lodge. there are differentantties within the grand oriente and there are twenty-two parcel squz want to address a application submitted this month by the property owner to divide had parcel of the temple and housing. so, the grand orante lodged owned 3 properties in that area and already sold one and they are attempting to sell the 106 south park hotel where steve lived so we are very concerned. as part of soma filipino heritage district we developed a historic context statement to support the district and included in that context statement are the properties and rich and important history as steve has spoke about before me. just about the farm workers and pulling their monies because there were laws not filipinos were aliens at the time as we were identified to be. that is a property and right next to it, the big housing on the left side is the property that they want to divide. it is togeth

after ten years; 55 regulate wts facilities in certain mission bay districts and p districts; 66 exempt certain telecommunications equipment accessory uses from height limitations; 77 allow screening elements for wts facilities to exceed height limits, consistent with existing height limit exemptions for antennas; 88 define and regulate temporary wts facilities; 99 allow the historic preservation commission to delegate determinations on applications for administrative certificates of appropriateness and minor permits to alter to planning department staff; and affirming the planing department's determination under the california environmental cohen absent. item 3, ordinance amending the planning code to 11 define wireless telecommunications services facilities; 22 create distinct wts facility land use controls and , among other things, require conditional use authorization for macro wts facilities in most article 2, 7 and 8 districts; 33 regulate micro wts facilities in all districts; 44 require that a wts facility's vu shall expire after ten years; 55 regulate wts facilities in certain

norton of the district of columbia. the chair: pursuant to house resolution 794, the gentlelady from the district of columbia and a member opposed will each control five minutes. the chair now recognizes the gentlelady from the district of . lumbia, ms. norton ms. norton: mr. speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. the chair: the gentlelady is recognized. ms. norton: my amendment strikes the repeal of the district of columbia budget autonomy referendum which allows d.c. to spend its own local funds, consisting of local taxes and local fees, after a 30-day congressional review period. astonishingly house republicans appear to be so afraid of a local jurisdiction spending its local funds without the approval of a federal body, the u.s. congress, no less, that they will be voting for a second time in little over a month to repeal the referendum. d.c.'s budget autonomy referendum is in effect as i speak. the d.c. council recently passed its first local budget pursuant to the referendum. therefore the repeal woul

and in terms of the case critical fact that the district court found, the district court did find that connection between the vestiges and the eliminated practices. for example, the district court said it's easy to see a connection between certain reasons for ending up in the incomplete queue and literacy. and the district court then found that african americans are vestige of discrimination is literacy and the benchmark electoral practice which is same-day registration produces virtually no incomplete registrations. that is the emulative interaction that the league of women voters test shows us a classic case of section 2 violation. now what caused the district court, once you get to those three critical facts, and we proved eight of the senate factors, what led the district court astray in not ruling in favor of plaintiff. and the first thing that the district court did is it created a new causation requirement. that's not been required in any section 2 case or any governing law. and that causation requirement, instead of looking at the connection between the vestige, the eliminated

we will prioritize the mission district in chinatown districts are to most densely populated district to help with community outreach. related to fire safety and then as well if there is a fire that impacts displaces people to have that investigator specifically take a look and be available to members of the community to talk about that. but i just want to make sure that you know that this is a priority for us. we sign up for these jobs to work to the fullest extent. there's no one hiding anything. can we do better? we always can but i really don't want us to convey i know that was a meeting in the mission district which i was unable to attend, but i believe we laid out pretty clearly the details of what it takes to be an arson investigator did the team approach, with the investigation team is called out for, what the specifics are. maybe some of that was not heard but we have met subsequently with your staff and with members of the community. i believe that something set up for july 11. it is our goal to protect lives and property and we will continue to do so. i am always very sadde

the district.o i'm in support of it. thank you. >> have we heard any objections from these folks of the land use change in the intervening years? >> no, sir, i have not heard any objections on this. >> okay, thank you. all right. we will close public comment. madam president, if you would like to offer these amendments, we can take them. >> so moved. >> moved by president breed. why don't we take those amendments. then send the item as amended to the full board with a recommendation as a committee report for full recommendation for july 26th. >> so moved. >> without objection, that will be the order. supervisor campos is not with us yet. so mr. krugs don't go away. item 5. >>clerk: 160556 [yerba buena community benefit district - annual report to the city - fy2014-2015] sponsor: kim >> the floor is yours. >> thank you, supervisor. >> you have your beautiful powerpoint right here. >> thank you very much. ms. moiven is running late. >> all right, why don't you call item no. 6. >>clerk: 160753 [civic

by district, race by race and that's a wee look like are the data in those districts, district by district what's going on and everything is established in time. it's legitimate but what i tell you is we are always look in the rearview mirror. the snapshot in time shows are members in strong shape and voters in the district hillary clinton worse off than donald trump. what happens between now and november we are going to be watching and adjusting. >> will go next to "washington examiner." >> mr. chairman you touched on the rnc and the job they are doing on the ground in various swing states in different areas but there has been a lot of talk about the trump campaign and how they are forced to pick up the slack in many ways operationally speaking with the ground game and the trump campaign -- how would the rnc basically served in the trump campaign congressionally when it comes to resources and money? >> so again reince priebus has done a great job. started early address the issues started early, addressed the that needed to be addressed at the rnc going back several years. in terms of fund

of the united states citizens living in the district of colombia. we need to speak out against that. also the efforts of democrats in congress to impede efforts by republicans in congress to bring things like school choice to the district of colombia. again, need to be pointed out. and need to be pointed out to people in the district of colombia let alone to the rest of the country. so we've had this language in past platforms. i think it is a mistake by the subcommittee to drop it. and the notion that we're doing this in the name of brevity is silly. we don't have to spend two or three paragraphs talking about the district of colombia doesn't make sense to me. i think we should support this amendment. >> delegate from missouri? >> i also want to say i support the amendment. i know what it would do, it would save a life. anything i can do to save a baby life, i want to do. >> additional discussion on the amendment? delegate from the state of va va. >> thank you. tommy valentine from va va i don't think there is a conflict between what the delegate f

but the winnable districts are increasingly becoming much more competitive, districts that would have been 50/50 tossups under presidential conventional year without donald trump like texas 23, illinois 10, florida 26 are now leaning in favor of democrats. our competitive battlefield pushes into republican leaning districts with strong candidates in place to challenge a weak republican incumbent. these races are now undeniably competitive. places like new jersey 5, utah 4 or california 25, and this also allow today recruit and compete in lean and likely republican districts where we have never mounted a credible challenge before. places like florida 7. we are now hearing and feeling the shift on the ground as we talk to voters in the districts and the data bares it out. from over 20 districts in our original core battle districts, the d triple c has seen average 8-point shift for the democrat in the named head-to-head vote. that's really important point and data. average over 5 points against the generic republican. in assessment of presidential favorability in 2016, hillary clinton h

it's a simple provision that says federal title i $ that go to local school districts are not meant to replace the dashed in local dollars for schools. give title i money to a school to show the school is getting the same amount of state and local dollars it would receive about title i money. one witness testified at the last hearing the laws of plane there didn't need to be regulation but you came up with a proposal that forces school districts to show they equalized spending of their state and local dollars among title i and non-title i schools although the new law and section 1605 explicitly prohibits exactly that. according to the congressional research service the proposed regulation appears to go beyond what would be required under plain language reading of the statute. the proposal is so far out of bounds, these are my words i'm assuming every regulation 30s attorneys to be one will bear no resemblance to the proposal you have drafted. let's talk today about the accountability rule 50 of the partner proposed on may 31. this goes to the heart of the law to fix no child left behin

the district called police on 1,745 students.hat number has since dropped to 184. >> the data was alarming. >> at a school board meeting, function credited our investigation, before unveiling a new district wide discipline policy. the dramatically limits when his administrators should involve police. >> why did you think it was important to make those change as soon as. >> if we are suspending an inciting students and putting them on path to prison, that's not keeping kids in school. >> bringing dangerous weapons or seriously injuring someone is still enough to contact law enforcement, but students using tobacco or profanity are examples of when not to call police. >> the statistics are clear. any time a student is suspended from school, expelled from the district, or enters the justice system, they are less likely to graduate from high school. >> function's school district and five others contract with the san jose police department to provide officers on campus so the department has cops at 41 schools. but our investigation rev

water district traced the problem to an algae bloom near mer set, that's the district's main water supply. the water level in the reservoir had gotten so low that the algae that normally floats harmlessly on tonight water was getting sucked into the intakes. water district's two treatment plants to remove the allergy, they can't completely remove the smell. once the water district figured out what was going on, they stopped drawing water from the problem says roar, and took it from two reservoir -- reservoir, and took is it from two other reservoirs. that is the coyote, and anderson lake reservoir to the north. once these became the main supply of water, they shut down recreation on monday, the district said they are hoping to start switching back to the original reservoir starting on tuesday, because they believe that water may be clean enough to start working back into the normal water supply. they will monitor the situation, and make sure the algae problem doesn't return. it's unglory when recreation might be allowed to return to coyote lake reservoir. in the south bay, kron 4 news. >>

if the district court applied the wrong legal standard, the facts found by the district court aren't binding. so to start with the intent analysis, there are critical errors in the legal analysis in the district court's analysis of the united states intent claim that framed the analysis. we have to start with the fact that in passing hb-589, the north carolina legislature acted to block growing african-american political power just as north carolinans began to experience political gains. in looking at this claim the district court failed to take account even as the deft's experts testified, in north carolina the best predictor of voting behavior is not party registration, but race. and so a proper intent analysis would have required the district court to expressly consider whether passage of hb-589 was motivated in part by what the supreme court called the troubling blend in race in politics. the district court committed legal error in failing to analyze plaintiff's claim through the framework that the supreme court set out. >> when you speak to the intent claim, are you referring to

one and you live in district two, in my opinion is the incumbent in district two is irrelevant because that income that doesn't work for me. the only one who works for me is the incumbent in district one. so it doesn't matter what my opinion of the incumbent industry to. what matters is my opinion of the incumbent in district one. if voters are happy with their own members of congress, then that suggests what to do things is the case. either voters are being systematically tricked about how well their employees are doing, or the system is functioning well. if the system is functioning well in we shouldn't worry that most elections are not competitive. if the problem is that voters are being tricked then we have a much bigger problem than the lack of competitive election. in the assessment of whether or not and incumbent deserves to get the job is a little bit subjective. so it's hard to say whether or not voters are being systematically tricked. there are limitations on what voters know. most voters are not particularly well informed about individual members of congress. but the times

>> the districts that intrigue me on nebraska second district and maine's second district.ine and nebraska have in common? they are the two states that abdicate their electoral college votes, the districts in play. maine's second district is a rural working-class white district where donald trump might have it healed. the second district in omaha, white-collar, professional, diversifying district that might be poor for donald trump. congressional democrat who is the first democrat elected in nebraska since 1992. and the republican, the first republican to be elected since 1994. an interesting symmetry to these districts. a different party has advantages to take both of them. >> way up in his polling, and indication of an incredible candidate. i feel good about both of them. >> if you have a question raise your hand. when the microphone comes to you tell us who you are. keep it snappy and let us know who you are addressing your question to. >> to whoever would like to answer first. i am 18 years old. my demographic has aligned with bernie sanders in the election. how do you

the parent/guardian disagrees with the districts evaluation. >>is there a second? >>second. >>pres. haney, can we ask the council to give us advice on that? >>commissioner norton, the change that you requested i believe is contained in administrative regulations if you are restating the law that the parents have a right to request that and there may be circumstances where the district doesn't agree to that request i don't think the language you propose rules out the possibility but i don't think that your amendment proposes when he stated by i don't think your amendment proposes any legal issues. just could you repeat that amendment? >>so after the phrase concerning their child which in the last paragraph and with a. i would insert and the right to request an independent educational evaluation at district expense if the parent/guardian disagrees with the districts evaluation. >>is the law. >>do you want to take a vote on this amendment? okay. >>[roll call vote] >>7 ayes. >>shall we take a vote on the resolution now? >>as amended? >>[roll call v

donors live in those districts. many donors live in my district. i can tell you if our representation, pause we are stuck with nancy pelosi for so many years were to be taken away on the basis of an amendment like this, you guys who come to san francisco for your fund-raisers would see a decreased amount of interest there. but on a fairness ground, i think for keeping all of our delegates throughout the state of california engaged and energized, decreasing the involvement at this national convention on the base of a rule change like this, would have a very similar impact. i don't think it should be taken likely even though it is simply striking four words. it will be a big impact. thank you. >> is there anyone else who would like the speak in support? is there anyone who would like the speak in opposition? >> madam chairman, john ryder, tennessee. i oppose this amendment. we are a national political party. our goals should be to represent and carry our vision to all corners of this great nation. that chus areas that don't yet vote republican. we ne

were looking district by district.we look at the statewide but our focus is each race and each campaign. but we are seeing places, if you look at pennsylvania to some recent polling data showed i think trump of the of the polling shows in tampa clearly pennsylvania must be in play. there are other states where he simply picke pick their artistic stupples a price people were trump is when either i think there's a bit of that going on out there. i think we will not better on the president asked egypt to these two conventions and a kind of subtle zen. i think our house races from what we are seeing our independent of the presidential for the most part. there will always be influences but for the most part our members are identified, our candidates are identified and they are running their own races. >> do you think they can be totally independent speakers i didn't say totally. there's always influenced. >> is that saying there are going to be, say, republicans who are not may be supportive of the nominee he will come up t

one part of the district specific strategy is to have an ausa (ph) in each district who is a point of contact for human trafficking. so that part of the strategy has actually already been accomplished. the final written document we expect to be done in the fall. senator cornyn: and as you know, the jvta credited domestic trafficking funds -- and i think you alluded to that earlier -- and it mandates that the -- this victims fund be -- that there be a levy of a $5,000 dollar assessment on offenders convicted of human trafficking, sex abuse, child pornography, child sexual exploitation, interstate transportation for illegal sexual activity and commercial of human smuggling. this was -- at -- at the time, we estimated that some $31 million dollars in obligated assessments could accrue based upon fiscal year 2012 data from the united states sentencing commission. that this additional special assessment would apply to more than 6,200 offenders per year. unfortunately, we haven't yet seen the fund -- seen the benefits of the fund to the extent that we had hoped for. how much money is in the