>> tt also means, doest it, that t issue's not longer abou nuclear energy and nuclear weaps, it's about the relationship of legitizing the government in iran and pulling back which may achieve grear desired rule is which changen the ground. >> given complicatio and i complicate things ormously i'm assuming for predent obama, woulthis be the prose time to put thi on holdather than go down the route saying we want to sanction and the chinese say the same thing? what is pointof going down the route? >> the russians wil always complicate this for us. unitedtates policy will be complicad by theussians being in thatquation and that's very real. i think this wi come to a head whenhmadinejad vsits new york, visits the u.n., and he's going to be her and there's going to be a great callor him to release the "newsweek" correspondent whis still bng held trelease many of the journalists andbloggers still being detained. there are things for ahmadinejad to answeror and i think, yes it will have to gonto a cooling pattern where thes going to have to b very clear that this gornment is seen as creasingl

that doest lok likely othe than what we tked about. at some point, there going to have to move fast. >> theice president still thinks -- >> you have got a lit of when will go rst? the house cou move faster. they have bills ready to go to the rules and to e floor. but thers a numbeof especly conservative democratin the house that say, wait aminute. you are gng to mak me wal the plank somehing thatis not popula in my district. i'm up for relection, let's see what the senate doe. >> let's talk abt what everody else is talking about. all the wonderful high-minde ubstance, is overshadowed by one moment on the house floor, two words. you lie, from oe wilson from north carolina. you're from north rolina. wanted to clear tt up for everybody. how much did that help or hurt what the prsident wasout to do? >> if i had power, i wuld joe wils's bank ccount to find ou how much rahm manuel pad him for is. thiscouldn't work out better. therehe white house is saing, time is - time for bickeng is over and then all of a sudden, u hear at the tow hall in

it doest mean she's not xually active two yars after she gets here, an the vaccine wi most likely preve her fromgetting thisprevalent disease. but demanding that she ge a vaccin for a disease that is not communicable, ithink, is a problem. ifshe were -- if she entered the count, then i ink she has he otion to decide whether she wants tha vaccne or the sceening that can be one on a older woan. it is the lack f liberty in this paticular instance of saying, no, i don't want i didn' want a t x-ray thi exposing myself to mre rays if yo will, but that's one of the quirements. 's no longer adisease that's prvalent in the united sates. but then -- >> tb, tre was a ne epidemic in new yk. >> actual, i was going t say that maybe the ason why it's t an epidemic was because initiallit wasscreened and required everyone to, y know, have that tst be provided. >> you can't afford it,are we going say everybody that couldavea sexually-transmitted disease can't enter the country? that gets ito a tochy area with the overnment. i find it very inresting, even if the pharmaceical company says they ave no opini

>>ow does this afct the qualityf informaon that russianset and how doest afct their demracy and the way that journalists a able to write about important stories around rruption, around cre in russia? >> well, democracys based on having a citizenry tha's fully formed. that's n the case in russi you have the print mea has been marginalized, thers essentially been broht under the corol of the government. and what's left is a small kind of elite print dia that reacs a small sectorf the populati inoscow and journalists for at print media that write about national securityissues, that write about the conflict i chechnya and the north ucasus, they fear for their life. >>hen you bring out reports ke this, is the russn government payg any attention? >> they're paying attention absolutely. ou delegation in moscow met toy with investigators who are looking into these cases. i talked t our people on the ground there, i understand the meeting was somewhat frustrating. but the point is we' having a dialogue. 're talking tothem. they know about our concern. ey know about the leve of inteational concer

doest mean they can actually rce iran to do somethi and do we kn that it's true what e u.s., france,and britain are chargin? >> it appears to be true in the see that iran has now admitted at it's true, has admied that it is anuclear installation the argume here was it for milita means. there is a long technic discussion about tha butit does appear, one of the significant thin that came out this was a verystrong statement from t russians saying they believe it's te, they thi it's unacceptable ad they thi irn has tofess up here. the russians, one ofthe inresting thngs tha has been hpening over the last few weeks and this push that little futher down the rod is the russians who had been dad set against sanctions are now moving closer and cler to that. what this is is a prelude to those negotiatons where the iranians ill be ased to feeze at they're doing that's t western --hat's the western proosal. the expectations is the iranians won't freeze iand then we do go bacto pursuing sancions. but in the vw of the administration,more of he ground rule has been laid because of the announcemen >

. >> charlie: it setimes doest? but it mostly did. >> i go in the cour >>harlie: what's your asssment of rog's game yesterda we, roger plays -- he never changes his game ande has t game to bt meut yesterday i playedery focussed. i triedto move him to the baseline and trying to play harder than him. the key to roger and nadal is to play unbeliable tennis and everything you suld do everything perfect and that' wh i did yesterday. >> >> you're the tallest pyer to win the open, maybe ever toin e grand slam, yes? >> yeah. >>harlie: why is that? why have tall playsot done as welin the past? >> i don't know. i feel vy comforbl with my size for m it's an advantage for the serv >> crlie: but like sampr you deveped ground strokes and you can play the baselines long as you need to. >> yeah, i love to play in the baseline but i want to improve in the net. charlie: if the forehandis the best shot, what the wor shot? what is theweakest? >> maybe volley. >> charlie: the voey? >>eah, i think . if you have a goodvolley, a good slice

say is it's about in cple is that you -- why do we go back to it is that it reach an intimy that it doest reach in an another retionship where there's not physical rationship or intimate re intimate relationsp and i think we go back to it because there's an interaction inside ourself we can only reach beuse of the otr. that'shat a belie. and it's actuay more about being in touch with the depth of ourselves of the hidden pla of ourselves that wwant so much to be with the other. i don't think it's about t other. you see what i'msang? >> charlie: it's your own what? >> bause you get touchwith places that you'veever been in touch with beforeyou met the person so -- that's why it's unbearable somime and wonderful sometis. cause you're reaching different spaces inside you. you want t reach, o course, a place where the's respect and then love. the respect is ithe mo diicult because y've t to in touch enough whe you can stop, there'the limit to respect the other and ittakes a whil ihink it takes maturity in order to t there and i have good plans -- [lauter] >> charlie: u reached that mature level

argument forot having intelligencoversight in group of calm professnal oversight what works and wha doest and what doctors are doina good job. we need more geriatricians and obgyns and real health practitioners an centers so let's give them more money as an intensive. that's theay you use professionals and specifically don't use congss whoever's working on them andthat's a little unfair and unkind to y but if you have lobbyists working down lg enough and you don't know how to arg back they'll probably do what ty say because they me a good case it ll be good for your constituts. they may berong and i wt loyists and congressmen out of the process an i think the president agrees with this. >> crlie: we know certain stat operate more efficntly than oers and there are differens in regions do yo buy you ough to be able touy yournsurance in any state you want to? >> n i'll tell you exactly why d i'll make some pple in oklaho mad when i say this. i come from weirginia and let'say i y aealth insurance policy from a company in west virginia a our overite of heah insurance tends to be pret good, ptt

>> it doest for this portion of the program. our conversatisill spill over into. i think -- my thanks to all of you for coming this evening and please join me ihanking all of o speakers this eving. [applauding] >> can i thank eveone in turn because for better or worse -- may be worse, i could not have written the book with my very good friend wanot asking me to speak here a couple of years ago, a year-and-a-half ago. made a huge impression on me. there may be an opening. ye, no more. [applauding] >> new york times book review editor sam tanenhaus is the author of "literature unbound", auide to the common reader, and louis armstrong. currently working on a biography of william f. buckley, the american enterprise institute hosted this event. for more information visit aei dot org. >> in the beginning of the book you dedicate the first part of the book to the people of your country. the other part of the book you dedicate to your mom, martha. tell me about rtha johnson. >> i think that was of real force that shaped my life and the life of my siblings. my mother was o

>fill: so there's room between outrightverruling, or overturning thesetwo precedents and-- doesn'- doeste believe in sari desis. >> that's thother issue hanging over this se that justic sotomayor brought up and so did oths. justice alito didn't think a decision from 1990 and a decisionw 2003 wereall thatld and perhaps not deserving the stare decisis. this case, if the cou does errule these two-- especiallyhe 1990 cision-- would mark a fundamental chge in how r elections are funded. oppones and supporters ofk the restriction oncorporate spending he disagr on the practical impact-- pporters of the restriction believe itould be like turning a spigot on full force in terms money flowing into campaigns but the opponents of the restrictions arg there are 23 statethat don't have restctions and nody's saying they're overwhmingly corrupt. lehrer: congress might be writing mpaign law inhe middleave cpaign year. ank you very much. >> my pleasure. >> lehre you can listen to all of today's arguments athe supreme court on o web site at newshour.pbs.org. next, a "gooye, hello" to the beatles as the mu

representative ed marqukey doest know. >>> south carolina governor mark san ford is talking again.ces his biggest audience yet during the kevin cohen program. the governor will take questions from callers. it'll be his first radio appearance since that secret trip to argentina. by the way, he said to the daily beat, everyone goes through a secret agent mission some time in their life. hmm. while we're on the subject of governors, former illinois governor rob blagojevich has a brand-new mem hua out today. it's called "the governor." the truth behind the political scandal that continues to rock the nation. in it blago presents himself as an innocent man. he talked about his situation on the "today" show. >> when you want to tell the people who hired and trusted you you didn't let them down, you look for the highest mountain top you can find to shout out and say it just ain't so. no one hears you atop a mountain. the next best thing is to write a book. >> he likens his situation to the book "alice in wonderland." he says so much of this story is upside down. i didn't do anything wrong

opportunities to beg a member of the internaonal community, and there consequences to acting as a state that doest ke the responsibilities as a member of the internation community. >> rose: what is our ssage to the isrlis if they decide the want to take mitary action at so point? >> that i wouldn'do it, even thoht i would like to do it. >> >> what would you ke to do? >> , way. i'not going to comnt on that here. >> rose: ay, but the message to iran: if, in fact, you ow, which is a cdition, if, in fa, you show that you want to be a part of theommunity of nations,ere prepared to engage you on all bilater relationships th exist, wheter it has to do with you stopping enriching nucar fuel. >> a nucleazed iran is a theat to the region and ever - >> rose:verybody knows that. everybody knows that. >> but, as the president s quite clear inoth bilateral meetings as well as 's been in hi communication to the irania government,hey have a choice to make. they know the opportunities those choices anthe consequenceof those choices. and they will, but whatill not happen i as the president said, merely talking for

of this online speech will somehow crowd out the speech that we want to hear but the online world doest work that way. it's not like broadcast or print where there's a limited capacity for messages. my blog doesn't crowd out yours. there's room for everyone. so that's the end of the top 10 list but you know, sometimes it's really good to go to 11. so in closing, i want to talk personally about another kind of misunderstanding or myth that's pretty widespread. the idea that sooner or later one day the web is going to calm down, grow up, put on a suit and stop being so bunktious. a lot of people thought it would be a new era of self-expression and i did too. but it didn't live up to it at first it wasn't until blogging became popular that we could see what that era really looked like. and we started calling it lots of things. web 2.0, user-generated content, the culture and it describes the same thing. the fact that we now have a medium that invites broad participation. that offers us the chance to create it together and add pieces of ourselves. blogging was the first nd in some ways stil

it's not a matteof who owns or doest own it. it's a mter of what use is it being madfron;it.actory farming has grown, the volume of exces manure h mushroomed, and thers been an increasing push to regulate rm pollution. but american agricture has fought offollution controls for three decades. >> the whole agriculral community has remained may the last big or e biggest unregulated, lgely unregulated area of wateq;[tion. and it'shy epa tells you across the country agriculre's responsible for 60%, or somethg, like that of our water quality oblems. >> we're tking the equivalent of medium-si cities in terms of the waste that is genated, that is virtually untre ing into the chesapeake bay and... >> sth: so cities have their waste treated, go through ter treatment ants. farming,griculture, these concentrat animal-raising opations, they're not treated the same way? >> that is absolutelcorrect. >> sth: the delmarva poultry indury on the bay's eastern ore doesn't see it that way. it contends that there's fundamental dierence between industrial pollution or urn sewageand agricultural was

whoop, whoop doest want to here. that was not a reference to prior president. wish i had been that cute. i wish i would have thought of it. what that means that the recovery starts, and thdn abates and then starts again. so it has the shape of the letter w. i would never, seriously, really try to avoid, we have too much to look forward to look back. we keep our ice ahead. we want to maintain the support of the american people to understand that the fact that we may be, uld be, possibly, might be at the end of a recessionary period is interesting information. but until we put people back in jobs, and we have more people in jobs, than we had before this started, i know the president won't think we're successful but that we haven't even begun the success of this operation. so i want to thank you for the hard work that you do throughout america in growing small businesses, and as a former small businessman, i know how hard it is. i stayed up late at night, working with salesforce.com and working with quicken and quickbooks and things like that to try to do all of t

you make some passing reference to teacher effectiveness, hily qualifd may be important but doest explain a lot in terms of teacher effectiveness. mr. harrs, the new schools in new york are quite exciting. i couldn't help but wonder who were the teachers, where did ey come from, where these existing teachers that were there. similarly, fors. lockett. where did the teachers come from? did you select them? do you keep them? do you have control? i found steve barr's observations that 40% of the teachers in locke high school returned. think about it one way and i think wow, that is a lot. and i think about another way and i think g., 60% don't want to be there andhey were there before. bit about that self-selection that you seem to be tapping into so if we could start with dr. peiffer and then go to mr. harries and then the ms. lockett and in mr. barr. thank you. >> i would agree to holli qualified teache aren't necessarily highly effective. i seem to very highly qualified people not doing a particular od job, but when wlook at all the statistics right now, our concentration of teachers who d