dmitry evgenevich, you, as a representative of an organization that , in principle, is for peace, yes yes, events, the hawks are still defeating the doves, you know, in the continuation of this conversation, why france, why lithuania, there latvia, starting from the rhetoric, why not poland, the whole point is that it is ordinary. they look at what putin is ready to do, what russia is ready to go to in negotiations, if it suits them, they will negotiate, they don’t care about this poland, but putin is now announcing a demarcation line, a sanitary line, yes, through which must necessarily be between the remaining ukraine and russia so that the territories of donetsk and lugansk people's republics are not bombed, we see that they are fighting in the belarusian region, yes actively, how will the west be satisfied with this? what we are saying is that this is a defeat, a political, military defeat of the west , including why macron? firstly, this is the next next scenario, and we are talking about the fact that now the ambitions, yes, of some kings, when now scholz and macron are starting

yes, dmitry evgenevich, let's continue, huh what the elections in russia showed the world , maybe nots they affected, you know, here... even abstracting from the fact that this is a strong leader who won, who was able to rally the whole of russia around you in difficult times, and that ’s all, that’s all true, we see how much putin is now supported by the russians, what these elections have shown, these elections have shown a huge gap in the level of politics between russia, belarus, china, the west and america, where do... strong leaders stand here, who can think soberly , really look threats in the eye, give some messages for the development of their countries, collaboration forward, yes, at the same time we see puppet politicians who seem to want to do something, but they cannot, because in the era of developed democracy, as vadim frantsevich said, if you comply with the canons. everything is very good, that is, you obey, serve, do what you are told, as soon as here is the example of hungary, as soon as you begin to express your point of view, that’s it, you are no longer the same,

the head of state took responsibility for going against some of the opinions of doctors there, dmitry evgenevichg the inviolability of the constitutional system, continuity of generations and civil harmony, we actually filled our article with this status third of the constitution with new content that the only source of state power is the people, in principle this position, this concept is constitutional, it is characteristic of all states, without exception, that declare themselves democratic, but i absolutely agree with gregory that we there is no need to follow western patterns, they appeared immediately after world war ii in accordance with the concept. which needed , on the one hand, to politicize the masses to show that they are the only source of power in the country , on the other hand, to maintain the power of the oligarchic bourgeoisie , therefore the so-called concept of minimal or elite democracy appeared, when the people participated in the exercise of their power only during the period of electoral campaigns, during the election period, throughout the rest of the electoral cycle, o