we're looking at british colonies apply british doctrine french colonies upright french doctrine. these doctrines don't work most of them come from world war 2 they've never been updated revaluated and besides doctrine is related to the training which you operating in doctrine tells you how to do things it does not dictate what you should do in other words doctrine will tell you that if you need to go and drink a glass of water you get up you walk to the cupboard you take a glass you fill it up with water and you drink it doesn't tell you which route to take it doesn't tell you which class to take it doesn't tell you which tap to take your water from that just an example of doctrine so we have this mess of mismatch of doctrine versus the terrain versus the enemy or the threat. and these templates that are being super imposed on africa are failing wherever they're trying to be superimposed on. i know of no great success which tells me that there is something very very wrong with the doctrine. last summer there was a frenzy recruitment in pretoria. by men who posed as a representati

the trump doctrine reminds me of the reagan doctrine with a trump overlay.t do you think about that? >> that's well said. the obama doctrine was a bad overcorrection to what happened in the bush years. we badly harmed our military and hollowed it out. and turned the other comeek con -- turned the other cheek consistently. donald trump came into office and said we are not going to turn countries into a western european parliamentary government. he enforced barac barack obama'd line in syria. the red line has been if you harm an american you will suffer consequences. when quassem soleimani killed an american he did just that. it's like what reagan did in iran. question a u.s. navy vessel was struck by an iranian mine, that was after three years of iran mining those waters. reagan practiced restraint and forbearance. he had the threat of the soviet union to consider as well. but even if you look at the threats the soviet union posed during the cold war, i think china poses a greater threat in the 21st century. he has done a lot to bring along people in my party

the trump doctrine reminds me of the reagan doctrine with a trump overlay.hink everybody is missing this. >> i think that's pretty well said, mark. the obama doctrine was a bad overcorrection to what happened in the bush years. we badly harmed our military and hollowed it out in many ways and turned the other cheek consistently. even when barack obama promised a red line he wouldn't even 40s. donald trump came into office and said we are not going to turn them into western democracies. his red line in iran has been very clear for the last several months. if you harm scene american you will suffer severe consequences. when qassem soleimani's proxied killed an mayor can, he did. in 1988 when the u.s. navy vessel was struck by an iranian mine. ronald reagan' ask practiced restraint and forbearance at the time. he had the threat of the soviet union to consider as well. f even if you look at the threats the soviet union posed during the cold war, i think china poses a similar threat. and donald trump has done a lot to deal with that threat. he has done a lot to b

we use to have the monroe doctrine, truman doctrine and now we have the trump doctrine. in which the leader of the free world, commander-in-chief of the greatest fighting force ever assembled get manipulated again and again by dictators of hostile regimes. s we've already seen it too many times since he was sworn into office. we seen it played out on the streets of venezuela in the deserts of northeast syria and we seen them get manipulated by pyongyang despots as our allies laughed, literally laughed, at him behind his back. all these dictators and hostile regimes no they are realizing the sameto thing that the president of the united states is easy to control as a toddler. thump your chest, issue schoolyard threats and you've got him.im he will fall for it every time. he will do your bidding as if it is your own. i wish this weren't true but my diaper wearing 20 month old daughter has better impulse control than this president. kids in school cafeterias note not to look up when someone tells them they are gullible is written on the ceiling but i'm pretty sure donald tr

doctrines developed judicial deference.e statute that give them power and what was at issue this year, agencies reinterpreting their own past regulations. now, the court by a vote of 5 to 4 did not throw out that doctrine. but the majority, the liberals plus john roberts tried to tighten the standards and said we will only defer to agencies in this context when they actually show expertise, when they're acting as economists or scientists, not simply as lawyers. when the issue is truly -- when the regulation is ambiguous. certain other considerations really tightening the scrutiny. we'll see what happens in the lower courts in the next 5 to 10 years. gorsuch with the lead blistering this time concurrence because they threw out the lower court decision anyway, but dissent in all but name saying yeah, we ought to throw out this doctrine altogether. we'll see what happens. there's an appetite on the court for reigning in agencies both in terms of judges pushing back on them, and forcing congress to be more specific and narrower

the rogue nation doctrine emerged. we were going to go after countries that we believed were led by rogue dictators that would threaten international peace and stability. since 9/11, we have engaged in those things, in some cases because we believed our safety was threatened, and in other cases because we were trying to promote our values. think of libya. libya is a place where we violated libyan sovereignty stenciling to protect people in the eastern portion of the country. that led to a regime change war. libya is a basket case. in. have flowed efforts-intentioned were undermined. the spirit of this system was valuable because it understood that things could get out of control if states were going to intervene in the affairs of other states. we have seen this in syria and iraq. currently 800 u.s. military bases in more than 70 countries and territories around the world at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars a year. what would you propose? what makes us safe? guest: a lot of those are necessary. we need to have

david: you invented something that became known as the powell doctrine. powell: not quite. it was invented by a "washington post" reporter, who came to see me one day, and he said, "i'm writing an article about the powell doctrine." i said, "great. what is it?" [scattered laughter] he sai "what you always say "and what you did when we invaded panama and took out manuel noriega"--one, make sure you go to war after all diplomatic and political possibilities have been dealt with, and there s to be a clear political objective, not just a military objective; anhethen the second part ofowell doctrine is i used overwhelming force once, but what i've ways said is decisive force, so that people don't think you have to sort of have a gazillion people, just have what you need ave a decisive outcome. david: you get the order from the president to kick saddam hussein and his troops out. a diplomatic solution, i received the order and i gave the order to norm and we were ready. david: so there was a famous military maneuver. rather thagoing directly toward the emy is you kind of went aro

the only basis for appellate jurisdiction is the collateral order doctrine. i have two points, first -- >> i think you're taking away the assumption i asked to you make but maybe you're not. go ahead. >> no i'm not, so even assuming that the notice of appeal was effective, still the basis for jurisdiction is the collateral order doctrine. that's the only basis. what this court said, so the supreme court has addressed this in several ways. in sinken and tennessee doe, both quote sinco, the courts have wide leeway in choosing among threshold realms for disposing of a case. so there's no reason, and this court, in several cases -- >> is it immunity -- immunity which is usually raised under rule 12 b 6 and it is an affirmative defense, which could be waved, does that get precedence over a jurisdictional issue which goes to the power of the court to act? and steelco, i thought suggested that we couldn't assume our that we here was a sume our question of that power. we had to resolve that first. and so it seems to me this is not threshold jurisdictional issues, whe

and also somebody mentioned about the trump doctrine.i would've thought like many truck voters that the trump doctrine would have been one of kind of like a coil or snake words all or most of the u.s. assets, including troops, civilians, and intel assets come home. until we are facing a domestic threat from abroad. and then we put all of our efforts together like a snake andd we strike to get rid of or to solve that particular issue. i would think that would've been the trump doctrine and i would like to see mr. ruger could comment on that? >> guest: i like the imagery, on the navy uniform we are allowed to wear the navy jacket which is a snake that says don't tread on me, right? so that idea of being kind of strong and powerful but really kind of careful until you actually have to strike is something that rings true to me. this is the realism and restraint is a grand strategy to the approach that we have been using for the last 30 years, and i think that is kind of a hallmark of it. be strong, keep an eye on the world, hit where you nee

which is i am so glad you laid out a trump doctrine in iran that doesn't require boots on the ground. kill the terrorists and bring our troops home. >> sean: 100%. we have the military capability of to do it. coming up disturbing allegations about zero experience hunter biden and sleepy joe not getting a billion dollars.

i think i was advancing an america first trump doctrine.ut this is more important than any one president. i don't think any president should have the ability to commit our troops tonedless wars. and i think it was resolved by washington in 171. i'm total -- in 1791. we see that we don't have to engage in a forever war to win in the middle east. president trump has proven by enhancing america's economy, we strengthen the tools in our arsenal to engage in check wars. the iranian re ijams crumbling under the maximum pressure campaign. but i think making our country stronger and making sure we don't let any president in the future making the mistake of the obama doctrine. steve: you were pretty much the star of the impeachment hearings in the house. you have that opportunity to show what a ludicrous process it was. we don't see that when it gets to the senate. they will be debating it and there will be a trial. how do you see this unfolding in the senate when it finally gets there? >> i think the president has very good counsel. and it's my ant

most right well don't forget eric holder tim geithner number 2008 they came out with the holder doctrine so about moral hazard they institutionalized moral hazard they said every time you banks commit fraud every time jamie diamond commit fraud we are going to cut those laws out of the books we're going to eliminate laws against financial fraud whenever you commit fraud oh by the way of jamie diamond by citibank or travels corp violates classical oh well we'll just get rid of glass steagall to accommodate jamie dimon because that's the eric holder doctrine that's the jimmy geithner doctor and that's the ben bernanke you doctor and that's the doctor that's a jay powell doctrine is forget all rule of law for people with a lot of cash from the fed. in terms of fighting the fed and this war with the fed and this war with economics and business cycles for example. where in this sort of benign totalitarianism is where they don't have to lock up short sellers for example remember during the financial crisis it always emerged that emerged in europe and the u.k. and the united states were going t

congress passed to the eisenhower doctrine by an overwhelming margin. , i do not asklear for anything beyond the discretion granted to dwight eisenhower in 1955 in 1957. the manner in which the resolution was obtained is insensible. unprecedented.ot [applause] >> listen to lectures in history on the go by streaming our podcast anywhere and anytime. you are watching american history tv only on c-span3. next, two historians present talks about world war ii in a program titled supremacy in the skies: allied air domination in europe. donald miller discusses the strategic bombing of germany followed by conrad crane who focuses on airpower during the d-day invasion of normandy, france. of the world war museum's annual conference. our final panel for what has been a great day and is only going to get better is "supremacy in the skies: allied air domination in europe -- europe." i feel a certain sigh of relief that i am not the only world war i guy

with the world is witnessing is a change in doctrine.bama-bush middle east, regime change doctrine was to invade and hope to persuade people that we were liberators. instead, the trump doctrine is that it is best when we strike the terrorists and then bring our troops home. i'm concerned about the additional troop deployments for the reasons you mentioned in the last segment. i'm grateful that president trump is trying to end the war in syria. he's the first president to end one of these forever was an upstart one, and we should not engage in a war with iran absent congressional approval. >> raymond: congressman, i don't remember democrats whining about the 563 drone strikes that obama ordered. in fact, president obama ordered ten times as many drone strikes as george w. bush, according to the bureau of investigative journalism. the obama administration's of the strikes complied with the externally broad authorization for military force act passed by congress after nine 9/11. congressman zeldin, why are air strikes acceptable under democ

but because i was convinced, i was persuaded of the goodness of those doctrines, i was — i was happy.elt like i was fulfilling a divine purpose, so, yeah, i was very happy. i suppose it is more about now what your parents‘ protests were, and whether it is enough to say of your parents that they are basically good people. because there comes a point, isn't there, where if good people do bad things, they're not really good people anymore. i understand what you're saying. and so this is where the epigraph of the book is this line from the great gatsby that says, "reserving judgement is a matter of infinite hope." and that is for me a posture of grace, it is the picture of grace. it's the idea of seeing people as being on a journey, and that there is hope for them to grow and evolve and change and be better, and i believe that is possible of my family. so, if you want me to say that my family are... i will absolutely say without question and without caveat that they do evil things sometimes, and that is extremely painful, to look back at my own past and know that i was doing evil things,

and we are going to move forwa forward. >> geraldo: i thought the president's doctrine was not to getvolved, martha, in the foreign entanglement. >> martha: let me explain the way i see the president's doctrine. i think it's america first, based on what he established in his campaign. he said that that was his priority. he has built up our defense capabilities paired he wants to intact dell might protect american interest abroad'. are you negating the fact that this action was taken because there were eminent attacks against american interests. >> geraldo: i have been around a long time. i'm in my 50th year. you tell me what this eminence is for an attack like this. >> lawrence: here's the deal. i don't need to. you already killed 600 soldiers, 17%. why did we decide to do a counterterrorism strike? you are saying that the president has declared war after the president said, look. he also said that i did this to prevent a war, not to start a war. the president has been consistent. there is a difference between war and out counterterrorism strike. >> geraldo: he was on our side two mon

the fairest doctrine is a judicial doctrine that was developed by the supreme court that says if you're in the military you cannot sue for something that happens to you that's incidental your military service if you military doctors amputate the wrong limb you are out of luck you cannot sue for that for that harm that's been done to you so we filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of. 16 men and women seeking to bring former secretary rumsfeld and secretary gates to justice. i heard about the lawsuit and decided to become a part of it. because i never wanted another woman to go through what i would. be a lawsuit alleges that they have overseen a system that has deprived the rape survivors of their constitutional rights specifically we allege that they deprived them of their substantive due process procedural due process equal protection and 1st amendment rights. me sick to see everybody stories. how they kind of closely tied together everybody's story somehow has a it's consistent that the military does to people like us all the things that they put in place are all pretty much inte

host: what about the last caller's concern about the monroe doctrine? guest: also be fear of autocracy. fortunately, we can vote and we can vote in meaningful elections. it is not like russia. right? well, turkey just had a meaningful election. it was kind of surprising. the would-be dictator there got rebuked, his party lost the race for the mayor of istanbul. that is a problem for dictators is that they let elections keep going, sometimes they will lose them. china is seeing this in hong kong also. recently. but yes, if they are problems out there, do something about it. you can. you can organize, you can donate money to candidates. you can vote for them in caucuses and primaries. and in elections. we have these freedoms and these opportunities and they were won for us by americans going back centuries. host: just under 20 minutes left with our guest. jeff an independent caller from logan, utah. caller: i appreciate your time. i have a quote, liberty is not a perpetual motion machine. it has to be maintained, it has to be understood, and to be upheld

they were the what is called doctrine of subpoena power. the only thing you can do as president is refuse your asset such a lot the last law been passed the law what would not or did it but executive the law is still going through the senate so how is that how did i just miss the president stop it with i've been accused of no dictatorship and muslim the you telling me you wouldn't have signed the law with that provision in it i think this you can tell me that caylee had been speculative you can't tell me why when we went we get when we get that bridge right across it would look at what are the contents of that law in what form will it be passed but you see people rushed in order to history to get to judgment you can't if we don't have one you said we submitted that that bill we did not we know nothing other than wanted submitted knew we don't micromanage the parliament building what about the protection from internet for sword and manipulations bill also carrying draconian provisions on the journalist could be in prison and who for publishi

make illegal deductions from the account what it depends what you may get a look at the illegal doctrine deductions that violated constitutional provisions it's not easy if if it does member list concessional provisions it is the little duty of parliament to take appropriate action but i don't believe that we do sponsibility the government if it cares about the people's money to mend its ways and oh of course and will but that's if you had lived that you have even belittled the loss but what i'm saying is and yes they are turned out with alfonso nominees the or lessons of a degenerate anywhere in the ward that they will be chosen balances and ali as does what we'll put out here is that the asshole regularities and then the appropriate you know i am of god plenty we didn't fall so what are you going to do in future about this i'm sure it has been iffy what are you going to do if those alligators are true and she has been taken care of but hasn't been in these been reporting and complaining about the government's attitude to the sick since 2007 well just as the un has been complaining that

we know the trump doctrine. he will sit down with anyone.e got criticized for sitting down, i will sit down with kim jong un, vladimir putin come all these bad actors. i will not bribe you but we will talk. let's see if we can talk. and we will not have boots on the ground. we do not have protracted contracts. i will be in the caliphate in syria. he will not allow the hostile regime to cross the red line. that is to attack the sovereignty and kill americans. unfortunately, iran is ruled by what is a reckless, evil, irresponsible, radical dictatorship. and on tuesday according to the intelligence, they found a passenger plane with a russian-made antiaircraft missile killing 176 human souls on board, including dozens of canadians, ukrainians and iranians. now new video has emerged showing the plane getting struck with what looks like, yep, some kind of missile before falling out of the sky. the rogue regime and iran are still denying the plane was hit with the muscle claiming the u.s. is spreading lies about the crash. according to reports fro

monro ism of the united states ally into the national security doctrine of united states and following the call of sort of bilateral foreign policy as opposed to wanting to integrate and having regional integration having more unity in south america in particular those governments and those leaders being the victim of serious attacks and the latest example is the coup in bolivia songes also an ecuadorian citizen he was given a good durian citizenship tell me about would you characterize the situation in your country today because let him or ino said you know it was nearly as being a problem for ecuador it was your government's refusal to allow the cia base in mentor bay what we've seen over the last 2 and a half years in ecuador is a very sharp uta. the government is actually governing now with all the advisers all the people who were on his presidential opponent the contender in the elections in 2017 elections has contend all these advisors over those people are the people who are in cabinet posts. what in has really done a 180 degree a youth and governing with the elites with the rig

directly part of this story so you have the obama and holder doctrine where we had to look forward not back don't prosecute these banks and in particular they let h.s.b.c. go with the crimes they kept on finding j.p. morgan never sentence anybody to prison for any of the crimes they did and here you have this nonstop thing and you know we have the situation now where all these millennialism generation z. want a billionaire tax they want to take some of this back these ill gotten this odious wealth and then you have somebody like mike bloomberg a billionaire part of this whole wall street sort of front running sort of lifestyle where they have the data 1st data so a poor and even 5 seconds gives you a huge advantage over everybody else well the billionaires enter and say don't take our money we got this fair and square you're just jealous you're envious well i think a lot of people think it's all about a rigged game and you know bernie sanders has articulated that the most even saying it's a rigged game elizabeth warren also says a rigged game rigged game rigged game and that's the big

to make illegal deductions from the account what a deposit what you made a good illegal illegal doctrine deductions that violated constitutional provisions it's not you see if a god member list concessional provision it is the little ditty of the parliament to take appropriate action but i don't believe that we do sponsibility the government if it cares about the people's money to mend its ways and oh of course and will but that's if you had lived that you have even the little of the laws but what from sins and yes they are today out of alfonso much normal is the all essence of a degenerate anywhere in the ward that it will be just ambulances and ali as does what will put it out here is that there are some regularities and then the appropriate you know i am of god plenty who did it for so what are you going to do in future about this i'm sure it has been and if he what are you going to do if those allegations are true and has been taken care of but hasn't been in these been reporting and complaining about the government's attitude to the subject since 2007 well just as the un has been co

but just -- the macro point, michael just coined the alexander doctrine. the founding fathers absolutely understood and made it very clear that one of the greatest dangers they foresaw was foreign powers interfering and influencing our elections. and for it to be called inappropriate. to be given a pass on this. that is an incredibly dangerous precedent. because it opens the door. and does anybody think seriously, by the way, that republicans would not vote to impeachment a democratic president for doing just this? and that just shows how hypocritical and how shallow and how hyperpartisan and mindless so many of the debates we're seeing are even at this high level. >> all right, john, anna, michael, thank you all very much for being with us this morning. >> be sure to tune into "smerconish" tomorrow morning at 9:00 a.m. eastern. that's after a special edition of "new day" which you should tune into at 7:00 a.m. tomorrow if you want more of this. >> an historic "new day" and historic "smerconish" tomorrow. >>> the state department has issued its most seriou

is not actually lol it is doctrine adopted by the cults but it has an operational tactical implication in terms of the matrix. for the pneumatic jack outright survival is about reaching their destination if we don't hurry will never be able to get the top of the storm we follow the mongolian herdsmen on a treacherous migration running the country for dangerous the ice and then as they strive to preserve their traditional way of life with everything sometimes luser cattle they would die of cold war because of the storm risking you don't go on al-jazeera. informed opinions the economy is actually what's keeping donald trump afloat right now and in-depth analysis of the day's headlines the protest movement is only getting stronger the more people who kill the more resilient the resistant they will become the inside story on al-jazeera i've worked it out as their anger since its launch as a principal presenter and as a correspondent with any breaking news story in the world to hear from those people who would normally not get the voices heard on the international news channel one moment i'

the doctrine joint enterprise was actually brought in over 200 years ago to stop people encouraging jews so if 2 people are judging whether it's by pistols or swords there's seconds or there to support them they can be done for joint enterprise if someone is killed so that doctrine is not actually lol it is doctrine adopted by the courts but it has an operational and tactical implication in terms of the matrix. i've worked it out as a regular since its launch as a principal presenter and as a correspondent with any breaking news story more to hear from those people who would normally not get their voices heard on the international news channel one moment i'll be very proud all was when we covered a new poll of quake 2050 a terrible not sure of the stock stuff and the story that needed to be told from the heart of the affected area to be then to tell the people story was very important at the time. more than 10 years after the global financial crisis you've taken home more than 480000000 dollars your company is now bankrupt our economy is in the state of crisis i have a very basic questio

and, you know, it's kind of the get real doctrine, in a way. now, this isn't going to happen overnight. it's going to take a long time. but i think we would be making a mistake if we just say, we're going to put it on the shelf and deal with the nuclear program and see what happens. i think we want to be doing both of those at the same time without holding the nuclear deal hostage. >> you participated in a panel in c.a.p. a few months ago, deescalation in the middle east. one of my friend was joked with me, how is that working out for you? we had someone from carnegie and someone from israel and talking about some of these that jake had mentioned in his previous about the outreach from saudi arabia, uae, oman is constantly doing outreach, which is great, i think, and important. how do you see iran responding to this, you know, this increased tension and then this outreach from some of the gulf countries? is there an opportunity to de-escalate in the region and start there first, or no? >> yeah, i think so. i mean, part of the iranian strategy s

was evidence of communist insurrection in lebanon, eisenhower asked what he termed the eisenhower doctrine that gave him the freedom to protect interests in the middle east and congress passed this by an overwhelming margin. johnson made clear without asking for the resolution that, i don't ask for anything beyond the discretion granted to 1957.ower in 1955 and so while the manner was some that -- it is itself was not unprecedented. the consequences were. i will see you next week. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2020] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] >> you can watch "lectures in history" every weekend on "american history tv". we take you inside college classrooms to learn about topics ranging from the american resolution to 9/11. that is saturday 8:00 p.m. and midnight eastern on c-span three. >> "american history tv" products are available at the new c-span online store. go to c-spanstore.org to see what is new for "american history tv" and check out all

geithner doctor and that's the ben bernanke you doctor and that's the doctor that's a jay powell doctrine is forget all rule of law for people with a lot of cash from the food. in terms of fighting the fed and this war with the fed and this war with economics and business cycles for example. where in this sort of benign totalitarianism is where they don't have to lock up short sellers for example remember during the financial crisis it always emerged that emerged in europe and the u.k. in the united states were going to ban short selling because the short sellers i.e. those taking a bet against the markets are the ones causing this well they don't even have to do that anymore they don't have to threaten to arrest anybody or ban anything or throw people in prison they do it themselves because they've been trained through years of abuse and that is nobody is short short sales and the s.p.d. are s. and p. 500 e.t.f. trust known by its ticker s.p.y. as a percentage of shares outstanding fell to 1 point one percent last tuesday that's the lowest level since january 28th seen before the event k

sun, is there arump doctrine? >> i think if you -- if you would have said 24 hours ago at the trump doctrine was it would have been end endless wars. let's get out of afghanistan and iraq and this action he has guaranteed an iranian retaliation, a war of some sorta maybe no traditional looking war and maybe something more like michael was talking about. and there is -- there are no defenders in the united states of general soleimani an no one saying avenues good guy and didn't deserve to di this way. there is concernhat presiden trump is not -- has not thought through the consequences of what's going to happen next. this is something that is going me degree shape and define the rest of his presidency. dealing with theonsequences of the action that was taken last night. robert: we heard mromichael, lisa, that senator graham when michael was down at mara-lago playing golf with the president and briefed by the president, familiar with the plans. wh about congress? democratic leaders, were they in the dark?he >>were c