year, 11% of the dod's budget. that would suggest there was a growing emphasis on my program because there is a one percentage point difference between this year and next year. that is the type of logic that i apply when i conducted this analysis. so the bottom line up front is that the report identifies several areas where budgetary winners don't seem to align with the strategy, and budgetary losers also don't seem to align with the strategy. the chart in front of you on the left-hand side is showing you four of the priorities identified as crucial by the national defense strategy. the two boxes to the right are showing you different ways of categorizing dod spending. the middle box is what is called the major force program budget, which is a way of dividing dod's budget among mission activities. the box on the right hand side is showing your investment spending, which is the dod's research and development and procurement spending combined together. this is what you should be looking at. do the priorities on the f

of funding that the dod forecasts in the future as being necessary is often larger than what dod ends up receiving. part of this is a negotiations process. steve, you mentioned the fact that dod thinks of it as, we are going to provide a budget to achieve certain outcomes. if congress does not fund what we are requesting, that is going to put congress in the position of being responsible for any negative effects that might result. i agree with that in a sense. another way to say that is, it is an attempt to displace blame for potential future negative outcomes from the department of defense to congress. there is a very important political and bureaucratic dynamic that is going on there. it is important to note that it is very hard to draw a bright the level oflving military force that will achieve objectives, and the level that will not achieve objectives. i will draw your attention to the report, in the first test i have a great quote from president eisenhower which talks about the attempts by the department of defense to put forward those kinds of redlines. they all eventually fall

porter was by name assigned as the dod lead for 5g. we are, we are developing initiatives, we had a program planned, we have put that before congress and goes before omd this coming year. we are hiring an assistant director for 5g. outsideone where others ourselves felt this was sufficiently important that it now has become a big deal for us. can you explain briefly what it is and you talk about a new initiative you will be planning for 5g, what is it you are most concerned about an flesh that out for us about the initiative. broadly speaking, we are aware that commercial initiatives in telecommunications far outstrip anything that we can do and would want to do in dod. we are struggling to become the doa on the tale of telecom's g. we have national security needs and to the extent that we can exceed the competitive environment or encourage you to grow in directions that are relative to us, we want to do that so how can we help there? use cases, when we talk about 5g, we talk about greatly increased bandwidth, greatly increased downloa

dod has cases for that but just abound. smart ports, smart airports, smart depots, smart factories, all of that, all of those things have commercial applications but also national security implications. if we can make available in our infrastructure for experimenting and prototyping environments which different competitors can work in different areas that assure their proprietary information is perfected, if we can provide and use local, regional, municipal, state permitting is not required to operate because they are operating at the dod base, all of those things can speed progress in 5g development which the development won't be led by dod, we will be looking to be good customers but if we can help enable that development. >> there was a news article that came out yesterday saying you had done away with spending justifications for these. do you want to comment on that? >> i saw that article this morning. folks who like to send me bad news lost now opportunity to send me that article this morning. i talked with our acting

to reapes dod efficiencies of the competitive commercial marketplace and also makes dod dependent on the sources that competition produces. dod, through our colleagues at the defense logistics agency and at the policy level monitor available stocks and capabilities to meet contingencies and work with other departments responsible for u.s. pharmaceutical production capabilities. like other federal agencies, we rely on existing laws and other federal agencies, including the department of health and human services and fda, and the department of commerce to monitor foreign investment in distribution medical supplies. -- certainirs products are required to be manufactured in the united states or designated countries with which the u.s. has a free trade agreement or other trade relationship. it applies to all federal supply schedule contracts, including medical devices. the taa andes by ensures references are included in our procurement contracts. products available. although dod produces a small amount of finished products from chinese sources, we are aware that 80% of the active pharmace

porter, he was assigned as the dod lead for 5g. now we are developing initiatives, we have a program plan, we have put that before congress and those before the omd this coming year. we are hiring an assistant director. others outsidere ourselves thought that this was sufficiently important, that it be -- that it has become a big deal. rebeccah: can you explain what it is when you are doing a new initiative for 5g -- 5g. what are you most concerned about an flesh that out. broadly speaking, we are aware that commercial initiatives and telecommunications far outstrip anything that we can do and would want to do in dod. we are struggling to become the flea on the tail of the telecoms' dog. this is a trillion dollar worldwide industry. that said we have national security needs, and to the extent that we can help seed the competitive environment or encourage it to grow in directions relevant to us, we want to do that. so, how can we help? we have use cases. aboutk about 5g we talk greatly increased download speeds, we talk about an eno

there's no law that requires the dod and the a or just the cheapest drug.a well intended effort to save taxpayer money but we wouldn't have our aircraft carriers, nuclear summaries in china and for very important medicines, we should take a close lookat what it will take . to purchase based on value and not just on price. i think there's opportunity also for the dod and va to look at what the private sector market is doing in hospitals to purchase thosedrugs that are in perpetual shortage , so they are possible to see how much they pay now, the dod and va might be able to pay less. that would be a first step. insofar as will this cost more money, what we know is that large purchasers of generic drugs, big ones , they purchase the vast majority of all of them. they buy very cheap but that's not the price you and i pay when we go to the drugstore so without knowing how much a markup there is among these purchases in between, it's hard to say whether in fact if the dod and va went to the manufacturers whether in fact that could save taxpayers money and save fe

funds and under dod supervision? >> i don't know about the second part. on the first part, our response in terms of providing more resources depends on dhs needs. we look at them on a case-by-case basis so nothing comes to mind immediately. maybe i'm missing something but it deflects that force based on dhs needs on the border and their needs to be a band flow based on what they see of handling folks and whatnot. >> thank you. >> thanks, everyone. >> be with us later for live coverage of the release of the new report on a regular migration including refugee and migrant smuggling. live coverage starts at 3:00 pm eastern on c-span2. also today we bring you a discussion on constitutional issues and the trump administration and what it means for american democracy. join the american political science association and their 115th annual meeting. live coverage begins at 4:00 eastern on c-span, also online, c-span.org or you can listen live on the free c-span radio apps. we are featuring booktv programs showcasing what is av

dod i 649502. a definition that is broadly defined as circumstances associated with the set forth incident. false reporting is one of those concepts that is it a true false report when someone is saying something that is not true or not sufficient evidence. those are two things. eight cases out of the 154 as we identified as a false report. typically when we close out a case, there is a distinction between the problem of cause. i would have two go back and see if they are all classified. wewe had pulled through that tie period. false reporting to be collateral to the victim coming forward. i think that the intent of seeing our people reporting and now being punished. getting to that kind of concept of how many of those cases are out there. ephow many victims are accused f making a false report is a great data point. >> i have a question. it might make a difference to victims. how does collateral misconductay come to light? s e victim self-reports and says you should know that something happened or

on june 13th, opm and dod held a meeting to finalize the dod buyback of general services opm would continue to provide support background only rations during fiscal year 2020 after the transfer of those functions. that same afternoon opm staff briefed staff of this subcommittee and committees from the appropriations and the senate on those deliberations. this is an example of our commitment to transparency and engagement with congress and what we will continue to display moving forward. thank you for having me here today. opm leadership is heartened that congress has acknowleding ackno fundamental issues facing our agency, and we are optimistic that together we can work toward solutions. i look forward to answering your questions and continuing to engage with the committee as we work together toward reforms that best serve the american people. thank you, chairman. >> thank you, mr. billy. i had the opportunity to go to a demonstration outside of opm earlier this week, and a reassuring message to know how committed leadership is to its workforce at opm because morale was pretty low. mr. bord

these came from dod research endeavors and then entrepreneurs took the ideas and made them commercial success stories that we have today. we could do that more by opening up access to the natural lab, look at what they're doing, push technologies to the marketplace and have a terminus about of success with innovation stemming from government research. host: i want to dive back into the c-span archives. 1985. carl sagan testifying before the senate about the impacts of the greenhouse effect, but alternative sources of power and their development in the decades to come. [video] thate best estimates are at the present rate of burning of fossil fuels, the present rate of increasing minor infrared absorbing gases in the atmosphere, it will be a several cent degree -- sent a great degree temperature increase on the earth by the middle to the end of the next century. that has a variety of consequences including redistribution of local climates glaciers andng of an increase in sea level. there is concern on a somewhat longer timescale about the collapse of the west antarctic ice sheet and a g

and so they show up in the departments of books but because it's very much a shared program with dod, in terms of how the sales are recorded between the state and defensible to something we probably had to follow up on to reflect that. i think state general has made the programmatic system side of it, execution details the sort shared dod mission. it's better if we follow up to give a sense of how that the county works. >> you've been in your composition for a long time, right? >> i've been with the pure about ten years. i've been the director for four. >> have you had any foreign military sales payments go out during that time that didn't come through office at all? >> i would say they generally do not come to my office which i think is why -- they don't flow through that part of our budget. again, it's a shared program with dod, so it's not something my office actively tracks as a program. >> there have been other times where foreign military sales payments that a been made that didn't come through your office? >> again, because i don't come to my office in the sense it's not so muc

but when they are vindicated, we've now freed up a lot of dollars from dod. we expect to get a dozen scores, hundreds more miles of wall built because of dod funding over the next couple of years. so we're in a good position to finish out next year with several hundred new miles of wall on a 2,000 mile border, and they are all in the most strategic spots on the border. all where they have the most effect and protect cbp agents and so forth. lou: as you know, this administration doesn't have -- if i may say -- a stronger supporter than i am for its policies and for its leadership, if i can put it that way, but i'm also hearing simultaneously from the senate and from the house, where they passed house bill 1044, in the senate it's 386. mitch mcconnell is going to take it up. we heard the president start talking about we need more legal immigrants in addition to stopping illegal immigrants, in that i think he's half right. what in the world is going on talking about increasing legal immigration from its current levels of what is it, a million a year? >> well, i

and then 50% of other government cargo, nine dod is required to go on u.s. flags -- non-dod. to date, those those kinds of cargoes. exim bank, export-import bank sorts of cargoes would go that we have not had any exim bank cargoes, project cargoes recently because we have not had an exim bank that's been fully subscribed that could pass authorization for projects greater than $10 million, i think the threshold was. exim bank used to finance power plants and refineries and all kinds of stuff all around the world. all that big project cargo, all the bits and pieces the ge generators and all that kind of stuff, were all going on at least 50% 50% of the were goinn u.s. flag ships and that was a lot of cargo that was available to us that went away for many years. exim bank has now subscribed again and they getting ready, they have a big backlog i am told of projects that they're getting ready to approve and that all portends well for u.s. carriers that will now be able to carry. were talking in some cases 30 and 40 shiploads worth for a project. i think that's a very positive deve

in spd 39 gives dot lead responsibility over the full range of silver uses of gps, and along with dodkes dot coach of the national space base position navigation and timing executive committee. through this, we're working closely with dhs and of the federal departments and agencies to address policy and technical issues, including the security of resilience of gps receivers. in light of the critical importance of gps, dot as for submissions from technology vendors, interest in providing gps backup technologies and where not organizing field demonstrations of those technologies. another way to protect gps service is real-time monitoring of satellite signals to ensure they meet the necessary performance standards and are providing funding to the air force to support that monitoring. working closely with the commerce department ntia and the fcc, dot inducted gps adjacent band study to measure levels of tolerance and interference from adjacent band radiofrequency systems to the study results show we need strong, consistent policies to ensure rf protection for satellite-based navigation. l

space command the national space this fence center is a joint dod community organization and will beer of gravity for defending off vital interest in space. for the first time there will be a unified structure of the filling is great intelligence community space to put defense plans, authorities and capabilities to ensure seamless execution of space defense systems. furthermore, the arrow will take direction from the commander of u.s. space command and execute defensive operations based on the journey develop playbook and informed by a series of exercises. i want to commend space command and the nro leadership teams for their thoughtful and innovative work to develop this new approach. this will ensure this committee and the american people that if adversaries challenges no space they will face a truly unified national security team and thank you again, mr. vice president and members of this community for allowing me to update you on the vital reforms which will increase the joint effectiveness to ensure we remain safe in space. [applause] >> next we will go to the acting secretary o

i think it's very hard to see why amazon and also probably microsoft wouldn't win the dod contract if're going to outsource cloud commuting by the pentagon to one company, if you're only going to do it to one company, i can't imagine you can do it to anybody other than amazon. they're the clear leader in cloud commuting, and maybe you bring in microsoft as a backup, a second source. you certainly wouldn't bring in some of the other companies that have been mentioned, like ibm and oracle i find that very unusual and frankly a little bit disturbing. that's all i've got to say on that >> mark, that's a key point. and you have to look at the companies that have to handle these top security rankings, that the pentagon is even looking for. that being said, if you look at how, i guess, cloud economics have played out, for example, in the business community, we have seen more companies shifting more of their, you know, cloud to a variety of providers, and also doing things like hybrid cloud. should the government be thinking about those policies? >> oh, absolutely. look, there's a lot of evol

think to begin sooner rather than later in the short term, the dod and v.a. make purchases based on value, not just price, cheapest price. security,des quality, uninterrupted supply, that would be a very important consideration for force protection and combat readiness, and it would also direct our taxpayer money not over to china to build its industry, to build it here. my understanding is there's no law that requires the dod and v.a. to purchase the cheapest drugs. it is i think a well intended effort to save taxpayer money, but we wouldn't have our aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines built in china, and for very important medicines we should take a close look at what it will take to purchase based on value and not just on price. there's also the opportunity to look at what the private sector market is doing to purchase ,hose drugs that are expensive so it's possible depending on how much they paid now, the dod and v.a. might be able to pay less. that would be a first step. insofar as will this cost more that -- what we know is the large purchasers of

it seems to me that one of the central challenges or questions for the dod broadly or perhaps for the army is how do we shift as the nds says we should toward greater competition with russia and china while also addressing persistent threats from iran, terrorism, north korea as well. how do we walk and chew gum at the same time but also address these persistent threat in the middle east? >> i think it is a couple of things. that had to be very clear -- you have to be clear about national object is -- what are we trying to achieve, how do we compete against our peer competitors worldwide? aggressiveo be as with every dollar and focused on every dollar we invest in the enterprise. it is, where can you take risk? for the army, while we continue to grow albeit modestly, at about 2000 year-over-year, we still need a lot of people. the challenge was that is we have to continue to take grow. after train and have units ready. 65 to 70% of our balance sheet. so you're very fixed at what you can invest against. he used the word ruthless earlier. we work and we will continue to be. every investm

the most qualified person in washington to take on the hardest problems at dod, and so what i plan to do today is have dr. griffin get some

. -- from dod the other day made up point of distancing u.s. from these operations. put a finer point on that either u.s. wants to stay away from - we remain focused on iraq and supporting our forces in iraq to go after isis. >> all of these are consistent-all our operations in conjunction with the iraqi security for because -- forces focus on isis. we assessed force protection across the region virtually every day. general mckenzie is in constant dialogue with the secretary and i about the needs for force protection. he makes adjustments based on tensions and the region. so yes, are we concerned about it, we are not complacent about force protection. we look at it every day. and we are very attentive to the operational environment, when we make adjustments in force protection. >> i'm going to try one more time in afghanistan. still in negotiation with the taliban. he expects assurances from the taliban that it will not be used -other way i al qaeda terrorist organizations again. the pentagon last month said we need a robust counterterror capability. so just be clear

that was a reason nro really liked the idea, that's a reason dod liked the idea but when it came downto it, the money for mol was up against the money for a third satellite called the hex -- hexagon, we had 3 early satellites one was corona, first ever man-made satellite in space, the second one gambit and the third was hexagon, would cost just as much as mol and congress only had money for one of the programs, while mol had great concept, dod wanted it. the nro wanted it, just about every intelligence agency except for the cia wanted it, and this is where the cia was able to put immense pressure on the white house and in this case richard nixon to cancel the program to allow the money to go to hexagon later on. any other questions you got? over here? the microphone is coming all the way around the outside. >> desperation that actually worked? >> most of the time. what's fun about this, i even say in introduction, library full of books in which cold war and world war ii desperation led to some of the most innovative and useful technologies in history, right, if you go down out to virg

for the final session of the meeting, the committee will deliberate on the dod collateral misconduct report and services responses to its written questions. each public meeting of the we've received no request for public comment for the meeting. if a member of the audience would like to comment on the issue before the committee directed to the dac ipad all at the discretion of the chair. written comments may be submitted at anytime for the committee's consideration. before we do the data review, i i think we will start off with colonel where. we are ready for your remarks. >> thank you, ma'am. as the chair mentioned, this collateral misconduct study was the result of the national defense authorization act. legislation, the secretary of defense shall submit a report to the congressional defense committee that includes the following information. i'm reading now from the legislation that there are three requirements that this legislation put out. number one, the number of instances in which a covered individual was accused of misconduct or crimes considered collateral to the investigati

this team generated over 50 recommendations how dod and the ic can increase collaboration and improve space operations posture. the best of those recommendations are being concluded, the report presented to the president which is final coordination and review. i will summarize the highlights. for years, debate about how the nro, military space organizations can work. early in this task we recognize the proposed establishment of us space command provides us with the opportunity to determine the appropriate level of integration between the intelligence community and dod to assure effective space operations. i'm pleased to tell you after months of analysis and deliberations the intelligence community and the department of defense of agreed to align us space command and the nro into a new unified defense concept of operations with the national defense sector. as part of us space command, the national defense center is a joint dod intelligence community organization and will become the center of gravity for defending our vital interests in space. for the first time it will be a unified str

an example to work on which i think is less demanding to the taxpayer is if you took, for example,3 dods where it's critical and 3 doe, department of energy sites, it's also mission critical and you procure 6 to 8 small reactors, be they classic whitewater design or advance generation, then you have an ability to test the business model of the new generation of reactors which are converting economy of scale by getting bigger reactors and built interior production and benefiting from the price decline when you build a lot of the same thing, right, the benefit of that, sherry, number 1, you can have the reactors feed not only the pentagon bases and the reservations but they can feed the surrounding grid, what that means they can be backed by power purchasing agreement so rate payers are providing cash flow and what that means you can get banks to finance it. [inaudible] >> that's -- yeah, but it wouldn't have -- but, yes, essentially that kind of model and i think that could work and you could even add the last thing, there's still a lot of unexpended loan guaranty authority available for

the dod wasn't interested because it didn't fit with the agenda that they wanted said and they were happyrmine the integrity of the military. >> that's the most reckless thing i've heard in a long time and i never got credit for it in his book rectifies that. stand-down. socialist justice warriors are sabotaging america's military. >> brian: he had to write the book. men will come as we close us out, for decades, posing florida is the mark of the most original conspiracy theories. but can those conspiracy theorists have been right all along? we have new news suggesting florida water could be making our kids dumber. you want to know about us or a question mark i hope so. the music is to get louder and then we are going to go to a commercial and we are going to come back and that's my head created ♪ ry time. our 18 year old was in an accident. usaa took care of her car rental, and getting her car towed. all i had to take care of was making sure that my daughter was ok. if i met another veteran, and they were with another insurance company, i would tell them, you need to join usaa because th

it doesn't make sense to build another level of bureaucracy in an incredibly bureaucratic dod. >> reporter: the initial estimates range from 2 to 13 billion dollars in the first five years. greg boswell, nbc news, washington. >>> continuing coverage, 20 people could not return to their homes following a fire. s the safire destroyed a mobile home and two barns, but also knocked down power lines. several families live on that property. so far we haven't heard if they have received the all-clear. >>> denied bail, and remains in custody. just into our newsroom, the homeless man accused of attacking woman outside her san francisco condo, has been denied bail. his attorney asked the judge to release him and allow an ankle monitoring, but the judge denied that requested. earlier this week the d.a.'s office dropped a separate assault charge. also, a new judge was appointed yesterday. >>> video of that embarcadero attack is really adding to a growing debate over a nearby homeless shelter. now that construction is under way, neighbors want to be sure promises about public safety are kept. several vo

the dod wasn't interested because it didn't fit with the agenda that they wanted and they were happy: that's the most reckless thing a bird in a long time, and they never got credit for it. this book rectifies it. "stand down: how social justice warriors are sabotaging america's military." thank you for writing this book. >> brian: he had to write the book. for decades, posing florida is the mark of the most original conspiracy theories. but can those conspiracy theorists have been right all along? we have new news suggesting floridated waterou could be makg our kids dumber. you want to know about that? i hope so. the music is to get louder and then we are going to go to a commercial and we are going to come back and then that's the side of my head. ♪ ♪[upbeat music] ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun transitions™ light under control™ new transitions™ gen 8™ lenses ask your eye care professional today and learn more at transitions.com ♪ >> brian: for years, cranks and conspiracy theorist has been sounding the alarm about fluoride in the water

else warren when she wrote dod frank made sure you had to have the headquarters in washington, d.c. because she knew that it would never -- it would always get bigger if it were there. she pays for than everybody else. she hired everybody there except one person. when i got there, we tried to change that. it's really, really hard to drain the swamp. but we're working hard at it. you know about the successes in natural increasing gas. i wish i had more fun stories about imagine if but i don't. there were some really good ones that involved ryan zincy who isa friend of mine. he was a former navy seal. and all the stories i have in ryan i can't tell you in public when to tell vision is on. reorganization of government is something that the republicans have been trying to do for a long time. i presented on the reorganization of government, number one there's more to do during the day. and number two, what you saw was a presentation of what's broken in government. there are agencies that are in the departments that they are because the president did not like the secretary at the time the

the dod has expanded the abilities of employees to work from home and designate a telework center. we are also seeking ways to increase legibility for working mothers and new parents . >> miss bingen, if you can wrap up. >> there are also a number of enabling capability that will help evolve our workforce management practices to attract talent so clearance reform to get folks and faster on boarding using technology, bringing individuals in with interim clearances, providing work at lower classification levels get them in the door. and we're also streamlining our government application process and working on getting better data and metrics so in conclusion, thank you for holding this hearing andbring this issue to the forefront. the success of our war fighters and policymakers at home rests on the superior intelligence information and capabilities which in turn depends on our most important asset . >>and miss coker, did you have an opening statement you want to make or you want to submit for the record ? >> i'll add we're delighted to be here and grateful for the opportunity and we

these are main stories the united states has imposed sanctions on iran's top diplomat and is accusing dods a reef of spreading propaganda for around supreme leader ayatollah ali how many so we 1st pondered on twitter and ridiculed the measures roselyn jordan has more. they basically say that this is a situation where because of the u.s. is concerned they actually need to be engaging with people who they believe could actually make real change but they also indicate that they don't think that this is possible because they are continuing the sanctions and they are continuing to look at other possible targets basically anyone who is working at the direct leadership at the director has to i should say of the supreme leader ayatollah common a. second round of debate between your summer caddick presidential hopefuls has ended there was renewed focus on the frontrunner joe biden a former vice president was repeatedly forced to depend defend his record on health immigration and race the u.s. national security adviser says north korea's recent missile test does not violate a pledge it made to stop

i would dod it again.od i was in the room when he came. >> president trump's offer to buy greenland has been called absurd by the prime minister. president trump will pay a visit to greenland next month. greenland is getting greener b the day as the giant icebergs and glaciers melt into the sea. >> flying above greenland's glaciers and icebergs they are dropping probes into the ocean, trying to measure the temperature and salinty of warming artic waters. josh willis is four years into the mission. >> we think of greenland as a block of ice under a hair dryer but the oceans are doing a lot of the work too. >> greenland's ice sheet is melting six times faster than it was in the 1980s. willis' team is trying to understand the role that oceans are playing. they call the project oceans melting greenland or o.m.g. there are is enough ice in greenland to raise sea levels by 25 feet worldwide. we don't think it will happen right away but how fast it would is something we are trying to figure out with o.m.g. >> the

. >> good afternoon i'm chris current dod contractor former air force officer and former dhs. my time at dhs included three years of order protection. i inspect a lot of costco or go vessels with first-hand the economic work for china is engaging in. last week at the heritage foundation we have an interesting panel talking about the 5d networks and how prc that have that states connection and how they pose a threat. one more thing the panelist mentioned, there is evidence that huawei might've violated some of the sanctions in north korea which of true which show egregious intertwined of economic and military threats. >> other than news reports, that a been out there, i don't know. >> i don't know either. one thing i would say, things like breaking economic tensions are already within the system that we have organizations in place and tracking monitors and prosecute them. i think what is lacking again is when they become more sophisticated than that. and strategic actions that don't quaintly break ascension to provide a threat and how do we ensure they were able to respond whic

half of border patrol no longer on line, narcotics and this country, the dod is responsible for the nationalsecurity crisis. >> do you expect push back on this seemingly innocuous honor? >> of course. democratic leadership push back on everything this president has ever done. when it comes to the border -- let me be clear. i worked for six presidents darting in 1984. this president has been right on the border from the start. before he was president i watched his first speech in arizona. he was on the money. he is well advised, doing the right thing when it comes to border security. heather: we always appreciate having you on especially in studio. a long day ahead of you. todd: it is 19 after the hour. this little league coach's winning hearts around the country. >> we are fighters, every single one. i am proud that you guys call me coach. >> don't you love it? that coach and his player joins us live next. ♪ we will we will rock you ♪ we will we will rock you ♪ ♪ some things are too important to do yourself. get customized security with 24/7 monitoring from xfinity home. awarded the best pro

the cia was created to be a counterweight to dod, the department of defense because they were saying the russians are building give us more money give us more muscles in congress and wait a minute, we need someone to have an independent point of view and that conflict is a good thing but i was in gandy was the defense department, and essays part of the defense department and cia is not they report directed to the president. the tension has gotten really bad and got to the point where the director of cia, this is a mystery. what is the leak and what is the antenna, and the other mystery, the biggest mystery is two and half years into the investigation the director of cia called the director and said shut gandy down. stop this investigation. and the question is, why. why would they do that. you have to read the book to find out. >> all point out you did not answer about havana. >> oh did not? let me say this. there are eerie parallels, you have some kind energy flooding the embassy and you have the getting out there say we have no clue what this is and at the same time you people at ns

. >> i was blessed to have been associated with the navy, air force, and marines, basically the dod that made up the team. i really liked what i did during that time, because what i learned, being around our military was command-and-control, dedication. that has served me well through my career. i would've never been in the service. experience --at i'm so glad i got it, because it made such a big difference to me. the camaraderie and all these units we worked with was remarkable. it made you feel good. [applause] >> i was blessed to be at the cape for the first launch. recovery was not treated like everybody else. in the old mercury control room, which was around the air force station side. no lock on the door. the room wasn't brief -- rough shape. it was functional. we were all squeezed in. there, and it was a test of the heatshield. at two minus nine, the guy i was with, to this day, i am in his great gratitude, there's no reason for you to sit here and listen to all of this. why don't you watch it? i had the privilege of standing on a little stand just above the keep, whendown to the

you know, the dod, the technology transfer, and then the people on the state and dod on the u.s. side that looks at industrial security from their agency's lens will also have to be involved. the picture more or less similar on the japanese side and on the japanese side. and what makes it really difficult for u.s. to play a role is that u.s. is going through its own export control reform, in the manner that it makes, you know, we often read about high-tech cold war between u.s. camp and chinese camp to the point where, you know, u.s. government itself is really weighing in on its allies and partners to take whole new fundamentally different look at their own countries, like multinational corporation supply chain and also americans or multinational corporation supply chain, so u.s. system is in flux in big-time, and you probably can't even predict how this is going to shake out, right, at the end, so for the u.s. to going through the flux in house and then try to -- try to have this consultation with two of its allies, with serious disagreement is probably going to be a difficult

i'm current dod contractor, and heritage foundation. at the risk of stirring the pot i want to ask questions on pakistan. to be sincere and this to root out corruption and reform as governments. that being said do you think he has growing ability to reign in the eye as i particularly a closer relationship with the terrorist organization? >> i am a reporter with inside us trade in washington. with relation to the india relationship i would if you comment on their participation in the conference of economic partnership and whether you think india will participate in that by the end of this year? >> a third in the back. >> cliff smith. i wonder if you could comment on islam you's role in the violence in kashmir, people removed from leadership of mosques. what you saw the rollout and how you saw the us and europe as part of that in terms of things of that nature. >> let's start with the easy ones, pakistan. our position has always been, whatever we talk about in terms of the efforts to develop a new approach to the issues related to pakista