okay, do it. how do i do it? what do you mean, how do you do it? i thought this was like a, you know, a movie. how do you do it? i don't know, how do you do it? well, he said, i don't have access. and it finally dawned on me and i said, you don't have power of attorney and they're not recognizing you. he said, even if i did, i don't know where the papers are. and it just shocked me, i mean, here everything that i do in life, all of my documents, all of my document locator, my letter of instruction, this is it and one of my best friends doesn't even have it. the shoemakers kid doesn't have shoes. that is not what i set out to do. this is not what i wanted to do in life. you go get the power of attorney and you make sure you have the right people on as your power of attorney so if that were to happen, somebody can get into the financials, someone can pay for that man to get back to the states, someone can say yes or no to an operation, someone can get into the finances and still implement your alpha system. and you're thinking, well, how are they gonn

do the permit or not? >> most often, i find it to be the former. the latter does come up. people do considerate. usually, it is whether you will go back and permit something that was done illegally. >> that is really tricky. it has a lot to do with the expectation of the amount of money they will get for the property. you have to disclose, disclose, disclose in that case. it has happened to me before. it is mainly because you cannot see what is behind the walls. you can tell that to buyers and sellers. buyers should be concerned about what the electrical looks like, where the plumbing is, what is happening to something that has not been permitted. it could be just fine. owners will tell you that i had my uncle joe do with and he is a plumber and electrician, but we did not want to spend the time and money to do the permit process. that is fine, but it is hard to convince a buyer. it will have an affect on the value, no question. if they want to go to the process, great. i have had sellers require them to go through for a second bath for something that was not permit it. everything was done proper

tavis: best way to do it. me out of the blocks very fast and everybody talking about steel magnolia. meghan and josh make up a real-life couple. i'm glad somebody convinced you to do this. it's working out. called steel magnolia. congratulations already on what is going to be a great career. >> thanks for having us. tavis: that's our show for us. good night from l.a. thanks for watching. and as always, keep the faith. captioned by the national captioning institute --www.ncicap.org-- >> for more information on project. that's next time. we'll see you then. >> all i know his name is james and needs extra help with his reading. >> i'm james. >> yes. >> everyone making a difference? >> thank you. >> you help us all live better. >> nationwide insurance supports tavis smiley with every question and every answer. nationwide insurance is working to improve financial literacy and remove obstacles to financial empowerment one step at a time sm nationwide is on your side. >> and by contributions from your pbs station from

shut off utilities if it's safe to do it. you report it. we can cordon off the area just to make sure nobody else goes in the area. definitely tell the fire chief or whoever and we can go in there and try to do it safely. when we talk about search and rescue, i really want to make a distinction between searching and rescuing. searching is really basically looking for people; right? once we find a person we switch modes and go into this rescue mode. when we talk about search and rescue, try not to get it too mixed up because you think dfrpbtly based on what you are doing. if you are searching, you think about certain things and if you are rescuing somebody, you think about other things. the first rule, of course, would be do not become a victim yourself. whenever you do a search, you have to preplan. you have to understand who is doing what. we suggest that you work in two teams of at least two people, so that's at least four people doing a search at the very, very, very least. you want a team on the outside and a team on the inside. proper

just watching those videos, i was like, i gotta do it. i want to do it. ing them makes me want to work out and i want to go... [roars but when i first started, i couldn't do nothing. p90x, they laid it out for me and made it very simple. here's an analogy: it's like how to work a computer for dummies. all you have to do is push "play," follow the nutrition guides, and you're good. >> tony: three... oh, that's working it. three, four, five... 31, 32... [glass shatter >> anthony: after the 90 days i went to the gym. while most of the people were just focusing on, like, benching, and that's all they're doing, and squats, i was focusing everything that i've learned in p90x. i get comments, "man, i need to work my way up to where you're at." i was, like, well, you don't need to go to the gym all the time, you know? i use p90x... bring it. [♪.. sometimes i go in the bathroom and brush my teeth, i'm like... [chuckle >> hey, guys, this is demi and i wanted to talk to you about my experience with p90x. [♪.. i had my first child in, um, 2002 and i was in the marine

it's not something you do everyday. it's not like you come home from work and say "hey, hohn, let's go to...". >> rose: (laughs right. >> and as an art form i think it's absolutely as legitimate as say, an on what. or in some cases it's more popular, like going to see "wicked" on broadway. i don't want to see "wicked" every night, either. but it's an amazing piece of art. so... and i draw a distinction between that versus food you eat all the time. i eat lots of food. i eat lots of ethnic foods. so i'm never going to only eat that food but i do appreciate it as fine art. >> rose: can you find in the most cities? >> no. >> rose: that's the point. >> no, most cities don't have a rest like like this in part because how do you learn? unless you are an apprentice at the fat duck or half a dozen other restaurants around the world you won't learn these techniques. >> rose: does it have a restaurant in seattle that does this? >> there's some restaurants that are starting with the techniques but no. >> rose: why haven't you done

we know we cannot do it without doing a really good job. chair chu: and one last issue, the tax. into what area? >> it is inc. -- well, it would be part of the federal and state dollars. you are talking about the new fee that came from the cta, i can check on that for you. chair chu: it is very little. >> yes, it is only around $2.50 million per year, $2 million. but let me double check. so if we go to the next slide, we talk about some of the revenue constraints and the bond program. et we made a commitment when we first plaque -- passed the capital plan. chair chu: if we do not commit, where does our score fall by the year -- in 10 years? >> i believe it is indy -- in the fifties. we are currently at 64. when there was the working group reports, when you get below 60, you are in a dangerous area. there is a bit of a tipping point, where future costs become dramatically more. now, you are not able to do a top coat. you have to go into all of the streets and start from the ground up, so -- chair chu: thank you. >> this shows the proposal that the capital planners are working on. o

[laughter] >> but you kinda do it year around. >> absolutely. us out of trouble, huell. >> boy, look at this. and you just-- you have to do this and this is basically the old-fashion way, up one row and down another, this just goes on and on and on. >> that's perpetual motion. we do have big harvesters over there, that we've made vacuum shakers and all that, but it's just so noisy and so dirty-- it's much nicer this way. >> yeah, this is the way-- >> it gives 100% recovery. >> yeah, this is the way they used to do it. when i say, they used to do it, how long have they been harvesting jojoba? >> for as long as it's been alive, i believe. >> thousands of years. >> i believe so. we know the native americans, they used it to make bread, they used the oil for their hair. they made coffee with the meal after they pressed it, and they also would take jojoba seed, which contains simmondsin, which is an appetite suppressant so when they went from blythe to coachella, they would eat these seeds, because on the 100-mile trek, instead take food that would--

that, right now it's a whole lot of -- and we're doing it, it's in the testimony, well, we're doing this to improve it -- but there's none of this, here's where the failure occurred or senior management accountability. well, if you require the agencies to certify that they're effectively using it consistent with the requirements and the regulations, then at least you can evaluate the process that they're using. but if as you see in the chart there you get all those zeros or less than so %, you've -- 10%, you've got nothing to evaluate. so it would seem to me if you implemented that, you could turn to the head of agencies in forums like this and say, what's going on? and it seems to me then there would be a scrambling on the side of the government to get this done the way we all would like to. is anybody up there disagreeing with what i've said so far? okay, now let me get to a point that's sort of near and dear to me that i wanted to bring up which is the cost of these corrective action plans and the suspension and debarment work too. many of these contractors tha

it's create the room for something else to come along and go. you can do this. but you know i think everybody starts with a no don't thing but i did it for long i think i worked on mill for like i know that on the hansard for instance and that was eighty five who works with you for maybe. it's really you know yes eighty four. so i was eighty four so i was forty years old and i've done like thirty movie forty movies and i've been saying i don't like is i don't like this i don't like this i don't like this this is not that world there's a thought that character this is not a good director ever i was like a dog for forty years. and i was fighting everything and my so you know and it's not fair and the unfair to fight yourself that was but so i turned around a little bit funny you know when i was so the minutes or i decided to work in a different way. i don't know why i just got tired of. well according to your biography you've been saying no since childhood yeah i was in it's a natural but that's a teenager instinct i mean everybody says no for like ten years or sev

if you don't do it, then you do not have the power to do it because someone else will do it, and it's one thing for the u.s. economy or influence to sort of shrink. it's another thing for the president to draw draw attention to that fact and consciously say it's shrinking because then it will. shrink anymore. if you ab abrogate that role th, fine, you've lost it. it will be hard to get back. so all these things going on in the world right now are a consequence at some level of this drawing back. and you saw the same thing in the 1970s. it was very bad. and the only good thing i can say is so far the mistakes of the administration haven't resulted in something that is just profoundly negative for us. there's just a lot of potentials for really bad things. but they may come. and, you know, the next two years are going to be interesting. >> doctor, what about china? are they destined to be a strategic adversary, or is the prosperity they're enjoying, is that going to create an opportunity for the rule of law and self-determination to kind of spread in that large country? >> well, we saw

thirty-two can do. it's a three part rule. thirty, first part and 30 is respiration and it's the amount respirations per minute and if someone is breathing faster tha 30 times per minutes and it's about a breath every two second and if i breathe like this. that's about faster than 30 right? and if you have a patient breathing 30 seconds and they fail and tag them red and you move on. if someone is breathing normal than you go to the next rule. they pass and if go to the next rule. thirty-two is blood -- also ca called capillary refill and the blarch test and capillary refil and look ata palm of your hand or fingertips and the nail beds are usually pink and if you squeeze and do it on yourself right now and squeeze your finger and it turns right and when you let go the pink return and i hope everybody in the roo i hope the pink returns in two seconds and if the pink comes back in two seconds you pass an if it takes longer you fail and you tag red and move on to the next patient and we have two rules. thirty and breathing faster

do not think so. american people get it. we can do this. this is not impossible. leadership at this time is most precious and in short supply. it seems to me when confusion, uncertainty, short times, even fear abound that good leadership like your report should call us to return to the tried and true, first principles. we are a vigorous, healthy people. we can accept the truth and get on with fixing problems. the people know that the blast folks in washington at the right road will be difficult but it will lead to prosperity and progress and preserve our heritage of freedom and limited government. the current road leads to debt and the decline. we have to start telling the truth. the truth is that this budget we have been presented does not live within our means but doubles the entire gross debt of the united states from $ 13 trillion. it assumes no recession, low interest rates, and no new war or military conflict. it cannot stand -- it will not stand. for the time and effort you have given this cause, we are much obliged. you have worked hard giving a clear pictu

do it. that will change your life. do it. ] >> dalai lama: the genuine sort of compassion practitioner. i didn't have some kind of self, i think more self confidence and, and something very open. >> t. harv eker: so the enlightened warrior is one who conquers oneself for the purpose of serving others. >> john assaraf: if you line up your values with the right beliefs, then you can have it your values with the right beliefs, then you can have it all. [ ♪ ] >> john assaraf: well it's time that we use new technology for ourselves and our new understanding of how powerful we are, how we can manifest and how to do it is by retraining your brain to believe something different that you didn't believe before. >> john assaraf: we have to train our brain to see a new reality that we've never seen before and that just takes a little bit of time. it takes faith, the absence of fact. >> stephen covey: i love the statement from george bernard shaw. he said... "this is the true joy in life, being used for a purpose known to yourself as a mig

i have been doing it 15 years. i have figured out how to juggle it, how to plan to make it work out. >> you are at dinner with your three kids. you are talking about the world. what are the basic things you want them to know about this live? >> my biggest thing is i want them to be good people. i do not push them to news. i want them to be centered, focused, and good human beings, good citizens of the city, the country, and the world. i want them to be open to opportunities and challenges. i feel if i can interview them with those basic skills -- if i can give them those basic skills, the rest will fall in place. >> what is their reaction to having a dad is published in the "new york times"? >> they are not faced or impressed by it. in some cases they are irritated by it. sometimes i cannot take them to school because i have a television appearance. they will go sit in the greenroom have to get up an hour and a half earlier. they are not impressed. i had in turn at the new york times. they said that they could hire

commissioner: ok, so it is hard to do when economists -- when it is wet. much clearer. >> another is about an employee be hired back in 2009, so i thought i would bring it to you. the newspaper does not typically give the full story. i am sure most of you recall. so i wanted to walk for the process of hiring, reform, and the speculation for reasons why he would apply. in 2009, he called to ask if there was work that we thought he would be eligible to do at the puc for a short amount of time, we checked wham.com and there was something. -- and we checked around, and there was something. we told him to apply for that position. just for you to know, we have had to go back and look, and we have hired about 70 people at the puc that would have project worked anywhere from two weeks to two years. usually, the process for hiring someone to do this temp work is fairly simple.we wanted to makes properly and efficiently done for him. what that means is he applied for what is called a registry. a utility specialist. they have to put in a resume, make sure they are qu

we do not like to run sitcoms. it's a network where we try to do something different. even ben stein's money was a new take on game shows. every format we did was a new take on that format. this was brand-new in its format, in its expression, in its politic. and it was a funny-- and it's funny. and the common denominator for us: if it's funny, it works. and it did extremely, extremely well. as we went forward with it, there were issues, sometimes about, you know, what they-- what i would let them say and what they wanted to say. and mutually, we were able to work every one of them out. we do give them a lot of latitude. i want to talk about some of those. i'm curious. in a p.c. environment, you've done spirit of christmas, and hollywood's talking about it. and it sounds like a short leap to finding a home that would embrace you. was it that easy? no; and, in fact, the biggest thing was the same kind of-- and we even questioned, the same way larry did, you know, when people were like, "we gotta make this into a show. because the short actually had the kind of language th

he said, i'm going to do it a nonviolent way. at's how he did it. >> you look at the documentaries that are aired on pbs all the time. and they're people who are talking who are cesar's friends who were saying at the time they thought, boy, you're going to start a union for farm workers? you must be crazy. can you imagine now those feelings and where they've gone and what your uncle accomplished by the images we're watching hire on the screen? it's pretty incredible, the trajectory that cesar went through. >> a lot of people didn't believe in him when he started. now those people are the ones praising him. he just didn't let any of that get in his way. he had a vision of what he was going to do. he was very determined. and nobody could stop him. >> that's pretty amazing. rudy, this is the busy time of year for the family. talk about when the business starts. probably ends on march 31st. >> you're right, the whole month of march is really busy. because the chavez family vision coordinateth with the caesar chavez foundation. we get

. >> if they pass laws, they will have to do it but fundamentally they can be some really serious cutbacks throughout this country which will damage our future because the federal government and the state governments are not doing what they should do and that is investing in the things that really matter rather than wasting money and spending money where it is popular. and the greatest example -- tom friedman, one of them, we spend 40% of our money on seniors and 10% on our youth. if you think bit for the future, it should be much more balanced. >> we see in our various state governments and we looked at what goes on in washington. we could never get away with some of the stuff that goes on in those other places. you either filled the pothole or you didn't. you either had hat swimming pool open or you didn't. someone responded to 9/11 or you did not. i never have to wonder what's on philadelphia's mind. >> we're dealing with a system that was set up 50 or 60 years ago when life expectancy was probably about 65 years. people worked until they were 62. there was a very short time in between

wanted to close the loophole and raise it up to seventy four percent he actually actually he didn't do it it was l.b.j. as you know it happened a year after kennedy died it was so it was johnson who lowered their tax rate but he raised taxes on the rich and increased revenues. you raise taxes on the rich you raise the raise the amount of money that was collected from the rich that's right by lowering the marginal tax rates he write more red losing the loopholes so you what you're saying is by lowering tax rates the government gets more revenue or you know i'm not going to recognize our loopholes if you look at what reagan did reagan lower tax rates or created such a disaster that he had to eleven times raise taxes on working people in order to make up for the disastrous drop of taxes on millionaires and billionaires again and on top of that he ran up a three trillion dollars trip that i guess i'm just curious i am trying to understand what you think it's ok for the government to have ninety percent of our money but not a billionaire to have money that they made through their own governmen

now the gentleman from alabama said yesteay that it was obama that made him do it. rather implausibly he argued that he was compelled to fllow this recommendation of the obama administration to send $150 billion -- $150 million a year to brazilian cotton farmers for four years because the president told him to do it. well, that's a very selective invocation of the president. i must say no more persuasive than flip wilson having innoked the devil as having made him -- invoked the devil as having him made him do it. $150illion -- the argument by the way was that weave to send $150 million to the cotton farmers because otherwise we would be in trouble with the world trade organization. but we could have saved that $150 million to the brazilians by not sending $150 million to american cotton farmers. that would include american cotton farmers who get more than $250,000 a year.

other people do. >> it is not like we were sitting here saying let's rip on mormon, how should we do it let's start writing some songs. it really was for me, growing up with musicals, i loved the classics, all the roger and hammerstein stuff. and so it really was can we make a really solid traditional musical and in the same way that they would use a group from oklahoma. now we are chalking being chinese americans, no let's do a really traditional musical but with mormons. >> rose: and katherine deneuve about her new thing potiche. >> the actresses, they want to have in the film or they want to say, you know, get through the actors, that's how it works. and it's the first important decision they have, if they are right, of course, it is to the choice of the actors. because in the end, on the screen that is what you look at and that is what you har and the emotion you can get or the pleasure you can have, you know, is always -- >> matt stone, trey parker and katherine deneuve when we -- catherine deneuve when we continue. >> funding for charlie rose was provided by the following: who b

you think about it? do you want to take it to another step when you have time or-- >> well, the first thing i have to say is when i first told my internist, my general practitioner here, he looked at me-- this is in new york-- and he said, "i hope you're under therapy," he said. and i had to disappoint him i wasn't under therapy. but anyway -- >> that drives me crazy to hear somebody say something like that. >> he was being supportive, he was being supportive. >> rose: as if somehow you couldn't handle this without therapy. >> well, some people maybe it would be difficult. i've not found it difficult. i was brought up by loving parents. it wasn't the problem. i'm very curious about it. one day i wouldn't mind doing something if it doesn't happen before. >> rose: how do your grandchildren feel about it-- your children. >> and my sibling. i've now acquired my nieces and nephews. i thought for a day or two that i should let them know, and then i thought i'm writing off for my birth certificate and we'll send i

that is one way to do it. the other way is to give it to public safety and then go to the other option where we get it. we then become the paid for on building of the public safety network. we support whatever congress will do to make sure that there is interoperability when it comes to public safety issues. that said, we are concerned that there is a rasush without a current -- thorough inventory of what is out there. we seek a world of broadband and broadcast. some see a world where broadcast goes away. we think that is a huge mistake. i am not sure i know how the internet and wifi would do all for the american people that broadcasting does for the american people. it does many wonderful things, but it does not do broadcasting. >> is there too much focus on wireless in the country today? >> it is the cool thing right now. it is hip. i love the internet and my mobile devices. i want to be able to watch live television on my mobile devices, too. when my wife says we have to meet someone at a restaurant and i am

it is very difficult. i do know it slopes on two accesses, one downhill and one sideways so it's like a mystery house. i'm not going to try to play architect but file like you have a lot going on here trying to squeeze it into one site. so i'm not sure how we want to move forward. trying to do an awful lot on a very nice site, but a tight one. president olague: commissioner sugaya? commissioner sugaya: i would like to agree with fellow commissioner's comments. i think it's a little bit overscaled compared to the other buildings in the neighborhood. one of the factors i think in the neighborhood that had some diversity, if want to call it that, on this side they're almost all flat-roofed. i think they're one story over garage, maybe two. across the street you have similar maybe size but because of the gable, you gain some height. and i don't know if you can play with the design in some way in that manner to make an appearance of the building less bulky and -- and i don't know about -- i'm not so opposed to tryin

i can't always do it, but i can do it with this one. >> rose: in this kind of story, is the playwright's genius not in terms of the story-- because you knew the story-- the playwright's genius is the language. >> it occurred to me that, yeah, they did this and this is the way they would talk. i don't know... >> rose: but it was because you had an ear. >> yeah, i got a good ear and i'm southern and i can remember all that stuff. and all the yassums which look scary on the paper to a lot of people. but james earl says yassum about 50 times or more. >> you have said that this play leeches out racism. >> it leeches out more than just the act of hatred between people. i was raised by a grandmother who hated white people more than anythingers ever hated black people. she also hated indians because she was part indian, cherokee choctaw tow. she hated black people for allowing it to happen. she had a lot of people she didn't like and she begged and begged us and said to us children and grandchildren that bigotry. and i had to unlearn it when i got going to school up north in michigan. and that w

but just let us do it. she will not let us do it. the dormers we might have to remove -- we know it was built 25 years ago because she attracted and states it was 25 years ago. i did not even live in america 25 years ago. if i knew then what i knew now, i would not have touched the house with a barge pole. i naively saw the house next door, an identical house with a third floor addition. why was i to assume that i with -- that the same criteria would not apply to my house? when i assume as a homeowner -- every other house on our block has in addition. the historic house next door to us. why would i assume my home would be any different? the only reason is different is because ms. wuerfel chooses it is different. i will do anything you tell me to do. i want a roof over my children's heads. i no longer want an extension. i would move out of that house tomorrow, but nobody would buy that house. nobody would touch it because of this history. we did move out. we moved back in because we had no choice. money does not grow on trees. the cann

it was either let's just do it or let it fester. i was ordering business cards, and i realize, as you did, they were incredibly costly. so, why are we ordering business cards like this when we have the production bureau which our city employees -- which are city employes to do it. that brings us back to something that no one has ever done. could we not do it all? it was either say, and not done, make it go away, it was a long time subject of discussion at the puc. commissioner courtney: i just saw this as a of waste of personnel and resources that we could have used to educate the public instead of working on our letterhead. [laughter] >> i was hoping the tragedy of runyon and juliet would not come into play. -- romeo and juliet would not come into play. there is also an additional effort that it takes to educate the public. commissioner courtney: my point is, that is your responsibility and that responsibility should be utilized by the staff. a lot of people do not know what we do, and rightly so. if we change the letterhead on a s

you do not want to hear it here. you do not want to bring it up. you do not want to have discussions. it is all about you just taking money out of our hides. the next issue is we have two companies, one nationwide and one small one, operating illegally as taxicabs, and i have done some research on the internet, and i asked you to get your city attorney's office involved to write letters threatening them with lawsuits or finds. you have the puc here on friday. have them involved in why they are operating illegally, taking money from cabdrivers. while we sit down and talk about it, rather than allowing less than two minutes? i appreciate your concern about wanting to use drivers as a cash cow, but taking away money from cabdrivers being able to pay you. also, you promised us a meter increase. we should do it by july 1, when the new budget takes place. because drivers need to feed their kids and their wives and themselves as well, and everything has gone up, including gas, so i urge you to please do it. and also, there is blood on your hands because th

it. right now what we gotta do is clean all this up and get it ready to reinstall.nd the rest of this is bye-bye. the rest of that is junk. anything i can help you with? just watch your fingers and just... give it a light little scrub? you're just taking all the dirt, any kind of paints or anything that's on 'em. just kind of wipe 'em off. then we're gonna put a little wax on top of it after you're done. now what i have to do is, have to align this all up. now, these have little notches in 'em. see the notch? mm-hmm. so you know that's how far you go back? that's how far you're gonna go, take it up to the bore. you have these little line-up holes that'll tell ya-- like right here, right there-- that helps tell you where it goes. now we're gonna put these little backer washers on 'em. grab the handles... now squeeze. keep going. there you go. one more time. you just want to make sure everything's lined up. the next thing we're gonna do is attach all this. we start with the middle? yeah, you start in the middle, and then you work your way out. looks good. all right. l

the gentleman criticized us for doing it. we should have been criticized, but let me tell my friend when he didn't mention, one of the reasons we did it, can i have an additional minute? the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for one additional minute. mr. hoyer: we could not get 60 votes in the united states senate. in order to move a bill forward. keeping our government running is vital to our economy. none of us should want to shut down the government. it is also vital to the millions who rely on government every day , the sooner we can agree on a long-term package of smart cuts, not reckless, arbitrary job-destroying cut, the sooner we can stop funding the government in disruptive two-week incements. the gentleman was correct, we ought not to do that. we need to pass a seven-month funding so the government and all who rely on the government, who work for the government, who have contracts with the government, can rely on some certainty. you've talked a lot about certainty on your side of the aisle. you're abs

but i'm doing it anyway but it's not based in a city necessarily. putting this school filmmakers on the internet and i am dreaming about shooting films through the. shooting them through the and that would be fantastic. i'm going to shoot a short film this year and i will add it to the internet so you know it's like a conference but editing. a video conference but editing what do you mean just look at the added look at an added together with a co-director and look at the go and then you know say we talk about the you know differences and what you feel is wrong. this is the future we can sit in in the in new york and we can edit it and we can shoot movies and we can you know do all kinds of things was this the reason why you were going to open that film school in russia i wanted to see if there was a i wanted to see i'm looking for links but the link is nothing a link is a link but if if there's a connection that becomes real then i can work with it i'm hoping to do a workshop in poland because they are ready to take me or in denmark one of the two t

i do it at night. nd then all of a sudden though, like an hour later i have the longest, straightest hair down to here. i look like rick ocasek. [ laughter ] so, i'm down to here. and i'm like "oh, my god, i look cool. i've got straight hair." i go the next day to school and everybody's like, "what happened? why is your hair --" and i was too ashamed to say i did it. i kept saying, "nothing. [ laughter ] nothing." they were like, "you didn't do anything?" i said, "no, i just combed it." >> jimmy: you stuck to your lie? >> i stuck to the lie. >> jimmy: i hate doing that. i stuck to my lie once. i remember, i lied to my grandma. do you remember sun-in? >> yes, yes. >> jimmy: my sister had sun-in, and i used it in my hair. and, my hair turned orange, you know. my grandma said, "are you dying your hair?" and i go, "no, what are you talking about? i'm not dying my hair." [ laughter ] she goes, "you're dying your hair. your hair is --" i go, "this is just -- must be the pool or something." i don't know why i

do not think so. american people get it. we can do this. this is not impossible. leadership at this time is most precious and in short supply. it seems to me when confusion, uncertainty, short times, even fear abound that good leership like your report should call us to return to the tried and true, first principles. we are a vigorous, healthy people. we can accept the truth and get on with fixing problems. the people know that the blast folks in washington at the right road will be difficult but it will lead to prosperity and progress and preserve our heritage of freedom and limited government. the current road leads to debt and the decline. we have to start telling the truth. the truth is that this budget we have been presented does not live within our means but doubles the entire gross debt of the united states from $ 13 trillion. it assumes no recession, low interest rates, and no new war or military conflict. it cannot stand -- it will not stand. for the time and effort you have given this cause, we are much obliged. you have worked hard giving a clear picture

that it would be beneath them to publicize what they do and how they do it. the only reason i am here -- i even pounded the table. i would like the public defender's office to do a better job publicizing their work. i agree with jamie, the pendulum is swinging back. i was just in new york where the new shows are presented to advertisers. there are several that our defense-based shows. -- are the fenced-based shows. i think -- are defense-based shows. i think you are right. >> that is in large part the innocence movement, proving to injuries that they have gotten it wrong time and time again. this innocence project is based in new york. 300 individuals exonerated on dna evidence. people are starting to wake up to the important role of criminal defense attorneys, but jonathan is right. that court tv, we cover cases where public defenders and criminal defense attorneys are in court. we do not choose the cases based on either or. we see fine lawyer ring from both. often, the best lawyers a vcr from the public defender's office. they do not know the difference. >,7

it better from within. that is what i have been trying to do for some years. and i know that the awardees tonight are not so much about new programs. they are about retooling and about making government more efficient and better, so that it was not any longer about making people move out and get away so that you could shine as a department head or a division manager or program leader. it is more about how you got other people involved in what you are doing, about how an idea and how a better idea can get more people to rally around it and move on their roles in implementing a better government. that is why i have been increasing this program for so many years and -- embracing this program for so many years and really thanks for for the effort you have put into it. -- really thank spur for the efforts you have put into it. i want to thank michael for introducing me but also for agreeing -- for being a great sponsor. and for chris, for sponsoring this event of being a big sponsor of this effort for many years. i also want to thank all the departments i have had a

that's what it is supposed to do. that's not what it's doing. one third of americans have no savings of any kind. one quarter of all mortgages are under water and one fifth of all wealth was wiped out in the great crash. you cannot run an expansionist neo conservative foreign policy given that financial reality. why i came back to talk about eisenhower is he would have instinctively understood that that was our priority. that must be our priority, getting our house in order. i'm not calling on us to do nothing. i'm calling on us to make choices. even abroad, it reminds me of ex-girlfriends i have a love for, even from a distance. brian: people watching about now are saying you know, this guy's abandoned the united states, he's living over in germany. he's got all the answers, why should i listen to john hulsman? >> and i'd say because i put my money where my mouth was. it would have been very easy for me to be a think tank for me to be a think tank person who went along with the crowd when bush was at 85% and said nothing. or quietry voice even