it does create some long-term good will and does have an economic benefit of it. but the idea is to give the commander on the street some flexibility so that they can get the job done as the jobs arrive and get it done quickly and turn it around so cerp money has been an effective tool and it's enormously popular with the commanders on the ground. i believe one of the problems we have in afghanistan, one of the problems we always had is too many decisions are being made not only on the street, at the pentagon, and not in baghdad, not in kabul, not in kandahar where the commanders are closest to the war front. so for these reasons, mr. chairman, i urge a no vote. the chair: the gentleman yields back his time. the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from vermont. so many as in favor, say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. mr. kingston: mr. chairman, on that i ask for a recorded vote. the chair: a recorded vote is ordered. pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by offered by

the code does allow for a deck and railing. it does seem they cannot get the desired access. but there is a way to get up there. vice president garcia: rope ladder? >> i will hold my tongue, commissioner. >> commissioners, the matter is submitted. vice president garcia: did you want to offer more comment? please do. >> i'd just wanted to mention for one thing the coo in question for the building. for some reason, the building did pull all the permits for the work that has been done on the roof back in '95 and '96. that is on record. the work was done and inspected along the way. but for some reason when they built this building they did not get the final coo. my building is currently in the process of obtaining that, with all the inspections and everything. because of that, a whole bunch of the permits they pulled back in '95 appear as canceled. it is a huge mess for a building that we are slowly working out. the other thing is i can build an elevator but not a staircase, and that is crazy. it does not make sense. personally, i cannot afford to build an elevator. the other po

. >> ♪ does anybody really know what time it is? does anybody really care about time?hen you got time enough to do anything at all ♪ president chiu: in the other members of the public that wish to speak on the motion to table? if you wish to speak, please step up to the microphone. we cannot hear you. this is not general public comment. this is simply on whether we should table item 46. thank you. any other members of the public wish to speak with regard to the motion to table items 46 and 47? seeing none, can we take this motion without objection? apologies. roll-call vote on the motion. aye. supervisor chu: no. supervisor cohen: no. supervisor elsbernd: no. supervisor farrell: aye. supervisor kim: aye. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor weiner: aye. supervisor avalos: aye. supervisor campos: aye. >> there are eight ayes and three nos. president chiu: motion to table passes. on item 48, supervisor weiner. supervisor weiner: that was interesting. colleagues, our ballot measure system and votes in california and san francisco is broken. we have t

so does the house. the prime minister. >> what we need to do is make sure our welfare reforms are encouraging those people who sit on welfare who could work actually go out to work. what we had under the party opposite, yes, economic growth but 5 million working-age people living on benefits. that's not good enough and we're going to change it. >> mr. andrew bingham. >> thank you, mr. speaker. would the prime minister agree with me that birthing centers in royal areas provide a valuable and irreplaceable service to their local communities and every effort should be made to retain and i and hundreds of my constituents are sending to dar shire county as they consider. what we want to see is maternity choices where they give birth, whether that's a community center or a district general hospital where they have all the paraphernalia. it should be a choice made by them with a gp and others for what's right for their needs. >> this is margaret beckett. >> is the prime minister aware when yesterday bombardier

where does the money go? what happens if the employee changes jobs and has full health-care benefits? where does that money in the hra go? these issues are not addressed in the current legislation. we provide health care to our employees. we want to level the playing field, close loopholes, but this legislation, as it has been written, has not been thought out well enough. supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker please. >> i am a third-generation owner of a san francisco business. i pay taxes, 100% in compliance with all the laws. but my business does not reside in san francisco. my office is in daly city. you talk about leveling the playing field. the playing field does not even level with the current provisions for healthy san francisco. it does not cover any employers that are under 20, and it has two different rates, so the rate of 1.37 or $2. the provision itself is not leveling the playing field. you also do not cover the cost of health insurance. you want universal health insurance, but you cannot t

the grand jury does a great job. clearly they do not understand that ceqa has to the evaluate alternatives. they make a point of talking about entitlements running with the land, which we know is the case, but so do the obligations. i think that they do not quite get that part of the. there is confusion about whether public funds were involved. we point out that any of these things that are afforded to the developers, they have to provide sequentially for those to go forward. i think it is really well done. i think it is very quick. supervisor moore: i think it comes back around to -- commissioner moore: i think it comes back to what i was saying before. i personally believe that that does not speak with my language. i do not speak that way. i think we can do better. >> yes, this is a broader question. what power does the grand jury have? we get our response and they just accept it? commissioner antonini: if i may. [laughter] the grand jury has the power of the bully pulpit. they have no means or authorization within

it does not work. -- entrepreneurs, it does not work. we cannot do with a top-heavy tax code with biases, loopholes, and deductions that people run with. we can do better. we have to reform the tax code. number two, we've got to get the regulatory monkey off our back. [applause] small business folks say they cannot get access to capital because of the ratio requirements these days. other businesses say they will not deploy capital because they cannot figure out health care. they have no idea what it will cost so they're conservative about the future. if we're going to get the economy right, we need regulatory reform. third, the lowest of low hanging fruit is energy independence. for eight presidents going all the way back to richard nixon who stood up and said 34% imported oil is a travesty and we can do better, we will never let it go beyond 37%. then president carter stood up and said 40% imported oil, i will create the department of energy to ensure this never happens again. here we sit today at 60% imported oil. we are saying to ours

how does that make any sense at all? after this was reported, they are stepping up their efforts to grab that cash. they are doing things like threatening to detain contractors. if they don't pay up, take money that's assigned to build that road and put that money in the afghan covers, the afghan officials are threatening to detain our contractors. they are denying licenses to our contractors in an effort to what i call a shakedown. revoking visas on unpaid tax bills. we are spending money rebuilding their infrastructure. we should not be taxed, nor should we allow our taxpayers essentially to be stuck up by the afghan officials. this amendment offered by my colleague from washington, would end that practice. so we believe this is overdue and no tolerance by this double-dipping by the afghan government and our amendment is to crack down on that process. and i thank my colleague from washington in joining me in the amendment. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from ge

where does that leave you tonight? >> well, it certainly does give us a chance. believe it has our basic requirement, which is to protect social security, medicare, and medicaid. of course, it does lean heavily on defense cuts, which is a good thing. but we still want to parse through it to make sure we know what we're getting in for. we know there were going to be some cuts, we are realistic, we are here to work constructively, but it does meet our basic requirements. but what our position was that we won't vote for anything that does undermine social security, medicare, and medicaid, but we didn't say we'd automatically vote for anything that didn't. so we got to look at it, but it looks promising, but we're not ready to bite just yet. we're still reviewing the reid plan. but it is within the eligible range of things we would consider. >> is there anything that boehner put out in his plan that you could embrace? would it have a chance with democrats? >> i don't see anything -- i mean, as a matter of fact, i mean, the boehner plan is absolutely ridiculous. it wo

it does not reappropriate unused funds. it does not restrict availability of funds. and it does not change existing law. in fact, the -- in fact, defense suicide pretchings programs have already been authorized by law. for example, the yellow ribbon program, which helps support national forward and reserve service members and their families. this amendment simply clarifies, simply clarifies the suicide -- that suicide prevention programs which already exist and have already been authorized are a priority and will always remain a priority. so i humbly suggest that no one, no one in good conscience could suggest otherwise. i thank you and yealed back. the chair: does any other member wish to be heard? if not, the chair will rule. the chair finds that this amendment includes language expressing the sense of congress. therefore the amendment constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule 21. the point of order is sustained and the amendment is not in order. the clerk will read the amendment. the clerk will read the bill. the clerk: page 24, line eight, section

that is not what a government does. the people who did not choose this policy -- it was foisted on us by ideology by the current administration. this administration is choosing to go in the way of the enterprise. we need to augment our self against it and we need to vote on it. this is a simple measure that will draw a line. as supervisors, at your job, as i understand it, is to balance between them and us. please do not shirk the responsibility. >> walter paulson. ♪ you've got to have parks miles of parks you have to fix every park a good budget starts give it some heart but you've gotta have parks i hear laughter in the park rain with a better change i love a better way with the happy part i feel inside we run under a tree thanks to what the rules committee, it's going to be free there in our park, love under stormy skies we want to hear park laughter in the change her read down to the birthday stone pyknic -- hurry down to the birthday stone picnic there will be laughter and take -- cake and fine wine ♪ >> did he ear

what does that say to you?uest: remarkable continuity about something that is very important in defining this as a people. it does not seem to matter whether we have a democratic or republican president. we are patriotic nonetheless. host: james, pittsburg, republican line. caller: my comment is that you have to poll the younger crowd and they are the strongest and the fastest and most easily -- and it is easier for them to take in all the information they have take in. they are more alterable to become a soldier and not many of them are politically savvy. once they get into the war, they are generally -- most of the men i know that have come back especially from this war and from vietnam, they speak to the fact that they were fighting for its other. host: we will leave it there. guest: that is true. men who have had that experience in war talk about it that way. they also love their country. one of the things we see, it's a hard thing to take polls of soldiers because it's tough to do. but when you do, they ar

it does not matter. that is a flawed piece of legislation. it does not dissolution. no one believes that. they know it does not solve the problem. no one believes that is anything more than a big wet kiss to the right wing. i mean the tea party. it is too bad it is being read by a small number of people. >> at this late date, it might be less with the jump in their plan. make you thinkng that theory is not its solution. every democratic senator will vote against it. it is true. whether tonight, tomorrow, or the next day. the john boehner plan will not pass. it is not a solution. everyone knows the. that.was >> will you -- when will you make that decision that was at the appropriate time. >> would you bring it to show that it cannot past acts >> i can have a boat in a matter of minutes. -- a cannot pass? >> i can have a vote in a matter of minutes. they vote on it for whatever reason. we are weighing in on it. we are on top of this. if they get that over here, it'll be dealt with. beyond this plan. they will vote against it. >> there are obligations. >> that is someth

i think you -- >> how does he do it?um is one thing, but the message is another. >> by the way, the message sounded as old as this argument about jobs and stuff is about what everybody argues about. >> to a certain degree, the reason that obama had the youth vote in his corner in 2008 was because he represented so much hope and it was a kind of unvarnished belief in the future. four years later, it's been a messy legislative four years. >> you say content matters? >> yes, look, the youth unemployment rate is double the nation. there's a lot of disenfranchisement of the youth population. >> going back to john -- three years ago we had a president that wasn't very academic or inspiring to young people, went to college, certainly we had a war that was young and tired. those issues are not helpful to them. we have an iraq war, which is still there, an afghanistan war that has been beefed up, what's good tweeter, twitter, tweeting. >> not just that, chris, but a lot of the appeal about president obama in 2008 was he was new a

it does lend itself to some uncertainty. as of now, some of the bond counsel is hasn't to -- hesitant to opine on whether we should be able to issue bonds prior to the resolution of the lawsuit. that further suspends some of the uncertainty we face. we will know a little bit more later on, the bending on whether it gets heard in the supreme court or not, how fast that is accelerated. it really is making a huge impact to our work and our ability to contract, and our existing contracts as well. given the additional time, we will have more certainty when a comeback in august and september, to have a more detailed discussion. we will also have better numbers for you. at some point, we may also have better tax rolls, assessed values. then we will know the status of the lawsuit, and if any changes will be made to the current bill. there was some speculation that there could be some cleanup language. but we hope to have more information on those two things, and will go into detail discussion. supervisor chu: thank you. this item do

how does she prove this? >> from a scientific point of view, saying that her son is dead and he ci died in a car accident. presumably grandma, the new grandma has something with dna on it from her son. his hairbrush or toothbrush or something like that. they do have caylee's dna and they scientifically will see if there is a match. >> judge jeanine: an easy thing to establish whether or not she is the grandmother. >> what troubles me is where has she been. now, she shows up? the kid would have been five years old. >> judge jeanine: let's assume that she establishes paternity on the part of her deceased son. she is talking about a wrongful death lawsuit. is this like a redo of o.j. where the defendant is acquitted of murder but then someone sues civilly. >> except that the plaintiffs in the o.j. simpson case were extremely close personal relationships with the deceased. this is a grandmother who never ever took any affirmative steps to find her granddaughter eve. now, that the spot light is on her and casey mi

it is a death warrant if he does something like that. how do you go against decades, decades of legislation where year after year the debt limit has been raised by congress and the president requested it, whether it is a democratic congress, republican congress, democratic president, republican president. ronald reagan himself -- you asked about the politics of the limits -- when he was confronted with the issue, he said that the consequences would be impossible to predict and contemplate any would be a terrible thing to do. that is what this group of republicans, unlike the past republicans, have done. this is what brooks is saying -- this is kind of a different bunch. >> every generation, these conservatives are lousy -- >> we want to sit on the show and talk about this awful partisanship, and i burned a lot of trees during this. but we are actively at a historic moment here, folks. >> terrifying moment. >> we could default, which is really terrifying. are we act like at a real deal that everybody is pretty clear on -- or we actually c

so all of this does not work together. in fact, a lot of things that we have done in this previous congress has caused a snowball to roll faster downhill. i hope they'll look at the mark to market to see what has happened and what the effect of banks that have gotten tarp money have come in, and fire sold properties that have caused real property values to go down. not just for the banks, but for the people that have bought in there. we need to find out why lost share agreements promote not modifying loans. why it promotes getting rid of some of these bad loans. why it promotes being able, a bank to be able to get rid of property when the government guarantees them 95% of their loss. what effect has that had on our community banks that didn't get the tarp, that have not been allowed to be in these loss share agreements. these are answers we're looking for. mr. speaker, i have no further speakers, so with that, i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. the question is will the

how does that make you feel?ain, this is why i decided to come forward and this is why i decided, you know, to form a campaign called define american.com which is all about truth telling. i think the best way to solve a problem is to tell the truth about it. and to the extent that i did it in the article, kind of coming forward about what i had to do. whatever it is that i had to do, millions of other people are having to live that kind of life because we have an incredibly broken and irrational immigration system no one has been able to fix. and the only kind of -- the only thing that kept me going all these years have been american citizens. my high school principal, high school superintendent, a senior manager at the "washington post" who i told very earlier on who decided that they were going to take risks for me as well and they wanted me to continue living and working here. >> you have, and this comes through in the article which is an amazing piece of writing. >> thank you. >> you clearly have benefited fr

>> it does in my opinion.ot into her apartment the night the report was made because of the key. when i brewed mcdaniel he was not aware. he said her friends had a key. >> other people know there is a key. >> that's very interesting. you can't blame it on mcdaniel but as an investigator, i think the murderer or disappearance happened in the building because of where the build was place and dismembered. they couldn't take it out in one time. i think it was someone in the building. what does that tell you about the murderer? >> two things. either it is a serial killer with a particular penchant for brutality or it is somebody who wants to get rid of the body also a serial killer and wants to get rid of the body because it is easier to do it piece meal. i have energy studied 12 serial killers who dismembered and 13 nonserial killer who is dismembered. different ones where they want to get rid of the body. >> there is anger and hatred toward that person. >> that is a configuration. >>> and michelle, what did her f

does need to have the military capacity to wage coalition warfare yes it does granted if you have partners such as germany on board you know the danes are actually quite on board so it doesn't have the capacity yes it does of course there's political infighting things called national car. and and problems of material however the real question is political will and does it have the political will to sustain operations on the ground and afghanistan in the last decade has proven no we don't have that confirmed although the rule is no consensus because germany you mentioned italy the learn exactly enthusiastic about all this but may be a least what do you think a compromise between britain and france is the main partners in the you know this well i think in the architects of the franco british defense treaty a very glad to see that france and britain have agreed and continue to agree and really rallied round in europe and knocking on other leaders doors and across the globe as we got lower visit. well no i would say it's a marriage with love now do you think the brits and the french in general

what does that entail? is that literally strapping him down and forcing him to swallow something or injecting him? >> normally what they do is that they will try to convince him to take oral medications. if he does take it, they will ensure he swallows the medications. if he refuses the oral medications, they will give him the injectable. they will use a minimum amount of force in order to hold him down so that he is not a danger to himself or others as he is being injected with this anti-psychotic medication. >> jeff, a lot of people in the health care field have been asking me and talking about this issue. it is a dual-loyalty issue. you are treating him to make him better, but he will stand trial and may get the death penalty as a result. is this a conflict, do you think, for these doctors who are treating him? >> i think the doctors that are treating him in springfield, missouri, at the federal facility there, they are not thinking at this point about trying to get him well to stand trial. what they are

>> it does seem like a paradox. tavis: yeah, it does. >> in my mind, i looked at china, i felt that bold sense, the sense that the chinese in every way were saying look, we are who we are. we are not going to take this euro centric view of the world. we just won't do it. that intrigued me on top of the fact that it was just so far away and it seemed to be at that point in 2001, 2002, moving towards this watershed moment which i think has now reached. tavis: how did your dad feel about you dropping out of law school? >> he comes from 1950's 1960's -- he came to the united states from jamaica. he understands success, the bootstrap work ethic. you got this opportunity. i had an opportunity. he was on welfare i think during medical school. went to cornell medical school and finished. what he was saying is son, i have given you to best of everything. what i expect of you now is to ensure that you have learned a trade. that you are self-sufficient and that you can make sure that continues for pesterity. but he is -- poste

if it is by senior staff, it does not happen. it is done by an intake clerk, that as part of their job. then you would not wait -- need to wait for senior staff. ok? let us have a process that is transparent. every complaint that comes in is treated similarly. the complaint was made on the larkin street. it went through two nov's, and the building is weathertight. it is not pretty, but it is vacant. 2514 23rd. that is in various states of disrepair, illegal construction without a permit. open to whether probably still. two buildings, same city, same department, unequal treatment. commissioner hechanova: mr. butler, was there a tracking number when you filed the complaint? >> no, none are given. there is no process. complaints should be given numbers, just as permits are given numbers. then you can ask, what has happened to complaint number -- whatever the date may be. what happened? it is in the system, it is being sent to this person. as it is, no record. commissioner hechanova: thank you. mr. murphy? commissioner murphy: this o

that's what this bill does. take pride in what you are doing, gentlemen, because at the end of the day, the american public will not take pride in what you are doing to this piece of legislation. with that, i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. members are reminded to address their remarks to the chair. the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from colorado. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. and the amendment is not agreed to. for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado rise? >> i have an amendment at the desk. the chair: the clerk shall read -- will report the amendment. >> ask unanimous consent to wave the reading. the chair: is there objection? the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment offered by mr. tipton of colorado. the chair: the gentleman from washington reserves the right to reject. mr. dicks: what was the gentleman's request? the clerk: amendment offered by mr. tipton

for what purpose does the gentleman from kansas rise? >> i ask permission to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, mr. speaker. today i rise in defense of small business owners across the country who are attempting to survive under a mountain of taxes, rules and regulations coming out of washington, d.c. mr. yoder: seven out of 10 new jobs in this country are created by small business owners. to get our economy back on track we know it's these innovators and entrepreneurs who will start creating jobs. entrepreneurship is at a 17-year low. in the last few years there's been a 23% drop in new business creation, falling to the lowest levels since 1994. instead of debating ways to raise taxes and further burden these job creators we should spend our time trying to eliminate the job-killing policies coming out of this administration. mr. speaker, it's time we support the free enterprise system. it's time we get

does he want a deal? >> he is in a box. i think he does want a deal. i've heard that he wants a deal. he's had these secret meetings with obama. i think he takes his constitutional responsibility seriously. >> don't become a deadbeat country? >> it's don't become a deadbeat country. you can't let the country default. >> two dealmakers there. here we are, let's go to steny hoyer. house democratic leader. number two man. he wants a deal? >> he wants a deal definitely. >> durbin is out there. durbin backed the bipartisan commission. >> yeah. >> here are the four dealmakers. now the interesting guys and people. look at other people, of the baseball cards. let's look at these three guy. eric cantor. >> uh-huh. >> does he really want a deal or does he want armageddon? >> i don't think he would. >> he wants to bring down boehner, probably? >> well, you know, that's the question. the dynamic between boehner and cantor. i think cantor does want to bring down boehner and not give boehner enough slack to make a deal. >> because if boehner cut as deal with the pre

how does he get out of it? david cameron does have moral values and he has returned to those. he has to apologize. to bring such a man into downing street. we have to have an explanation. we need to know about the relationship with a back of trucks. what did they talk about? -- rebecca brooks. >> news international has revealed e-mails. he authorized a huge payments to corrupt police officers. that would seem to constitute a criminal offense. he was a witness in the trial for the scottish politician. tom sheridan past him, did the news of the world's a corrupt police officers? he replied, not to my knowledge. four words but not require extensive explanation. his lawyer called on the police to investigate. >> when the company announced two days ago that he had offered up payments to police officers for information, he told the jury that he has no knowledge of payments to police officers. someone is misleading us. he has to answer a perjury charge and that is very serious. >> news international took the action simply not available to david cameron. faced with a scandal that thre

what does that mean? it means a young couple trying to buy a house sees a surge in their interest rates. it means that if you've got a credit card it may be defunct only because you cannot afford to pate surging interest rates. fees for you to buy a house, might sky -- for to you buy a house might skyrocket. housing costs might go up. houses might stop being built. and so i would simply ask my colleagues today, let's be americans. let's look at what we can do together. just allow these tax cuts to expire and allow us to be able to calculate this amount of money and again $3.43 billion and $41 billion makes the difference in the lives of americans so i thank the gentlelady from the virge islands for allowing me to share some thoughts and to hopefully just dispel some myths but also some fears. it is a $14.3 trillion, it's a big number, but economists will tell you that america is not broke, it's not broken either, it is at stage when we need to come together to raise this debt ceiling and go back into regu

for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio rise? >> request time to speak in opposition to the motion. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. the chair: the gentleman from ohio. mr. gibbs: as we have seen this motion is nothing more than a partisan political move. there's been ample time for my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to suggest amendments to this bill through regular order. as we've been doing all year, our republican majority is openly considering bills through the committee process in full consideration by the house. this bill is no exception. yet we're here at the last motion that is designed to ensure the e.p.a. can continue to unilaterally force its own, one-size-fits-all policies onto the states' water quality programs. the underlying bill reestablishes the states' balanced role in carrying out the provisions of the clean water act. but this motion in effect says the underlying bill will not apply virtually anywhere the clean water act applies. implicitly, this motion also say

this is not bipartisanship. >> does he fundamentally want to deal? >> no, he does not! [everyone talking at once] >> if i can finish -- >> i'm going to let you in next. >> the white house thinks they have a winning hand on this. that because of the tabs issue they can a say you're not agreeing for minor tax and they're going to push it to the limit, whether that's july 22nd, 2 or whatever. >> free for all every day on capitol hill the selling of the president. he fights back and suddenly he's ruining bipartisanship? >> all right. >> what the stated alan greenspan said, that is incentives and tax breaks in the tax code are spending, and they have to realize. >> exit question, exit question -- the president is also keeping something else off page one by this debated. what is he keeping off page one? what is it. >> poor economy. >> afghanistan, iraq. >> afghanistan off page one. iraq is on page one? >> in the ends of july, this is going to be up this big on page one finish they're in the deal. he's got to -- [everyone talking at once] >> unemployment rate on page one! >> i

the group that does not want to pass any type of measure this week really does not believe that default will happen. there is a gap between what the conventionalal wisdom is and the group of freshman tea party members that thinks it won't. does not believe default is likely to happen. what we have seen as a result of this whole debate is just how far apart the two facts view reality. you can bridge differences in legislation. it is really hard to bridge differences in how people see things. >> so, are we going to go into default on tuesday? >> i think we will. i think he got exactly right what will happen with a few small change it is. they will pass it tonight by a small margin. it will go to the senate and be defeated. democratic and senator leader will offer an alternative that looks similar but will have some softeners for the tea party and liberals so that they can pass it through the senate. and then send it back to the house and say pass it or we default and it will pass on monday. >> so, who are americans blaming for this baffling thing? >> everyone. they will blame republicans

where does that leave you tonight? >> well, it certainly does give us a chance. believe it has our basic requirement, which is to protect social security, medicare, and medicaid. of course, it does lean heavily on defense cuts, which is a good thing. but we still want to parse through it to make sure we know what we're getting in for. we know there was going to be some cuts, we are realistic, we are here to work constructively, but it does meet our basic requirements. but what our position was that we won't vote for anything that does undermine social security, medicare, and medicaid, but we didn't say we'd automatically vote for anything that didn't. so we got to look at it, but it looks promising, but we're not ready to bite just yet. we're still reviewing the reid plan. but it is within the eligible range of things we would consider. >> is there anything that boehner put out in his plan that you could embrace? would it have a chance with democrats? >> i don't see anything. i mean, as a matter of fact, i mean, the boehner plan is absolutely ridiculous. it would

>> do i know why jose does what he does? absolutely not. as far as the testimony that was princed today, i they what he was trying to achieve in saying that george was the one who coordinated and then completed the burial ceremony that the family had. but as you heard the testimony i was a family affair. they all took part in it. and the inference that's where casey must have learned this is what you do with a loved one. >> greta: any worry or concern as a lawyer, for cindy? there was discussion outside the hearing of the jury about her -- when she testified she said that she was the one who had done the research on the computer and is she was home from work today. apparently the prosecution had secured some employment records to show that wasn't true. that testimony never got in. nonetheless, there's the possibility the prosecution may go after her for not being truthful on the stand. do you have any fear that is going to happen? >> i'm always the worst-case scenario type of attorney. i'm hopeful the state wouldn't do something like that.

how does microsoft safeguard that? >> we have our own policies and procedures for acting as a data handler. we also encourage consumers to take their role in doing that. we make sure that we encourage people to be careful about what they share online. you're on my reputation is being created out there, and you don't even know it sometimes. it woulthese profiles and imageu are being formed even sometimes without your knowledge. it is the responsibility for the consumer to be careful what he or she post's on-line, what he or she shares online. that reputation is being formed now. kids engaged in somewhat questionable activities, whether it is posting a photos are videos or even just texts. once it is on-line, is there to satay. i heard somebody say what happens on facebook and google stays there forever. it is important because it was posted online, what is shared. that reputation is being formed. >> along that line, have you attempted to simplify some of the user agreements of people understand what they're signing up f

speaker, does not belong to director ocasio. in fact, i don't think it belongs to the federal government. it belongs to the veterans who have served this nation all over the world in all wars. it belongs to them and it belongs to their families who bury them. and religious censorship has got to cease at this cemetery. americans are irate about this government attack on religion. i have heard from numerous veterans and loved ones all over the country who are shocked that this government, our government would allow such thing to occur. one man in particular stood out who called my office and he was in tears, mr. speaker, because his father, a world war ii veteran, was days away from being buried in the houston national cemetery and his father had heard about the censorship of religion and speech and he doesn't want to be buried in that cemetery with other veterans any longer. so no wonder that so many are shocked by the actions of this director. after all, it reminds me of the old soviet union the way they used to censor religion

does have a big price tag. what about our friends and our promises to them. if we promise money, can we put can you tell it? and is this at risk? israeli defense minister is visiting the united states and went on the record. >> nice to see you, sir, welcome to the united states. >> thank you for everything. >> so you've had a busy dance card so to speak seeing secretary of state hillary clinton, vice president biden and secretary of defense pinetta. >> yes. >> greta: why did you come to the united states? >> i came here to meet with palestine new jobs for the make sure that we are on the same page for the whole volcanic eruption in the middle east around us. >> greta: you came in the middle of washington seized in a discussion about our debt keel chg is sort of having across the world. and how does this affect israel? or debate over the debt ceiling? >> i believe that we cannot be of help. i think my wife to encourage the economy here by buying something. i feel the world is watching america. you know? it's the

does accreditation, up at the end of 2012? >> correct. supervisor kim: if we move forward with this proposal, you will not be able to move in until 2016. what are your thoughts on the impact on your accreditation? does this impact your ability to get accreditation? >> i see it as a positive impact. i say that because the people that come to do these sections are also people who are in the medical examiner's field and have to deal with issues regarding capital needs for their facilities. so, they have an understanding that the process will take time. it is something we have been working on at the medical examiner's office for over 10 years. i believe that the purchase in the building will show a good- faith effort on the part of this city to move in a good-faith direction, usually sufficient for an inspector to see that we are actively working to remedy the deficiencies they have identified. supervisor kim: thank you. supervisor chu: mr. rose? >> madam share, on page 6 of the report would point out that the total cost to purchase the facil