about the great philosopher plato, doctor of philosophy, roman svetlov, doctor of philosophy, dmitry bugay, candidate of political sciences vladimir ligoy, yes, we continue. what do you think, in the formation of personality, well, in addition to the fact that we understand that the meeting with socrates, the death of socrates, well, a lot, if not everything, in the life of plato was determined, yes or in many ways determined, here. what would you highlight from those personal characteristics in which we more or less can we be sure? again, the problem of personality in assessing earlier cultures is a rather complex problem, because for us, such words, these categories of thought, they seem natural, but the greeks did not use them, yes, in this sense, always, when we talk about the personality of plato, then firstly, this is a bit of a conversation in... that he supposedly meets socrates there in 477 bc, this is such a late antique mythology, because plato belonged to a family that socrates communicated, and roughly speaking, when plato was not born there in 428 or in 424, he was born in th

doctor of philosophy, dmitry bugay, doctor of philosophy roman svetlov, i am vladimir ligoyda, we have our thoughts about the great philosopher plato, we continue: plato and russian culture, not russian philosophy, only, although, probably, first of all, but russian culture, how he is read by russian culture, yes, what is the first thing to pay attention to here, well, besides the fact that in an explicit form, as far as i understand, plato, even in russian philosophy appears very late, yes, that is, somewhere at the beginning of the 19th century, yes, probably, although actually lomonosov already... says that maybe his own platos and quick-witted newtons, well, this is a fascinating, very broad topic, of course, yes, where a good historian of russian philosophy can say a lot, because acquaintance with some aspects of plato's thought was certainly in russia from the very beginning, because translating one way or another patristic literature and translating all sorts of collections sayings. one way or another, russian culture came into contact with plato, but for a very long time, but t

petersburg state university, dmitry vladimirovich bugai, doctor of philosophy, professor at moscow stateversity. i am vladimir ligoida, we are beginning our conversation. dear colleagues, and you know, i would like to ask you as a warm-up question, the following: which of plato's texts do you personally refer to most often. roman viktorovich, let's go. well , to be honest, then probably the armchair of truth, the bartender, things constantly appear that you want to look at there, and, probably, the most interesting text for working with students, it is very interesting from the point of view of different types of dialectics, dialectics, and i would say different types, yes, because it is possible to interpret from the position of dialectics itself in the modern sense of the word, from the point of view of skeptical dialectics, everything that is presented in the hypotheses that make up the main part dialogue on ramenit, but i even... more interesting is its water part, where in my opinion socrates is dedicated to philosophy. hmm, this interest, well, conditioned by teaching, it coincides

petersburg state university, dmitry vladimirovich bugai, doctor of philosophy, professor at moscow stateadimir ligoida, we are beginning our conversation. dear colleagues, and you know, i would like to ask you as a warm-up question, about this: which of plato's texts do you personally refer to most often. roman viktorovich, let's start with you, well , to be honest. very honestly, this is our armchair of truth, parmenite, things constantly appear that i want to look at there, and, probably, the most interesting text for working with students, it is very interesting from the point of view of different types of dialectics, dialectics, why i would say different types, yes, because it is possible to interpret from the position of dialectics itself in the modern sense of the word, from the point of view of skeptical dialectics, everything that is presented in the hypotheses, which makes up the main part of the dialogue poromenite, but i find its introductory part even more interesting. where, in my opinion , socrates is dedicated to philosophy. hmm. but this interest, well, conditioned by tea