like donald trum. ., , . much for our trump. thank you very much for your insights- — ukraine's president volodymyr zelensky has accused iran of "lying" and "terrorist cooperation" by supporting russia's war in ukraine. it comes after tehran admitted it had supplied drones to moscow — but insisted there was no evidence they'd been deployed in the conflict. the west believes russia has used the drones to hit key infrastructure targets. sylvia lennan—spence has more. wave after wave of drone attacks raining down on ukrainian cities far away from the front lines. russia's campaign to devastate ukraine's power grid lift millions without electricity. it's also raised questions about the origin of the weapons being used. and after weeks of denials, iran has finally made an admission. translation: the drone art an admission. translation: the drone part is— an admission. translation: tue: drone part is correct. an admission. translation: tt;e: drone part is correct. we provided a limited number of drones to rush up m

those that are republican are more likely to support donald trum and even though there's been a lot ofn the news over the last several days calling for donald trump to step down and move aside and allow the next generation, i just don't believe we are at that point in our politics. i think donald trump transformed republican party to frankly being one of the working people of the country. the republican party had not been a working people's party in a long. . people look to him to try to reset the equation and to give them a fair shake in terms of making it in this country. i would not underestimate or count out donald trump. laura: eric cantor, thanks much for being with us. in other newsow, kurdish groups in turkey and syria have denied being behind a bomb attack that killed six people in istanbul on sunday. two organization said ey didn't play any role in the explosion which happened on a busy shopping street. the turkish authorities say kurdish militants were to blame. please have arrested nearly 50 people, including woman suspected of planting a bomb. they say she is a rian nation

as you heard in the clip he has decided that is politically complicated now because donald trum announcedis running for the white house and the man who oversees the department and picked them for the job is also likely to return to the campaign trail. donald trump and his supporters often accuse the department of justice of being a political witchhunt. let's say merrick garland, if he stayed in that position, decided, ok, we will prosecute donald trump. mr. trump is on the campaign trail. mr. biden is on the campaign trail if they get the nominations. you can see how the narrative would be used by mr. trump and tepps oor getting to the white house, and so forth. so, by putting in an independent prosecutor, mr. garland wants to insulate him from those accusations. but the truth is, it almost does not matter who they appoint as an independent prosecutor. as far as donald trump is concerned, his supporters are concerned, no one could ever possibly fair enough in their eyes to mr. trump. he released a statement, mr. trump. "totally expected political stunt by feckless politicized, weaponized,

.— street journal really going for donald trump. street journal really going for donald trum. , ., ~ — donald trump. they have. as you say, both publicly and _ donald trump. they have. as you say, both publicly and from _ donald trump. they have. as you say, both publicly and from the _ donald trump. they have. as you say, both publicly and from the reporting . both publicly and from the reporting we have seen behind—the—scenes, many republicans are starting to build a case against donald trump, pointing out that in 2018 mid—term is he was not terribly successful and in 2021, the georgia senate race run—offs went to democrats, and so it is this idea that he has not actually been as successful. he is busy successful in promoting himself, and importantly, he is very successful in raising funds. in terms of raising funds, he raises them for himself, for his own campaigns. he does not raise funds as much for the republican party and other candidates, which is one of the complaints that senior republicans have. we do need to remember that, despite all this background noise, he is extremel

donald trum has now. what do we make of this? donald trump has fought _ now.ake of this? donald trump has fought this moment - now. what do we make of this? donald trump has fought this moment to - now. what do we make of this? donald trump has fought this moment to sand | trump has fought this moment to sand nail ever since that moment he came down the escalator at trump tower and announced he was running for president, defying decades of precedent for presidential candidates to release their tax returns to public scrutiny, arguing all the while that he was under audit and therefore could not do so. his opponents say he did not want to release them because he had overinflated ideas of his net worth and possibly under paid his taxes. now he has run out of eagle road and the treasury department will have to hand over six years worth of tax returns to a democrat —controlled congress. however, that democrat —controlled congress, only remains democrat controlled for a few weeks until the turn of the year when the republicans take over, having won the mid—term elec

. >> and then you are donald trum talk again.trum has not provided that information and steve bannon ha not provided information. [chanting fight for america ] >>> the night of january 5th yo were among those summoned to th oval office. >> here's swallah brought to th oval office that evening and th entire press team was assembled in their. >> again opened just a few minutes ago. >> to present at the door to th rose garden opened and you coul hear the crowd when the ellipse already assembled. and you could tell he was feeding off that energy and tha he was really excited for the next day. >> the president was making notes then talking there about we should go up to the capitol, what is the best route to go to the capitol. >> for generations committee presentation assessment and recommendation left no doubt that trump had every intention of joining his supporters' much to the capitol. [chanting fight for trump]. the president tell you this, that he wanted to speak at the capitol? >>> correct, yes. [chanting stop the steal ] >>> we

.— you think he's going to lose with donald trum -. , ,., , , .,, donald trump.rty. talking about the dynamics changing, maybe _ party. talking about the dynamics changing, maybe they _ party. talking about the dynamics changing, maybe they have - party. talking about the dynamics changing, maybe they have made| party. talking about the dynamics i changing, maybe they have made it happen _ changing, maybe they have made it happen at— changing, maybe they have made it happen. at the _ changing, maybe they have made it happen. at the end _ changing, maybe they have made it happen. at the end of— changing, maybe they have made it happen. at the end of the - changing, maybe they have made it happen. at the end of the day, - happen. at the end of the day, campaigns— happen. at the end of the day, campaigns and strategy, - happen. at the end of the day, campaigns and strategy, it - happen. at the end of the day, campaigns and strategy, it alll campaigns and strategy, it all because — campaigns and strategy, it all because of— campaigns and strategy, it all because of t

what about donald trum - ? they aren't. what about donald trump? you — they aren't.the state that was so divided for so long that 537 votes elected george w. bush as president. so it's a solidly republican state. so on the whole time i would say trump lost in terms of the 202a republican nomination. he may get it and he will have to fight desantis hard for it. and he lost because he's being blamed by many republicans for nominating weak candidates. ~ , , many republicans for nominating weak candidates. ~' , , ,., candidates. think this is the point at which some _ candidates. think this is the point at which some republicans - candidates. think this is the point at which some republicans are i candidates. think this is the point at which some republicans are to| candidates. think this is the point - at which some republicans are to put their head the pyramid? the? at which some republicans are to put their head the pyramid? they should. that wasn't my _ their head the pyramid? they should. that wasn't my question. _ their head the pyramid? they should. that wasn't my

donald trum has more than usually the case. donald trump has been — more than usually the case.hinking, do you think? i going to be a big factor in his thinking, do you think? i think it is auoin thinking, do you think? i think it is going to _ thinking, do you think? i think it is going to be — thinking, do you think? i think it is going to be a _ thinking, do you think? i think it is going to be a test _ thinking, do you think? i think it is going to be a test of - thinking, do you think? i think it is going to be a test of his i thinking, do you think? i think it i is going to be a test of his measure at the polls, because he has endorsed many candidates and done dozens of them on the ballot and some of them are controversial because of revelations about their private life and extreme positions because of weak financing, so it remains to be seen how well they do and that, i think, would remains to be seen how well they do and that, ithink, would be remains to be seen how well they do and that, i think, would be taken as and that, i think, would be taken as a measure of how we

if i were donald trum, well in florida. if i were donald trump. i _ well in florida.he key senate races _ ring. let's talk about the key senate races still _ ring. let's talk about the key i senate races still outstanding. which ones are you watching most closely from the republican point of view? irate closely from the republican point of view? i i. closely from the republican point of view? i i, i, , closely from the republican point of view? i i, i , closely from the republican point of view? i, , view? we are most closely watching nevada and — view? we are most closely watching nevada and georgia. _ view? we are most closely watching nevada and georgia. it _ view? we are most closely watching nevada and georgia. it is _ view? we are most closely watching nevada and georgia. it is likely i nevada and georgia. it is likely that we are not going to pull it out in arizona. it is still too close to call, but things are not looking good there. we never thought that we were going to do well there. nevada, republicans are very optimistic about it but there are thousands o

we heard from donald trum in the bbc. we heard from donald trump in the — the bbc.arder, what are they i the larder, what are they doing? _ the larder, what are they doing? are _ the larder, what are they doing? are they- the larder, what are they doing? are they running i the larder, what are they i doing? are they running the machine _ doing? are they running the machine to— doing? are they running the machine to las _ doing? are they running the machine to las vegas, - doing? are they running the machine to las vegas, whatj doing? are they running the . machine to las vegas, what is going — machine to las vegas, what is going on? _ machine to las vegas, what is going on? -- _ machine to las vegas, what is going on? —— in nevada. - machine to las vegas, what is going on? —— in nevada. the i going on? —— in nevada. the secretary— going on? —— in nevada. the secretary of _ going on? —— in nevada. the secretary of state _ going on? —— in nevada. the secretary of state is - secretary of state is essentially - secretary of state is essentially the - secretary of state

trum whp he said we're declassifying this information. the trump legal team has not made that claim in court. it is just a story that kash patel and donald trump like to tell from time to time which is why a lot of people would like to ask kash patel a lot of things under oath and tonight just before we got on the air, "the wall street journal" broke the news that that guy, kash patel will testify in the mar-a-lago case in exchange for immunity. a close associate of donald trump is set to soon testify before a federal grand jury probing the handling of classified documents after receiving immunity for his information. that, according to people familiar with the matter. mr. patel appeared before the grand jury last month and refused to provide information by repeatedly invoking the fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. that was then and this is now. the journal reports that immunity grant leaves the government only able to charge patel using information obtained independently of his immunized testimony. so if he incriminates himself and testifying about the mar-a-lago documents scandal, he won't go to jail. if he does go to ja

donald trump's home in mar-a-lago. the new court filing lawyers for the former president now arguing that the documents are, quote, personal because trump said they are. but federal prosecutors contend that trumses trump of, quote, gamesmanship by stating he'll exert he executive privilege over dozens of document it's a court appointed watchdog rejects the claim that he makes that they are personal in nature. last week lawyers for trump and the doj briefed a judge on the status of several issues related to the records seized in august from mar-a-lago. trump is under criminal investigation for the removal of 3,000 documents from the white house. more than 100 of those documents will mark as classified. joining us no you to discuss this is former u.s. attorney and msnbc legal analyst barbara mcquaid. all right, barbara, former president trump now claims the documents are personal because he said so. does he have any legal ground to stand on here? can he just say they're personal and therefore they're personal if you're the president? >> sam, one thing that prosecutors look for to determine whether somebody is telling you the truth is whether their stories keep shifting. it's the same technique

it comes on the heels of donald p trum announcing he is running for president again in 2024. will the gop once again rally behind him after its disappointment in the midterms. >>> also tonight, the investigation into the deadly missile strike in poland. both poland and nato