are only jay divens, it is only pre-election hype, and that if suddenly trump becomes president, and jay divens becomes vice president, then the rhetoric will be completely different , you don't think so, well, i think that politicization is possible, and the reversals are different, in different directions, maybe different sides, because they can change something in their position, and i don't think that... a radical change, ah , it is quite possible that they will refuse something in this plan, there is no plan, so far there is a person who was pushed against the wall and told, come on , tell me what your plan is, because your president is not ready and not able, probably trump will even talk about it, here he will probably force the public , and here's probably the most important question right now for us and for our audience, did jd vance voice his point of view, did he voice his... did he voice her point of view, did he voice the point of view of donald trump and his entire potential administration, right ? we, we cannot know that he just voiced, he voiced what was in his head a

scholz and divens, somewhere roughly voiced. the same plan, plus or minus divens said more about natolz said about certain territorial compromises, well divens actually also talked about territorial compromises, and somehow it all coincided in time, why, well, it is clear why divens is saying this, and of course that really somewhere plus or minus there can be such a position with trump, we do not know at all what the position is with trump, but we can guess whether this end of the war in 20 hours or in 48 hours , it can only be this way, and here is scholz, who spoke about supporting ukraine, about the fact that germany will be there with ukraine until the end, and so on and so on, why suddenly he came out with such initiatives, which to some extent contradict the interests of ukraine. and what do you see there, he says that he will invite russia to the peace and territorial summit concessions directly, well, he did not directly say that there will be territorial concessions. well , he is talking about the fact that ukraine may have to, conditionally speaking, give up some that, and

scholz and divens announced roughly the same plan.or minus, divens said more about nato, scholz said about certain territorial compromises, well divens actually also talked about territorial compromises. and somehow it all coincided in time, for which, well, it is clear, for what it says. and it is clear that trump may have such a position somewhere plus or minus, we do not know at all what trump's position is, but we guess whether this is the end of the war in 24 hours or in 48 hours, it can only be this way, but scholz, who spoke about support for ukraine, about what germany will be there with ukraine until the end, and so on and the like, why did he suddenly come out with such initiatives that... well, to some extent contradict the interests of ukraine, and what do you see there, he says that russia will be invited to the peace summit , direct concessions, well, as he did not directly say that there will be territorial concessions, well, he says that ukraine may have to give up some, conditionally speaking, and by the way, the head

territorial compromises, well divens actually also talked about territorial compromises, and somehowcided in time, for which, of course, why does divens say this, and it is clear that trump may have such a position plus or minus somewhere, we do not know at all what trump's position is. but we guess, this the end of the war in 24 hours or in 48 hours, it can only be this way. and here is scholz, who spoke about supporting ukraine, about the fact that germany will be there with ukraine until the end. and so on and so on. why did he suddenly come up with such initiatives, which to some extent contradict the interests of ukraine. and what do you see there? he says that russia will be invited to the peace summit, zelensky says this. concessions directly, well, as he did not directly say that there will be territorial concessions, well, he says that it is possible for ukraine will have to, relatively speaking, give up some that, and by the way, the head of the faction of his political power, the social democratic, if he proposes to create a committee of some sort to prepare for a coup, cl

return to the previous relationship for a week, even if before that there is no trump and neither divensor trump nor these trumpists are friends or supporters of ukraine and never have been and never will be and it is impossible, so to speak, to warm them up on our side, but you don't have to position yourself in the same way as their enemies there and put yourself under their disadvantage. once again, if you have already gone to a minefield, then walk very, very carefully and do not step on the same mine twice, in this case, well, it seems to me that the ukrainian side, the ukrainian authorities, have now made the same mistake for the second time, as in in the 19th year, when there was a phone call between trump and zelensky, and this started the impeachment procedure of president trump. this does not mean that you should not communicate at all, but you should avoid critical points. election campaigns and some political crises, and to understand who we, well, ukraine is talking to in this situation, with whom the psychological characteristics of this politician or presidential candidate

back to the previous relative for at least a week , and before that, it is not trump, and neither divens trump, nor these trumpists are friends or supporters of ukraine and never have been and never will be, and it is impossible, so to speak, to sway them to our side, but no you have to position yourself as theirs the enemies there and to put themselves under their displeasure, again if they have already gone to the mine. field, then walk very, very carefully and not step on the same mine twice, in this case, well, it seems to me that the ukrainian side, the ukrainian authorities, have now made the same mistake for the second time... the same mistake as in the 19th year, when the phone call between trump and zelensky, and this started the impeachment procedure of president trump. this does not mean that it is not necessary to communicate at all, but it is necessary to bypass critical points, election campaigns and some political crises, and understand who are we, well, ukraine is talking to in this situation, with what psychological features, this politician or presidential candidate, we

do not have enough strength to continue fighting, i.e. again, let's go back to the proposal of jay divensjay devens says, on the frontline of the cease -fire, it is like the chinese, and not the entry of ukraine and not the entry, but together with the fact that ukraine must be armed so that russia can no longer attack it. and tell me, please, and if you are putin, you are interested in such a peace agreement, why are you on your line? clash where you know that russia and ukraine claim these territories, and you claim ukrainian territories? why are you armed with americans in ukraine? that is, even a proposal that is quite liberal in relation to putin, relatively speaking, from the trump camp, it does not suit putin either, well, of course, it is not liberal, it is an open mockery of putin, when jay divan says, we will arm ukraine so that it can to pour no, he says that what is needed is not just a withdrawal of troops and not just an introduction, but demilitarization, fixing the number of the armed forces of ukraine, how many there are 60 thousand according to the istanbul agreements, s

trump's own desire to talk about the ukrainian victory, he chose jay divens as their vice presidentialdidate. he is too radical. the ukrainization of american politics in full swing, no traditions, no rules, no decency - trump jr. has already noted. that is, a foreign leader who has received billions of dollars in funding from american taxpayers comes to our country and has the audacity to attack the republican presidential candidate? and right after a pro-ukrainian fanatic tried to kill my father, shame. hopes for a meeting with trump, which zelensky spoke about before trip, evaporate by themselves, toxic. titles and state, which can decide the outcome of the entire race, trump and harris are going, as they say, head to head, and there is also the second largest ukrainian community in america, more than 100 thousand people, it is clear what kind of mood there is, zelensky's arrival is an undisguised political technology. in pennsylvania, there are places where people have nowhere to work, where they sleep on the sidewalk, so the fact that a person empowered in this state spends time a

option for the end of the war was described by the partner of the republican candidate, senator jay divensump sits down and tells the russians, ukrainians, europeans: you guys should figure out what a peaceful settlement looks like. and it probably looks like the current demarcation line between russia and ukraine becoming a demilitarized zone. it must be strongly fortified so that the russians do not invade again. as part of the peace plan, ukraine will retain its independence in exchange for neutrality, that is, ukraine will not join nato.

option for the end of the war was described by the partner of the republican candidate, senator jay divens. i think it would look like this: trump sits down and says to the russians, the ukrainians, the europeans: you guys have to figure out what a peaceful settlement looks like? and it probably looks like the current demarcation line between russia and ukraine, which is becoming a demilitarized zone. it must be strongly fortified so that the russians do not invade from... ukraine, as part of the peace plan, will retain its independence in exchange for neutrality, that is, ukraine will not join nato. there was no reaction to the words of vance, who actually offered ukraine to accept the loss of territories from official kyiv. instead, the bank reacted briefly and unambiguously to the unexpected proposal of the head of polish diplomacy, radoslaw sikorski. at the yalta european strategy summit, the minister of foreign... affairs of poland, as a possible option, offered to transfer crimea under the un mandate in order to prepare for an honest referendum. he was answered not only in the ukrain

version of the end of the war was described in a greenhouse by the republican candidate, senator jay divens. think that it would look like this. trump sits down and tells the russians, the ukrainians, the europeans: you guys have to figure out what peace, not settlement, looks like. and it probably looks like the current demarcation line between russia and ukraine, which is becoming a demilitarized zone. it must be strongly fortified so that the russians do not invade again. as part of the peace plan, ukraine will retain its independence in exchange for neutrality, i.e. ukraine will not join nato. word reactions. bens, who actually offered ukraine to come to terms with the loss of territories from the official kyiv, was not present. instead, at the bank briefing , they reacted unambiguously to the unexpected proposal of the head of polish diplomacy, radoslaw sikorski. at the yalta european strategy summit, the minister of foreign affairs of poland, as a possible option, proposed to transfer crimea under the mandate of the un in order to prepare for a fair referendum, he was answered not onl

don't have an army, you can't defend even that, well, pretty simple plan, now the question is, if jay divens is telling putin, you know nothing will work, we give you these territories in fact, we agree that ukraine will not be a member of nato, although in fact putin does not care at all, he does not care about nato, but that ukraine does not exist, but ukraine for you is that part of ukraine that you failed to conquer. it will not be possible to conquer, because there will be such weapons that your army will simply be destroyed in 48 hours, there will be missiles, there will be planes, there will be tanks, and it will be, i don't know, like sweden, let's say, before joining nato , but sweden has a very strong army, and that's it putin, why would putin sign it now, when he has the power, well, even if he agrees that such a situation is inevitable, well, we are sitting in the kremlin with you at a meeting, a meeting. the security of the russian federation, and i am telling you, like patrushev, this situation is inevitable, volodymyrovych, early on, we will not have enough resources, we are f

states of america, jay divens and tim wold, by the way, will be, i think, no less interesting, well, definitely people of a different category, but they are such interesting personalities, different, and to finish the topic of the debate, the world-famous singer taylor swift, which has 283 million followers on instagram, of course, not all of them are from the usa, on on her instagram page, she finally wrote who she is on instagram. supports, and this should be the drumbeat of kamela garis, because earlier information was thrown at trump that she was for trump, so taylor swift in particular wrote: let's hear it... taylor swift in direct speech. i will be voting for kamela harris and tim waltz in the 2024 presidential election. i'm voting for kamala harris because she fights for rights and causes that i believe take a warrior to champion. i think she is solid and a gifted leader and i believe we can achieve much more in this country if we lead by peace rather than chaos. and she also called herself childless, as it is better in ukrainian, well, the owner of cats, let’s put it this way

well, divens, in addition to announcing, to put it mildly, a controversial vision plan for the end of the war, also mentioned corruption in ukraine, and we will also talk further, in particular, about corruption, in particular, because it is precisely corruption that is used as an argument by opponents of supporting ukraine, they say, why help them, they steal everything, so that’s why i was recently informed about... the ex-head of the dnipropetrovsk region valentin reznichenko, his former deputy, heads of departments, as reported in nabu, detectives and prosecutors exposed a large-scale fraud in the road sector, as a result of which , during a full-scale war, the state budget suffered more than uah 286 million in losses. what is it about? in the fall of the 22nd, actually two years ago, journalists from radio liberty's schema program found that since the beginning of the russian invasion, dnipropetrovsk region has spent the most... public money on road repair and maintenance than all war-affected regions combined. journalists established that the private firm budynvist inzhenerg, wh

option for the end of the war was described by the partner of the republican candidate, senator jay divensink it would look like this: trump sits down and tells the russians, to the ukrainians, to the europeans: you guys should find out what a peaceful settlement looks like, and it probably looks like it is now.' it must be strongly fortified so that the russians do not invade again. as part of the peace plan, ukraine will retain its independence in exchange for neutrality, i.e. ukraine will not join nato. there was no reaction to the words of vance, who actually offered ukraine to come to terms with the loss of territories from official kyiv. on the other hand, on the bank brief, they reacted unequivocally to neochi'. proposal of the head of the polish diplomacy of radoslaw sikorski at the yalta european strategy summit , the minister of foreign affairs of poland proposed to transfer crimea under the un mandate as a possible option in order to prepare for a fair referendum, he was answered not only by the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs and mejlis, but also by the president's office

but we saw this video, where, in principle , zelensky himself began to speak and not only about jay divenslutely correct, we agree with his assessments, but perhaps they should not have been expressed at this moment, it could have been said earlier, and before the visit and looked at the reaction or later, because , well, not for... the effect of these speeches, well, i immediately suspected that this man had come to campaign for our opponents for of ours, mr. volodymyr, well, it looked like this, well, it really looked like this, about such an overzealous american consumer, it could look like this, it could, i agree with this, but once again, in this case, the key issue was to address the presidential candidates , in addition to dealing with the current president, it was probably worth limiting yourself. in the promotion of these national interests of ours and this plan of victory, as it is called by our side, well, by the name, with the official authorities, then... there would not be, there would not be these, there would not be b the context of the election campaign, and maybe we would

video, we, we, we saw where, in principle , zelensky himself began to respond and not only about jay divenstely correct, we, we agree with his assessments, but maybe they are not it was necessary to express it at that moment, it was possible to say it earlier, and before the visit and see the reaction, or later, because, well, these words do not always have an effect. well, i immediately suspected that this man had come to campaign for us, for our opponents, for our competitors, well, it looked like this, well it really looked like that, oh such a jaded american consumer, it could look like that, it could, i agree with that, but then again, in this case, the key issue was to address the presidential candidates, in addition to dealing with the current president , probably it should have been limited in the promotion of these. our national interests and this plan of victory, as it is called by our side, well , the name, with the official authorities, then there would be no, there would be no these, there would be no context of the election campaign and maybe we would have succeeded to avoid a

scheduled for october 1. between the candidates for vice president of the united states of america, jay divens walt. by the way, i think it will be no less interesting, of course, these are people different category, yes, but they are such interesting personalities, different, and to finish the topic of debate, the world-famous pop singer taylor swift, who has 283 million followers on instagram, of course, not all of them from the united states, on her instagram page . finally , she wrote who she supports, and this should be the drumbeat of kamela garis, because earlier information was thrown at trump that she was for trump. well, taylor swift, in particular, wrote: "let's hear taylor swift in direct speech." i will vote for kamala harris and tim waltz in the 2024 presidential election. i vote for kamala harris because she fights for rights and causes. which in my opinion need a warrior to defend them. i think she is a strong and talented leader, and i believe that we can achieve much more in this country if we lead by peace rather than chaos. she also called herself childless, as it is better

this video we saw where, in principle, zelensky himself started. to respond and not only about jay divensabsolutely correct, we, we agree with his assessments, but perhaps they should not have been expressed at this moment, it could have been said either earlier, and before the visit and see the reaction, or later, because no no no always the effect of these statements was the immediate suspicion that this man had come to campaign for our people, for our opponents, for our competitors. yes, well it really looked like that, oh such a cross country american consumer, it could look like that, it could, i agree with that, but again then, in this case, the key issue was to appeal to the presidential candidates, in addition to having case by the acting president, perhaps it should have been limited to the promotion of these national interests of ours and this plan of victory, as it named by our side, well, by the name... with the official authorities, then it would not have happened, there would not have been these, there would not have been the context of the election campaign, and maybe we wo

trump, naturally, by declaring that he has no peace plan, he bullied the vice-presidential candidate divense generally attaches importance to the interests of ukraine, and then you remember, yes, that story when he went to the plant where shells are produced for ukraine in order to strike our territory, but it turned out that all this was part of the election campaign in the state of pennsylvania, there were only democrats there, who at the same time were present, in general, all of zelensky's movements, as it turns out, are paid for by the white house, including his plane, security, and so on and so forth, well, in the end, it means that regarding this meeting, zelensky ran into the fact that the speaker of the house of representatives, michael johnson, he is a republican, not only refused to meet with zelensky, he sent him a letter asking him to fire the ambassador. ukraine to the united states of america, that's what he said. today i sent a letter to president zelensky, because the ambassador crossed the devil dragged him into this, instead of holding a pre-election meeting on behalf of