the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady -- the speaker: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. moore, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. moore will vote yes on h.r. 172. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on h.r. 172. as the member designated by mr. lowenthal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on h.r. 172. the speaker: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. green from the state of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. green will vote nay on h.r. 172. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. steube of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. steube will vote nay on h.r. 172. madam speaker, as t

: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote no on the amendment -- will vote no on the miller-meeks amendment. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 181. the nays are 241. the amendment is not -- the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 183. the nays are 244. the amendment is not adopted. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. the previous question is ordered on the bill, as amended. the question is on engrossment and third reading of the bill. those in favor say aye. those opposed no. the ayes have it. the clerk: to provide more effective remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on passage of the bill. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the ayes have it. ms. foxx: madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpo

for what purpose does does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. i request unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. >> mr. speaker, i rise today to recognize the heroic actions of the u.s. marshal service. last month the u.s. marshal service issued this press release. in an ongoing joint operation, the u.s. marshals in coordination with the national center for missing and exploited children and other iowa agencies have located 21 missing iowa children between the ages of 4 and 17 since october, 2020. as a mother can i not begin to imimagine the heartache of families, the families of these children have endured, thanks to the u.s. marshal service and other agencies stacked with finding and exploited children, these 21 children have finally been brought home. i would like to thank deputy marshal simons, and more than 50 local task force working to return iowa children home to their families. speaking of missing and exploited children, it cannot go without saying m

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. keating, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. keating will vote yes on h.r. 1502. as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h.r. 1502. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, thank you. as the member designated by dr. brian babin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that dr. babin will be voting yea on house resolution 1502. as the member designated by mr. dan crenshaw, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. crenshaw will be voting yea on house resolution 1502. and mr. speaker, finally, as the member designated by mr. troy nehls, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. nehls will be voting yea on house resolution 1502. thank you, mr. speaker. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does does the gentlewoman from missouri seek recognition?er designated by ms. ilhan omar, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. omar will vote yes on h.res. 330. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. moulton of massachusetts, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on h.res. 330. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. allred, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. allred will vote yes on h.res. 330. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on h.res. 330. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h

does acknowledge that it does not daca -- does not? press sec. psaki: all right. we have a special guest. we know this is one of the events where people get to take their children, family members, friends to. it is not quite the same. we will do a big one extra. we wanted to have a visitor and some special commemorative easter eggs for all of you from the president and the first lady. >> is the bunny taking questions? press sec. psaki: not today, but we will invite the bunny back for a future briefing. the bunny is wearing a mask. use every opportunity. it does not look similar to that funny but we will have to fact-check that for you. different eyelashes. >> army giving those out? >> chris will be the bunny's helper. he will deliver eggs and make sure each of you get one and some chocolates to take home to your loved ones. thank you everyone. [no audio] >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. created by america's cable television companies in 1979. today, we are brought to companies who provide c-span to viewers as a public service. >> two house subcommi

>> how does the suspect respond to the officer? if it's the arrest situation turnaround put your hands behind your head if they complyur that's it if the suspect is not comply and begins to resist than a look at what level of resistance does the suspect display to the officer and what does the officer do to overcome that resistance. nelson: let's talk on the second prong on the different types of resistance a suspect could use. can you describe the levels of resistance. >> no resistance would be compliance that is always the goal. the next level is passive resistance you tell the suspect turnaround put their hand behind their-- back and they don't. they are not resisting just physically noncompliant without any type of physical strength or any type of maneuver to prevent you from handcuffing them. the next level as active resistance. i put you into a handcuffing position and you pull your hands away. or you struggle with me. you use energy to prevent an officer from accomplishing their goal. the same suspect while handcuffed pulls

john, does it speak to a change in time, or does _ sentence.speak to the quality of the evidence in this particular case? it the quality of the evidence in this particular case?— particular case? it speaks to a chante particular case? it speaks to a change in _ particular case? it speaks to a change in time. _ particular case? it speaks to a change in time. there - particular case? it speaks to a change in time. there have i particular case? it speaks to a i change in time. there have been incidents in the past where the have been good or better evidence has been good or better evidence has been a complete reluctance for prosecutors to charge an individual police officer whom they consider to be their primary partners and investigation. it was an inherent conflict of interest historically. there was also some have a tenancy upon structural racism as well. both of those are fundamentally changing now, and this verdict has helped to change that. do now, and this verdict has helped to change that-— change that. do you think this verdict, cases _ c

what does that mean? >> of all the things that we do as peace officers for the minneapolis police department, i mentioned thousands of calls that our men and women respond to. it's my firm belief that the one singular incident we will be judged forever on will be our use of force, while it's absolutely imperative the officers go home at the end of their shift we want to ensure that our community members go home, too. so sanctity of life is vital, that that is the pillar for our use of force. >> has this generally always been the case with minneapolis use of force policy? >> it is not. >> when did that change? >> we implemented this particular in 2016. >> is the training and use of force and application of use of force policy been imparted, including this philosophy, onto police officers in training, at the training center? >> it certainly has, yes. >> does the policy itself define force? what is force? >> yes, it does. >> if we can take a look at exhibit 217, publish that. you highlight use of force. gene

the energy and commerce committee, which i'm a member of, does not oversee foreign policy, but it does have jurisdiction over the department of health and human services and subsequently the office of refugee resettlement which does take care of children who end up in the united states from one of those northern triangle countries. i learned that there are different drivers for people to migrate from each of those countries. there is, unfortunately, corruption at the highest levels of governments in that region. one common theme, however, is campaign rhetoric that places an open for business sign on our burdener -- border. the vast majority of people in the northern triangle countries do live below the poverty level and lack the job opportunities to escape these conditions. in el salvador there are problems with gangs and the gangs are violent. medieval levels of violence and brutality. many of the individuals serving in their government are holdovers from revolutionaries and the civil war which ended over 20 years ago. honduras is a country that is a through point for narcotics traffi

what does ubs do? what does credit suisse do? they have both done reasonably aggressively on the private bank wealth management route. if you think about ubs and its retrenchment out of things didn't come, which is very similar to what we saw with deutsche and equities, they have become far more selective in the businesses they are in, so when you think friday sort of -- when you think for a sort of non-investment banking for ubs, they certainly punch above their weight, and i think globally, you forget quite how big the u.s. banks continue to become as europe spends a decade in turmoil. jonathan f: how's this for a stat? it comes from a report here at bloomberg news, coming from the fed data. total loans and leases out to a record low as a share of deposits. we talked about that subdued loan demand in the first quarter. does that continue into q2, q3? jonathan t: well, we know that the behavior of the corporate and retail last year has ramped up deposits, and credit carnes end loan facilities have been paid down, so that will co

does it benefit? israeli press reports say u.s.fficials are satisfied with what the israelis have done. either way, it puts the united states in a very bad position in any perception of talks over iran's nuclear program. >> how is this being seen in iran? >> people basically believe this was carried out with u.s. support because all israeli acts of terror and sabotage have been carried out with support from u.s. military bases surrounding iran, u.s. embassies, sometimes other embassies. we also have a history where iea -- iaea have passed on intelligence to the israeli regime. whether biden himself knew it or not, there is the possibility the pentagon and the cia went behind his back, as with all repeatedly during the trump administration. whether biden knew or not, it does not make a difference. the fact americans have spoken of their satisfaction shows that when they want to talk, they are still willing to be violent and to support acts of war against iranian people. that does not help any talks. i think it creates an incentive -

-- what does that lead to? >> it leads to difficulty in moving your diaphragm and your chest. and impairing your ability to reoxygenate your blood. >> can that lead to hypoxia? >> yes. >> which bodily organ would you expect to see affected first? >> the brain. >> and all of those effects on speech and orientation and things progressing? >> correct. >> you describe what you saw as a sudden change. what does that mean to your analysis? >> so mr. floyd goes from making clear statements, some words i heard were please and i'm short of breath, please. and then there's a period of about 45 seconds of silence. but he's still moving. and seems to be active. and then there's a sudden relaxation. and so he goes from pretty much fully functioning and coherent to unconscious very rapidly. >> so in this particular case, how does his 90% blockage of the right coronary artery come into play? >> so what you're looking at there is a sudden decompensation, which is much more consistent with a sudden cardiac event. what happens t

>> it does. >> skipping through, does this appear to be and accurate copy? >> it appears to be so. >> i will now just kind of skim through fast. >> pretty much the entirety of the training? >> it looks likeke it, yes. fornd can you just describe the jury what excited delirium? is? >> certainly. it's a condition that is a combination of a variety of different medical issues happening at the same time it could be like psychosis -- i'm sorry. agitated delirium, pressurized speech, incoherent speech, superhuman strength, hypothermia. >> does the minneapolis police department to train cadets what kind of things because excited delirium? >> in the general sense it is the combination ofli pre-existig that could lead cardiovascular disease and also with drug use mental health diagnosis. >> okay. in terms of the signs officers are trained to look for, can you describe what those are? >> we do use an acronym. b whether it is a bystander or the caller they might describe it as a person thaty just snapped. i could go through in a little more detail. a. >> for the purpos

it does. how so? what — factor into your analysis? it does. how so?sent sides the person - how so? what other threats are present sides the person we'rel present sides the person we're dealing with? are there environmental hazards? or is there track of it, is there onlookers, people to people focused on the arrest? the officer's exhaustion level, what are other officers doing, things of that nature. ts level, what are other officers doing, things of that nature. is an officer entitled _ doing, things of that nature. is an officer entitled to _ doing, things of that nature. is an officer entitled to rely _ doing, things of that nature. is an officer entitled to rely on - officer entitled to rely on information he or she receives from dispatch— information he or she receives from dispatch in— information he or she receives from dispatch in formulating whether they will use _ dispatch in formulating whether they will use force? in dispatch in formulating whether they will use force?— will use force? in 'ustifying force, i would say _ will use force? in '

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin of the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote yes on the senate amendment to h.r. 1868. as the member designated by mr. crenshaw of the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. crenshaw will vote yes on the senate amendment to h.r. 1868. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on h.r. 1868. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. blumenauer, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote -- will vote yes on h.r. 1868. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu wil

>> it does. >> how so? >> the so, what other threats are present besides the person that we're dealing with? other environmental hazards. is there traffic going by on the street? are there onlookers? are there more people starting to focus on your arrest versus just walking down the sidewalk? the officer's exhaustion level. you know, what are other officers doing? things of that nature. >> is an officer entitled to rely on information he or she receives from dispatch in formulating whether they're going to use force? >> in justifying force, i would say no. in preparing to deal with the situation you're being sent to by dispatch, then i would say yes. >> how does that differ? >> so, an officer has to take into account what they see on the scene. dispatchers do the best jobs they can, but they're usually only getting information over the telephone. and the information may be inaccurate, it may be false, it may be exaggerated. so it's up to the officer on the street to determine what is the best course of acti

where does the other 2% go? democrats across the country, their definition of infrastructure includes universal pre-k, climate action, climate jus tirks eradicating right to work environment, care give, afordable house, police accountability and paid leave. this ain't infrastructure. so we all know what this is. the largest corporate welfare slush fund in american history. joe biden will have virtual carte blanche to dole out hundreds of billions of dollars to curry favor with ally, supporters, friends and family. this isn't the hol mark of innovation. but it will ensure that the d.c. swamp continues to be a festering pool of corruption. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: i thank the gentleman from texas. we came here -- mr. johnson: i theaning gentleman from texas. we came here to drain the swamp but it's -- we'll get back to

it does serve a very useful purpose for life insurance, whatever. but forensic pathologists are also using death certificates for public health data purposes. in any given case, we aren't just thinking about this particular person and their cause and manner of death. we are also thinking, the state and the federal government collect data on why do people die, what is cause of death. it's how we know as a country that we have -- how many people die of covid, for example. it's because death certificates list that. one of the things that we use this other contributing conditions for is to list disease processes or drugs that are present at the time of death, but that we don't directly -- that we don't believe directly contributed to the cause of death. it's so that someone looking at data years from now can say, okay, we want to do an evaluation of all deaths during law enforcement subduing. how many involved someone who also had drugs on board? that may be something that is relevant in trying to prevent these sort of deaths in the future, for example.

the grand jury does not indict. does not return a true bill which would be an indictment. let's assume that there's a no bill in this case. what happens before the grand jury stays with the grand jury. this family won't have answers. there was supposed to be a ballistics report. will they have the opportunity to read the ballistics report? i hope so. but the grand jury works in secrecy. it's shrouded in secrecy. and i'm not antithetical to grand juries. but my point is will this family get answers if there is a no bill? the system's got to change. you cannot leave a family under these circumstances with more questions than answers after the case has made its way through the judicial system. you can't leave them like this. they will suffer the rest of their lives. they've got to know what happened. the system has to change. there has to be a way for these families to know more about what happened when the cameras are off, no witnesses are available. there has to be a way for them to at least know what happens when the case is presented. they're not allowed to be there when

it does not surprise me that this is where he has ended. was telling people during the primaries that this is where i thought that, where i thought he would be. there are some obvious things with joe biden, and joe biden is old, he is an old, white, catholic man who has a very genial personality. even people who are trying to demonize him now have a hard part getting past that. barack obama was a young black man with a foreign sounding name rooted in arabic. very different people. it is not surprising to me at all that things, he is a different person, american politics reacts to does two different people differently. that is obvious. the other thing is, and this is one of those examples -- some time, a flawed person, a flawed person meets their moment. and the signature thing about joe biden to his political career has been politics of empathy. and at many points and our history, that is of only limited political currency. he managed to come residents -- president anna. -- eve managed to become president -- he managed to become president b

meanwhile, that does it for "what'd you miss?"will be digging into bloomberg "technology" in a moment. joe: that is next. have a great evening. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ ♪ look, if your wireless carrier was a guy you'd leave him tomorrow. not very flexible. not great at saving. you deserve better... xfinity mobile. now they have unlimited for just $30 a month... $30. and they're number one in customer satisfaction. his number... delete it. i'm deleting it. so, break free from the big three. xfinity internet customers, take the savings challenge at xfinitymobile.com/mysavings. or visit and xfinity store to learn how our switch squad makes it easy to switch and save hundreds. emily: i am emily chang in san francisco. this is "bloomberg technology." coming up, amazon beats estimates. the pandemic momentum is not waning as the world reopens. shares surging after hours. qualcomm

>> it does. >> how so? >> so, what other threats are present besides the person that we're dealing with? are there environmental hazards? is there traffic going by on street? are there onlookers, more people starting to focus on your arrest versus just walking down the sidewalk? the officer's exhaustion level, you know, what are other officers doing, things of that nature. >> is an officer entitled to rely on information he or she receives from dispatch in formulating whether they're going to use force? >> in justifying force, i would say no. in preparing to deal with the situation you're being sent to by dispatch, then i would say yes. >> okay. how does that differ? >> so, an officer has to take into account what they see on the scene. dispatchers do the best jobs they can, but they're usually only getting information over the telephone, and the information may be inaccurate, may be false, may be exaggerated, so it's up to the officer on the street to determine what is the best course of action. >> okay. h

or does it indicate something else going on under the surface that does not question the optimism but how quickly we will get to the peak growth people are expecting? neil: know, i think the only issue is people are suffering from cognitive dissonance. do you honestly believe 700,000 people are getting laid off every week with consumer confidence at the same level it was in 2017? lisa: would you say these numbers are fictitious? neil: they are not fictitious. the news is real. the analysis is fake. what is the point of using these numbers? jonathan: in what way is the analysis fake? build on that. neil: anyone trying to pitch an argument in our business, the sell side economics research business, trying to pitch a call for the economic outlook based on initial jobless claims data -- if you're paying for that, you are wasting your money. that is what i think. jonathan: a really good point. let's build on it a bit more. this is where you've been strong over last 12 months. you have disregarded some of the more dramatic numbers and look to a better economy. it was not always this way. it

debt does that mean anything rick. it really doesn't and you know it's a big number so it has to have a consequence does it my way of looking at it even though we look at it and say well wayne quake nobody's ever really going to pay it in fact we will have to pay it and that's kind of where i was my starting point may be 40 years ago when i read . c.v. myers on the coming deflation eventually all of that will have to be repaid if not by the borrower than by the lender and so so 2828 trillion is a number we can't even wrap our heads around that but you have much bigger economies the the. i keep coming back to the derivatives market which amounts to something like depending on whose estimate a one quadrillion to 2 quadrillion dollars so that is so much bigger than the actual global economy of goods and services. it is so it's really hard to put $28.00 trillion dollars into perspective but trust me it will all have to be repaid at some point the number one component of the global economy is creating bet that if it's an va

one size does not fit all. in some cases at that means we increase distribution to pharmacies, to mobile vaccine sites, so that is something ongoing with the leaders around the country, including of course with leaders in the district of columbia. reporter: thank you. i want to talk about if the white house is content by the latest round of talks with iran? ms. psaki:ms. psaki: -- ms. psaki: we are only on the first day so i will give the team on the ground an opportunity to comment on that. reporter: -- the european direction and the chinese and iran, so why do you have a high-ranking u.s. official in vienna? ms. psaki: i think it is important to convey to our partners that we believe diplomacy is the best out forward, the most appropriate step forward, and rob malley has been a part of negotiations in the past and is appropriate to be there. reporter: it is the white house's position now no lifting of sanctions until they comply? ms. psaki: we expect a big part of the conversation will be how iran can come ba

it does not say if it does that you can do anything you want.hey must do some contest like proportionality or something else. i can mention that often outside of school is -- it is the parents job, not the teachers if there are parents in the house etc.. i can mention the differences and say, take those into account. i do not see how to go beyond that. any suggestions you have will be welcomed. >> i think it is important that there be clear lines. that is why they issued the decision they did. within the context of school supervision, whether it is an afterschool program, a class trip, in the classroom, tinker applies. tinker does mean the school can shut it down a speaker if the speaker -- if those words will be to disruption. whether it is political, religious, that is the state of the law in the cases below. i don't know where the other side gets this exception for political or religious speech, does not exist. outside of school, the priority is not to give the school discretion to regulate kids speech, it is the -- to protect people's freedo

>> yes. >> does the fact mr. floyd was handcuffed somehow come into the analysis as to whether or not to put him into a prone position? >> no, any resister handcuffed or not should go to the ground in a prone position. >> and could you describe generally what you mean as a prone control position? >> so it's where the suspect either handcuffed, handcuffs are behind the back, placed on their stomach or chest and officers are in a position to apply body weight to keep the suspect on the ground and to keep them further immobilized. >> would it be common practice in that situation to employ an mrt or hobble restraint? >> you could. >> what would be the factors to determine whether or not an officer would employ such a technique? >> so the officers control the person's legs? does the person need to have their legs controlled in the situation they did? and could officer lane be successful in trying to control the legs. so that's part of the force option selections they had to make. >> in terms of you're familiar officer

that pushes really hard to say, this does not fit. d.c. does not fit. the territory doesn't fit. of course, if you look farther back to the founding, it did just fine. question three, and this is one that i picked up listening to the hearing. i am going to put it out, but i don't think much of it. is turning d.c. into a state a good idea? is it a partisan idea? lots of members of congress cap making that point. i will tell you, the question was policy debate for which the constitution has nothing to say at all. i will tell you this, i don't have much to say. you can make up your minds on that one if you wish, but it seems to me that if this is a policy debate, and the congress did what it was supposed to do, the issue for me as i watch the hearings and the problem is we often recomplete policy, partisanship and constitutional law. as we think about this question, we should keep it separate. surely we could say, is it a good idea, is d.c. too small? are there things in d.c. that are industrious, is a big enough, small enough? all of those questions are fine, but it might not right

[indiscernible] does the president continue to stand by the campaign promise? ms. psaki: he does. it continues to work toward it. in order to sign legislation, he needs to come to his desk. he has certainly been a vocal advocate in support for the equality act. he noted it past the house and needs to work its way through the senate -- he noted it passed the house and needs to work its way through the senate and get through the senate in order for him to sign it. he has put out a statement of administration policy. he talked about his views that this legislation to pass. he has had conversations on a range of topics, but so does our legislative team who works to move forward his agenda every day. reporter: one thing related to this is the supreme court upcoming decision in a case against philadelphia on first amendment rights on child placements same-sex couples. is the administration doing any contingency planning on that decision and the equality act? ms. psaki: you mean if there is a different outcome than we would like from the supreme court ruling? reporter: based on the outco

that's not what he does.e sort of significant defense work that needs to be done and in light of the information that came out about, and do you means and clearly being eager to provide not only the documents but her on testimony about what her ex-husband and perhaps her ex-father-in-law have said. it is an indication that this investigation is certainly heating up. >> one of the interesting notes here is that the new hire by the trump's team used to be a law partner. >> that's right. they practice today in the '80s. the head of all the prosecutors. i don't read much unto that. long-term colleagues and a variety of different cases and traveled in a lot of it the same and public corruption, that's my guess as to why ron was brought in. lawrence, as andrew just said in the last segment of how you build a case, it is interesting that alan weisselberg is also in the hot seat. he also works for the trump administration. one way to get your way to work your way up is you start low on the ladder so to speak and weis

does someone need to squeeze the bag? how does it work? >> it's just a bag that you will squeeze roughly every five or six seconds to breathe for the patient. >> so after you set it up and the firefighters arrived, did one of them take over that part? >> from what i remember. >> and then you said you moved down and assisted with the iv. can you describe that? >> i just worked on trying to get iv access. >> and was there some difficulty with that? >> a little bit. i believe we had access at some point, but i'm not sure when that was done. >> and what is that? >> it is a needle that drills into the bone in your leg and another way of giving medications. >> and why would you need to have that kind of access? >> the same reason, to give medications to try to resuscitate. >> may be you can describe why you might initially go from one location to moving to this access? >> it's done if you have difficulty with iv access and it's common to do any cardiac arrest. >> and it stands for? [inaudible] >> and iv is? >> intravenous. >> does that get estab

how does that come to pass? have people made common specific requests aboutha access to specific records, or is there a kind of step by step process whereby it happens over a period of time? >> well, the process has been murky in terms of how it comes about, but the national archives has released documents that show when the president does relax the records -- restrictions and under what circumstances. and so there was pressure on bill clinton to relax those restrictions when hillary clinton was running for office. there was pressure against george w. bush after his presidency when people were still looking at what happened in rack, what happened in hurricane katrina -- iraq, hurricane katrina, what happened in afghanistan. so those relaxation documents have been released. .there right on the presidential act of congress and the courts have access. they just need to request it. and they have the right to determine when congress and the courtsnd can have access. in terms of the public the only way the public woul

does not have it in places where it used to have a print does not have an communities oriented roaming old protestant nominations or in most cases my own roman catholic church. you have dissolve into a pure individualism in the u.s. when idea you advance look at the discourse of antiracism with you on the right call low ideology you see something that could to your mind have a positive dimension. which is to say you could help fill the void left by mainline protestantism. can you talk a little bit about that? >> there's no question about we called the great awoken ring. participate some sense that used to be powerful and elite america. we are now no longer powerful but leading cultural residue theological residue in a spiritual desire behind. i think calling awoken as a post- protestant, does not explain everything about it. but it is a really useful analytic tool. and it tells you something to that i think conservatives may be especially religious conservatives should be conscientious toward these emergent progressive structures are structures that speak to impart meaning and purpose

what does that mean? >> it's a term we are going to use for anybody that's not responsive, not breathing, and doesn't have a pulse currently. >> so essentially does that mean that someone's heart has stopped? >> yeah. >> are there multiple things that can cause someone's heart to stop? >> absolutely, yes. >> when you say cardiac arrest, you are dealing with a patient whose heart has stopped. is that an emergency? >> yes. >> what did you guys -- knowing that you had an individual george floyd, in cardiac arrest, what did you do? >> my partner said let's just get him in the truck so i unloaded our stretcher bring to the patient to place him in the ambulance. >> what were you -- what was the reason for getting him into the truck? >> all of our equipment at that point was in the truck for resuscitating patients, and we -- we also didn't have the ambulance fire there who work with us on that. so we needed to get him in the truck. on top of that there were a crowd of people that appeared very upset on the sidew

nelson: does name have a standards committee? >> it does. right no there are two separate committees. previously they were both inspection and standards under one committee at the time i was the chairperson no they are separated. nelson: how are the standards approved? >> they are different. the accreditation checklist is approved by the board of directors the standards are a grassroots process where any member of name can't adjust the standard that is put out to the general population members. then those are discussed and voted on at the annual general meeting in the business meeting. therefore, anybody out of the hundreds of pathologist that are present can stand up and debate and address the standards. at some point to vote is called as to whether or not that standard will be included or not. therefore it is approved by the general membership not the board of directors. nelson: when were those standards approved? >> initially they started 2005. then they are updated on a regular basis because medical knowledge changes. someone needs to ke

what does that tell you?ink it's part of a wider pattern, a lot of people get up every morning and scan the news cycle and whether it's a country and our michael brown and the tragedy of george floyd, they see this as useful for a larger agenda that does not have public support. and so whether it's open borders or reparations or redistribution or the end of the second or first amendment or alternate constitutional customs and tradition, it doesn't matter. they want to use this crisis to indict all of america in the majority population and then the majority population of america says continually, what can we do? what medieval indulgence or reparation can we do? then they are given some things they can do. you can change the voting laws or have a greater proportion of this particular group and make race-based reparations in the department of agriculture but it's never going to be enough. there are certain rules of this progress and you mentioned data, data doesn't matter. african-americans are being slaughtered

tell you know what seem pretty they're going to the russians so it does seem a bit all right it does cooper in delhi from where you are is this a particularly acute issue in as much as there are issues of procurement and procurement specifically in india because you are going through a vicious 2nd wave of coronavirus there. yes it's a quite led set of issues as fires india's vantage point goes the 1st is that beginning crew india expanded the vaccination program so those 45 years and above and then beginning me in a more recent decision it's open door than dollars and that's 18 years and above which has obviously led to an enormous increase in the demand for vaccines at that point india had only 2 axioms the astra zeneca went back to base elements and the other one the vax vaccine went back to read about it by a day and only recently this what nick was given the arc raises and to be important initially what all this means is that there was a report as early as late march that in the interim government has decided that debate is not to be under court according to that report expanding

he actually makes it to about fort recovery and little turtle again is watching and as he does so they do attack anthony wayne's legion as this unfolds. he realizes that this army is different than the other two armies that he had previously faced. so he goes back to the grand council and he says this army is different. he says, i'm not sure the british are actually going to involve themselves in our fight. we really may need to consider negotiations at this point in time the council votes and they decide that they do want to continue with military action when they do decide that little turtle actually hands over. here the rains to blue jacket blue jacket is of the shawnee and he's warrior-minded and he's really ready to take this fight to the united states legion the native americans have actually built their village right behind fort miamis, which is a fully constructed fort garrisoned with the british at this point in time under general campbell anthony wayne on august 17th has made it to roast a book. so as he comes to roosevelt, which is just a little bit outside of our battlefiel

what does that mean? >> it's a term we are going use for anybody that is not responsive and not breathing and doesn't have a pulse currently. >> okay. so essentially does that mean someone's heart has stopped? >> yes. >> are there multiple things that can cause someone's heart to stop? >> absolutely. >> when you say cardiac arrest you are dating with a patient whose heart has stopped. is that an emergency? >> yes. >> so knowing that you had an individual in cardiac arrest,, what did you decide to do? >> so we, my partner said let's just getting in the truck. so i unloaded our stretcher to bring to the patient to place and in the ambulance. >> and what were you, what was the reason for getting him into the truck? >> all of our equipment at the point was in the truck for resuscitating a patient, and we also didn't have minneapolis fire there yet which they work with us on critical patients like that and help us a lot. so kind of resource management we need to get them in the truck. on top of that there was

record does that have any sort of impact on what the officer does when they approach a vehicle 'd. that's circumstantial and you know i couldn't tell police officers are acting you know with that interacts with the public in the 1st place in traffic stop i don't know what the initial problem was the traffic stop was he has a warren's. again i don't know what that officer of the initial one was putting the handcuffs on it seemed like everything was under control again until the subject chose to resist so ultimately you have to put the onus on the subject who did actively try to resist and sleeps in the screw the seat we have season police officers who if they were so seasoned again armchair quarterbacking i'm putting my opinion out there how you can mistaken mistakenly grab your pistol instead of your taser after you have had training that makes no sense to me whatsoever i'm going to disagree with you a little bit i'm not a fan of taser whatsoever and the teaser has the taser when it 1st came out gave police officers this sense of that it was the end all be all tool it would stop re

what if ou do does not need to be stored. what if you do not — does not need to be stored. stored. what if you do not have a _ does not need to be stored. what if you do not have a smartphone? - does not need to be stored. what if you do not have a smartphone? it l does not need to be stored. what if| you do not have a smartphone? it is reall you do not have a smartphone? it 3 really important that there are alternatives like paper certificates or even just serial numbers that people can write down their notebooks and read out. that means that actually the master information should be stored online rather than insisting that people have smartphones on which to store them. 0nline credentials, authenticated with faces, are going to be the secure, inclusive and private way to go. secure, inclusive and private way to .o_ , ., ., secure, inclusive and private way to go. good to talk to. thank you. -- aood to go. good to talk to. thank you. -- good to talk— go. good to talk to. thank you. -- good to talk to _ go. good to talk to. thank you. -- good to talk to you. _ four more cou

it is— truth and it does not matter any more it is a _ truth and it does not matter any more.o be renowned for having honour in our politics _ renowned for having honour in our olitics. ., ., ~' renowned for having honour in our olitics. ., ., ., politics. looking at the front of the metro. _ politics. looking at the front of the metro, this _ politics. looking at the front of the metro, this again - politics. looking at the front of| the metro, this again underline something you are saying about the roll—out and enjoying the freezing outside and people are more relaxed about this and that gives you a reason, come it's a pretty stark headline, that. its covid—i9 depths plunge 97%. did we think in february or march but this is what was going to happen? and, i think britain and i keep the point by the think we all know, we all have friends who exaggerate a bit, who were a bit larger—than—life and either decide that you really can't bear that sort of person and some people cannot and i understand that, oryou some people cannot and i understand that, or you say, with a pinch of sa

there does need _ grip of the situation. there does need to— grip of the situation. the situation. there does need to be —— i seem to be a lack of clarity— need to be —— i seem to be a lack of clarity and _ need to be —— i seem to be a lack of clarity and thought over issues. thrat's— clarity and thought over issues. that's not— clarity and thought over issues. that's not a good image for any prime _ that's not a good image for any prime minister to have. you want him to look— prime minister to have. you want him to look in— prime minister to have. you want him to look in control and the people around _ to look in control and the people around him. if you're keir starmer, why wouldn't — around him. if you're keir starmer, why wouldn't you... i can't believe it or— why wouldn't you... i can't believe it or you _ why wouldn't you... i can't believe it or you politician has gone to a photo _ it or you politician has gone to a photo shoot in the last all week. they— photo shoot in the last all week. they all— photo shoot in the last all week. they all do it every single

it does, does feel a — resuming for women's golf?s, does feel a little bit _ resuming for women's golf? it does, does feel a little bit like _ does feel a little bit like normalcy, which is a nice way to get back to the regular time slot and it is very warm, it is very beautiful here in temperatures are expected to climb into the triple digits and later in this weekend and it's going to be hot, it's going to be a great test i think players are really excited to just be out here and back, playing the first event of the first major of the year. let’s back, playing the first event of the first major of the year.— first major of the year. let's go throu . h first major of the year. let's go through one — first major of the year. let's go through one of _ first major of the year. let's go through one of the _ first major of the year. let's go through one of the ones - first major of the year. let's go through one of the ones we - first major of the year. let's go l through one of the ones we could first major of the year. let's go - throu

but for every single person who does develop the blood clots and does have _ who does develop the blood have the reaction as virtually to the jab, that's a horrific situation _ to the jab, that's a horrific situation for them to be in and for their— situation for them to be in and for their families as well. sol understand why they're talking about may be _ understand why they're talking about may be looking for alternatives to astrazeneca for the younger people who appear to be more vulnerable to this particular side effect.— this particular side effect. daisy, most peeple _ this particular side effect. daisy, most people seem _ this particular side effect. daisy, most people seem to _ this particular side effect. daisy, most people seem to be - this particular side effect. daisy, most people seem to be not - this particular side effect. daisy, most people seem to be not too| most people seem to be not too worried about the negative publicity that has surrounded the astrazeneca, with the link with the clots, and people are still very much for taking the vaccine and the roll—out is cont

tobin, does this reflect the calculations that he did? >> yes, this does. but now you see -- >> one moment, doctor. your honor, i want to, i offer exhibit 93232. >> any objection? >> no objection. >> 932 is received. >> now doctor please tell us what we see in 932. >> what you were seeing now is that networks no longer just prone. now you have the knee on the back in addition or the knee on the side. and so it is, this is going to her the compressed down the eelv. so here you are seeing that the eelv is now being really squashed down. so by the combination of turning him prone and also having the knee on the back you are seeing a 43% reduction in the eelv, which means that there's also a 43% reduction in his oxygen reserves, which means there is also a huge reduction in the size of the hypopharynx. because this is directly linked to the hypopharynx, and you will see how this is linked. and so when you decrease the size of the eelv, that's going to cause it. and an additional effect is that your work of breathing goes up because when you are turned prone and