battle on the girl's field, the forces of the second people's militia, led by kuzma minin and dmitry pozharskythe troops of hetman khatkevich. in a few days, ours managed to defeat the poles and drive them away from moscow the battle on the girl's field, which settled in the kremlin, became a turning point of troubled times, as the author wrote in search of a chronicle of the 17th century, stanislav of fabergetsky, the wheel of fortune turned and the polish hope to take over the russian state was destroyed to replace the chaos of unrest, order began to come and already in the next 1613. a zemsky sobor was convened in moscow, which elected mikhail romanov to the throne, initiating a new dynasty on september 1, 19. this year , the world's first public school was opened in moscow. movie. at first, just in the four rooms of the apartment in in the center of moscow at the beginning of tverskaya street, students played behind a frame that imitated a screen. in 1928, one of the greatest directors of the world, sergei eisenstein , began teaching here. and now , over time, the all-russian institute of

battle on the girl's field, the forces of the second people's militia , led by kuzma minin and dmitry pozharskypposed the troops of hetman khatkevich. in a few days, ours managed to defeat the poles and drive them away from moscow, the train of the pritov garrison earlier, which sat in the kremlin, the battle on the girl's field was a turning point in the troubled times, as the author of the polish chronicle of the 17th century, stanislav of fabergetsky, wrote, the wheel of fortune turned and the polish hope to take over the russian state was destroyed to replace chaos troubles began to come order and already in the next 1613. in moscow, they convened the zemsky sobor, which he elected to the kingdom. mikhail romanov, having laid the foundation for a new dynasty, on september 1, 1919, the first in the world was opened in moscow. public school. movie. at first, just in the four rooms of an apartment in the center of moscow at the beginning of tverskaya street , students played behind a frame that imitated a screen. in 1928, one of the greatest directors in the world, sergei eisenstein, began tea

under the eagle at tsarev ford , prince dmitry pozharsky defeated his troops.nturies, fighting . they bypassed the orlovsky lands, but not far from the eagle, an unusual architectural monument of military history by a russian-turkish warrior of the 18th century was preserved. five kilometers from the eagle there is an amazing structure on twenty hectares, only 7 hectares less than the moscow kremlin, there is a structure that resembles a military fortress, but this is not a fortress. this is the fence of the manor's estate, which is a symbolic monument to the first annexation of crimea to russia in the eighteenth century. century. the fact is that the authors are the creators of this composition. e, count and all russian orders of cavaliers, field marshal, one of the sixty-four glorious russian marshal mikhail fedotovich, kamensky was a participant in all wars of the second half of the 18th century. closely knew several russian tsars and tsarinas and ultimately. uh, his victory over turkey in the russian-turkish wars. e, led to the fact that kuchuk was signed t

motherland was legalized at the very top in this war. liberation wars of alexander nevsky dmitry tolchkov his beloved pozharsky in their honor, monuments were erected and squares were renamed, so in 1943. at that time, in novgorod, gorky erected a monument to the famous native of the city kuzey minin. but back in 1939, the film minin and pozharsky was released, the authors tried to convey to the viewer that it is possible to resist the enemy and defeat him only through heroism , self-sacrifice and universal unity. and now i’ll wash my money. so igor sergeevich a can you compare those searches that unite the heroes with the searches of the present one, because then it was more likely the commanders themselves and their political activities. she rather faded into the background. it's probably different now, or maybe i'm wrong. try to formulate it. you know, in my opinion, the analogy here is, uh, obviously then the country was facing the threat of a war in which it was deciding to be or not to be. now we are in a state of hybrid war with the west and the west does not hide that their goal is the strategic defeat