attorney general rod rosenstein was confirmed in the senate so now he will oversee the russia probe for doj, and he has told senators according to senator

the past doj was doing?you're absolutely right. in the future when we have future ferguson or a future freddie gray case, the doj can say, hey, we don't think there's a problem mere. we don't want to force the police to sit down with the mayores and it's going to be much, much harder to engage in this federal oversight moving forward. >> jeffrey, thank you very much. >>> findings, lester holt is granted rare access to the air operation center where north korea missile launch res first detected. we head to south korea for an exclusive behind the scenes look, next. what powers the digital world? communication. like centurylink's broadband network that gives 35,000 fans a cutting edge game experience. or the network that keeps a leading hotel chain's guests connected at work, and at play. or the it platform that powers millions of ecards every day for one of the largest greeting card companies. businesses count on communication, and communication counts on centurylink. termites, we're on the move.24/7. roger. h

we do not want to see you in court and i'm sure you do not want to see the doj in court. it may not be typical for the attorney general to speak a compliance conference like this. i guess i would give a few thoughts about why i am here. i thought it would be a good opportunity to convey two important messages.first, i want to thank you for working so hard to ensure that their companies and clients do the right thing. that is so important. the department of justice investigates and prosecutes people and companies that break the law including laws that criminalize corporate misconduct. that is an incredibly important flexibility and the men and women are department of justice taken very seriously. i have to say these are good people. they work hard every day. to try and do the right thing. i love you.i know larry thompson loves the department. we have high ideals for the department.they are not some theoretical ideological group far off in the sky.we need to be sure that our reality is your reality. in the world that we are in. and people who do wrong or identified and puni

the doj reported unjustified stops, searches, arrest, uses of excessive force. what do you make of these recent statements by attorney general sessions where he says he is going to "reconsider those corrective actions"? mayor baraka: he is just not clear on exactly what the doj findings were, how extensive they were and systematic they permeated the entire department and departments around the country in relationship to african-americans, latinos, poor people, black and brown folks. soledad: what happens if in fact the attorney general does what he says he is going to do, which is to turn back these corrective actions? mayor baraka: thank god we have separations of powers in america , and there are three branches of government. the court has already given us permission to move forward with a consent decree in the city of newark. i don't think you can have a serious impact on the direction we are going. ultimately, they could have an impact on other cities, and how much attention they actually pay to what we are doing in the city and how forceful they are with ou

in the voting rights case, the obama doj required voters to have i.d.as intended to suppress the minority vote. the trump doj as to federal judge to dismiss that claim saying a new law is in the works. last year, former and attorney loretta lynch for bid schools from disseminating against transgender students, the new attorney general probably withdrew that guidance meeting public schools no longer have to allow transgender students to work use the bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity. >> martha: is only 83 days and pretty he's been busy. thank you very much. to debate this, supporter president trump, richard fowler, nationally syndicated radio show host. good to have you here. police reforms is where we can start here. your thoughts on what jeff sessions has done so far? >> it's been 83 days of horror from this attorney general. clearly he is to set up some sort of nationalist utopia where police can get away with anything, where muslims aren't allowed into the country, where transgender students don't get the protections they deserve a

he is being heralded by the police, and you think about the doj report that just came out in chicago, that noted that there's a deep pattern of practice of discrimination. and we would say that that is endemic of police departments all across the country. - of course, that's a city run by a democratic mayor, one rahm emanuel. you put that on him, or on the federal administration, whoever administration it is? - yeah, well we've seen with the police that the uprising in ferguson started under president obama being president, - indeed. - which doesn't-- - well, in fact so much of what black lives matter has come into existence to respond to what happened during the obama years. - yeah, but we know that obama didn't make the 18,000 police departments, that the legacy of racism that is in the police departments was long before president obama and long before rahm emanuel, which is not an excuse for either of them but it is real. he said he wants to build a wall, there are so many things. we think about even undoing the affordable care act as the first step of it happened at the 11th hour

. >> the counties argue that doj lawyers today were put in a no win situation. >> the doj was in a difficult position of trying to defend a patently unconstitutional executive order they made a smart decision to come wup a new executive order to be easier to defend the judge did not buy that. the lawyers did not talk to reporters after the hearing. >> now in next month's budget this county says it's already allocating about a quarter billion dollars in reserves in case the trump administration decides to take local money in one way or another. now tonight at sourks we'll take a look to it richmond lawsuit against sanctuary cities what happened in this case. live in san jose. >> thank you very much damian. >>> beautiful weather across the bay area today. >> look outside right now in fremont. but a change is approaching this easter weekend. chief meteorologist jeff ranieri shows us how soon the rain arrives jeff. >> i do think we'll have at least 24 hours before we start to see some dramatic differences here across the bay area. storm system out here in the pacific that eventually will bring u

>> the doj did just respond and their response actually dealt les with this ruling and more with their contention that the federal government can prohibit cities from withholding information from immigration officials, the doj putting it this way in part saying the department of justice previously stated to the court and reiterates now that it will follow the law with respect to regulation of sanctuary cities jurisdiction. >> and the san francisco city attorney just held a press conference, what did he say? >> he did not hold back. the san francisco city attorney said that the president was bullying in signing this executive order and he praised the judge in this case. >> this is why we have courts to halt the overreach of a president and attorney general who either don't understand the constitution, or choose to ignore it. this is why san francisco had to stand up on behalf of people everywhere. be they immigrants or native born. as americans, we all have a duty to confront injustice even when it emanates from the white house. >> reporter: so the city attorney with very strong words t

i was able to bring the best ideas from communities back to doj and try to uplift them and make them a part of federal policy. it is something that every person, every committee can do. i urge community to to this day, get to know your police chief. everyone has a concern or care about policing in this country, you should know who your police chief is in your local jurisdiction. you should know, does that person have any kind of citizens advisory council or not. this is something many departments are doing at the request of communities so they can hear directly from people about concerns before an incident occurs. i urge you to do it before an incident occurs. but if something does happen, don't feel like something can be done. i've seen it happen. i sat at a roundtable, and i would talk with young people, high school in particular and they'll tell you what's going on in their community and how they feel about law enforcement. the common theme i heard was i want to be able to call the police if i feel that i'm in trouble but i'm afraid too. now, those are two very important statement

baltimore and other places say they will go through no matter what the doj says.nks this also is a plant of reduced crime, but it's not. these consent decrees are supposed to help fix police departments not build better bridges or reduce crime. i think the general public needs to understand that too. >> deray, again on policy, take a look on the screen. we will show some of the executive orders related. task force on crime reduction and public safety, combatting drug cartels to increase intel and share among law enforcement partners and use existing federal law. that's already there to prosecute crimes against police. again what jumps out there is a matter of emphasis as you know and lawyers know there are very strong state and federal protections and enforcement for any crime against police as there should be. the question of why this is the executive order and why this is the emphasis, what do you see there and what do you want to see from jeff sessions? >> yeah, so as we know, 18,000 police departments across the country. policing is mostly a local issue. what

doj has 40% of the japanese government bond market. that means 60% is still in the market. is current pace of purchase to continue for some time. if the fx appreciates, they will hitherto percent target. france withover to marine le pen's interview. >> i think the economy is on track. were making an adjustment. likely to growl 1.35% this year. this is a big improvement compared to this last year. the japanese economy is growing 1.5%. growth potential is less, percent in japan. have, there risk we is a lot of judgment. for developingr countries is where the money is. there is no sort of financial crisis or financial programs. ok.financial sector is however, there are some -- also, most emerging economies are doing quite well, including japan, and indonesia. francine: when you talk geopolitical risk, what is the one geopolitical risk? will it affect central-bank policy? have asia, as you know, we north korea -- we have a north korea program. there are of east, -- there are some internal conflicts, and in africa, there are a number of countries engaging in internal war. there

followall parts of doj the broad sections strong approach to promoting ethics programs? what do you think about the antitrust division's programs? >> when i was fighting the mcnulty memo and we were talking about the factors for considering whether to charge a business organization -- and all those were laid out in a holder my receptionist said the antitrust division wanted to see me. guy walked in and said, you know this memo does not apply to us? and i realized the antitrust world was a world of its own and did not evaluate cases in the same way. so your question, and this is a really interesting one because they do not all operate the exact same way. that is a memo, or a philip , they apply toy all prosecutors, not just the broad section. not just fcpa prosecutors, all federal prosecutors prosecuting business organizations. those factors do make an exception. i think that is still part of the revision and is found in the manual. ms. gorelick: there is a reason for that. cartels are hard to break. just as we were talking about in the defense industry initiative, if you

larry left the doj and went into the private sector to oversee another part of compliance at pepsico were he was general counsel and secretary until his retirement in 2018. -- in 2014. notably, the compliance function reported to larry. until his retirement part that i got from his official bio, i would argue larry has not retired yet. he is teaching at a university and is counsel to an attorney law firm. we were honored that he agreed to serve as the new chairman of our board in january of this year. it is a great pleasure to have him help lead this organization. with that, i would like to welcome larry to the stage so he can introduce our afternoon keynote. larry. [applause] >> good afternoon. thank you for that kind introduction. i would like to say a few things, preliminary remarks, before i have the honor of introducing our distinguished speaker. i'm sorry i could not be with you this morning. last night, i had a little incident. i had to go to the george washington hospital emergency rooms. i was not released until 1:30 this morning. so i could not make it this morning. but i w

government can prohibit cities from with holding information from doj officials. saying the department of justice that they will now follow the law with respect to regulation of sanctuary jurisdictions. this is a response to the ongoing legal fight in general. that's what they chose tofocus on in their response. >> and the san francisco atto attorney just held a press conference. >> he did not held back. saying that the first 100 days have been a disaster for president trump. that the president was a bully in signing the executive order and praised the judge in this case. >> this is why we have courts, the halt the over reach of a president and attorney general who either don't understand the constitution or choose to ignore it. this is why san francisco had to stand up for people everywhere. as americans, we have a duty to confront injustice, even when it emanates from the white house. >> he also said that the trump administration would be better advised to move on to other issues and told the trump administration to stop targeting these immigrant communities. >>

the other investigations into the trump-russia outside out of of doj's fpurview are the two investigationsappening in the senate intelligence committee and the house intelligence committee. the house intelligence committee is again calling people into testify as part of their investigation. on may 2nd they're going to hear testimony behind closed doors from fbi director james comey and nsa director mike rogers. they both testified in the opening hearing that the intelligence committee already held. they will bring them back now. that same committee will hear from them behind closed doors so they can talk about classified matters. sometime after that may 2nd hearing they will schedule, they say, another open hearing. so we finally get to hear from sally yates. testimony from john brennan, james clapper, and former acting attorney general sally yates, the one who reportedly went to the white house with disturbing news about the national security adviser having communication with russian government officials that he was lying about. these three had been scheduled to testify in an open hearing

if the doj is interested and start issuing subpoenas. if they decide to dig deeply, they are the agency to do it. and they could unearth things to make a plaintiff's case very powerful. the doj wants to get to the bottom of it, they will. >> if they want to get to the bottom of it. >> does this ding him? >> will his viewers care enough? i think the answer right now is probably not. will there be a boycott. the justice department now overseen by the trump administration and this is trump's favorite tv channel. in some ways president trump the charges against him during the campaign, the women who came forward accusing him of harassment, the way that was handled. the way people reacted to that, there might with. some similarities here. >> brian stelter, thank you very much. we do have some breaking news here. president trump responding now to that subway terror attack that killed at least 11 people. we are live in st. petersburg, russia, on this, next. >>> breaking news here on what's happened in st. petersburg, russia. the motive behind t

top republicans asking the doj to take a fresh look at evidence against lois lerner, former irs employeeparty groups over their political views. she called to testify to congress but pleaded the fifth. >> i have not done anything wrong. i have not broken any laws. function of this fifth amendment is to protect into vincent individuals and that is the protection i'm invoking today. >> in 2015 the doj refused to file criminal charges and lois lerner resigned. it is time to brew on this. school district under fire for keeping the doors open on one of the holiest days of the christian calendar. complaint are pouring in for their decision to hold classes on good friday. one parent writing this, how dare you undermine the christian religion and observance of christian holiday holy days and the district claims schools only close for good friday if the holiday coincides with spring break. >> we can't base our calendar on religion. it has to be secular. to take a day off purely because it is a religious holiday is not acceptable. >> children who do stay home tomorrow for religious reasons neck bu

here in california, the doj said, i'm quoting, just several weeks ago in california's bay area afterid captured 11ms-13 members on charges including murder, extortion and drug trafficking, city officials seemed more concerned with reassuring illegal immigrants that the raid was unrelated to immigration than with warning other ms-13 members that they were next. the mayors of california's biggest cities as well as chicago and new york have already vowed to fight the doj, but they all risk losing their chunk of $2.2 billion in federal grant money used to pay for things like jails and extra police officers. and the funding is for 2016, which means sanctuary cities won't get paid back by the feds for money that has already been spent. nonetheless, 2017 money would never come in. it's interesting because officials from new orleans just got back to us saying they are not a sanctuary city, don't know why they got the letter, but they do not fear losing federal funds. sandra? >> sandra: trace, thank you. for more on this, vince collenaise, marjorie cliffton. thanks for joining us. vince, i'll

simone, under the obama administration, the doj has concluded it would be difficult to bring charges.ferent now? >> i think there's a different administration, quite obviously. they have a very different position about leaks. under the obama administration, there were leak investigations and prosecutions for leaks. i think thissed administration, this department of justice, is taking a different look at this. in terms of julian assange, there was always this concern that he sometimes fell under the umbrella of the media and it's clear in the last few weeks that the current administration, the department of justice and u.s. government don't think that he any longer is protected by the first amendment. >> so what kind of charges could be filed? >> well, there could be an espionage charge. there could be a possession of stolen property. remember, he released tons of -- he was part of the release of tons of information of classified information that went overseas. that went into the hands of not only news organizations but foreign countries, countries that want to so-called harm us. also,

should all parts of the doj follow the fraud section promoting effective compliance programs? what you think of the antitrust division's? >> quick story on that. when i was writing content writing the modest memo. we were considering the factors to chart a business and those factors were modified by the thompson memo and i got my receptionist said that the and i trust provision wanted to see me in the antitrust 880 walked in and said this memo doesn't apply to us. i quickly realized that the and i trust was a world of its own and didn't want to try cases in the same way. clever this question is, it's an interesting one. they don't all all operate the same way. the fact is that a memo -- those philip factors as we say, mark phillips who replaced me. they apply to all prosecutors. it's not just the fraud section. not just at cpa prosecutors. it's all federal prosecutors, prosecuting all business organizations but those factors do make an exception and, i think, that was still part of mark's revision and it's found in the attorney manual in the antitrust division. >> there's a re

everything you see in michael's article, you know, whether it's loretta lynch at the doj or it's trump now pushing against director comey. he's trying to balance himself in a nonpartisan way. he's getting caught in these political traps one way or another. the one that's playing out right now. you hear these sort of taunting from the president about leaks, well, if there's a leak that comes out of the fbi regarding this russia investigation, that might be grounds to fire director comey, now that could be a replacement by republican donald trump of the fbi director, if there's some sort of grounds for his firing. he's been caught for the last year a a half. >> wait a minute, you're saying he got a leak, you're saying he went public out of the obama administration before the election out of fear that a leak would be blamed against him in subsequent republican administration, he thought hillary was going to win, according to your article. >> well, they were playing as if she was going to win. >> he said -- >> they were afraid that 2017 would be house and he would accuse of suppressing thi

should all parts of the doj follow the fraud section promoting effective compliance programs? what you think of the antitrust division's? >> quick story on that. when i was writing content writing the modest memo. we were considering the factors to chart a business and those factors were modified by the thompson memo and i got my receptionist said that the and i trust provision wanted to see me in the antitrust 880 walked in and said this memo doesn't apply to us. i quickly realized that the and i trust was a world of its own and didn't want to try cases in the same way. clever this question is, it's an interesting one. they don't all all operate the same way. the fact is that a memo -- those philip factors as we say, mark phillips who replaced me. they apply to all prosecutors. it's not just the fraud section. not just at cpa prosecutors. it's all federal prosecutors, prosecuting all business organizations but those factors do make an exception and, i think, that was still part of mark's revision and it's found in the attorney manual in the antitrust division. >> there's a re

he's clearly emboldened that the doj is looking into this. >> they also have documents they releasedpress that they say show that flynn was not forthcoming about his payments that he received from rt and elsewhere. one thing that really stood out to me from this is that cummins said he wants to call flynn before the committee to testify, that as flynn's lawyer said, flynn has a story to tell but that he's getting resistance from the committee's chairman and that that resistance might be coming from the speaker. >> and that's something that will undoubtedly get a lot of questions. stand by, jill. i want to go to kasie hunt who's in that briefing with congressman cummins. c kasie, i believe you were pressing him on who or not he thought flynn's lawyer had been lying to him. take us to what the headlines are. >> i think you heard congressman cummins said -- >> kasie, we're going to come back to you. we have a little bit of audio issues with you now. i'm going with the former fbi double agent and author of "how to catch a russian spy." navid, what are your takeaways and headlines as we t

. >> so when did you have that conversation with the doj? >> well, my first conversation was with the senator's office [inaudible] district when i met with jeff sparks. district director. and my conversation with the department of justice was just a few days ago. >> this has been-i'm sorry i'm not trying to question, but this is been going on for a while, sir, why would that call to the doj only be a few days ago? >> this investigation-no. let me >> take your time. relax. >> i first contacted the antitrust division when david ward was there. a few years ago. but he's no longer-david ward was the attorney following the case that he is no longer there. so, now there's a person named tom greene. he is a new attorney on that. i have been going back and forth with a lot of departments on this. i was waiting and i had not heard anything. >> are you currently living at property, sir? >> no., i am not. >> thank you that answers my question. your time in the rebuttal as well. >> i just want to characterize it properly. so, what i got from reading all

but when i read that statement by doj this afternoon, my blood began to boil. >> new york's responseto jeff sessions is thing 2 in 60 seconds. >>> i would say to president trump and to attorney general sessions, if you believe this statement is accurate, come here to new york city. look our police officers in the eye and tell them that you believe they are soft on crime. this absurd statement needs to be renounced immediately. >> new york city mayor bill de blasio blasted the justice department statement which in addition to calling new york soft on crime, claimed the city continues to see gang murder after gang murder. as vox points out, murders have actually plummeted, down 50% since 2000. the nypd says last year saw the fewest shootings ever since the city began keeping record. the doj attempted damage control saying in part, as made very clear in the department's release, it is new york city's policies that are soft on crime. that was not how the police commissioner read it. >> we took this job to do good, to make a difference, and to keep this city safe. and look at the city in

but when i read that statement by doj this afternoon, my blood began to boil. >> new york's responseng 2 in 60 seconds. the allergy relief that starts working in as little as 30 minutes and contains the best oral decongestant. live claritin clear, with claritin-d. >>> i would say to president trump and to attorney general sessions, if you believe this statement is accurate, come here to new york city. look our police officers in the eye and tell them that you believe they are soft on crime. this absurd statement needs to be renounced immediately. >> new york city mayor bill de blasio blasted the justice department statement which in addition to calling new york soft on crime, claimed the city continues to see gang murder after gang murder. as vox points out, murders have actually plummeted, down 50% since 2000. the nypd says last year saw the fewest shootings ever since the city began keeping record. the doj attempted damage control saying in part, as made very clear in the department's release, it is new york city's policies that are soft on crime. that was not how the police commis

but, you know, think about president trump, jeff sessions, and the doj under jeff sessions. about 40 years behind the times. they're talking about crime exploding. crime has been going down. crime overrule, violent crime in the last 20 years is at an all-time low. and you had certain specific places like chicago that's got some unique problems i won't go into. it will take me an hour just to tell you about the complexities of that place. but we've got a few cities that have had a surge in crime in recent years. but overall, the kind of methods that jeff sessions doesn't like, which is community policing and other reforms, are very effective, and i think that's going to get rolled back under this current regime if we're not careful. >> but, heidi, i think if attorney general sessions were here, he'd say you can't pick and choose the law. if you don't like the law, go to capitol hill and change the law. these are the laws and if the cities are going to enforce some of these immigration laws -- >> sure, and that's one of arguments they'll make. but if you look at where we are a

the only way we got to a consent decree is due to mountains of evidence that the doj produced.eople in communities have been saying this for a long time. the proof has always been in people's lives. even the d.o.j. validated it. you can't just dismiss that. >> there wasn't mountains of evidence. they took 600 reports out of 2.2 million available to them to come to the very dangerous and politically motivated conclusions. barack obama started this -- >> the 600 reports don't matter? are they just not -- they don't count for anything? >> they're not accurate. >> oh. >> law enforcement across this country has one million contacts with citizens every single day. every single day in the city of cleveland we have 36,000 arrests in 2015. >> you don't think there is any change necessary in cleveland? you think cleveland is a model city for policing? >> i think we proved it on an international stage with the rnc, the way we handled the rnc, several protests. >> how about the way you handle policing every day? your example of great policing can't be a convention for four days. >> we can'

against these sorts of abuses, and the template that has been late out are the protections that the doj and the fcc jointly implemented in the comcast nbc merger. >> host: newt neutrality, hat -- net neutrality has has has been void of economic analysis. >> guest: in the 2010 open internet over under chairman janikowski the decision was made tot to impose a strict ban on paid priority, instead it was a case-by-case review. the correctas really is that certain arrangements arrangemeni pride orthodontistation could be done for procomb betive ropes and others for anticompetitive reasons and for economists when there's that ambiguity better to do the case by case view. and in the 2010 order, in contrast to 2015, there were tons of citations to the economics literature explaining the ambiguous effects on a ban on thing load consumer welfare and benefits ha that was flushed away in 2015 and what tom wheeler did was embrace the populist wind and that led him to a decision of an outright ban on paid priority, and you would be hard pressed to find an economist who would support banning done dete

the template that has been laid out of course are the protections that doj and the fcc jointly implemented in the comcast-nbc merger. cspan: net neutrality is another issue that has been developed under the tom wheeler administration. how has been devoid of economic analysis or part of economic analysis? >> guest: right. in the 2010 open internet order under chairman janikowski the decision was made to not impose a strict ban on paid priority. instead, paid priority was subjected to what is called ex-post or case-by-case review. the rationale, the correct rationale is that certain arrangements of pay prioritization could be done for pro-competitive reasons. others could be done for anti-competitive reasons, economists whenever there is that kind of ambiguity it is always best embrace case-by-case review instead of ex-ansi protections that is the economic way to think. in the 2010 order, in contrast to 2015 there were tons of citations to the economics literature, explaining ambiguous effectses of a ban on consumer welfare and investment. that got "flushed away" in 2015. instead what tom wh

baltimore decided a couple years ago, they wanted the help and support for the attorney general and the doj, the attorney general, after a judge decided entering into the consent agreement, saying the following about the agreement, make no estate, baltimore is facing a violent crime crisis. in short the citizens of baltimore are plagued by violent crime that shows no signs of letting up. i have grave concerns some provisions of this decree will reduce the powers of the police department and result in a less safe city. >> what do they do? i respect him, he is fighting for something, silly i did racial view of the world. i respect that. he is in proud condition which there is a succession with controlling women's bodies or black bodies, he engages in a legal somersault, you have the rights of states and you might think these supersede, when it comes to the negro you don't hear a citizen of the state or citizen of the united states. why is that important? what does that have to do with what beauregard is talking about? it is a shell game with the federal government as it suits them. we upset a

as i said, we, the cia and fbi, dni dod, doj, dot and dhs and , all of our international partners have been successful thus far. i recently made decisions that added additional baggage protocols to the number of foreign airports that fly flights directly to the united states. this decision was not about the muslim religion, skin color or ethnicity. i would like to impact the foreign air carriers to the benefit of u.s. air carriers. my -- my decisions were based on save living and protecting the homeland. if wcannot get our arms around the current thread, you can expect additional protocol adjustments in the near future. i'll end by saying i thank you so very much for the support you gave elaine duke, the fact that she is now confirmed and with any kind of luck i'll return to my building after this meeting or after this committee, swear her in, and put a very, very heavy pack on her back, fill it up with a lot of rocks and make the department of homeland security better than it already is. with that mr. chairman, ranking member i standby for questions. , she had to be looking forward to

the template that has been laid out by the protections of doj and the fcc jointly implemented in the comcast merger. peter: net neutrality has been developed under the tom wheeler administration. how has that been devoid of economic analysis or part of economic analysis? dr. singer: in the 2010 open internet order under chairman jankowski, the decision was made to not impose a strict ban on pay priority and instead pay priority was subject to ex post or case-by-case review. and the rationale and the correct rationale is that certain arrangements of a paid prioritization could be done for pro-competitive reasons and others for anti-competitive reasons. for economists when there is that kind of ambiguity it is , best to embrace case-by-case rather than blanket protections. that's the economic way of thinking. and by the way in the 2010 order, in contrast to 2015, there were tons of citations explaining the ambiguous effects of a ban on things like consumer welfare and investment. that economics got flushed away in 2015. instead what tom wheeler did was embraced this populist wind and t

. >> i don't think the position of the prime minister is a -- one.ble and -- the doj shows improvementencouraging, inflation in the year ahead. authorities and visit three offices for alleged tax evasion. the bank

tillerson announced the security council will lead interagency of the doj and the u.s. has little interest at allowing the deal. >> it really does not achieve the objective. another example of buying off a power who has nuclear ambitions, we buy them off for a short period of time and someone has to deal with it later. we just don't see that that's a prudent way to be dealing with iran, certainly not in the context of all the other disruptive activities. >> at the white house a spokesman voiced criticism that iran is complying. >> is the president concerned that iran may be cheating? >> that's why he's asking for the review, if he didn't, if he thought everything was fine, he would allowed this to move toward. he's doing the prudent thing for review of the current deal. >> the jcpoa imposed time limited curves on iran's nuclear program along with inspections in return of billions of sanctions relief. >> he would rip up the iran deal, the iranians wouldn't have a chance. there's no degree of compliance the iranians can achieve that would convince to keep in place. fox ne

we have seen that play out with the irs and the doj when fox news reporter james rosen was watched. this is a serious problem because there is no reason why the trump people were caught up in this even if the excuse is for russia because it has nothing to do with russia. in the revelations of evelyn fargas. she took his to members of the hill. we should find out who else knew about this, how long it was going on. 237. liz: evelyn farkus later became an visor to the hillary clinton campaign similarly susan rice advised hillary clinton. she said she advised obama officials to seek as much information as they can about trump and his team, parade that information around, get it to capitol hill where leaks geometrically rise. >> i was urging my fellow colleagues. it was telling the hill people, get as much intelligence you can before president trump leaves the administration. >> if there was anything extremely bad having to do with anything of the president's staff, it would have come out because it was their goal to get those leaks out there. this is not the case. this is far more sinis

. >> i don't think the position of the prime minister is a -- one.ble and -- the doj shows improvement for japan. encouraging, inflation in the year ahead. authorities and visit three offices for alleged tax evasion. the bank repeats zero-tolerance approach in newspaper as. what does this mean for the turnaround plan? ♪ anna: a very warm welcome to debate -- bloomberg daybreak: europe -- "bloomberg daybreak" going to india and cfos are up there of the u.k.. most optimistic in 18 months. is it getting harder to hold onto the short dish? data, slightly likes but you can see short vision was after the flash crash. we are less short on the british and thatn we were, positioning is getting more and more difficult to hold onto. 1.21 by the beginning of this year. it depends which research you've read. every time you see a little bit of a nuance, you see a squeeze wethe purpose house anna: were talking a lot about how short the market was. bit ofk radar, a little a picture of where we are on various assets as you go to the asian session. dollar pretty weak. new york president weighing in on w

the doj put money find this.have a division that makes police body cameras and all the associated cloud computing software needed to manage the digital footage people have, so basically that has been the fastest growing part of the company and they see that as a way to expand, so they announce this plan to change their name from taser to axon. they really see the future of the company. everyone is still committed to the taser, but they see growth potential coming from the body cameras and this digital management of evidence and digital life of a police officer. oliver: this is very interesting. i feel like there are very few instances where the name of the .ompany is the product what was it along the way that happen, an opportunity? where is the impetus for the change coming from? they were facing a lot of lawsuits and a lot of public scrutiny for injuries and death. there was a lot of debate about cause and effect, but they were facing scrutiny regardless. they developed a taser camera that activated when the gu

that same level of oversight occurs at the nsa with respect to odni and doj audits every 60 days, and indeed every single selector that is used under 702 is audited. not a single one is missed. in addition to the executive branch oversight, there is of course the inspector generals of the agencies have oversight authority as well outside of the executive branch. there is congressional oversight through the committees. the fisk provides oversight by setting the standards and getting reports on any mistakes that are made. and then there is the fourth layer of oversight, which you alluded to, the privacy and civil liberties oversight board, which did a thorough and detailed review of the use of 702, established that it had been an highly effective tool in disrupting specific terrorist plots. they also found, as i mentioned to senator king, no trace of illegitimate activity or intentional misuse of the tool. >> thank you for the answer. and thank you for your willingness to come serve our country once again. and thanks to all the many men and women you will be leading in the office of gen

but when i read that statement by doj this afternoon, my blood began to boil.point. this is shiftingth top ping. there is no way you can make the case credibly that jeff sessions and attorney general re anti-cop. connell: says the numbers are down wants to make the point. can i understand his point on that. ed: bill de blasio? abby: talk about words matter? let's think back on the words bill mayor has said talking about the police in his own city? take a listen. this is back in 2014. >> i've had to worry over the years, have to worry was donte safe each night? and not just from some of the painful realities crime and violence in some of our neighborhoods but they say from the very people that want y want to have faith in as their protecters. the department will act aggressively tone sure any officer who is not meant to be in this work no longer is. those who don't live up to the values of the uniform, who are quote, unquote, brutal, who are corrupt, who are racist, who are incompetent. abby: what does that do to the morale of our police force? ed: talking about