and later hiding it from your money on down here don don don see it on our commitments face it's all on you by people. you know you're in your false he can't see he's younger that's what he eat with it in your own mind all those aircraft are young you become a lot more important for your yes maybe you married. him to tell you that not love . you're out but no one but let him take up one now about one gets she should. good user level there's a consideration to men always must be the answer i mean i'll give myself. so if you survive. and play. tested before you. don't think i'll. click enough it's a lot more tells. me i'm going to be remade more room. to use the. big kind that's an understudy. i don't have much in that direction. i'll just calmly said i stopped at the. point 00. once i had a brief conversation with someone who told me he was a nazi. and he asked me where do you come from. ok you come from syria right mark and he said i don't like refugees but i respect that you speak german. i asked why are you afraid of refugees on your sleeve he didn't answer. you know. cannot how to

don mcgann of course is someone legally. don mcgann of course is someone who was legally. don mcgann of course is someone who was very legally. donis someone who was very useful to the former special council robert miller and his investigation into allegations of collusion between the trumpet campaign and russia. mr mcgann famously told robert mueller that he had been told by the president in a late night telephone call to his home to get onto the justice department and suck mueller himself, the federal council, and when that story became public, the president had fallen him to hold a press co nfe re nce president had fallen him to hold a press conference and deny there was any truth to it. what this could all do now is lead to renewed democrats rather former do now is lead to renewed democrats ratherformer senior do now is lead to renewed democrats rather former senior trump administration officials to be brought before congress to testify, not least of them of course the former national security adviser john bolton. that said, this ruling by this federal court in washington, dc is expected to be appealed by the white house. we

don mcgahn, jeffrey, you looked very carefully at the language used by don mcgahn's lawyers, which don mcgahn's legal team didn't say, we're just going to see this through to the bitter end, let the appeals process play out. what don mcgahn's attorney said is he will testify if this decision is not stayed. >> right, and i don't want to bore people with too much civil procedure here. but what's important is that when you appeal something, usually the underlying decision comes into effect unless you get what's called a stay. and that means the d.c. circuit, the appellate court says you, white house, have a likelihood of success on the merits. you are so likely to win on appeal that we're going to hold off on this ruling. it's pretty unusual, and i think it's unusual in this case. so what don mcgahn's lawyer, william burke, means is that unless he gets -- the white house gets a stay -- and that should be known within a week or two -- mcgahn's going to testify. and that really changes the calendar in a very dramatic way because if he were going to wait for the appellate process to be resolved, that could be months. this is probably just a couple of weeks. >> not impossible in other words that there is no stay, is what

don mcgahn because don mcgahn already testified he didn't do anything wrong. remember don mcgahn spent quite a wit of time with robert mueller on the mueller investigation. he said he would be inclined to let other people testify like rick perry, mick mulvaney, secretary of state mike pompeo, even john bolton who is in a separate lawsuit about whether or not he can be compelled to testify. he said he's not going to do do so, at least he's hinting on it. there's a hint he doesn't want to do it because he says he's protecting the presidency. that's where we're at. similar to what the statement was from the white house last night, this idea they are in lines with past presidents. it's judge jackson who is the out lioutliar with this new cas >> what, if anything, did the judge say about john bolton and this claim his attorney seems to have made that bolton's portfolio, national security, that the portfolio itself should in some way, shape, form or fashion shield him from having to appear before the house committee? >> the aim simple answer is nothing. this is all about don mcgahn's testimony, not anybody else's. remember, we have to step back here to first principles. all the ruling says is that white house employees, and maybe even the president himself, can't just slam the door in congress' face when they're issued a subpoena and say no, we're not coming, we don't have to. what the judge say is, yes, you do. but when you get there you still may be able to refuse to answer certain questions. you can cite executive privilege or something else. that's part two of this which we haven't really talked ability. she does say there's no exception here for people who are talking about national security or anything else. so she sort of dismisses this claim that has been made that the closest advisers to the president or people who are involved in sensitive national security issues can resist subpoenas. it may well be when they get there, they can legitimately claim they can't answer questions about that. this judge's ruling has no legal binding effect on any oth

don's sister.and ple mr. nono. >> i'm doris. i'm don's oldest sister. >> i'm elinor simmons. and i sister-in-law. >> i'm bernie simmons, i'm don's brother. only one left. see the picture? >> definitely, yes. >> that's him. >> yep, that's him. >> reporter: a few months after they melt over the phone, they were about to meet in person. nono traveling to syracuse to meet the family of his fallen came rad. our station wsyr, right there. applause from strangers at the airport. nono about to meet the simmons family. >> what do we got here? >> reporter: they were lined waiting to shake his hand. >> i'm nono. when we landed, we were 19-year-old kids landing on the shores of france and within a half an hour, we became men. >> reporter: we have traveled all over the world this year, to afghanistan, where we met the current generation serving their country. lieutenant colonel jill moss from coudersport, pennsylvania. her family back home. she speaks dari with the afghans. ca you're able to form better rly costello from marietta, georgia. >> i remember -- i remember 9/11. i was in -- i was in seventh grade when it happened.d to iraq, where they are

don mcgahn case which is being decided here by this judge. right? the ruling says, bottom line, that don mcgahn has to testify. that trump can't tell don mcgahn to defy the subpoena to testify, but this case did not come up in the context of the current impeachment proceedings against president trump. right? you will remember that don mcgahn, then-white house counsel, was subpoenaed to testify to congress not because of the current impeachment but because of the mueller investigation. remember, don mcgahn was, like, the key witness to ten different instances of potential obstruction of justice that were laid out in great detail in mueller's report. don mcgahn was cited more than any other witness in that report. but even though that was the context in which this case was initially brought, the case is being settled now, this ruling is arriving now tonight, of course, while impeachment proceedings are under way. and while congressional oversight of this president is, therefore, at its most serious and most consequential point yet. and so this is just the last bit of this i want you to hear. listen to how judge jackson sort of situates us here in that moment. in the importance of this moment for the rule of law. for the fate of the republic. she says, "when a committee of congress seeks testimony and records by issui

don again isjust two minutes look at the river. the river don again is just two minutes away. look at the river. the river dono minutes away. it is falling. we can tell because we do have some piles with a steel barrier. it is quite easy to measure on there and it has definitely gone down. we were told by the environment agency at four o'clock that the river would peak between five and six, and that would be a great risk of flooding. several the residents have left the village because of that, but i'm convinced now that we will not get flooded. would have you done with your livestock? it is limited to what we can do with it. you can't put them in the back of the van and take them somewhere else. finding somewhere to ta ke somewhere else. finding somewhere to take them would be difficult. if i get flooded, they will get flooded. and what harm can it do if they get caught in deep mud and floodwater? you could lose them. it could be days until they get somewhere dry where they could lie down. they could be fine. it is difficult but feeding them will not be easy if you cannot get them warm. what sort of flood def

don mcgab's lawyer has stated that he did nothing wrong. i don't think that don mcgahn's lawyer ever said that. but the bigger question here about this ruling is not will don mcgahn ever testify. because question already basically know from the mueller report what don mcgahn has to say. the repercussions what the question is, does this ruling affect other people like john bolton and will it make them testify. and what i found interesting about this is that it led me to believe that john bolton doesn't really want to talk because this judge's ruling if he wanted to talk, he's been waiting for a judge to rule about whether he should, could have been potentially used as a door opening saying, well, this is in precedent here, the judge even talks about bolton in the ruling, but his lawyer is saying that this does not apply to him and that he had a different role in the white house. and it leads me to believe that bolton will not be looking for a reason to speak in front of congress. >> mimi, there was a win for the president yesterday being specifically the supreme court temporarily blocked the disclosure of his financial records. we'll wait until december 5. how do you think this will play out? >> well, i mean it is not surprising that they issued a s

don fidencio sÁnchez, el paletero de origen mexicano cuya imagen empujando su carrito de paletas se hizo viral alrededor del mundo. viviana Ávila nuestra el detalle del homenaje que se le reenviÓ hoy a don fidencio. don eladio recibiÓ las condolencias de allegados y extraÑos por la muerte de su esposo fidencio sÁnchez con quien pasÓ los Últimos 60 aÑos de su vida. el paletero de mÉxico mÁs famoso de chicago fue despedido con un sentido homenaje donde se conocieron detalles de su vida entre ellos haber perdido a su Única hija. creciÓ de familia en familia hasta los 20 aÑos de edad. hace tres aÑos esta fotografÍa de dones que el iba agachado. despuÉs de recibir el dinero estaba muy derecho. definitivamente le ayudÓ mucho anÍmicamente. en total lograron recaudar $284,000. >> estoy muy contento por lo que han hecho por mÍ y mi esposa. el autor dijo que lo incluyÓ por considerarlo un ejemplo del mexicano trabajador. quienes lo conocieron en vida asÍ lo recordarÁn. >> yo convivÍ con Él. era una persona ejemplar. >> viviana Ávila, univisiÓn. felix: con el 100% de los votos escrutados el partido socialista ganÓ las elecciones generales en espaÑa. en segundo lugar quedÓ el partido popular de centroderecha que aumentÓ el nÚmero de votos. la gran sorpresa es el tercer lugar del partido de ultraderecha. como ningÚn partido tuvo mayorÍa absoluta del gobierno tendrÁ que buscar una coaliciÓn de complicada conformaciÓn que prolonga la inestabilidad polÍtica en el país. >> en mÉxico el consumo de agua es escaso, como nos cuenta jessica zermeÑo esto se estÁ convirtiendo en una emergencia pÚblica. >> chiapas es uno d

don mcgann question, the question whether it geese beyond don mcgann. it goes on to john bolton and some people in the administration claim even if you make don mcgann. she is saying absolutely not. and then, of course, as you pointed out, she's saying that the president is himself not immune. what does this mean when don mcgann does show up if he does show up? it means that he may still, however, refuse to answer certain questions because of executive privilege. we don't know, erin, how long it will be before this all gets resolved. we know the justice department says they're going to appeal the ruling. we're looking at an appeals court ruling in the next couple of months before it may even get to the supreme court. we're still looking at several months of litigation during which time, of course, the democrats want to wrap up their impeachment inquiry. she's a member of the judiciary committee which will be drawing up articles of impeachment. i appreciate your time tonight. congresswoman, obviously your a right now looking at potential articles when it comes to ukraine. do you think this ruling about don mcgann will compel others to testify was imminently. i think it was a resounding victory for the rule of law and our constitutional. the president's claim of absolute immunity, i think that at the end

don right now, thatis am next to the river don right now, that is the river don that we've been hearing so much about in the past few days because of the source of so many problems with flooding along the river donrted receding ever so slightly by a few centimetres in the past few hours, given how deep the flood waters well, that is very slow progress. they water levels are rising in other places, such as newark in nottinghamshire, so we are not out of the danger zone. there are still seven severe flood warnings in place across parts of the north of the country and that is affecting travel and transport, as you can imagine, with lots of training suspended. it looks quite clear now, there is the forecast for worsening conditions and there are lots of people who are still in areas with a severe flood warning in place, meaning there is a potential risk to life. thank you. not quite out of the woods just yet. let us bring you up—to—date on the general election campaign. labour has criticised conservative attempts to unpick their spending plans as the political parties continue their general election campaigns. the conservatives say labour's spending plans would cost the country an extra £1.2 trillio

excited for don jr he even tweeted, "wow, was just told my son's book 'triggered' is number one on the 'new york times' best seller list congratulations, don." that's a pretty special moment for dontil a few minutes later when trump tweeted, "just got hacked ignore last tweet. [ laughter ] >> steve: wow. come on. why, why >> jimmy: well, tomorrow the impeachment hearings continue, and we're going to hear from marie yovanovitch the ambassador to ukraine that trump fired. i'm a little worried, because if every person trump's ever fired is going to testify, the impeachment is going to last forever. it's like -- [ laughter ] "lil jon, please raise your right hand." "what!?" yeah [ light laughter ] "do you swear to tell the truth? "okay! [ laughter ] tomorrow, all the regular daytime tv shows will be preempted again for the impeachment hearings but to keep viewers happy, they are getting "the price is right" announcer to tell the witnesses to, "come on down! [ laughter ] you're the next witness in the trump impeachment. but after tomorrow's testimony, another eight witnesses are going to testify next week just a word of advice for the democrats. if you preempt another five episodes of

don butler from today. can i ask you, we have spoken to don butlerfrom the labour today. can i ask you, we have spoken to donion, and half the debate was missing from it. and some of the format was just a bit weird as well, i thought. the thing that struck me was that on the one hand you had jeremy corbyn, who couldn't say where he stood. he was going to negotiate a deal and then put it to the people, but would he campaign to remain or not? he basically underlined what we already know, which is that the labour party is not a remain party. and then borisjohnson who, as we know, has a casual relationship with the truth. i think the most shocking thing actually was the changing of the twitter handle of cchq press, to suggest they were an independent fa ct suggest they were an independent fact checker. that i thought was utterly outrageous at a time when there were many questions about do you trust borisjohnson, and at the same time that twitter handle being changed, i don't think that was a good look. louise hasjust put those points to you, as well. the problem is, i know you said thatjo swinson should have bee