i was against the view of dumbing doha down. i wanted to and i get a deal on an enemy, so i was making a case for being more bold and aggressive. in the u.s. constitutional system, everything has to go back to congress, but i honestly think that if you are not doing it, the congress is not going to do it for you. it is not going to come -- you will not get a trade deal driven by congress. you need someone in the united states to organize this with a condition and a vision. you also have to help people adjust to change. the other place where the united states has not kept up is that we have an unemployment insurance system that is 80 years old. we have a trade adjustment assistance program that is 50 years old. you have a workforce investment act that is 30 years old. why not take these tens of billions of dollars and ask yourself, is this the system we would design to get people back into jobs in an economy that is changing? i think you will find that you want a different system that can help people adjust to change. >> thank yo

as we look at a doha round in any trade agreement, we want to make sure it's fair and balanced. we can quantify with great specificity what we're willing to do relative to our support structures and systems. we need the same kind of specificity from china, india, brazil and other countries in terms of how open markets will be to ensure we are getting a fair deal. >> one of the paradoxes of booming u.s. exports is that some of the most feared import dependent nations are the ones that have the greatest amount of food security and the most dependent on food prices seminar price spikes in more developed regions, they tend to bear the brunt because of their lack of car. for mr. security standpoint, how do you balance your charge, really secretary of aquaculture to boost u.s. exports at the same time some of the poorest nations need to become less dependent on this export? >> well, first and foremost were interested in making sure those developing countries are able to create rural economies that are strong and can provide greater financial benefit to those who live in the rural area

a little delay in the interview, we are, believe it or not, just live to doha. >>> a break as we setfor the evening. >>> on "hardball," chris has his take on the latest partisan politics playing out on the debt debate. before we get that, keli goff what it takes to manage a household and for that matter an entire country.t 34 mil on pounds of mail every day. ever wonder what this costs you as a taxpayer? millions? tens of millions? hundreds of millions? not a single cent. the united states postal service doesn't run on your tax dollars. it's funded solely by stamps and postage. brought to you by the men and women of the american postal workers union. ♪ of the american postal workers union. having the right real estate agent on your side is more important than ever. at remax.com, you can find the experts you need, whether you're trying to sell of hoping to buy. nobody sells more real estate than re/max. visit remax.com today. oh, we call it the bundler. let's say you need home and auto insurance. you give us your information once, online... [ whirring and beeping ] [ ding! ] and we gi

justice and equality movement is best on the fence and most of the others do not take part in the doha peace process as well. we emphasize to the government of sudan that signing an agreement was a positive start, but has to continue and be ready to negotiate with the other events. they can't say now we've done it and the other room movement sinusoids are outside the process. we're also going to let the other armed groups are not very interested and therefore so much as they are interested in riot change in sudan and are fighting on that basis, which mix almost impossible for them to become part of attire for base political process. we urge them to come to the table and negotiate around the issues of darfur are. also, to look ahead, we need to engage the peep hole. they deserve a much of a right to participate are greatly in determining not only the process of peace, but their future. but the conditions aren't ripe yet for carrying out the political process. so we have set forth a list of conditions that we think are very important to create what we call an enabling environment you can

justice and equality movement is the best on the fence and most of the others did not take part in the doha peace process at all. but we have emphasized, the government of sudan is that signing an agreement with lg him as a positive step, but it has to continue to negotiate, be ready to negotiate with the other arm movement. they can't say, well now we have done it, the other need to sign his or their outside the process. what we are also concerned that several of the other armed groups are not very interested in darfur so much as they are interested in broad change in sudan, and are fighting on that he says, which makes it almost impossible for them to come and be part of a darfur based local process. and we've urged them to come to the table and negotiate around the issues of darfur. also, to look ahead, we need to engage the people of darfur. they deserve a much of a right to participate, much more greatly in determining, not only the process of peace but their future. but the conditions are not ripe yet for carrying out a darfur based political process. so we have set forth a list of co

that's the doha process and the darfur issue itself. i gather that even this morning it's possible they may have signed that agreement in doha. do you know if they did? >> i don't have a report. it was supposed to be 4:00 their time. i was told they didn't sign. i knew there were some outstanding issues. >> if they did, or contemplate, it leaves us with the same problem. that's an important one which is that j.e.m. and two major factions of the sla, the abdallah waheed and the factions aren't there. as you stated, they have a different agenda. i think we are going to have to think carefully about how you measure it. one the things i heard repeatedly from people is look, you can't hold us to the darfur accountability act. which requires complete settlement in darfur before you do certain things with us if the players in darfur aren't choosing to be part of the process. if their goal is our overthrow, that is different from the struggle that took place in terms of the genocide in the 19 -- in 2000s, 2004 and 2005. i think it is fair to sa