we asked donald campbell to look at patrick kelly's scans. actually removed any bone or disc. he's opened the patient and then come out again. he hasn't actually even why would he make an incision... ..in a patient who needed disc work? i can't think of any explanation why how would you regard mr eljamel? to claim that you have done an operation in this critical area and then not to do it, knowing that the result of approaching the area and not operating on it will be to leave such scar tissue that no—one else is going to operate on it... ..it shows a complete lack of any consideration for the patient. so, he's ruined his chances surgery which could help? the risks of such surgery would be so large that i don't think any rational person would accept them. these are not the only concerns at nhs tayside. tayside says it received 55 complaints about mr eljamel‘s work when problems first came to light, it also called in the royal college of surgeons, who carried out an independent investigation. we've been asking for months for the board to relea

donald campbell looked at the patient‘s scans.the whole point of doing the operation is to remove the disc and remove the pressure on the spinal cord. and you can see from the scan, that didn't happen. that was not done at all. and then to tell the patient that you had done the operation is simply not true. what do you think of that? it's completely unacceptable. it's dishonest. the fact that these problems weren't picked up earlier raises serious questions about the oversight at nhs tayside. i've been handed documents which show that not only was mr eljamel failing to use x—rays during surgery, which meant that sometimes he operated in the wrong area of the spine, but that he taught his trainee surgeons to do the same, and that they, too, harmed patients. one of the documents describes how a junior surgeon carried out surgery at the incorrect spinal level while under instruction from mr eljamel. despite the trainee surgeon clearly raising concerns, he says mr eljamel advised him the site was correct and told him to carry on with

consideration i mean going back even further than that you're talking about these most recent reports campbell. donald trump has had an issue with rod rosenstein for a while just simply over what he might call the russia stuff. absolutely and that is how this could be viewed by the president's critics that this is certainly an effort especially before the midterm elections to potentially police supporters by blocking or impeding the russian best occasion because rod rosenstein is the one the deputy attorney general overseeing that russia probe whether or not there was collusion between presidential campaign and russia and that is of course after the attorney general jeff sessions recused himself something that donald trump has also been very unhappy about been very vocal and critical of his attorney general so this is getting back to the issue of rod rosenstein whether or not he stays in office we know that the president's allies including the fox news host sean hannity has suggested even in the last week to president trump that he not fire rod rosenstein that he believes this is a set up but again it