on this point, the district court committed reversible error. the judges continued, the district court did not air in concluding that the events at the u.s. capital on january 6th constituted an insurrection. the district court did not air in concluding that president trump engaged in that interaction through his personal actions. president trump's speech inciting the crowd that breached the u.s. capital on january 6th was not protected by the amenent. and they conclude that president trump is therefore disqualified from holding the office of president under section three of the 14th amendment. because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the election code for the

as you noted that's an area where the district court ruled in favor of donald trump. i was not surprised to see the supreme court in colorado overruling that. i think they have the better of that argument, but i think we're seeing that revisited. i think we're going to see the issue of whether it's self-executing, which is a form of the sort of procedural argument and what do i mean by self-executing? there can be language in the constitution, but you need congress or a state legislature to provide a lot of gran flu lar detail about who is going to make the decision, what's the standard of proof, what kind of discovery, what kind of hearing is held. there are all sorts of processes that are left very much unanswered. and so you could imagine that being another battleground in the supreme court and the one thing we know, joy, while we're sitting here, this will be decided by the supreme court. there's a stay in effect right now, but we've heard from the trump team that they rightly will seek review, so the supreme court is now going to have two incredibly important dona

certain proceedings will be stayed in the district court. it really depends on how fast the supreme court rules, they take the case, rule against donald trump. will they rule against him before march 4th, and will it be enough time before march 4th to get a jury selected and impanelled and ready to go or will it slip by days or weeks. that remains to be seen, but the schedule that jack smith is asking for is aggressive. it's trump, file your opposition by next monday. supreme court, i hope you would decide it quickly at your next conference, and then a note that in the nixon case, the supreme court took it one week later, and then they said, this is the schedule. once the supreme court, we would suggest that the parties exchange briefs 14 days later, replies seven days later, and arguments scheduled. with that schedule, we could be talking about the case being fully briefed and argued by the middle to late january. >> vaughn, let's talk about the politics of this. we have seen donald trump at his civil trial in new york. how much attention is

that the trump team is going to make this argument with a straight face that they made in the district court, that trump is swield as a former president to absolute criminal immunity. i mean, that is just a really strong position. it's one that is not going to find favor with the appeals court certainly, you know, one would have thought that they would have taken maybe a more measured approach to certain facts and tried to argue about official duties and whether or not they are actually within the scope of immunity. they are taking a hard line and one that i don't think is going to be successful, whether it's before a d.c. court or the supreme court. >> hugo, a little bit of inside baseball on this. i know that you have a beat on kind of what happens in trump legal world. i mean, let's be frank. christy, i, most legal experts agree there is really not a shot here from trump claiming he has absolute presidential immunity for his conduct when he was in the oval office, specifically what is alleged as well in that 1/6 indictment. is this just a way to delay or is there some legitimacy that the

the colorado supreme court affirmed the district court's decision that he engaged in insurrection. the fact of the matter is he incited the insurrection to try to stop the peaceful transfer of the presidency. and in the colorado supreme court has decided thought those actions are disqualifying. again, as of now he's not a qualified candidate in the state of colorado. of course the u.s. supreme court may choose to review, and i will follow whatever court order or decision is in place by the time of certification. >> i mean your deadline of when you have to decide what names to put on the ballot is january 5th, right? there's a stay on this july january 4th. can you walk me through the scenarios here if the supreme court does not decide whether it's going to review this or not by january 5th -- or sorry, i should use the latter. if the supreme court does decide it's going to review it but does not issue a decision by january 5th. that means that trump's name goes on the primary ballot. is that correct? >> if the united states supreme court decides to take this case, i'm sure that they

the district court ruled in her favor on that. and so did the supreme court today. the district court ruled against us on a very technical, legal issue regarding that interpretation of the 14th amendment. we were very confident that the colorado supreme court would not side with a district court on that. and although there was three senators among the senate justices, none of them sided with a district court on that issue. two of them said they would have agreed with a district court, simply on state court rounds. and another senator said there was a political question under federal law. but colorado just, again, as unique procedures that allow us to do this. >> and we will talk more about what that dissent said in a moment. but we have heard from the trump team, his attorneys, we have said that they would be appealing this to the supreme court. do you think that you have a chance at the supreme court? >> we do. i think we have a chance at the supreme court. first of all, trump is going to have to convince that supreme court to take this case. and i could imagine a

it district court in the supreme court here-— district court in the supreme court here. , .,, court heree by surprise dave _ court here. it took some people by surprise dave you _ court here. it took some people by surprise dave you are - court here. it took some people by surprise dave you are in - court here. it took some people by surprise dave you are in one | by surprise dave you are in one of those important primary states, new hampshire, what is the trump team saying about all of this? , ., the trump team saying about all of this? , . ,_ the trump team saying about all of this? , . _ , , of this? they are saying pretty brazenly that _ of this? they are saying pretty brazenly that this _ of this? they are saying pretty brazenly that this series - of this? they are saying pretty brazenly that this series of - brazenly that this series of indictments, these trials have been good for him when it comes to winning the nomination. after the first indictment allen bright's case in new york early in the year every time he has gotten into criminal trouble the entire republican party whether

people, in the materials of the criminal case, which was carefully studied in the simonovsky district courtmazurov heard his verdict. dmitry mazurov. were accused on several counts of embezzlement, especially large-scale and fraud. according to the investigation, mazurov, as the owner of the antipinsky oil refining plant , took out loans allegedly for the development of the enterprise, and then withdrew the funds to third parties organizations. he embezzled some of the money. in addition, he embezzled 473 businesses in the summer of 2018 , and less than a year later , bankruptcy proceedings began. later, the owner of the plant changed, and mazurov ignored it until the verdict was announced. dmitry mazurov was detained in the summer of 2019 at sheremetyevo airport while boarding a flight to nice. the investigation does not rule out that he could have fled the country; he has real estate in france. according to media reports, the model, who provides escort services, is yulia milshtein. the attack allegedly took place in 2015 at the entrance where the victim lived there. the second person invo

he arrived at the oktyabrsky district court of kirov from a maximum security colony near ryazan, wheree is already serving a sentence for taking a bribe. here is footage of the arrest in one of moscow’s expensive restaurants on novy arbat. there is a scattering of crisp bills on the table. investigators proved that for 600 thousand euros, the official promised personal patronage to large enterprises. in this criminal case he received 8 years in prison. it was then that belykh swapped his expensive jackets for a prison uniform. what everyday life looks like now for the ex. the governor was told my colleagues from eduard petrov’s investigative program. journalists came to visit him in the correctional colony. instead of planning meetings for the regional budget, at first there was the dusty job of the prison library. after one of the checks, citizen belykh changed his job and found himself in a sewing factory. here is an ex-governor convicted of bribery in a white cloud of cotton and arranging stuffed hares and bear cubs, and has mastered the profession of a stuffer of soft toys. maybe i

the district court said former president trump did engage in insurrectionist, but out technicality sayings section of the 14th amendment did not say that president trump could stay on the ballot. what this court says is no. they reversed the ruling saying he does fall under this. i'll review where they review the district court filing. they say in conducting our independent review of the factual findings, we agree that president trump intended that his speech would result in violence or lawless action on january 6th to prevent the peaceful transfer of power upon they go through the actions of the former president on january 6th. they talk about the fact that well before january 6th donald trump had begun laying the groundwork saying that the election was going to be rigged. so they go through all of this and go to his intent. erin, look, it's very important that the district court first ruled that donald trump essentially was an insurrectionist and this court says we agree and as a result of that, he is disqualified, erin? >> what happens from here? you talk about this supreme court rulin

. >>> donald trump is appealing district court judge tanya chutkan's denial of his motion to dismiss his d.c. indictment on presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. you'll recall last week the judge said that trump's position as president did not give him license to commit crimes. she wrote, quote, defendants for your service as commander in chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens. trump's appeal was expected but sets up a fight that could reach all the way up to the supreme court. it raises a very important question. could this impact the start of the trial, scheduled currently for march 4th? now less than three months away.

alexey was arrested in the presnensky district court varakina. was detained the day before on suspicion of double murder. as follows from the materials of the criminal case, he brutally dealt with two girls, and both, in some cases, yes... earned their living from sex. it is curious that varakin himself had previously been convicted of similar crimes and was only recently released after forced treatment. vlad egorova will tell you how the suspect was captured. this foreign citizen in black, who appeared in the corridors of the presnensky court of moscow in accompanied by guards, clearly not used to publicity, hiding behind a hood, lowers his eyes and turns away. the murder of two girls in st. petersburg, as it turned out, both made money in the intimate field, then the court sent him for compulsory treatment, incredible, but history repeats itself, in just 24 hours, now in moscow he dealt with two more priestesses of love, one of the victims rakina, according to investigators, turned out to be vlad’s twenty-five-year-old girlfriend; it is known t

district court for the northern district of oklahoma.amona to the district court of the northern islands. today we will again vote on two judicial nominees who have been referred back to the committee due to a procedural issue the previous boat given the nominees have been debated at length we will move directly to those votes but we also vote on three additional nominees and a justice department nominee. the committee will then return to consideration request for authorization for subpoenas related to the committee's investigation into the supreme court ethics standards. before i turn it over to ranking member graham, let me address the most recentor development. on november 13, the supreme court and outs for the first time in its history it would implement a code of conduct for the justices. this came after the roberts court refused to act on the issue for more than 100 years. after a series of heavily reported disclosures involving several justices and after this committee favorably reported the supreme court recusal and transparency

in particular, pavlo gorbasenko literally spammed the courts with lawsuits. in the odious districtative court of kyiv, he appealed against the negative conclusion of the public council of virtue. then he tried to appeal the decision himself in the supreme court. ks experts regard these actions as procrastination, an attempt to avoid passing the qualification assessment. the higher qualifications commission announced a break to make a decision on pavlo gorbasenko's eligibility the position of a judge, to study additional documents and provide explanations. a decision is announced, a decision because several moments, several moments. according to which the commission cannot believe that it cannot make a decision. assets of dubious origin, possibly a fictitious divorce to hide them, attempts to evade the qualification assessment and use of family connections to advance up the career ladder in the business jurisdiction. we hope that the higher qualification commission has identified and thoroughly investigated all the skeletons in cabinet of the head of the economic court of the kyiv r

it turns out that on monday the dragomilovsky district court of moscow sent him under house arrest, andring took place, so to speak, in silence. no one told reporters about him. the information has only just appeared. a quarter of a billion in lost years a bashkir pensioner, who is now innocent, is trying to sue for unprecedented compensation. grandfather is already 87, the court compensated him 30 million, two for each year in the colony, but the innocently convicted person categorically disagrees with such a small amount. a word from alexander polivka. the supreme court of the republic of bashkartastan is a respectable plaintiff at a respectable age - futhulla iskhakov. recently, a pensioner, who turned 87 years old, sued the russian ministry of finance for 31 million rubles. but he believes in his case this year. in a small village in bashkiria there is a criminal climbed into one of the. only half a century later , the real criminal confessed, his conscience was tormented, so a decade later the supreme court of russia rehabilitated iskhakov, for his suffering he demanded compensatio

the district court ruled in our favor on that and so did the supreme court today. the district court ruled against us on a technical legal issue regarding an interpretation of the 14th amendment. we were very could have if i d -- confident the colorado supreme court would not side with the district court on that . colorado has unique procedures that allowed us to do this. >> we will talk more about what that dissent said in a moment. we have heard from the trump team, his attorneys. they have said they will be appealing this to the supreme court. do you think you have a chance at the supreme court? >> we do. i think we have a chance at the supreme court. trump is going to have to convince the supreme court to take this case. i can imagine a world in which the supreme court says, this is pretty early on in the election cycle. let's see how this plays out in some other states first. he is first going to have to convince the supreme court to take it. once he convinces the supreme court to take it, i do think we have a good shot on the substance. again, we have good, s

at the district court level in new york where they brought this, we are in california. the district court judge said that this is not right for us to do for books that are in the publishers e-book collections that are licensed to the libraries. >> a couple things we want to break down. why can't we get an e-book copy a digitized copy from a publisher? >> the internet archive has been trying to find e-books. the same way that you would own a physical book. libraries buy, preserve, and lend. the publishers in the electronic world cannot buy an e-book and you cannot reserve an e-book. and you cannot land an e-book. that is controlled by them under their terms. they will not allow you to buy it. they can take away and change electronic books at any time. when you go to your public library and think you are borrowing a book actually, they are sending you to their database as a publisher. and they get all the surveillance information about who is reading what on what page. that is not in the tradition of library practices. there are a few small publishers that will sell a few

oksana myroshnychenko, judge of the holosiiv district court of kyiv, was recognized as unfit for office by the supreme court of ukraine. she revoked the driving rights of five participants of the auto-maidan for six months, who allegedly did not stop at the request of traffic police inspectors on the day of their trip to mezhihirya in december 2013. yavchenko issued a number of resolutions, which in the 14th year brought the participants of the auto-maidan to justice. the only evidence. acted in these cases the protocols were drawn up by the inspectors, the judge allowed the delay, which involved repeated violations of the terms of prosecution . in her declaration of integrity , the judge hid this fact. nevertheless, i indicated that i did not make a decision, but, well, it would be strange not to admit that this decision falls within the scope. during the interview, the members of the highest quality commission of judges drew attention to a lot more. and mistakes on the part of judge myroshnychenko. in particular, she often violated the deadlines for entering decisions into the registe

prosecutor's office completed the investigation of the case of the judge of the brovary city and district court, volodymyr serdynskyi. the case of the servant of themis will soon be considered by the court. it will be recalled that serdynskyi jumped at the bribes of 400 us dollars. according to the investigation, the judge received an illegal award benefit from a representative of one of the parties in a civil case for making a decision in its interests. part of the money in the sum. he received it earlier, when the decision was made to suppress the evidence in the case. while receiving the second part of the funds in the amount of $3,000 for the debt collection decision in favor of the plaintiff, serdynskyi was hotly exposed by nabu detectives. the sbu added that during the search , $15,600 packed in different envelopes was seized from the suspected judge. out of more than 300 ukrainian judges involved in of repression of protesters who participated in the events of the revolution of dignity, 170 are still working in the courts. as our colleagues from the investigation-info project found out,

in particular, pavlo gorbasenko literally spammed the courts with lawsuits. in the odious district administrative court of kyiv, he challenged the negative conclusion of the public council of virtue, then tried to challenge the decision of the vkk itself in the supreme court. these actions growth experts. as an attempt to avoid passing the qualification assessment, the higher qualification commission announced a break to make a decision on pavlo gorbasenko's suitability for the position of a judge in order to study additional documents and provide him with explanations. the decision to adjourn the meeting is announced, because several points, several points in connection with which the commission cannot. assets of dubious origin, likely fake divorce to hide them, attempts to evade qualification assessment and use of family ties for career advancement in the business jurisdiction. we hope that the higher qualification commission has discovered and thoroughly investigated all the skeletons in the closet of the head of the commercial court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko. we will find out soon

or incited insurrection, incitement of the charge, it is a higher test than what the colorado district court used when it came to the determination that trump engaged in insurrection. in federal court it is normally reasonable doubt. it will be interesting to see what the interplay is between these things moving together at the same time and how the supreme court applies these terms. host: how do president trump do in colorado and 2020? -- in 2020? what is his strategy in the western state in 2020 4? guest: i don't think this is a state where he has the luxury of -- just taking colorado alone, this is not a state trump will just let go or can afford to let go. i think for him it is crucial and he sees it as crucial. i think in general they go to the supreme court because her all the legal reasons we have seen that this is not a federal issue, it's a case of first impression. they see their chances in a good light. there is another thing to focus on. there is the remedy for congress to reinstate him if trump is ever removed from a ballot. there is that provision for congress to grant amnesty,

how did you write it around your work as as the senior district district court judge for the western district of oklahoma, probably a pretty busy schedule week to week for you. well, that's what nights and weekends are for. and yes, my, my, my official duties certainly take up my time all day. and sometimes they take up my time when i'm staring at the ceiling in bed in the middle of the night as well. i'll acknowledge that. but in terms of my work on the book, it it it really was a nice break, if you will, from my judicial duties in the sense that it was essentially the unrelated to my judicial duties. i it gave me an opportunity to research, to, to read history and to write. and the direct answer to your question is that i have a nice office at home and i have a summer home as well, that at has a very adequate office in it. and that's where i did most of the work. and it was really a refreshing break from the day to day repetition of my judicial duties. appointed by george w bush in 2001 to the bench, went to the university of oklahoma for undergrad and law school. this book, publish

how did you write it around your work as as the senior district district court judge for the western district of oklahoma, probably a pretty busy schedule week to week for you. well, that's what nights and weekends are for. and yes, my, my, my official duties certainly take up my time all day. and sometimes they take up my time when i'm staring at the ceiling in bed in the middle of the night as well. i'll acknowledge that. but in terms of my work on the book, it it it really was a nice break, if you will, from my judicial duties in the sense that it was essentially the unrelated to my judicial duties. i it gave me an opportunity to research, to, to read history and to write. and the direct answer to your question is that i have a nice office at home and i have a summer home as well, that at has a very adequate office in it. and that's where i did most of the work. and it was really a refreshing break from the day to day repetition of my judicial duties. appointed by george w bush in 2001 to the bench, went to the university of oklahoma for undergrad and law school. this book, publish

i want to begin with you for a second, because >>> this is significant to go from the district court's ruling that says you do not have presidential immunity. everything you did is not presidential, so to speak. to saying now the supreme court will look at how a case normally goes through to get to the supreme court. this is significant, ian. >> it is. i think jack smith's being very smart trying to make this move as fast as possible. you don't want a situation where like on october 20th the supreme court throws out a conviction because of some procedural rule that no one anticipated. ordinarily i advocate for the supreme court to do as little as possible. you want narrow -- that's not because i don't like the supreme court. that's good judging. you don't want judges to overreach, but in this case i think we want the court to give us as much guidance as possible as to how this trial is going to be run. it's an unprecedented case. >> right. >> it's a case where the stakes are enormous. the voters need to know if this man is a convicted felon when it comes time for the election and so i

every day the appeal takes is a day of delay in the district court. it is not impossible that the march trial date could hold. but, i think it begins to slip and certainly a lot depends on how quickly each of these appellate courts willing to move. >> joyce vance, i know that you didn't plan on doing this in your future, but, i'm glad you are able to do the breakdown here, legal jargon and speak as well as all the rules and regulations related to it. joyce vance, thank you so much. rough weather conditions starting -- christmas eve throughout the midwest, dozens of flights canceled in chicago. alone after a thick fog caused a complete ground stop in the city, one of the nation's biggest travel hubs, it's as a blizzard has taken name at the central plains and colorado up to south dakota in parts of minnesota. truckers along the interstate i 80 in the roscoe are siding off of the slick rather sliding off of the slick roadways, and at this coming to a call from blinding snowfall. shaquille brewster is at midway airport in chicago today. he joins us now an

the supreme court concluded that the district court judged right. he did engage in insurrection. >> colorado's highest court disqualifies trump from the primary ballot. tonight an exclusive with the head of the group that just won this enormous case. plus the stakes for trump's candidacy and his january six trial date and his fate rests in the hands of the united states supreme court, mired in scandal. >> right now what is the compensation of a justice of the supreme court? >> oh, goodness. i think it's plenty. [laughter] >> new reporting on the money woes of clarence thomas and just who has been lavishing him with gifts. >> i feel like i should quit while i'm ahead. >> when all in starts, right now. good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. we have a stunning bit of unprecedented news out of the state of colorado tonight. it comes at an unprecedented time, with an unprecedented presidential candidate, donald trump. tonight, the colorado supreme court ruled that the ex president cannot even appear on the republican primary ballot in that state bec

the sovetsky district court of kazan sent the deputy head of the ministry of emergency situations offound guilty of major fraud. from which exceeded 42 million rubles. for the same amount , the court satisfied the civil claim of the ministry of emergency situations against stepushenko. the chief doctor of sailor's silence will move to sultan zeganov, who will tell you how the investigation went and what decision the court made. close relatives of the hospital's chief physician.

worked the way they wanted to, with possibly two strong opinions in their favor, one from the district courte from the appeals court. jack smith had to decide, nope, we are gonna go at the supreme court without what could be a possibly very helpful opinion from the appeals court. take us through that strategic decision, how they would have made that? >> sure. that's a great question. i think the way i would have analyzed it, and i'm pretty sure the way jack and now one of the new attorneys, michael truman, and eminent supreme court practitioner, we have looked at this, is that there is really if you focus on the fact that time is of the essence. this is a case where there needs to be a trial and a resolution before the general election so that the public which has a right to a speedy trial can see that evidence and weigh that in assessing the vote. there is no question that the district judge has already found that that is consistent with due process for the defendant. and from jack smith's point of view, you do not want to have the delay at the court of appeals level, and then potential add

the district court in colorado had a similar one in well. the trial court said yeah, it was an insurrection, he engaged in it. but he's got to be on the ballot. the supreme court said yeah, he engaged in insurrection, but he can't be on the ballot. what do you make of that choice? >> the district court in colorado thought because the president is not named in that part of the 14th amendment, that the president wasn't included. and, there are some serious constitutional scholars that think the same thing. you know, the colorado supreme court pointed out the language that is there, any office under the united states has been interpreted many times as including the presidency. >> when you look at this, playing out in the courts right now. congress comes to mind. could they have done anything in the aftermath of january 6th that frankly could have resolved this before we got here? >> hindsight is always 2020, laura. at the time, i was writing to friends of mine who served in congress and going while don't you use this provision of the 14th amendm

the defendant ivan kostyukov was taken to the proletarian district court for trial. a few minutes before the meeting, the repeat offender asked the convoy to escort him to the restroom, and on the way he attacked with a sharpener and wounded the same head of the judicial convoy, klimanov, in the neck. this moment was captured by surveillance cameras. the employee tried to resist and took out his service weapon. the distraught kostyukov knocked him to the floor and struck him several times in the neck area. he took the weapon and ran out into... corridor, further wounded the bailiff and jumped out of the second floor window. fleeing from pursuit, he pulled the trigger several more times, the bullets hit a passing bus, but by luck, none of the passengers were injured. the police chased him there and started shooting at him. as journalists found out, kostyukov is a repeat offender with an experience against him. previously , eight criminal cases were initiated, including for murder, robbery, and illegal possession of weapons. a few weeks ago he had already heard court s

a line of journalists gathered at the moscow women's district court.ccommodate all the film crews. lawyers and relatives of the accused are also here. the main person involved in the case, mikhail abyzov, huddled in a glass box with as investigators found out, the ex-minister of open government secretly owned a control a block of shares in seabek, although according to the managers of seabek. the scheme for the theft of billions turned out to be simple; money from the largest siberian company was transferred to the accounts of offshore companies, and as a result, 4 billion rubles disappeared into oblivion. in order to compensate for the damage caused, the investigation seized the property. mikhail abyzov and other defendants, as well as companies controlled by them, worth about 37 billion rubles. a significant part of these funds was turned by the court into state income, economic development and energy security of the novosibirsk region and altai region. in 2018, obyzov, as follows from the materials of the criminal case, personally participated in th

and at the district court level in new york, where they brought this, even though we're in calif, you don't have anything to do with new york. the the district court judge said that this is not right for us to do for books that are in publishers e-book collections that are licensed to libraries. well, mr. kail, there's a couple of things we want to break down there. first of all, why won't why can't you get an e-book copy, a digitized copy of a book from a publisher? the internet archive for years and years has been trying to buy e-books. they buy them in the same sense that we would own a physical book. right. what libraries do is they buy preserve and lend. that's what they do. and the publishers are saying in the electronic world, you cannot buy an e-book, you cannot preserve an e-book, and you cannot lend an e-book that all of that is going to be controlled by them and under their terms. so they won't allow you to buy and and they can take away or change electronic books at any time. so what happens if you go to your public library and you think you're borrowing a book from your p

magazines, but in the materials of a criminal case, which carefully studied in the simonovsky district courtnally dmitry mazurov heard his verdict. dmitry mazurov was accused of several counts of embezzlement, especially large-scale fraud, and fraud. according to the investigation, mazurov, being the owner of the antipinsky oil refinery, took out loans allegedly for the development of the enterprise, and then withdrew the funds to third parties. he embezzled part of the money, in addition, he squandered 473 million rubles. belonging to refineries. the construction of the antipinsky oil refinery began in the mid-2000s, the first the line was introduced in 2006, the enterprise was completely built in the summer of 2018, and less than a year later the bankruptcy procedure began. later , the owner of the plant changed; before the verdict was announced , mazurov ignored the attention of the press and talked for a long time with his lawyer about something. dmitry mazurov was detained in the summer of 2019 at sheremetyevo airport while boarding a vnitsa flight, the investigation does not rule out t

and allow the district court to proceed if you do not petition with an x amount of time so they can easily force him to go to the court quickly or jack smith can do what he suggested, that after the d.c. court of appeals rules, then the supreme court can expedite. and that is the option available to the courts, it is in the courts hand what they want to do. >> do they have the expiration date, do you see a scenario where trump could, if the chips fall, all the chips fall in his direction, could delay beyond the election? >> it is not impossible, but i think not likely. as ryan said, we really have the court in control of how much evidence and how the court proceeds, the trial court, to a greater degree here. and i would be shocked if the court does not take charge and go forward. so, i don't think he can prevail with the delay strategy, the d.c. circuit is very privy to donald trump's delay tactics, and know what to do with them. >> gloria, this is such a central question, to all of the cases facing trump. is he immune? and i just wanted the potential consequences. like this decisio

central district court of chelyabinsk.l regional town of troetsk, alexander vinogradov, sits in the dock. although he would probably prefer to sit on the bench at some sporting competition, according to investigators, even the mayor took a bribe in 2020 not with money, but with a treadmill, the price of which was 126,000 rubles. i ask you to choose a preventive measure, if necessary, not related to detention. this is the one who allegedly gave the bribe, surprisingly, but also with the last name of grapes dmitry, a businessman owner... of a grocery chain , a pretty penny for an expensive gift, could quickly and easily obtain a building permit to put a new store into operation. there is already pressure on me , which means that today they have already moved in a person who is sick, who has been smoking all night, in general, fsb police officers detained all the participants in this ugly story, so with a sledgehammer to their advantage they headed to the house of a certain boris spiredonov, who is called the intermediary in

trump's lawyers are saying that the district court, the trial court, is divested of any jurisdiction to continue ruling on anything involved in the trial. now this issue is on appeal. they cite some very standard case law. there's a supreme court case, for instance, the says that. during an appeal the trial court loses its jurisdiction over any matters that are related to the appeal. trump's lawyers say that because the questions are asking the appellate court to decide this issue of immunity, would mean that if they win trump wouldn't have to stand trial, wouldn't be subjected to any other proceedings, that everything should go on halt, as of now. and one of the major problems is that they face in their argument is that they are citing civil cases and civil laws. and there are different equities to be considered in a criminal case. including, among other things, the public's right to a speedy trial and the very unique nature of these proceedings, which i think you do a fabulous job of outlining. the future of the country hangs in balance. much of the proceedings that trump is compla

the day before, the samara district court granted the claim of the prosecutor general's office, accordingmust demolish your estate. when will you carry out the dismantling? according to the court decision, the owners of the building on the island are now obliged to dismantle their disputed site with an area of ​​40 hectares, becoming... state property, until the decision of the samara district court came into force legal force, it is possible that mr. ifanov and representatives of the era company will try to appeal the verdict, but city residents are already calling this decision historically important. olga zhurenkova, sergey soldatov, denis tsitseronov, sergey saushkin, conduct the duty department. in kazan , the former head of the vishnevsky police department, vyacheslav kotchitov, was found guilty of a series of scams. as investigators proved, being an employee of the ministry of internal affairs, he robbed. promising not to prosecute them for offenses, otherwise he threatened with deportation. court regarded several criminal episodes not as bribes, but as fraud. this article is more

the day before, the samara district court satisfied the claim of the prosecutor general's office, accordingu must demolish your name. when will you carry out the dismantling? according to the court decision, the owners of the building on the island are now obliged to dismantle their disputed site of 40 hectares, which becomes state property. so far the decision of the samara district. court has not entered into legal force, it is possible that mr. ifanov and representatives of the era company will try to appeal verdict, but city residents are already calling this decision historically important. olga zhirenkova, sergei soldatov, denis tsitseronov, sergei saushkin, leading the duty unit in kazan, were found guilty of a series of scams by the former head of the vishnevsky police department , vyacheslav kotchitov. as investigators proved, being an employee of the ministry of internal affairs, he robbed foreigners, promising not to hold them accountable for... the state will develop civil defense systems and equip the ministry of emergency situations with the most modern equipment and digital t

the day before, the samara district court granted the claim of the prosecutor general's office, accordingh your estate. when will you carry out the dismantling? according to the court decision, the owners of the building on the island are now obliged to dismantle the technically controversial site with an area of ​​40 hectares, which becomes state property. so far the decision of the samara district court. entered into legal force. it is possible that mr. ifanov and representatives of the era company will try to appeal the verdict, but city residents are already calling this decision historically important. olga zhirenkova, sergei soldatov, denis tsitseronov, sergei saushkin, conduct the duty unit. voronezh investigators are looking into the circumstances of the attempt on the life of the owner of the largest poultry farm in the region, gennady shryaev. let me remind you that on thursday the businessman’s car was shot at from a machine gun while he was driving home, but fortunately not a single bullet hit the target. it also became known. what just a day before the assassination attempt ,