my name is mack allen i am a member of the dogpatch organization and i am a member of dogpatch with in the cove and i think it is an exciting opportunity for our neighborhood to truly contribute to better outcomes to the homeless in our city. i am proud to say that dogpatch has contributed directly to this exact type of outcome and i hope that throughout this year we can have a navigation center in our neighborhood. >>thank you. thank you dogpatch.next speaker please. >>i speak on behalf of small landlords in the city and we are unanimous and in support of navigation centers i think it's an conscionable that people are arrested and incited have in their belongings confiscated in the middle the night. we believe homeless people should get the r same benefits as b and b should specifically have task forces that are designed to not solve the problems. i love of the city would approach it. i think that you should consider that and not call for a separate hearing. in regard to safe injection sites. if we were told that they were given a prescription of zoloft all of the homeowners would emb

my name is mack allen i am a member of the dogpatch organization and i am a member of dogpatch with in the cove and i think it is an exciting opportunity for our neighborhood to truly contribute to better outcomes to the homeless in our city. i am proud to say that dogpatch has contributed directly to this exact type of outcome and i hope that throughout this year we can have a navigation center in our neighborhood. >>thank you. thank you dogpatch.next speaker please. >>i speak on behalf of small landlords in the city and we are unanimous and in support of navigation centers i think it's an conscionable that people are arrested and incited have in their belongings confiscated in the middle the night. we believe homeless people should get the r same benefits as b and b should specifically have task forces that are designed to not solve the problems. i love of the city would approach it. i think that you should consider that and not call for a separate hearing. in regard to safe injection sites. if we were told that they were given a prescription of zoloft all of the homeowners would emb

[inaudible] due for the mission and [inaudible] mission potrero and dogpatch. we asked for business permits for pdr but tod this is impossible. now we understand the sfmta is considering [inaudible] we also hear a plan to raise the parking fee for residential parking permit and lower temporary fees, what is drivering this change? is this part a a push to apply pressure on rez sidence to give up their cars? [inaudible] plan to make more room for the businesses and customers as the expense the residents? is this a divide and conquer scheme? it looks as a plan to roll out [inaudible] by oversellic the parkt permits. why do we see one permit system in one neighborhood and another system in another neighborhood? we are not the guinea pigs for the test to see how we perform under different rules. we are human beings and had enough of the test squz ready to take bake our streets sfr our use and make them livable for our lifestyles. >> thank you. any other members who like to comment on this item specifically? >> they say there is no places you can [inaudible] contract

those restriction tooz be considered for part time employment with a organization newly formed, the dogpatch and northwest potrero hill green benefits district. there are specific provisions the commission must consider in waying whether to grant the waver. in the first instance the question is, the compligz can wave the one year ban communicating with forming agency or agencies if they make a finding granting such a waver will not create potential for undo influence or advantage. there are factors on page 5 the commission is directed to. also, the consideration of the waver the employment restriction for having employment with contracting to contract with the city, the commission may wave those restrictions if they determine imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship for the former city officer. in this regard the commission shall not approve request for waver unless it makes a findsing that imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship. it lays out the factors to consider making that determination. on balance as we looked at the information provided by mrs. christensen and

my name is mack allen i am a member of the dogpatch organization and i am a member of dogpatch with in the cove and i think it is an exciting opportunity for our neighborhood to truly contribute to better outcomes to the homeless in our city. i am proud to say that dogpatch has contributed directly to this exact type of outcome and i hope that throughout this year we can have a navigation center in our neighborhood. >>thank you. thank you dogpatch.next speaker please. >>i speak on behalf of small landlords in the city and we are unanimous and in support of navigation centers i think it's an conscionable that people are arrested and incited have in their belongings confiscated in the middle the night. we believe homeless people should get the r same benefits as b and b should specifically have task forces that are designed to not solve the problems. i love of the city would approach it. i think that you should consider that and not call for a separate hearing. in regard to safe injection sites. if we were told that they were given a prescription of zoloft all of the homeowners would emb

my name is mack allen i am a member of the dogpatch organization and i am a member of dogpatch with inhe cove and i think it is an exciting opportunity for our neighborhood to truly contribute to better outcomes to the homeless in our city. i am proud to say that dogpatch has contributed directly to this exact type of outcome and i hope that throughout this year we can have a navigation center in our neighborhood. >>thank you. thank you dogpatch.next speaker please. >>i speak on behalf of small landlords in the city and we are unanimous and in support of navigation centers i think it's an conscionable that people are arrested and incited have in their belongings confiscated in the middle the night. we believe homeless people should get the r same benefits as b and b should specifically have task forces that are designed to not solve the problems. i love of the city would approach it. i think that you should consider that and not call for a separate hearing. in regard to safe injection sites. if we were told that they were given a prescription of zoloft all of the homeowners would embra

my name is mack allen i am a member of the dogpatch organization and i am a member of dogpatch with inhe cove and i think it is an exciting opportunity for our neighborhood to truly contribute to better outcomes to the homeless in our city. i am proud to say that dogpatch has contributed directly to this exact type of outcome and i hope that throughout this year we can have a navigation center in our neighborhood. >>thank you. thank you dogpatch.next speaker please. >>i speak on behalf of small landlords in the city and we are unanimous and in support of navigation centers i think it's an conscionable that people are arrested and incited have in their belongings confiscated in the middle the night. we believe homeless people should get the r same benefits as b and b should specifically have task forces that are designed to not solve the problems. i love of the city would approach it. i think that you should consider that and not call for a separate hearing. in regard to safe injection sites. if we were told that they were given a prescription of zoloft all of the homeowners would embra

[inaudible] due for the mission and [inaudible] mission potrero and dogpatch. we asked for business permits for pdr but tod this is impossible. now we understand the sfmta is considering [inaudible] we also hear a plan to raise the parking fee for residential parking permit and lower temporary fees, what is drivering this change? is this part a a push to apply pressure on rez sidence to give up their cars? [inaudible] plan to make more room for the businesses and customers as the expense the residents? is this a divide and conquer scheme? it looks as a plan to roll out [inaudible] by oversellic the parkt permits. why do we see one permit system in one neighborhood and another system in another neighborhood? we are not the guinea pigs for the test to see how we perform under different rules. we are human beings and had enough of the test squz ready to take bake our streets sfr our use and make them livable for our lifestyles. >> thank you. any other members who like to comment on this item specifically? >> they say there is no places you can [inaudible] contract

those restriction tooz be considered for part time employment with a organization newly formed, the dogpatchnd northwest potrero hill green benefits district. there are specific provisions the commission must consider in waying whether to grant the waver. in the first instance the question is, the compligz can wave the one year ban communicating with forming agency or agencies if they make a finding granting such a waver will not create potential for undo influence or advantage. there are factors on page 5 the commission is directed to. also, the consideration of the waver the employment restriction for having employment with contracting to contract with the city, the commission may wave those restrictions if they determine imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship for the former city officer. in this regard the commission shall not approve request for waver unless it makes a findsing that imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship. it lays out the factors to consider making that determination. on balance as we looked at the information provided by mrs. christensen and t

those restriction tooz be considered for part time employment with a organization newly formed, the dogpatch and northwest potrero hill green benefits district. there are specific provisions the commission must consider in waying whether to grant the waver. in the first instance the question is, the compligz can wave the one year ban communicating with forming agency or agencies if they make a finding granting such a waver will not create potential for undo influence or advantage. there are factors on page 5 the commission is directed to. also, the consideration of the waver the employment restriction for having employment with contracting to contract with the city, the commission may wave those restrictions if they determine imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship for the former city officer. in this regard the commission shall not approve request for waver unless it makes a findsing that imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship. it lays out the factors to consider making that determination. on balance as we looked at the information provided by mrs. christensen and

a project in the dogpatch central waterfront neighborhood, comes in with 44 dwelling units that have 12 parking spaces. with the 12 parking spaces, they would have to meet a target of 14 points. under the planning code today they would have to do a couple of things. the first is they would've to provide bicycle parking, which they would get a .4 and then what we call parking on bottom. separating the costs that parking space from the cost of the year. so when you get that unit you don't automatically come up with a parking space. you get two points for that. so you are at three and you need 11 more points and the next thing you would look at is what is my parking supplied compared to my neighborhood context. this measure is designed to be similar with a lot of other planning provisions that talk about how do you fit within your neighborhood. we created this map based on estimates of what the existing parking rate is throughout san francisco. so, nocturnal percolate uneven number of offstreet spaces but the spaces that are on the site per unit throughout the city. so, in order to get

those restriction tooz be considered for part time employment with a organization newly formed, the dogpatch and northwest potrero hill green benefits district. there are specific provisions the commission must consider in waying whether to grant the waver. in the first instance the question is, the compligz can wave the one year ban communicating with forming agency or agencies if they make a finding granting such a waver will not create potential for undo influence or advantage. there are factors on page 5 the commission is directed to. also, the consideration of the waver the employment restriction for having employment with contracting to contract with the city, the commission may wave those restrictions if they determine imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship for the former city officer. in this regard the commission shall not approve request for waver unless it makes a findsing that imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship. it lays out the factors to consider making that determination. on balance as we looked at the information provided by mrs. christensen and

mostly bayview hunters point and dogpatch. a lot will be for the existing communities so that-i think given that we would be seeing a good number of children as well. >> related to that and looking at the list of city departments at what point do you envision engaging on the city department side and not city but a city partner and player of the district? >> i didn't hear-dcyf is a good [no audio] >> the approach more than what it results come out of it, which is given that this att to candlestick as the memo suggests, a number of different and growing and evolving dynamic neighborhoods, how are you approaching getting [closed session] >> in your discussion. >> move to broadcast on all media channels. >> i oppose that motion and move we do not disicosis. close. >> all in favor? >> can you also make a motion on reporting actions? so you donot want to report actions? >> that is included in the motion. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye >> we are item 12, commissioners matters. any public comment? seeing none, item 13, new busines

a project in the dogpatch central waterfront neighborhood, comes in with 44 dwelling units that have 12 parking spaces. with the 12 parking spaces, they would have to meet a target of 14 points. under the planning code today they would have to do a couple of things. the first is they would've to provide bicycle parking, which they would get a .4 and then what we call parking on bottom. separating the costs that parking space from the cost of the year. so when you get that unit you don't automatically come up with a parking space. you get two points for that. so you are at three and you need 11 more points and the next thing you would look at is what is my parking supplied compared to my neighborhood context. this measure is designed to be similar with a lot of other planning provisions that talk about how do you fit within your neighborhood. we created this map based on estimates of what the existing parking rate is throughout san francisco. so, nocturnal percolate uneven number of offstreet spaces but the spaces that are on the site per unit throughout the city. so, in order to get

those restriction tooz be considered for part time employment with a organization newly formed, the dogpatch and northwest potrero hill green benefits district. there are specific provisions the commission must consider in waying whether to grant the waver. in the first instance the question is, the compligz can wave the one year ban communicating with forming agency or agencies if they make a finding granting such a waver will not create potential for undo influence or advantage. there are factors on page 5 the commission is directed to. also, the consideration of the waver the employment restriction for having employment with contracting to contract with the city, the commission may wave those restrictions if they determine imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship for the former city officer. in this regard the commission shall not approve request for waver unless it makes a findsing that imposing the restriction will cause extreme hardship. it lays out the factors to consider making that determination. on balance as we looked at the information provided by mrs. christensen and

mostly bayview hunters point and dogpatch. a lot will be for the existing communities so that-i think given that we would be seeing a good number of children as well. >> related to that and looking at the list of city departments at what point do you envision engaging on the city department side and not city but a city partner and player of the district? >> i didn't hear-dcyf is a good [no audio] >> the approach more than what it results come out of it, which is given that this att to candlestick as the memo suggests, a number of different and growing and evolving dynamic neighborhoods, how are you approaching getting [closed session] >> in your discussion. >> move to broadcast on all media channels. >> i oppose that motion and move we do not disicosis. close. >> all in favor?

mostly bayview hunters point and dogpatch. a lot will be for the existing communities so that-i think given that we would be seeing a good number of children as well. >> related to that and looking at the list of city departments at what point do you envision engaging on the city department side and not city but a city partner and player of the district? >> i didn't hear-dcyf is a good [no audio] >> the approach more than what it results come out of it, which is given that this att to candlestick as the memo suggests, a number of different and growing and evolving dynamic neighborhoods, how are you approaching getting [closed session] >> in your discussion. >> move to broadcast on all media channels. >> i oppose that motion and move we do not disicosis. close. >> all in favor? >> can you also make a motion on reporting actions? so you donot want to report actions? >> that is included in the motion. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye >> we are item 12, commissioners matters. any public comment? seeing none, item 13, new busines

a project in the dogpatch central waterfront neighborhood, comes in with 44 dwelling units that have parking spaces. with the 12 parking spaces, they would have to meet a target of 14 points. under the planning code today they would have to do a couple of things. the first is they would've to provide bicycle parking, which they would get a .4 and then what we call parking on bottom. separating the costs that parking space from the cost of the year. so when you get that unit you don't automatically come up with a parking space. you get two points for that. so you are at three and you need 11 more points and the next thing you would look at is what is my parking supplied compared to my neighborhood context. this measure is designed to be similar with a lot of other planning provisions that talk about how do you fit within your neighborhood. we created this map based on estimates of what the existing parking rate is throughout san francisco. so, nocturnal percolate uneven number of offstreet spaces but the spaces that are on the site per unit throughout the city. so, in order to get any

the warriors order custom chocolates from a dogpatch chocolate ear. [inaudible] made a t shirt for ainker brewing and guitar maker in the sun set working with a amplifying biltder in the bayview. these are examples what we can do when we encourage bigger businesses to also shop local see hope board members with join me encouraging to shift 5 percent of spending here in san francisco. with that, i submit. >> thank you supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. >> thank you madam clerk. today i introduce legislation to prohibit city spending both including travel, purchasing and contracting in states that passed lgbt haet laws. i want to thank you supervisor campos and farrell for cosponsor. this will target not just traffic but ban contracting with and purchasing from companies in states that enacted these despicable laws. the legislation was drafted in response to recent hateful laws passed in states like norths carolina and mississippi mptd laws that target the lgbt community for exclusion from full citizenship and status the community. theords nns will cod

mostly bayview hunters point and dogpatch. a lot will be for the existing communities so that-i think given that we would be seeing a good number of children as well. >> related to that and looking at the list of city departments at what point do you envision engaging on the city department side and not city but a city partner and player of the district? >> i didn't hear-dcyf is a good [no audio] >> the approach more than what it results come out of it, which is given that this att to candlestick as the memo suggests, a number of different and growing and evolving dynamic neighborhoods, how are you approaching getting [closed session] >> in your discussion. >> move to broadcast on all media channels. >> i oppose that motion and move we do not disicosis. close. >> all in favor? >> can you also make a motion on reporting actions? so you donot want to report actions? >> that is included in the motion. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye >> we are item 12, commissioners matters. any public comment? seeing none, item 13, new busines