that donald trump deserves. and we are not going to relent the january six commission, they are not going to relent, and i promise you viewers, who has a, senator very active on twitter, they recognize that there is an inside game and outside game, this is the outside game on accountability. the inside game is as a relates to voting, writes is something that if we want to make sure that donald trump cannot be successful in trying to do many of these tactics again in 2024, the senate needs to step up and do its part, because i can bring a lawsuit, my colleagues can bring lawsuits, we can pass legislation in the house, but this is an all hands on deck effort. and it's just as important is anything that i did in the courtroom today. >> congressman eric swalwell and neil, thank you very much for starting off our discussion tonight. at the end of the hour tonight, we will have a special last word, about the loss of sydney poitier and other greats, who we lost this weekend, including some dear friends of mine. coming

thanks to the january six committee we now know that donald trump, and what donald trump was doing during the worst of the attack. >> the committee has firsthand testimony now that he was sitting in the dining room next to the oval office watching the attack on television. as the assault on the capitol occurred. we know, as he was sitting there in the dining room next to the oval office, members of his staff were pleading with him to go on television to tell people to stop. we know leader mccarthy was pleading with him to do that. we know members of his family, we know his daughter, we have four centers to money that is daughter, of ankara, when in it least twice to ask him to please stop this violence. >> we always knew that the house republican leader, kevin mccarthy, was finding the creation of this committee because, among other, things he was afraid of what it would reveal about him. we now know, after congresswoman liz cheney said that yesterday, that kevin mccarthy was pleading with donald trump to go on television and tell the people who he said up to the capitol. to lead the capi

donald trump sent me there. you have the video of donald trump sending them there. lying to them and saying that he was going to walk up there with them. can that be linked up in some criminal action against the president? >> yes, absolutely. and i think the key fact, adding to everything you just said, is after, while these riots are going on, what does trump do? he sits on his hands for 187 minutes. and so i think both for trump and for the rioters themselves, i don't think there's any first amendment defense with due respect to what was just said a moment ago. i mean, there is -- the first amendment does not protect that kind of conduct. and to me the most heart breaking thing, lawrence, is that a year ago tonight we had republicans and democrats both condemning not just the rioters but condemning donald trump or at least as an action, indeed inaction as well. i remember some commentators said, oh, this will be whitewashed and forgotten. i said, no, this is a turning point. this is when people stared into the abyss and the republican party realized what donald tr

donald trump's lawyers were seeking to have the lawsuits dismissed and insisted that donald trump said nothing to provoke the attack on the capitol. once the attack was under way, judge maeda asked donald trump's lawyers, once the attack was under way, wouldn't somebody who is a reasonable person say that's not what i meant? the judge was wondering why donald trump never said that to those people attacking the capitol. you're not doing what i wanted you to do. he never said that. donald trump's lawyers argued that anything said as president can never be the subject of a lawsuit. and as lawyers do, when they think one argument might fail, donald trump's lawyers offered a second argument, which is that donald trump's comments were simply part of doing his job as president. judge maeda raised the georgia case where donald trump called the secretary of state asking him to change the vote count in georgia. judge maeda asked donald trump's lawyers how is he carrying out the function of the presidency by calling a state official? donald trump's lawyers argued that his job is to make sure, quo

he went to meet with donald trump. quote, the select committee does wish to discuss any communications you had with president trump at that time regarding your account of what actually happened on january six. your public statements regarding january six have changed markedly since you met with trump. at that meeting or at any other time, did president trump or his representatives discuss or suggest what you should say publicly during the impeachment trial, if called as a witness, or in any later investigation, about your conversation about him or on january six? here's what kevin mccarthy said on january six, in an interview with norah o'donnell, cbs news, while the capital was still being attacked. >> you said you spoke with the president, what did the president say he would do? >> i don't know. he had put a tweet out of. there i told him to talk to the nation. i told him what was happening right. then i was very clear with the president when i called him. i said to stop. and he said go to the american public and tel

donald trump's fifth and final national security adviser, keith kellogg, is quoted in peril, giving donald trump similar advice to the man stephanie grisham says, was gleefully watching tv. sir, vice president is secure, kellogg told trump. where is mike? trump asked. the secret service has. him there down in the basement. they're okay and he's not going to get in the vehicle. he knows, kellogg said, that if they put your ass in the vehicle, they're going to take you somewhere. mister president, he added, you really should do a tweet. on capitol hill, nobody is carrying a tv on their shoulder. you need to get a tweet out real quick. help control the crowd up there. this is out of control. they're not going to be able to control this. sir, they're not prepared for it. once the mob starts turning like that, you've lost it, he said. yeah, trump said. trump blinken kept watching television. kellogg looked around and realize the west wing was nearly empty. meadows was in his office, but trump was essentially alone. leading off our discussion tonight, bob woodward, two-time pulitzer prize-winnin

trump, donald trump jr.pite numerous attempts to delay the investigation, we're confident that questions will be answered and truth uncovered because no one is above the law. joining our discussion, tim o'brien, author of "trump nation" and former acting solicitor general and msnbc legal contributor. when you read the argument sequence dealing with these subpoenas, what is your sense of enforceability of the subpoenas is headed? >> these subpoenas are going to be enforced. today's revelations think are significant because what she show is the attorney general is seeking information about the books and answers to questions, to get the information under oath, why trump and his kids are resisting so much. but trump books appear honestly more cooked than a trump steak at his hotel. the "washington post" reported that 40 wall street, evalated at $16.7 million talking to property tax officials. and this is really significant, this is theft against our taxpayers. it's as if trump and his kids went into the new york

donald trump was going to donald trump. that meant holding on to power. the constitution be dammed. >> daniel golden, as you read the information today with prosecutor's eye, what do you see in the flow of the texts? >> i see a couple of things. i think what they are starting to do now they obtained the documents is starting to slowly drip, drip them out so that the public can get a sense of what the documentary evidence is. i don't think they expect a ton of cooperation from sean hannity which is why they want to lay it out in the letter. it puts more pressure on him now that we know he was in the inner circle, talking to mark meadows. clearly having a good understanding of what was planned for january 6, what the discussions were and what the resistance was from the white house council's office. i think we should expect to continue to see more of the documentary evidence. what we don't know is what the testimony from the witnesses has been. that will likely come out in public hearings that my former boss, adam schiff said would begin in as little as wee

biden and donald trump. biden is beak and we need people who will keep america strong. host: who do you think that might be in 2024? who would you like to see? caller: that is a good question. at this point right now, i am trying to educate myself and trying to look at the candidates, but i heard earlier that you had a guest talking about governor desantis. i am not thrilled about him, but i am very much in advocate for someone who will stand up and do the right thing for america, instead of trying to divide us. you had a collar earlier you mentioned the gop has no policy. the gop has a policy. they have a list of policies that they are trying to implement. for example, state legislators are trying to suppress voters. all these laws are trying to suppress the vote. gerrymandering, favoring the gop , and finally, all this hate that has-beens viewed from republic -- has been spewed from republicans. somebody made a comment about the red states and blue states being separated. that is un-american. that is not w

donald trump is the boss until he's not. each other, that's constantly scheming, that has one eye on trump's health, on his fitness, wondering what he's going to do. there will be a lot of people quickly out of the gates. but nothing will happen until trump makes his decision. he's got the party as a hostage. they're willful in the sense that most of them aren't hostages, they're accomplices. but in totality, it's what holds the whole country hostage as we wait to see what donald trump does heading into 2024. but as you look right now, democrats have a lot of work to do and have to change the terrain they're fighting on immediately to be in a position to prevail in these 2022 midterms. because the trajectory they're on, the lane that they're in is headed towards defeat. and to see a republican speaker in the constitutional line of succession which will set off two years of chaos, nihilism and sabotage of the public good, the public interest, and the biden presidency. >> steve schmidt, thank you very much for joining us again

and there's a lot, donald trump, in his po. and today in his speech, joe biden, there was no, there was no concession to the other side. there was no healing till he went for donald trump again and again without actually using his name. yes, that's what he tries to do. he really tries to avoid mentioning a him by name. he just refers to him as the former president, as he tries not to give him any more power. but indeed, as william just pointed out, phil, he really vent after donald trump and for a reason he might only have like one actually less than a year left in which he has the majority because of the upcoming mid terms. and this was a clear call for action also to the senate to pass through or writing a voting rights or legislation to use these last months of the majority of the democrats to really make everything which can kind of secure the american democracy. because, i mean, i think he and, and as did vice a president carmella harris made it crystal clear. this is a crucial moment in american history. this is, everythi

the donald trump candidates one of— where the donald trump candidates one of the _ where the donaldoking at these — differently and so byjust looking at these polls— differently and so byjust looking at these polls ask _ differently and so byjust looking at these polls ask republicans . differently and so byjust looking | at these polls ask republicans do you support — at these polls ask republicans do you support donald _ at these polls ask republicans do you support donald trump - at these polls ask republicans do - you support donald trump committee splendour— you support donald trump committee splendour run — you support donald trump committee splendour run again, _ you support donald trump committee splendour run again, what _ you support donald trump committee splendour run again, what you - you support donald trump committee splendour run again, what you think i splendour run again, what you think of him _ splendour run again, what you think of him with— splendour run again, what you think of him with matt — splendour run again, what you think of him with matt that— splendour

trump, pero veamos dÓnde estaba el expresidente donald trump. >> el expresidente donald trump tenÍasiguiente evento pÚblico serÁ en arizona el prÓximo dÍa 15 y allÍ va a expander mucho mÁs a la respuesta. >> ya se sabe que la mayorÍa de los estadounidenses considera que el asalto al capitolio por parte de los seguidores del expresidente donald trump fue un acto violento, el 68% de los encuestados seÑalÓ que los acontecimientos fueron un claro ejemplo de violencia polÍtica y un 32% asegura que sÓlo se tratÓ de un incidente aislado, si la democracia de estados unidos estÁ en la actualidad en peligro, un 66% dijo que estÁ amenazada, mientras que un 33% respondiÓ que la democracia en nuestro paÍs no corre ningÚn riesgo. la encuesta entrevistÓ un poco mÁs de 2000 personas entre el 27 y 30 de diciembre del aÑo pasado. >> padres que recibieran cheque de ayuda por sus hijos, fue el servicio de impuesto y anunciÓ el envÍo de cartas donde informa que algunos contribuyentes recibieron mÁs dinero del que les correspondÍa y como nos cuenta socorro cruz, algunas familias tendrÍa que devolverse di

but it didn't make any difference because donald trump was going to be donald trump. and that man holding on to power. >> david goldman, as you read this information today with the prosecutors i, what do you see in the flow of those text? >> i see a couple of things. i think they are starting to do now that they have obtained these documents is starting to slowly drip them out. so the public can get a sense of what the documentary evidence is. i don't think that they expect a ton of cooperation from sean hannity which is why they want to lay it all out in the letter. it puts a lot more pressure on him now that we all know that he was in the inner circle as claire mccaskill so rightly said. talking to mark meadows and having a good understanding of what was planned for january six. also what the discussions were, what the resistance was from the white house counsel's office. so, i think that we should expect to continue to see more and more of the documentary evidence. what we don't know is what the testimony from the witnesses have been. and that will likely come out

trump, donald trump jr.nka trump to comply with our investigation into the trump organization's financial dealings. i want to welcome back daniel goldman, former united states district attorney for the district of new. also served during the first trump impeachment. i do not know if you had a chance daniel to go through the reporting on this. it does seem that the attorney general of new york state is making the case that donald trump, donald trump jr., and ivanka trump provided misleading financial representations to institutions that the former president quote, had authority over a wide swath of conduct by the trump organization, involving misstatements to counter parties, including financial institutions and the internal revenue service. would you make of this, if you've had a chance to look at it, what is new and important? >> what is new is some details about what her civil investigation relates to. we've known there has been an ongoing civil investigation into the trump organization in the internal gen

trump, donald trump jr.ed misleading financial representations to institutions at the former president, quote, had ultimate authority over a wide swath of conduct by the trump organization involving misstatements to counter parties, including financial institutions and the internal revenue service. what do you make of this if you had a chance to look at it? what is new in here and important? >> what's new is some details about what her civil investigation relates to. we've known there has been an ongoing civil investigation into the trump organization in the attorney general's office, which is separate and parallel to the criminal investigation that the attorney general is involved with as well as the manhattan d.a.'s office, who is leading that investigation. and it was certainly around the trump organization's finances. but now what we are learning from this filing and that press release tonight is that the allegations are that donald trump, donald trump jr. and ivanka trump were very involved in exaggerat

by a never named donald trump. and steven spielberg never showed jaws the show. and the what made it one of the most guessed terrifying movies of all time. and joe biden runs at risk of enlarging this boogie man that's out there by not, but by constantly referring to him. this man behind the curtain. um and they, there's a wrist there. he's walking a very fine line. you can't ignore the elephant in the room. no pun, attendance is republicans there. i commer mascots the elephant. but when you address it, you make him more powerful, more strong, remembered donald trump is banned from social media. he's very quiet. we can't hear him right now. um, and so how to address him, how to talk about him is a really risky move for joe biden. he the president joe biden runs the risk of, of bringing himself down to the level of donald trump, who he himself says as a defeated president. and what the see, the days and weeks go on as we had towards the mid terms in november. how the democrats are going to play this. because donald

what has been the response of donald trump? he has been the response of donald trum - ?esponse of donald trum? .. ., trump? he reacted to joe biden's is _ trump? he reacted to joe biden's is forceful - trump? he reacted to joe biden's is forceful speech | trump? he reacted to joe - biden's is forceful speech when biden�*s is forceful speech when it comes to donald trump and donald trump hit out at president biden saying he was trying to distract from his own failures. it was interesting in that speech joe biden failures. it was interesting in that speechjoe biden gave, he does not really mention donald trump and he has made a point of not doing so throughout his presidency. he does not mention his name. he still did not mention donald trump by his name terms of that support for donald trump, it is still very much there if you believe some of the poles. 60% of republicans it shows still believe the election was rigged and back donald trump, thatjoe biden is the illegitimate president. it was interesting thatjoe biden mentioned he won the election fairly. if you look at th

if donald j.aid you know, being a sore loser is a stain on america. no matter who wins, they're the winner and no matter who loses, they're the loser and it's a tradition of our country to you know, be part of a peaceful transfer of power. 1/6 would not have happened? 55% of americans wouldn't stand alone as the only people who think joe biden was legitimate as america's president? and -- maybe he would, tucker carlson, but the rock is the republican party. >> yeah, you can frame it that way. and the elements within the party that will perpetuate this are well-known and documented and identified. but as i look at tomorrow and move into it, i'm going to move the lens out more because the numbers you put up in the polling says a lot. and i don't think we can just gloss by it or we can just put it at the feet of the republican party because lord knows they have fed that particularly ugly beast. but the question then comes back to us. and what does it say? and what does it mean? do you really give a d

biden and donald trump. biden is beak and we need people who will keep america strong. host: who do you think that might be in 2024? who would you like to see? caller: that is a good question. at this point right now, i am trying to educate myself and trying to look at the candidates, but i heard earlier that you had a guest talking about governor desantis. i am not thrilled about him, but i am very much in advocate for someone who will stand up and do the right thing for america, instead of trying to divide us. you had a collar earlier you mentioned the gop has no policy. the gop has a policy. they have a list of policies that they are trying to implement. for example, state legislators are trying to suppress voters. all these laws are trying to suppress the vote. gerrymandering, favoring the gop , and finally, all this hate that has-beens viewed from republic -- has been spewed from republicans. somebody made a comment about the red states and blue states being separated. that is un-american. that is not w

he's been endorsed by donald trump in the battle against the party establishment. there - is a civil war going on right make no mistake there is a civil war going on right now in the republican party for the direction of the republican party. i believe the america first, the president trump movement, that we have the vast majority of the country and the republican party. you don't think some people would have looked at the events of january the 6th and thought, "i don't want to be a part of that?" initially, a lot of people did and a lot of those folks now regret that. the mob was fed lies. they were provokedl by the president and other powerful people. and in the days after the storming of the capitol, senior republicans condemned the attack, but when it came to action, the vast majority of republicans voted not to impeach and convict donald trump for incitement. he is not guilty as charged with the articles of impeachment. for all the condemnation he's received in the last year over his involvement in those violent events, donald trump still enjoys the support of

donald trump won this election. i call upon the arizona legislature to vote to decertify the 2020 election. >> that final speaker of course was not a trump elector. he engaged in that criminal conspiracy to actually create fake electors to somehow create a donald trump presidency where there was none. and so that that's what we're going to be seeing. at all of the trump rallies. >> we sure are. it will only get crazier. i think that the great deficiency in this moment in america's life in the public square in american life is this singular fact. nobody knows what to call that. that thing that we just watched. what is that? how do we think about that in 2022? is it fair to look at it and say that this is the legacy of, this is the descendant of a george wallace rally. is this the descendant of a bill connor rally? i think it is fair to say that in substantial measure. is it an extremist movement? does it have fascist markers? appropriate to say it's fascist and it's an autocratic movement. i think it is. you saw one

donald trump won this election. the arizona legislator, to vote to decertify the 2020 election. >> steve schmidt that final speaker of course was not a top electorate. he engaged in criminal conspiracy. to actually create fake electors. to somehow create donald trump presidency where there was none. so that is what we are going to be seen at all these trump rallies. >> we sure are. and it will only get crazier. look, i think that the great efficiency lawrence in american's life and the public square in american life, is this singular fact. nobody knows what to call that. that thing that we've just watched. what is that? how do we think about that in 2022? is it fair to look at it and say that this is the legacy of? this is the descendant of? a george wallace rally. is this the descendant of a bill connor rally? i think it is fair to say that. in substantial measure. is it an extremist move? does it have for justice markers. is it appropriate to say that it is fascist? that it is an autocratic movement? i think it is

about donald trump? about donald trump? that's next.y repairs so there are almost no signs... of visible damage. dove intensive repair. number one beauty brand not tested on animals. (vo) you can be well-dressed. you can be well-mannered. (man) oh, no, no, after you. wahoooo! (vo) you can be well-groomed. or even well-spoken. (man) ooooooo. (vo) but there's just something about being well-adventured. (vo) adventure has a new look. discover more in the all-new subaru forester wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. (burke) with farmers auto multi-policy discount, the more policies you have with us, the more you could save on your auto insurance.. (man) hey, hon! (wife) hi, honey! (man) like what? (burke) well, you'd get a discount for insuring your jet skis... and boat...rv...life... ...home and more. you could save up to forty-five percent. (man) that's a whole lot of discounts. (burke) well, we offer coverage for a whole lot of things, and you could save a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. (kid) sup, dad! (bur

his name was donald trump.emocratic colleagues and constituents irritated because they say, you need to go just as dirty as the republicans have gone. you know what? i think there are constitutional order is such that we don't want to go just as dirty as donald trump would be willing to go. >> do you think, though, that you have seen enough evidence that if he wasn't donald trump, and he wasn't in another party, that firsthand witness accounts of a deadly insurrection playing out in the tv and no action taken would at least represent enough in terms of what's in the public view to be examining that? >> well, let me answer that question both from a knowledgeable standpoint and a completely unknowledgeable standpoint. from a knowledgeable standpoint, i'm in politics, right? had hillary clinton or al gore or barack obama done 2% of the things that donald trump did, he would have been crucified or she would have been crucified and i know that because benghazi, in which hillary clinton did nothing, coughed up nine d

donald trump is still puppeteer in the republican party. he is handpicking candidates that he wants to win in primaries. the litmus test is the 2020 election still for him. do you believe it was rigged and stolen from donald trump? if you believe that, then you're in his good graces and maybe he'll support you. and that support will bring you money, and that support will bring you voters. and so he's still running things a year later. it looked in the immediate aftermath, when lindsey graham went on the floor and said enough is enough, it looked like, well, maybe things would shift. but they haven't shismfted. in fact, donald trump has consolidated his support among fervent republicans, and he runs the party a year later, and that is another reason that i think joe biden felt that he had to come out and give this direct speech, challenging the belief that the election was stolen. >> gloria, david, susan, tim, thank you all very much. >>> join jake tapper, anderson cooper for an unprecedented gathering of police, lawmakers, and leaders on th

what about donald trump? he gave a statement saying he still thinks the election was fraudulent a year wrong. do you think trump's base still believes that oh, of course i think the base things that it's fraudulent. what's unfortunate here is that we haven't been able to have a conversation about how american politics is built upon fraudulent behavior where so and aren't able to participate in the civil democratic process of voting. we're gerrymandering and redistricting, the redrawing of lines where a person can vote for a particular representative gets changed to skewed towards the white and the rich. there are some fundamental issues, not even don't forget the electoral college, which is another way of counting beyond just the popular votes of who wins the election and that these are individuals representing numbers, not necessarily the popular vote numbers themselves. and it's just unfortunate that we can have that conversation about the fundamental flaws in us democracy. and yet we have kind of the show

. >> el presidente joe biden seÑala a donald trump como el principal culpable. >> y todo sigue con ell que el ex presidente jugo ese dia >> los testigos relatan, desd washington dc (democracia cristiana( uenas noches desde el capitolio de los stados unidos el alma de la democracia en este pais, soy julio vaqueiro y cuesta creer que hoy hace un aÑo la turba de seguidores de donald trump marcho desde las escal escalinatas al capitolio de estados unidos y luego comenzo la invasion del congreso, ataque directo de la democracia porque lo que vimos hace un aÑo fueuna imagenes de stados unidos y miembros democratas del congreso se reuneron hoy en una vigilia de reflexion sobre el asalto del capitolio de estados unidos para ver lo que aprendimos, vivimos y lo que se ha a avidenciado la ausencia de los republicanos en eos actos pero sera suficiente, podria volver a pasar esto? y hay que echa una mirada hacia adelante¿que nos espera? para conseguir miradas hacia adelante asi lo dijo hoy el presidente joe biden y en su discurso responsabiliz al expresidente donald trum d crear una red de mentira

donald trump is a criminal.th, and so now he's not just going to rely on maybe a pliable vice president or more members of congress maybe supporting decertifying the election but he will conduct and do it so the michigan assembly would certify wayne county or something like that could happen in georgia or invalidate early ballots for whatever reason. there are a lot of ways this corrupt human being can conduct his silent coup before we get to 2025. >> all right, congressman gallego, thank you very much. his recent book entitled "they called us lucky." " and david drucker, thank you for your reporting. we appreciate you coming on this friday morning. still ahead on "morning joe," labor secretary marty walsh joins us after the supreme court struck down the administration's vaccine mandate for private businesses. you're watching "morning joe." we'll be right back. you're watching "morning joe." you're watching "morning joe." we'll be right back. medusa lived with a hideous curse. uhh, i mean the whole turning peopl

the attorney general is synging to enforce subpoenas against donald trump, donald trump jr.ivanka trump for their testimony. eric trump has already given an under oath deposition in the case in which he refused to answer questions, citing his fifth amendment rights, over 500 times. in the filing released close to midnight last night the attorney general says, "since 2017 donald trump jr. has had authority over numerous financial statements containing misleading asset valuations. donald trump jr. should be compelled to testify before the office of the attorney general. until january 2017 ms. ivanka trump was a primary contact for the trump organization's largest lender, deutsche bank, in connection with this work ms. trump caused misleading financial statements to be submitted to deutsche bank and the federal government. ivanka trump should be compelled to testify before the office of the attorney general." in a press release the attorney general's office noted that they have "not yet reached a final decision regarding whether this evidence merits legal action." the trump org

donald trump worked for the people. the economy was good.ost: some of jerry's comments reflected in this opinion piece from the new york post. voters need to tart -- need to start turning to page on bidens disastrous presidency. president biden on with david muir on news tonight asked about 2024. >> i want to ask you about something i asked weeks before the election will be set down. you said he would absolutely serve eight years if elected. do you plan to run for reelection? >> yes, faith has intervened many places in my life. if i'm in the health i'm in now, i'm in good health, i would run again. >> if that means a rematch against donald trump? >> you're trying to tempt me now. sure. why would i not want to run against donald trump? >> politics aggregate poles. this is from real clear politics. host: 43.1% disapprove. 53.3%. stamford connecticut on the republican line. daniel connecticut caller: i'm in stamford, texas. host: my apologies. go ahead sir. caller: that's all right. the thing is, donald trump should run again because they tried

you wrote the book, that donald trump to do for.e you basically said a version of what the attorney general is now saying, that donald trump was wildly overstating his wealth. you, of course, won that lawsuit over donald trump. this reading, for you, of the attorney generals hundred and 50 pages, had to be quite an experience, after the book pages that you produce on the same subject. >> it was groundhog day, lawrence. as it always is with donald trump. it's just a new version of the same old grift. and children are doing what he did, he was doing with his father did. this kind of behavior is almost in the trump family jeans. the issue is whether or not the new york attorney general can prove intent to commit to fraud. that they knew what they were doing was, wrong and they went ahead and did it anyway. that's a high bar. there is no doubt, i think, there was a grift going on here. there is no doubt that the trumps routinely inflated and deflated the value of their assets to court the media, to appease from ego, to get banged loans

it's a direct attack on donald trump. if you're saying this is a violent coup or a violent act, you're saying that was pushed by dear leader. you can't attack dear leader. dear leader is perfect. that's what's happening right here. this all points back to the cult of personality that's surrounding donald trump. it's being reenforced through fox news, their particular blogs, telegraph list and what's happening more and more is because the decisions are being made in primary, the republican party is becoming more extreme because moderates are just levering the republican party and not participating in primaries. this thing is going to keep evolving. the way you stop this, the way we have seen it pushed back in arizona is you have to start giving them losses and proof to the point where extremists can't win and hopefully there's some type of fixing. the problem you have here is donald trump controls the message and the money of the republican party. it's going to be very difficult for them to do that until donald trump is de

importante para la democracia de estados unidos, hace exactamente un año seguidores del expresidente donaldonizaron un hecho violento en la historia de este país. >> fue un ataque directo a la democracia, entraron al congreso y intentaron certificar los votos de que le daban la victoria a joe biden, varios heridos y muertos y hoy estamos aquí ante un capitolio que está diferente ante lo que pasó ese día ¿cómo fue que pasó eso aquí? >> esta tarde hubo un homenaje y oración para los caídos en ese asalto del capitolio de estados unidos. >> (audio en inglés). >> más temprano el presidente joe biden en un discurso fuerte en el que responsabilizó al expresidente donald trump de lo ocurrido y llamó a no normalizar esto en la política. >> (audio en inglés) >> (audio en inglés) . >> ahí lo escuchamos y cristina londoño se une a la cobertura, cristina joe biden sin mencionar nombre pero apunta directo al expresidente donald trum. >> un discurso que no lo conocíamos, nunca vimos a joe biden así de enérgico y con insultos, su popularidad está por el suelo y es un año de elecciones también y la ausencia

has the bible described, donald trump, the 1st u. s. president to refuse to accept the will of the american fleet. also on the program doesn't kill this protest as in cat expand battle security forces in the worst unrest for 30 years. the president of pills for health almost soviet states led by russia, sent troops in ah i'm fil gale. welcome to the program. yes, president joe biden has marked the 1st anniversary of the storming of the u. s. capital. the violent mob of trump support is attempted to stop the certification of the 2020 election results and biden's. when in his speech the president sought to land, the truth of what happened that day. a year on many trumps supports us continue to spread false narratives about the attack. many republican lawmakers still refused to acknowledge that president biden won the 2020 election. president said that american democracy was under threats as long as that discord remained. he also had a scathing assessment of his predecessor, who he said, had set the stage for the attack by continuously

>> donald trump estaba hablando ese dÍa.s esas personas, ahÍ mismo dijeron, vamos a entrar? >> ahÍ mismo. reportera: ¿si puedes regresar el tiempo lo volverÍas a hacer? >> no, absolutamente no, estoy arrepentido porque la manera que me estÁ tratando ahora es que quiero ser claro, por ahora lo que me hacen es injusto, quieren ponerme obstrucciÓn de justicia que lo mÁximo es 20 aÑos. reportera: esto le costÓ a todos los oyentes $500,000,000. >> creÍa que era menos, cuÁnto cuesta eso a los migrantes que entran ilegalmente al paÍs. reportera: piensas que te violaron tus derechos en la primera enmienda? >> hasta una extensiÓn sÍ, por lo que me acusan y por decir lo que he dicho, estaba la de los congresistas y la policÍa lo sacÓ de contexto y por decir eso me la estÁ montando, igual que lo que dije de nancy. reportera: a quiÉn te referÍas? >> nancy lÓpez. reportera: cÓmo describes este aÑo para ti? >> malo, todos los dÍas pienso en lo que puede pasar, el distrito de washington sabemos que 92% de la gente votaron por biden, la jus

it seems to be donald trump all the time-— all the time.s question of former president trump's - former president trump's accountability, his responsibility for what happened that day, the department ofjustice are charged more than 700 of the rioters with various crimes. here on capitol hill, the january the 6th committee is investigating what happened and delete republican in it, liz cheney, has hinted maybe that could be a criminal referral to the department ofjustice for former president trump because of his role in obstructing the official certification of the election. do you see that as a possibility? i you see that as a possibility? i don't but there's several things to unpack. i think leader mccarthy and senator pelosi did greater service to the country by not putting aside partisan differences to have a truly bipartisan commission. you have liz cheney and another republican from illinois but neither of them are ranking republicans, they don't have jurisdiction. has won a former president of the united states, he was impeached on th

laura: what about former president donald trump?till as influential with the global populist right? is he still seen as an influential figure? lyse: it is interesting how we talk now, how we talk about our global political system. we use talk about superpowers. then we used to talk about great powers, but there has been a noticeable shift inhe lt few years where we tend to talk about not just a battle between countries, but a battle between systems. it is what joe biden talked about. he had this democracy summit, a battle between democracy and autocracy. there is discussion of strongman, and those strongmen have to decide what to do, whether it is modi in india, bolsonaro in brazil, their great friend in the white house, what to do when he lost power. among the allies of the united states, there was a palpable sigh of relief, among nato allies, among european states, when president biden won the election, that they would be able to try to revive this transatlantic alliance even though they knew that, mindful of what happened with tr

trump, donald trump, donald trump is not the way for democratic candidates to proceed.. but go back to that scene last night, to the amazing dick cheney? >> i know. >> the democrats warmly embracing dick cheney? that's something i never thought i would see in my lifetime. that tells you how much the politics have changed in a very, very short time. inconceivable six years ago. >> no, you're absolutely right. ruth, we like to call this friday's segment lessons learned. could there be another ought carat in waiting with donald trump? >> oh, absolutely. i've got my eye on ron desantis. when personalities come on the scene like donald trump and they do similar things from mussolini onward, they act like an earthquake on the system. they shake everything up, and they show the weaknesses and exploit the weaknesses. for example, the electoral college where you give a great amount of power to a small number of people. if you think like an autocrat, that's very dangerous. he's showing people and othering the weaknesses of our system and definitely people have learned from his pl

did it a third time and donald trump lost and donald trump tried to get involved in cheating, to cook. donald trump is supporting a primary challenge to brad province pittsburgher because he wants a trump ally in place in gentleman to count the votes, to be there the next time to take the phone call next time and get a different answer. >> right. absolutely. jeff is right. that is one of the reasons that this particular investigation, although it's only a piece of all of the other investigations that are going on is going to be particularly fascinating to watch unfold because it's not happening in a vacuum. there are a lot of political crosses here. it's interesting that raffensperger certainly invited this subpoena or -- or it to be compelled to -- to cooperate in this investigation rather than voluntarily going in and talking to her because he is in a fight for his political life. he does have a primary challenge backed by the former president, and so this is a way for them to get at him and get at what all he knows without him having to look like he's somehow going in and, you know

because of donald trump. donald trump started this all. he started by lying about the election.t before it even happened. and he kept going. and was the one who basically told them to go up on capitol hill. there are any number of theories, by which he could be held criminally liable for this stuff. harry lippman, you just had on, talked about policy to, which is a perfect fit for this. it talks about -- it criminalizes, somebody should go to jail not more than 20 years, if they corruptly obstruct, influence or impede any official proceeding. to include a proceeding of congress. in the judges, in this victory, and the district of columbia held an official proceeding of congress, includes the january 6th counting of electoral votes. the question is did he try to obstruct influence? or impede that proceeding? yes he did. did you do it corruptly, let us count. he lied. for two months about the election. it seems pretty corrupt. tried to coerce the vice president. seems to be pretty corrupt. your colleague rachel maddow's, then showing the certificates that republicans have prepared

listen, i was no cheerleader for donald trump. i've known donald for a long time.i criticized him when i thought i should. but look at it this way, it's as if the media believes everything bad -- every bad thing about trump is true. he has to be a crook in this business. he has to be a crook. he has to have ripped off the irs. by the way, where's the irs case if this is such a damaging tax thing? why haven't the irs been looking at donald trump for a long time? where's the indictment? i mean, where is the indictment after all these years? and if she has the goods, she should be bringing a case. now, it doesn't take a rocket science to figure out she doesn't have the goods -- [laughter] because she would have brought the case. howard: right. half a minute. the a.g. did put out some eye-popping information such as the former president had claimed his own trump tower apartment was three tiles the size that it actually -- times the size that actually is. whether or not that's fraud or not would have to be decided by the court, but some of that information was put out.

making sure that people realize donald trump is the way he operate is donald trump and how he's done it for a long time. he does not think about democracy in the same way that you outline or a lot of people who are in the building right behind us think about it. we do have to walk and figure out how to chew gum at the same time. the white house is trying to figure out what's the messaging around inflation and how do we talk about getting back to build back better bill and how do you talk about the infrastructure bill. we are thinking about how important democracy is. it's a hard balance. it's not something that's animating voters right now. i honestly find it shocking. i think about it quite a bit. >> there is been a lesson for i think a lot of us over the past five years. the things that donald trump did day in and day out that were so shocking and ill-liberal that led to january 6th. we found a lot of voters didn't care about it. okay, whatever happened in d.c. they were concerned of the economy and the pandemic and getting their kids back to school and virginia concerned of inflat

then there were two republicans for donald trump, who are here.ing their side of their argument about january putting their side of their argument aboutjanuary the 6th. putting their side of their argument about january the 6th. so, the ceremonial elements have largely been dominated by democrats. they've had prayer visuals and moments of silence, they've had recollections and reminiscences of the fear they felt here last year. the centrepiece of it all was that great big long speech by presidentjoe biden, where he really went after donald trump for the first time in the last year. a lot of people have been hoping for that on the democratic side, that he would be more robust, more forthright in blaming donald trump forthright in blaming donald trump for what happened onjanuary the for what happened on january the 6th, and today, he did that. he referred to him as the former president more than a dozen times and calling out what he called his lies and pressing home this idea that he was defeated, that he lost the election. they are all likely to tr

are you or have you prevented donald trump supporter. anyone securing the capitol would look into additional fencing barriers. other security measures need to be put in place. anyone actually interested in the truth and what went wrong would subpoena everyone responsible for bringing in the proper amount of security based on the conditions. instead, they are demanding testimony from steve bannon? congressman jim jordan. who had no role in securing the capital. jim jordan noted in the letter to the january 6th committee and the chair "i am aware of no effort by the select committee to solicit testimony from speaker pelosi, house administration chair zoe lofgren, or any other democratic members with responsibility or oversight of the security posture at the capitol complex on january 6." the double standard confirms our suspicion that democrats are now using this select committee as a partisan weapon against their political adversaries and not to advance any legitimate legislative purpose. just another day in the democratic-controlled hous

he hates donald trump.out the support of trumpist voters, so he tries to thread the needle. the same thing is true on voting rights. does he want to change the electoral count act? yes. is that a good idea? yes. has he been leading at the forefront of blocking any kind of further voting rights legislation of getting through the united states senate that would address the things that are going on in the trumpist republican party in states around the country? yes. he's done both those things. and so i think people are right. the only way to properly analyze mcconnell all the time is he's an institutionalist when it serves his purposes. he's a trumpist enabler when it serves his purposes. ultimately mcconnell is always that angel dancing on the head of the pin. he would love donald trump and the trumpists to go away but he's recognizing they're not going away and if he's going to maintain power he has to court them to some degree. we watch him pull off this balancing act every day, 24/7. does he like it? i don