usually splintered which reform which take different names n s one three one for example scottish dohrn. are. when the organizations are beginning to develop the potential which you see is you know terroristic but seriously dangerous then i think you don't have any choice you have to take that sort of action even though you know that the the groups will then disperse the people in the groups will disperse they'll probably create new organizations nevertheless you are disrupting them and so that there is a benefit there's an immediate benefits. to that disruption. in the wake of the murder of george s. the u.k. government used anti terror laws to crack down and ban these fascist groups. national option will become the first ever extreme right wing group in the country to be for school actually action is a violent group they promote to the phobia they promote violence and terrorism and they have no place in this country a number of alleged members of national action are now facing trial on serious jaja two of them are soldiers in the british army. for legal reasons we can't go farther int

one three one for example scottish dohrn. are. when the organizations are beginning to develop a potential which you see is you know terroristic but seriously dangerous then i think you don't have any choice you have to take that sort of action even though you know that the the groups will then disperse the people in the groups will disperse they'll probably create new organizations nevertheless you are disrupting them and so that there is a benefit there's an immediate benefit. to that disruption. in the wake of the murder of george s. the u.k. government used anti terror laws to crack down and ban these fascist groups. national option will become the first ever extreme right wing quake in the country to be for school actually action is a violent group they promote to the phobia they promote violence and terrorism and they have no place in this country a number of alleged members of national action i'm now facing trial on serious job . two of them are soldiers in the british army. for legal reasons we can't go farther into their

one three one for example scottish dohrn. are. when the organizations are beginning to develop the potential which you see is you know terroristic but seriously dangerous then i think you don't have any choice you have to take that sort of action even though you know that the the groups will then disperse the people in the groups will disperse they'll probably create new organizations nevertheless you are disrupting them and so that there is a benefit there's an immediate benefit. to that disruption. in the wake of the murder of george s. the u.k. government used anti terror laws to crack down and ban these fascist groups. national action will become the first ever extreme right wing group in the country to be for school actually action is a violent group they promote to the phobia they promote violence and terrorism and they have no place in this country a number of alleged members of national action i'm now facing trial on serious jobs two of them are soldiers in the british army. for legal reasons we can't go farther into their

launched political career inside the living room of bill ayers and bernadine dohrn.ation this 2005 photo of barack obama grinning ear to ear with louis farrakhan, it shouldn't be a surprise. now, the reason we never saw this before the election in 2008 is because the photographer who took the picture said he was prerksd by the congressional black caucus to keep it a secret. and the photographer also says that he thinks that this photo would have made a difference in the 2008 election. i believe he is right. this photo would have further expose you had everything we were uncovering on this show about barack obama and his radical, rigid leftist beliefs and friends. we did reach out to obama for comment about farrakhan's comments. not surprisingly we didn't hear back from his spokesman. here is the most important question about this. if farrakhan isn't that bad of a guy, like several democrats are claiming, then why is it necessary to hide a photo of him with obama? maybe democrats didn't want you to be reminded of farrakhan and history of hate. this is a small sampling

launched political career inside the living room of bill ayers and bernadine dohrn.is 2005 photo of barack obama grinning ear to ear with louis farrakhan, it shouldn't be a surprise. now, the reason we never saw this before the election in 2008 is because the photographer who took the picture said he was prerksd by the congressional black caucus to keep it a secret. and the photographer also says that he thinks that this photo would have made a difference in the 2008 election. i believe he is right. this photo would have further expose you had everything we were uncovering on this show about barack obama and his radical, rigid leftist beliefs and friends. we did reach out to obama for comment about farrakhan's comments. not surprisingly we didn't hear back from his spokesman. here is the most important question about this. if farrakhan isn't that bad of a guy, like several democrats are claiming, then why is it necessary to hide a photo of him with obama? maybe democrats didn't want you to be reminded of farrakhan and history of hate. this is a small sampling. take a

one three one for example scottish dohrn. are. when the organizations are beginning to develop the potential which you see is you know terroristic but seriously dangerous then i think you don't have any choice you have to take that sort of action even though you know that the the groups will then disperse the people in the groups will disperse they'll probably create new organizations nevertheless you're disrupting them and so that there is a benefit there's an immediate benefit. to that disruption. in the wake of the murder of george s. the u.k. government used anti terror laws to crack down and ban these fascist groups. national option will become the first ever extreme rightwing quake in the country to be for school actually action is a violent group they promote to the phobia they promote violence terrorism and they have no place in this country a number of alleged members of national action are now facing trial on serious charges two of them are soldiers in the british army. for legal reasons we can't go farther into their ca