the dnc wouldn't let them. the fbi just took the firm's word for it. but declassified documents show the president of the firm, sean henry, testified under oath, that he had no evidence that russia hacked the dnc server or evidence that anybody hacked it. look what he says here, there's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfill traited. we don't have the evidence that says the data actually left. we didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. joining me now, the reporter behind the story which first appeared in real clear investigations aaron mate, journalist with the gray zone and host of pushback. so aaron, i just want to let everybody know we don't know who did it. maybe it was the russians. but we're just saying that the guy who was in charge of investigating it, he doesn't have any evidence that it was the russians. how did the story get out there, that the russians did it? >> well, the firm was the dnc contractor that generated this allegation and first made it public. and when they said it in june of 2016, tha

i want to know, is there any evidence that they hacked the dnc server.hat is a central allegation and we are hearing, there is no evidence. and so i don't know what this is about. >> well, we couldn't answer that because remember the fbi did not gain access to that server. they didn't even try to gain access to the server. but the dnc gave it to crowd strike and we will never know the answer to that question. i think whether or not to sow seeds of discord i think our report did a good job of outlining that yes, they did specific reference to the dnc. i asked that question. i don't know that anyone connected russia with the hacking of the dnc or if they did, i can't recall it. >> tucker: everyone did. many republicans did it turns out, they didn't know that. thank you for coming on tonight, good to see you. >> you too. >> tucker: vapes shops in many states are closed yet liquor stores remain open. two people say it's totally okay and three say it is illegal. on rules like this, lockdown rules based on actual science, or are they more just social control f

siding with the dnc.ink that's how they got there? how did they get to wikileaks? >> i don't think we know. that was the point all along. the original heresy inte russiagate that got many of us expelled from the halls of decent company was questioning the declaration from security state agencies who have a history of lying, declaring definitively that russia was behind the hacks. and all you had to do in order to be declared a heretic and journalism was to say i would actually like to see some evidence for that. i'm not saying that it could noi have happened or it was beyond the realm of plausibility. russia does stuff like that. so does the u.s. but before i believe it, i would like some evidence. and we got the response is that you just showed with adam schiff accusing you of being a kremlin pollen or kremlin asset, disloyal, unpatriotic, for having to want to see the unevidence. and as it turns out, there is some relevance, but it was hidden for years until recently, the head of crowd strike, the only

>> as a former dnc spokesperson, let me say, if the dnc were to launch an investigation, who would takeock on a dnc, but in a partisan investigation isn't what it's going to take. let's let the press investigated and we will see. >> bill: will you be reporting on the dnc panel to look into this? >> they are not going to hire me to help that's for sure. i'm not one to let the democrats do -- they set a bar for brett kavanaugh and denied him the presumption of innocence. they said that he had to prove a negative. he had to prove that he was not a predator. now they want to do process and investigation and presumption of innocence for joe biden. i think the standard for brett kavanaugh was completely unfair. the people who treated him unfairly was joe biden. >> bill: not you gentlemen come about the word from the senate. i don't know how you get that paperwork now. >> maybe she requests it. it might have to come from her. >> credit to the biden campaign for keeping the paddle on the metal on this. >> bill: we will see if we get it and if it's even there. thanks to you as well. you look lik

was siding with the dnc.you think that's how they got there? how did they get to wikileaks? >> i don't think we know and that was the point all along. the original heresy investigate that got many of us expelled from the halls of decent liberal company was questioning the declaration from security state agencies who have a history of lying, declaring definitively that russia was behind the hocks and all you had to do in order to be declared a heretic and journalism was to say, you know, i'd like to see some evidence from them. i'm not saying it couldn't have been or that it's beyond the realm of possibility. but, we got the kind of response is that you just showed with adam schiff, accusing you of being a kremlin pollen or cram an asset or disloyal or unpatriotic, and wanting to see some evidence. as it turns out there is some relatives -- of the head of crowd strike, the only entity that was actually able to examine the server is admitted in closed hearings before the house that there is no concrete evidence

writing in a new editorial chosen by get this, the dnc. dnc investigates the sexual assault allegation against joe biden. while we're at it, why don't we just let the dnc investigates theau emails. scorn from fellow media mob, and reporter jonathan swan tweedy mess. of course, wanting to avoid any serious work. we know what the outcome would be. that is predictable, nothing new. after all, they are the arm of the extreme radical democratic socialist party. they are one of the purveyors. leader in the fake news industry. for the new york toilet paper times. who says it's not safe to travel to china? coronavirus travel ban is unjust, doesn't work anyway. now i just want to come out like they do come out what would've happened to any readers if they ignorant,o that stupid advice from new york toilet paper times. they published another piece in february reading "you know who to blame." one of the latest examples of the politicization of the virus. they are destructive to the country. they are all things democratic state propaganda, no honor, n

now the dnc got crowdstrike to look at the servers but the dnc prevented the fbi from doing its own analysis. the allegations helped trigger the trump russia probe. adam schiff and eric swalwell were on the house intelligence committee. they knew crowdstrike, the founder, that ran it, quote, we don't have concrete proof, concrete evidence that russian hackers stole dnc emails. they didn't have the evidence that the data was exfiltrated from the dnc. what do you make of this story? >> i saw the transcript where chris stewart, one of the republican members, went back in on looking at that exfiltrated information and asking that question about that. liz, i think what we have to look at here is, they created this russia narrative. i mean my goodness, always wanted to be a screenwriter. his goal was to win an oscar for some great screenplay. what we now realize they made this up. they made the whole thing up about russia collusion. and, then they tried to create a crime. they had to find an action that they could say was pinned or tagged to their crime. they made the whole thing up. hillary clint

all right, "the new york times" calling for the dnc to investigate joe biden as the chair of the dnc says there is nothing t to the sexual harassmt claim. there is a lot to say about that. he is on deck next. ♪ in nearly 100 years serving the military community, we've seen you go through tough times and every time, you've shown us, you're much tougher your heart, courage and commitment has always inspired us and now it's no different so, we're here with financial strength, stability and experience you can depend on and the online tools you need because you have always set the highest standard and reaching that standard is what we're made for ♪ we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go

now biden, "the new york times" saying the dnc? talk about a biased investigation.he american people would not believe that investigation. it really is unfull display the discrepancy between how these two men were treated. listen, i'm glad democrats embraced due process and presumption of innocence because it is now pa democrat because they threw all those standards away when a republican is accused. it eroded our country's judicial process, due process, all the things we hold dear. we can't hold presumption of innocence to joe biden to declaration of innocence. there has been no investigation. i think they're skipping a step here. elizabeth: critics are saying the president had his accusers too. his accusers ended up on the cover of magazines, whole profiles done on cnn, msnbc, "60 minutes," same with kavanaugh's accuser. don't have that with tara reade. your word on president's accusers. >> anybody that accuse as republican gets full media attention. you're allowed to do any type of interview. there is no vetting. we saw that with brett kavanaugh, with a woman who

>> i think the dnc, they both went to the nancy pelosi school fearmongering.not the case, it's called planning ahead. just like the democrats are saying, that's how you mess up the iowa caucus and find who the winner is. they want them open for the voters to be based on the candidates. >> we will give you a fair shot today. rhonda mcdonnelronna mcdaniel t. in a moment, the rush to get a haircut. salons and barbershops slammed with customers as some states allow them to reopen. there's word that people are even crossing straight lines to get a trim how about that these are extraordinary times, and we want to thank the extraordinary people in the healthcare community, working to care for all of us. at novartis, we promise to do our part. as always, we're doing everything we can to help keep cosentyx accessible and affordable. if you have any questions at all, call us, email us, visit us online. we're here to help support you when you need us. take care, and be well. to learn more, call one eight four four cosentyx or visit cosentyx.com many of life's moments in

"as it relates to the dnc, we have indicators that data was infiltrated. we do not have concrete evidence." later, henry admitted he had only "circumstantial evidence does quote that the russians were involved at all. adam schiff heard those words directly, he heard it from the one person who would know for certain. adam schiff knew there was nothing substantial at the core of the russian collusion story, at the very center it was hollow, a sham. he never even suggested this in public, and said he the opposite. he spent years on television telling you it was totally real, shut up. >> there is clear evidence on the issue of collusion, ample evidence of collusion in plain sight. >> have democrats found any evidence? >> yes we have. you can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence. there is significant evidence of collusion. of people in the trump campaign with the russians. >> there is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and russia. >> tucker: in case you weren't counting during that montage, adam s

citing sketchy storages like a dossier that had been funded by theth hillary clinton campain and the dnc. here's how even the "new york times" explain the recent findings of the justice department's inspector general. here's what the "new york times" said. the fbi had cherry pick and listed evidence about the trump advisor when seeking permission to wiretap him. that, madam president, was from the "new york times." so an american citizens campaign for the american presidency was treated like a hostile foreign power. while all law enforcement in part because the democratic led executive branch manipulated documents, he had contrary evidence, and made the dnc funded dossier a launchpad for an investigation. inspector general counted seven significant inaccuracies and omissions. here's his report. in which actual assertions relied upon in the fbi's fisa application were inaccurate. incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation based upon information the fbi had in its possession at the time the application was filed. did you catch that last part? based upon information the fbi had

the new york times calling for the dnc to investigate joe biden and the chair says there's nothing to the sexual harassment claims. brit hume has a lot to say on that next. ... and staying active? on it! audrey thinks she's doing all she can to manage her type 2 diabetes and heart disease, but is her treatment doing enough to lower her heart risk? maybe not. jardiance can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. so it could help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. and it lowers a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection... ...in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection,... ...ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction and don't take it if you're on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin ma

that the debunked steele dossier was bankrolled by the dnc and hillary campaign. we have proof after taupe hillary clinton official saying that on the record. house judiciary doug collins on serious questions mounting now whether former senior fbi official doctored and altered a key document in the quest to nail michael flynn for trying to get him to lie to the fbi. thanks for joining us. i'm elizabeth macdonald. the"the evening edit" starts rit now. elizabeth: you're watching as president trump focused on a payroll tax cut and about potential second wave. watch this. >> i want to see a payroll tax cut. i want to see various things we want. i want workers to be taken care of. we're negotiating with the democrats. we'll see what happens but as i said it is a transition. this is really going to be, in my opinion, we'll see, i think it is going to be something very special. it is a transition to greatness and greatness is next year, right from the beginning, i think we're going to do fantastically well. elizabeth: let's begin with north dakota senator kevin cramer. g

the dnc, you will remember, never allowed federal investigators to inspect to their email servers.hat's odd behavior for people who claim to be the victims of foreign espionage. instead, the party servers were inspected by a third party nominee called crowd strike. it is all of this coming back to you? adam schiff's committee interviewed the ceo of crowd strike, and interviewed him personally. he asked if henry knew when the russians had stolen the data, henry's reply that we are seeing for the first time is this "as it relates to the dnc, we have indicators that data was x will treated, we did not have concrete evidence. we do not have concrete evidence. later he admitted that he only had circumstantial evidence that the russians were involved at all. adam schiff heard those words directly. from the one person who would know for certain. and he knew that there was nothing substantial at the core of the russian collusion story. at the very center. it was hollow. it was a sham. schiff never even suggested this in public. instead, he did the opposite. he spent years on television tel

, we have data that data was extricate expo traded from the dnc.hat about the emails thater everyone is so, so knowledgeable of? or there are also indicators they were prepared but evidence they were actually exp expo is he admitting that four years of blaming russia for hacking the dnc on behalf of trump is completely bogus? i found that to be stunning, frankly. >> we have two different issues here. one is the democrats hired crowd strike and they refused to let the fbi go in and look at the server to do a proper evaluation. that evidence is likely lost forever. on the other side of things, remember, this is not been the big secret. we have been advising anyone who would listen that if you are a government agency, the department of defense, anybody who works for the department of defense, anyone who has personnel records, political party, congress, russia, china, north korea, iran, every single day they are trying to get in and break into these official records. you know, i don't think it's rocket science to think that several countries, you know,

the dnc, the very fake dnc. [inaudible conversations] steve: i'm sorry i have to cut you off but see you next sunday you off but see you next sunday >> we're winning bigger than we've ever won before. i think we saved millions of lives. but now we have to get it back open. we have to get it back open safely but as quickly as possible. rob: it is monday, may 4th. happening right now at 4:00 a.m., the president's promise to get america safely back to work one step closer as more steps reopen today. jillian: we're live with the encouraging motion about the future of a covid-19 vaccine. >> china behaved like authoritarian regimes do, attempted to conceive and hide. it's classic communist disinformation, that created enormous risk. rob: intel on a chinese coverup during the pandemic now coming to a head as the trump administration promises accountability for beijing's secrecy. jillian: the bombshell new report reveals the country kept silent to get more medical supplies for themselves. ♪ god bless america. rob: heros

now, dodd was the foreman dnc -- former dnc chair back in the '90s when the committee accepted illegalhina. dodd also accepted $36,000 in political donations from his good friend harvey weinstein. second only to the donations weinstein made to barack obama. and like joe biden, dodd has also been accused of sexual improprieties during his time in the senate. well, joining us tonight, a man who talked with someone who says she was assaulted by chris dodd. joining us now is one of the leading investigative journalists in the country, award-winning investigate irv journalists and editor-in-chief of "just the news." john, great to have you here. >> thanks, lou are. lou: first of all, chris dodd, of all people. it's just, it doesn't make any sense that biden would entrust -- other than his affection, apparently, for chinese money -- that he would entrust such an important role to someone with dodd's checkered career. >> yeah, i think that's certainly the question. within a few hours of the announcement yesterday, i started hearing from democrats saying this feels like a deaf ear appointment.

people at the dnc whether this was legit or not. apparently that guy replied it looks ok but meant to say it does not look ok. that would be the most important typo in history of the him and race. gives theto that and password, the gr you goes. they broke into the dnc using more for -- technically sophisticated work than this. when they had that information, they were not releasing fake accounts. they were not releasing fake information, a cherry picked the emails that told the story they wanted to tell. that was the story that bernie sanders was ripped off in the dnc primary. to do so, they put that message through -- real emails. people were saying that nesting is about bernie sanders. that failed. they tried it again through an that they were pretending was a real leak site. d.c. leaks reached out to a bunch of journalists and said here are some documents from john podesta into the dnc. they had a real live block of all the most embarrassing things that john podesta did. even the new york times ran with the stories over and over

the question is, did the hillary clinton campaign tell those reporters that the dnc and that campaignor that steele file, steele dossier? take it to oklahoma senator james lankford. senator, great to have you on. this is steady information river coming out of house intelligence, media leaks, setting stage for impeachment. we're still at the beginning. we don't know a lot. your reaction to all of this. >> a lot of it we already know. we're getting opportunity to get it confirmed in writing. getting to see what many of us known along. the house was sitting on items they knew full well, saying for the public from democrats from the house, we've got all these issues. we know there are some things. we have the smoking gun. when you go to the actual evidence, the smoking gun actually goes the other way. hillary clinton campaign and dnc were working with a foreign agent, a british citizen which they had hired to work with russia to try to create a document to be able to come back and to be able to work with. getting it leaked out to the press. even the fbi fired him but quietly there is a de

and then the dnc chair says nothing to see here, this is like the hillary email scandal.did hillary delete 30,000 emails if there wasn't anything to see? speaking of deleting, the associated press admitted they interviewed this woman reade last year, spiked the story and deleted the file. and now the secretary of the senate says yeah, you know the complaint that we may or may not have? you can't see it because it's confidential. so the two places where the complaint could be, either in the university of delaware or the senate file, you're not allowed to look into? you've got to be kidding me. this thing is not over by a mi mile. >> juan: dagen, i was going to do a call for it but i will do it now because we are short on time but there's a poll that indicates most democrats favor right now if it was up to them, the massachusetts senator elizabeth warren to be the vice president for joe biden. wonder if you think all of these allegations or this specific allegation, there's not a bunch, there's one allegation against biden, it's going to impact the way that he calculates wh

dollars that have turned the house of representatives into a research organization, an appendage for the dnc that's why they want his taxes and make records. i've never seen anything like this in my life. and they challenge him. i'm not going to give it to you. we will go to court. he's going to sue them and go to court and he says that is obstruction of justice. [laughter] this is like the dumbest house of representatives. [laughter] [applause] >>> .. >>

the dnc investigating joe biden is ludicrous. tom perez already ruled out.says the "trust joe biden." just like david axelrod and gretchen whitmer said. look, imagine proposing that during cavanaugh. that the rnc would run an investigation looking into the allegations. they would be left out of the room. in this argument from david axelrod and others that you know, if it was okay for obama, that he vouches for joe biden, then it should be accepted across the board, again, trusted biden, trust obama argument is ridiculous. democrats have paved themselves into a corner here, they don't have good answers, a couple years ago, it was believe women, believe all women coming forward, and now, it is trust joe biden. >> dana: marie, so, i think that democrats are just going to coalesce behind joe biden regardless. i truly do. you saw, over the weekend, none of the high profile democrats moved away from joe biden in anyway. so i think that's going to happen, but what about how this has refocused republicans minds about how brett kavanaugh was treated when he was going

people at the dnc whether this was legit or not.pparently that guy replied it looks ok but meant to say it does not look ok. which perhaps be the most important typo in the history of the human race. he logs into that and gives the password, the gru goes. they broke into the dnc using technically sophisticated work than this. once they had that information, they were not releasing fake accounts. they were not releasing fake information, the cherry picked the emails that told the story they wanted to tell. which specifically was the story that bernie sanders was ripped off in the dnc primary. to do so, they powered that message through real emails. where people were saying not nice things about bernie sanders. they did this through a fake persona. there is a history we cannot get into. that failed. they tried it again through an organization called dc leaks, which they were pretending was a real leak site. d.c. leaks reached out to a bunch of journalists and said here are some documents from john podesta into the dnc. and the journal

first of all, the dnc is a political organization. the dnc elects democrats in on and there are no off years for us. we organize. we build the infrastructure for the nominee and democrats up and down the ballot. we're not an investigative unit. with that said, "the new york times" also leaves out that joe biden has been vetted. barack obama had attorneys that did a thorough vetting. and they did not even find a hint of an allegation involving this or any allegation. and so barack obama picked joe biden as his vice president because he trusted him. because he had been vetted. because he has been a champion in our party. and that is exactly why he picked him. >> so so sochi, would you support an inchoiry trying to chronicle everything in the papers that are boubds for the university of delaware, the senate position papers and the like of the former vice president just not being done by the dnc? >> well, i think there are a few things that need to be looked at here. first of all, when it comes to the university of delaware, and i think a

i'm a republican, it would be good to have us have the dnc in terms of economic impact. door is open, we want to have a conversation whether it is are in c, dnc or whatever because it would be good for the people of florida. >> reporter: the rnc is determined to host this convention and hired a doctor to guide their health decisions. this will mean attendance of 20,500 million and thousands of journalists and visitors. jillian: thanks, we will continue to follow it. the stock market surging as americans get back to work. todd: states prepare to ease more restrictions. jillian: a and rafferty joins us with the message. >> reporter: donald from celebrating an economic comeback. businesses around the country once again welcoming customers back inside, without responding by hitting 25,000 of 530 points. >> a big day, substantially over the last 6 months. we had a very big day. people are seeing what is happening, they are seeing there is pent-up demand and you're going to see it more and more, we, the transition to greatness. >> reporter: stock market futures trending upward

my current dissertation is about the institutional history of the dnc and unlike the representation of african americans, in the national deck met crowded party, it is not until the 1970s where you even have conversations within the organization to think about hiring some sort of latino outreach representative it is shocking to think that it was not until the late 1970's where you have conversations about national democratic outreach to latinos. i think if we look at these kinds of national institutions, there is a serious lack in the scholarship and the basic facts of presidential elections and latinos. before then, of course, this will be my segueway into the next question, the engagement between the dnc is very touch and in other places like chicago and you have independent lead and because somewhat quasi-formal relationships with the national party fund-raising for jfk. there is some work and i think that influences my perspective on things and seeing an evolution of latinos and the national democratic party. that leads me to my next question. what are some of the key text that hav

the dnc has its office there and richard nixon wants to break in to the dnc to see if they have anything on him. nothing particular. just to see. it was a mistake. the people who burgled on his behalf are actually caught and arrested. that is the beginning of the downfall of richard nixon. thanks.

nietzsche about this whole thing, jimmy carter raised concerns about voting by mail even as the former dncand congressman from florida who raise concerns in the past, why because if there legitimate cases, is a prime example in a partisan issue, it's a local election and when he had governor murphy calling on 100% of the election had to be done by mail, tremendous problems, we are not talking about as you just heard from ohio, were not saying you can't do absentee ballots, the spring in wisconsin, my entire family, myself, my wife, my adult children, all of us voted by absentee because of the lockdown in the state, there's a set process we had to request absentee ballot, we had to show and send our photo id and all the safeguards it made sense. if you just mail it like they're talking about california and when you talk about doing it nationwide, it opens the door to ring in the next election, we certainly do not want that. liz: that's a great point about absentee nealon ballots pre-come back soon. great insight. next up, dni john ratcliffe sending chuck grassley and ron johnson the new dee

how much you have been following what will happen with the summer convention in milwaukee, but the dnc will be meeting tomorrow to look at the idea of remote voting for delegates, which means that convention in milwaukee will have a very different feel. what is your sense about what is going to happen when your party nominates joe biden in august? guest: conventions are part of our political system and so is in person voting on election day and we have already changed that to do a lot of mail in voting so i think the new norm is going to figure out -- when we do not need to be together in big groups, then we are not together in big groups. party conventions will not be what used to be where we had thousands of people, tens of thousands of people in the same room at one time. that is not going to happen. host: your colleagues in the house of representatives, working on a new round of legislation, will come from the house but may hit a brick wall in the senate. what do you want to see in the next round of legislation? the follow-up is, how do we pay for it all? guest: we need the next ro

as it relates to the dnc, we have indicators that data was expedited.e do on my congressman of utah pressed him on the point. what about the emails that everybody is so, so knowledgeable of? were there also indicators that they were prepared, but evidence that they actually were? henry then responded there is not evidence that they were actually expo treated. now, as he him admitting this is just completely bogus? i found that to be stunning, frankly. >> you have two different issues here. one, the democrats hired crowd strike. they refused to let the fbi go in and look at the server to do a proper evaluation. so that evidence is likely lost forever. but on the other side of things, remember, this is not been a big secret. we have been advising anyone who would listen that if you are a government agency, the department of defense, anybody who works for the department of defense, anybody that has personnel records, any political party, congress, russia, china, north korea, iran, every single day they are trying to get in and break into these official rec

martha maccallum joins the discussion plus reaction from the dnc. >> bill: at the list of names is nowseveral dozens of those seeking to unmask general flynn. i've been watching and listening to all the analysis here and a lot of this is instant reaction. do we take that based on what we think we know now? >> obviously the names on that list are the people that we all would have assumed, i think, would have possibly been the ones who wanted to unmask general flynn's name. during that period i think there was some concern among those obama officials about the content of the conversations that general flynn might have been having with russian ambassador kislyak. but when we go to the conversations we've had with kt mcfarland she said during that period it was perfectly natural and expected that the national security it director would be reaching out to investors of many countries to sort of open the conversation and began having discussions in that transition. and she believes that's all there was to it. she's not the only one who believes that. the fbi agents who interviewed director fl

you don't have the fbi, the cia, the dnc, the state department, the treasury department, the nsa andhe rest of it, you don't have such a full administration wide activity to destroy a candidate, destroy president-elect, and then to destroy a president, all donald trump and everybody around him without the president of the united states not only knowing about it at least in general terms even the go-ahead. the go-ahead. more when i come back. hey it's me, lily from at&t. i'm back working from home and here to help. hey lily, i'm hearing a lot about 5g. should i be getting excited? depends. are you gonna want faster speeds? i will. more reliability? oh, also yes. better response times? definitely. are you gonna be making sourdough bread? oh, is that 5g related? no, just like why is everyone making sourdough now... but yes, you're gonna want 5g. at&t is building 5g on america's best network. visit att.com to learn more. we're finally back out in our yard, but so are they. scotts turf builder triple action. it kills weeds, prevents crabgrass and feeds so grass can thrive, guaranteed. our

going on in his administration, really, law enforcement, intelligence, all that was going on with the dncillary clinton campaign. is it really believable that barack obama didn't know anything about any of this? >> it is not believable for multiple reasons what i loved about you taking us through this in the first few segments is that while you're going through this whole russia collusion hoax it is easy to get caught up in weeds when you realize okay so we know that there was no russia collusion. we also know that the people who claim that there was, knew at the time that they were saying it that it wasn't true. so what's beginning on exactly? you know we get more and more information. itit was a counterintelligence investigation thatwe really shod never have started. counterintelligence investigations should be known to the president. they exist so that the the president can know about threats to the country. so it was never believable he didn't know about and a lot of evidence that he did including text from lisa paige i believe to peter strzok saying that president wants to know every

mark alea's december 2017, by the way, a political law firm that funneled the money from the dnc andet opposition o research. your question, your reaction is this, media leaks were totally damaging here. the democrats did not deal, you know, of b course they will leak to help their own side. when you see adam schiff and house intelligence sitting on a lot of information and doing selective leaking, what was your reaction when you sell all of that? >> at the time i was serving on the intel committee. jim comey was saying publicly and privately we have not found anything to confirm the steele dossier. we are stillti looking. the fbi stated that spot. they would not say, hey, we have debunked it. they said we are still confirmingwe it, which, to this day, no evidence the fbi was actually working too confirm ths and getr it resolved one way or the other to get to a decision. as long as they left the steele dossier sitting out there, they some assumptions. the farther they went on it the more they knew this was all rumor, all innuendo, russian misinformation against president trump. just