don. >> but no doubt in washington not everyone is thrilled with it, i'm just guessing. >> absolutely. very predictably there's a tough statement out from a couple of high profile senators john mccainlindsay graham. they said without a u.n. security council resolution under chapter seven of the u.n. charter which threatens the use of force for noncompliance by the assad regime, this framework agreement is meaningless. assad will use the months and months afforded to him to delay and deceive the world using every trick in saddam hussein's playbook. so, that's going to be a common theme, because a lot of people are skeptical whether assad is going to do anything unless he's threatened. mccain and graham also complain that that agreement doesn't do anything to stop the civil war in syria and they call for support of the moderate opposition forces there. so, a lot of stuff going into this. >> let's bring it back here to america, because this was one of the first questions i had, if the folks were -- the lawmakers were relieved that they don't have to vote on military strikes. >> yeah, i think that's true. there are a lot of people who are relieved that they don't have to vote on this b