to what donald trump calls for and what his political interests are. ate the words like red line and trip wires because they've all been annihilated by the trump era. but what does this represent, sort of in the world of dealing with an adversary like russia. how hamstrung are we by having the last president speaking out to, calling out to vladimir putin like he's some political ally at a time of war. >> well, nicolle, i think this is extraordinarily dangerous. we're in the middle of the most consequential war in 80 years and what the nato alliance and the united states are trying to do are walk a fine line to support ukraine and defending against this daily russian atrocities as part of this war, while at the same time not allowing that to escalate into a conventional war went nato and russia, let alone a nuclear war between nato and russia. and what is worked in a country context for decades and decades and decades throughout the cold war was an understanding that there was a unified front by the united states, by the rest of nato, that if something w

donald trump is not going to be president again. mocrats need to understand, they have a loser right now too. that is not helping them but i think there's going to be a post-pandemic, post trump publican and democratic party. the person like miles was saying they can realize that market opportunity, it is a moment. get out there and enter that. people are dying for leadership again. it just takes a few people to step out and make the difference. one person with courage make a difference, that is way liz i -- and adam are making a difference. [applause] >> let me just jump in. i adore and respect everything barbara had to say. if trump runs again in 2024, the nomination -- will know that. no one will challenge him. larry hogan, great man. he does not have a prayer. mitt romney, great man. but does not have a prayer to when the nomination and that party in 2024. if trump runs he will not be challenged. to barbara's other point, trump is a cancer. trump is not the cancer in the party. trump -- it has metastasized way beyond him. i know

donald trump is not going to be president again. democrats need to understand, they have a loser right now too. that is not helping them but i think there's going to be a post-pandemic, post trump publican and democratic party. the person like miles was saying they can realize that market opportunity, it is a moment. get out there and enter that. people are dying for leadership again. it just takes a few people to step out and make the difference. one person with courage make a difference, that is way liz i -- and adam are making a difference. [applause] >> let me just jump in. i adore and respect everything barbara had to say. if trump runs again in 2024, the nomination -- will know that. no one will challenge him. larry hogan, great man. he does not have a prayer. mitt romney, great man. but does not have a prayer to when the nomination and that party in 2024. if trump runs he will not be challenged. to barbara's other point, trump is a cancer. trump is not the cancer in the party. trump -- it has metastasized way beyond him. i kno

the kremlin-run tv is calling for regime change here with an eye on donald trump, who is acting out this way on the world stage, they refer directly to getting, quote, their partner trump back in the u.s. white house. e u.s. white house. >> we're joined now by political strategist and former obama campaign operative and josh marshal. if it were a movie, it would be interesting to look at the interplay of domestic politic, international media and a raging war, but it's not a movie, it's a conflagration with serious consequences. i'm not one to sit in this anchor chair and try to lecture people about the american interests or what's the right thing to do on every issue, but this is really far over the line and would seem to have very real consequences during the war. your analysis on both the politics and the policy implications with people's lives on the line. >> yeah. the reality is that we talk about what's in the american interest but all that donald trump cares about is what is in his interest. and one thing that he's knows very clearly that is in his interest is that this invasion by

the person supported by donald trump. that was not expected. i don't think you see max miller and congress is going to be a lot of trump losers appeared going to start racking up only start having primaries. not all them unfortunately. but let's focus on the ones we can make sure they are losers because they are dangerous. they are dangerous to be in office at all. you did your part and putting a big a black eye on donald trump right after january 6 so god bless you. [applause] okay let's shift gears a little bit. something tells me you guys have questions. [laughter] let me ask a question and then 40 minutes later after it is answered. [laughter] okayay. joe you've struck with this as well put them at the beginning of the tea party, remember that? as a gentleman here who hands out constitutions as he still here? god bless you w sir. that used to be all over the place. it's about reducing the size and scope of the government, getting spending under control going back to the constitution whenever mite left wing friends onwould talk to me and said

it today, brooks releases a man saying in part, donald trump asked him to rescind the 2020 election, n. nbc correspondent spoke to brooks on the phone and talk about this remarkable claims. >> did he directly tell you to fight to decertify the election, the 2020 election? >> he did not use the word decertify. he used the word recent. >> we send. what did that mean to? >> well, i'm a lawyer. recent means that you render it null and void. >> do you guys have the power to do that in congress? >> no. >> and then immediately remove joe biden, i guess, that would be through impeachment? >> through the decision of the election results. >> got it. and did he say that he wanted congress to immediately put him back into the white house? >> okay, you're using the word congress. my statement doesn't say congress. we never got that far because i explained to the president that what he asked is legally impossible and violence the night states constitution and i'm not going to do it. >> so, how did he want you to put him back into the white house? >> through a rescinding of the 2020 elections. >> an

all statement you have said or tweeted about donald trump at some point. y should trump supporters vote for you? >> all of us say stupid things and i happen to say stupid things very publicly. i've been very public about the fact i voted for the president in 2020, that i was wrong about the president in 2015 and 2016, and he's been the greatest president of our lifetime for the simple reason that he revealed the corruption in washington, d.c. who would have believed five or six years ago that the fbi would investigate an illegal wiretap on a sitting u.s. presidential candidate? one thing i pointed out, i was just north of 30 years old when i said a lot of those things and a lot has changed for rv engaged in my faith -- changed. i reengaged in my faith and i got baptized. donald trump was a great president and i think at the end of the day, one of the things this race presents is opportunity. who agrees with trump on immigration and trade? that is clearly me. >> mr. dolan, you are the only candidate in the race donald trump has weighed in on and said he will

donald trump was not just avoiding using official lines on generous except partly, maybe using cell phones, so-called burner phones, something trump claims he knows nothing about. although his former national security adviser said he heard trump use the term burner phone several times. the guardian report indicates that trump or someone in the administration appears to have been tempering with the records. there should be a record of the calls from the switchboard, and it is not there, which means that it was removed at some point. but many others likely from the log. that said, the calls that are recorded here before the mysterious disappearance window, do provide a window into what trump was doing on the day of the insurrection. locke show trump is still trying to show up support for the plan to overthrow the free and fair election, to circumvent the free electoral vote. he called josh hawley of missouri, infamously raising his fist to the insurrection, one of the leaders inside the senate to do with the mob wanted. that was to object the electoral college certification. probably not tal

the donald trump of 2020.erhaps the donald trump of 2024. the difference between donald trump of 2000 and his later years is that he did not really have anything to say. you can hear him saying that in that clip. he is talking about his popularity and his liberty and the public response to his efforts to begin a presidential campaign. all of this is very familiar. he did not have an ideology. the ideology was good for me, i am famous. there was another candidate who is running within the reform party. the reform party was a third-party that was begun with as a vehicle for his third-party presidential campaign in 1992 and 1996. the core of the reform party is the same group of people ideologically we think of as the trump base or the republican base. these are people who are anti-trade agreements. these are people who talk about things like restrictive immigration policies. they actually had a candidate who spoke their language in that campaign in 2000. he was pat buchanan. he was a guy that donald trump ran ag

donald trump did it. i was a donald trump so i'll -- ohio chairman fighting for america first priorities. vladimir putin did not invade ukraine under president trump. jd, you said i don't care one way or another what happens in ukraine. >> a quick follow-up. would you support the no-fly zone? >> we should not have american pilots flying in ukraine. what we should be doing is providing the migs from poland that president zelenskyy has requested. that is peace through strength. we need to make sure they have the weapons they need to defend ukraine. >> we are sticking with ukraine and i have a 32nd follow-up for you, mr. mandel. you are endorsed by congressman call thorne, who called ukrainian president zelenskyy a thug. do you agree? >> i fundamentally disagree. i think the thug is vladimir putin. people forget he was the kgb station chief in east germany when the wall fell. the kgb station was surrounded and he was embarrassed for his life and mother russia, and he hated president reagan and hated us. thos

claudia:¿a quiÉn llamÓ donald trump entre las 11 y casi 7:00 de la noche de ese dÍa ?cen en el registro de la casa blanca. lo que se aparece una llamada recibida de su ex asesora las 8:37 de la maÑana y otra llamada recibida de juli giuliani a las 8:45 a.m. se conoce que donald trump durante la maÑana llamÓ el vicepresidente mike pence, pero esa llamada tampoco estÁ en los registros de la casa blanca. se investiga si donald trump utilizÓ un telÉfono desechable o se comunicÓ a travÉs del telÉfono de otras personas, algo que estÁ prohibido por ley. donald trump indicÓ que no sabe que es un telÉfono desechable y que nunca habÍa escuchado ese tÉrmino. en washington, claudia, univisiÓn. jorge: tenemos la informaciÓn sobre el caso de ayotzinapa. la marina de mÉxico ayudÓ a manipular y ocultar pruebas en investigaciÓn sobre la desapariciÓn de los 43 estudiantes de ayotzinapa en el aÑo 2014. esto lo asegurÓ hoy un grupo internacional que investiga este caso. el informe aÑade que la marina mexicana tambiÉn colaborÓ en la construcciÓn de la versiÓn oficial del gobierno del enton

>> i don't imagine that he will speak about donald trump directly, or mentioned directly. anniversary of january six, he doesn't need to really -- he won after trump, but he didn't do it in a way that met at the moment, and i do think that joe biden can reference the challenges we've had here at home defending democracy from autocrats from autocratic threats. he'll probably, i imagine, reference january six in the speech. especially if he's talking about with the ukrainians are going through, as well. so, i don't think you have to mention donald trump directly to make it pretty clear that the world is under threat from autocrats whether it's vladimir putin in ukraine right now, or what we know when donald trump was president. >> what does he say to republican voters who, before the invasion of ukraine, expressed more admiration for vladimir putin than for joe biden? >> there was some new polling that came out today. there was -- it showed that support for vladimir putin, admiration for vladimir putin's and single digits. that's even shulman republican voters. so i don't th

the difference between donald trump in 2000 and donald trump in these later years is, he really didn'tave anything to say. you can hear him saying in that clip, he is talking about poll numbers, his popularity, his celebrity. he is talking about the public response efforts to begin a presidential campaign. all of this is very familiar. he didn't have an ideology. essentially his ideology was, "vote for me i'm famous." there was another candidate who was running, -- another candidate who was running in the reformed power -- reform party. the core of the reform party is the same group of people ideologically that we now think of as the trump base or the republican base. these are people who are anti-trade agreements, they talk about things like restrictive immigration policies and retributive law and order policies. they had a candidate who spoke their language in that campaign in 2000 and he was a guy that donald trump ran against and ultimately lost two. or pulled out in lieu of losing too. canon, his slogan was america first. he talked about building a wall or a barrier along the bord

all statement you have said or tweeted about donald trump at some point. why should trump supporters vote for you? >> all of us say stupid things and i happen to say stupid things very publicly. i've been very public about the fact i voted for the president in 2020, that i was wrong about the president in 2015 and 2016, and he's been the greatest president of our lifetime for the simple reason that he revealed the corruption in washington, d.c. who would have believed five or six years ago that the fbi would investigate an illegal wiretap on a sitting u.s. presidential candidate? one thing i pointed out, i was just north of 30 years old when i said a lot of those things and a lot has changed for rv engaged in my faith -- changed. i reengaged in my faith and i got baptized. donald trump was a great president and i think at the end of the day, one of the things this race presents is opportunity. who agrees with trump on immigration and trade? that is clearly me. >> mr. dolan, you are the only candidate in the race donald trump has weighed in on and said he wi

be engaged to donald trump jr.chair thompson writes, miss guilfoyle met with donald trump inside the white house, spoke at the rally that took place before the riot on january 6 and apparently played a key role to organize and raise funds for the event. the select committee is seeking information from her about these and other matters. because she backed out of her original commitment we issue the subpoena to compel her to testify. he expect her to comply with the law and cooperate. joining us is legal analyst neal katiel and now a georgetown law professor and jonathan carl, author of "betrayal." on the breaking news, this is clearly part of the follow the money part of their investigation? >> absolute. she was there on january 6. she was in the oval office when donald trump had that conversation with mike pence and told him as he admitted to me you can either be a patriot or a whatever. >> right. >> and -- but i think if you look at the letter from bennie thompson the role in raising money by lying about the elect

did into i was donald trump's ohio republican chairman and fighting for the work in verse policy that he secured the southern border and the strength and vladimir putin did not invade ukraine over president trump and jd said that i don't care one way or another what happens in ukraine. >> on ask you a quick follow-up his own would you support the no-fly zone. >> we should not have american pilots flying in ukraine what we should bein doing is providing t the makes for: that volodymyr zelensky is' requested it, we need to make sure they have the weapons they needed to defend it ukraine's sovereignty. >> thank you sticking with ukraine and i have a follow-up, 32nd follow-up for you josh mandel your door spike congressman hawthorne who calls ukrainian volodymyr zelensky a thug. >> i fundamentally disagree and a thug in this cup elected this work is vladimir putin they forget that vladimir putin was the station chief any serving with the ball fell, that station was surrounded and he embarrassed for his life and his russia and he hated president reagan and us everyone here watching at

ba da ba ba ba. >> (♪♪ mÚsica ♪♪) . >> donald trump y algunos asesores, participaron en conspiracións y liderógualmente esta campaña para la situación del capitolio así lo dice el documento que dice tener pruebas por esta situación . >> planes que tenían planes de bloquear la transferencia del poder . >> jason es uno de los entrevistados . >> pondrías las manos al fuego por donald trump de que él no sabnia de esta situación . >> Él es humano está consciente de esto, y lo (inentendible) a él lo más cercanos lo traicionaron no solamente a él al país también . >> dice también que donald trump y su abogado son parte del plan corrupto para el conteo electoral y la conspiración para el traspaso del poder, pero el ex presidente dice que es noticia falsa, insiste en que le robaron las elecciones, y quieren evitar que se lance nuevamente en la presidencia . >> la gente con quien hablé sí tiene interés de decir la verdad ahora ponen en su reporte la rdad . >> el comité no puede presentar cargos, pero muchos ven la documentación con recomendación al departamento de justicia para iniciar este pr

in donald trump's lawsuit against his niece, mary trump, donald trump accuses mary trump and others threehite house communications director kit bedingfield made it clear that president biden, who is the only person in the world who can claim executive privilege in the january six investigation, will not be claiming executive privilege, for ivanka trump or jared kushner. >> the president has spoken to the fact that january 6th was one of the darkest days in our country's history, and we must have a full accounting of what happened, to ensure that it never occurs again. and, he's been quite clear that they posed a unique threat to our democracy, and at the constitutional protections of executive privilege, should not be used to shield from congress or the public, information about an attack on the constitution itself. so, as a result, the white house has decided not to assert executive privilege over the testimony of jared kushner and ivanka trump. >> joining our discussion, now ej dion i comments from washington post, he's a co-author the new book 100% democracy, the case for universal vot

>> donald trump made it very clear. so clear that the talent did not kill one american soldier the last year of the trump administration. he spoke clearly and forcefully. that is a credible deterrent. when he talked to foreign leaders he was always strong and clear and that included dictators around the world. i have every confidence that we would not be in in situation because donald trump made that very clear and would have made that very clear to vladimir putin. that's why that didn't happen. it would have to be the strangest of coincidences, vladimir putin wanted to bring ukraine back into the fold of russia and took a giant bite of crimea when joe biden was last in the white house. it's strange he would lose that an tight for 4 years and not move on ukraine until after donald trump left the white house or perhaps because donald trump left the white house to amass troops last april. he was moving on this last april, sean. president biden did not do anything to confront him. he appeased him by lifting sanctions on no

if he starts saying, donald trump was a part of it.'t see how the doj could ignore that. >> no, i don't see how the doj has ignored the mountain of evidence regarding donald trump's criminal responsibility for all of this, that we see reported every day. and you're exactly right, when your highlighting the evidence of donald trump's corrupt intent. because usually intent is hard to prove because we have no way of looking into the human mind, to discern what somebody intense. so usually, we have to infer intent from conduct and statement. but here, we have direct evidence of donald trump's corrupt intent, not only because bill barr told him, there was no fraud undermining the election. not only because describes an ounce that this was the most secure election in u.s. history, but because remember there was also reporting about a meeting donald trump had with some of his doj officials, we are again, he was being told that there was no fraud undermining the election. and he said, the words out of his own mouth, which actually constitute d

misthat congress wanted his answers on in we did ask and many want to know how involved he was in donald trump'sachines and get the military involved. >> you cannot assert on the pence side that president trump was wrong. >> vice president harris will ultimately have the call over who should be president regardless of the results? >> you've misconstrued the hole green bay sweep. >> it seemed to change when we changed the names. >> if any vice president. >> what? >> you have two hours of -- >> is that a yes or no, peter. >> at the end of that, you have the opportunity to -- >> i didn't hear a yes. >> i didn't hear a yesterday. viewers and listeners can decide what they heard. he was struggling to to why they would have a power to overrule elections. he was laboring to claim it wasn't the overruling, but to send the votes back to the state for some re-re-recount. the vast majority of people contacted by congress in the january 6th probe have cooperated, providing testimony and documents. this is actually the fourth time the handle has said someone is so uncooperative they're moving toward the very

when donald trump made known he had covid, and the debate with joe biden, and the reporter says what did he think and biden says he tries not to think about trump too often. trump went into a self exiled place in florida where he continues to undermine democracy at a state level. we know what joe biden would call it in another country. but when he sees it in america, i am not sure it is the same thing. >> biden ran as a unifier. i think perhaps he thinks he can reach crossover or independent votershe can reach crossover voters or independent voters by taking this political stance by not mentioning trump so perhaps he would will him away. he has to strongmen, they don't disappear, they kind of remain there, so, i think that he is trying to straddle the line between not giving this person who dominated the media more oxygen. there is evidence the trump release are less attended. his social media isn't going anywhere. perhaps biden thinks it's a good counter propaganda strategy. but it is dangerous because day after day our rights are taken away at home and there is a plan that dates bac

you in here as well, there is one minus six in my head from when it emerged late last year that donald trumpmay have known earlier that he had covid, and that debate with joe biden, did he risk joe biden's health. when you make of these revelations from? trump and biden says, i try not to think about it too often. ruth, that is a mistake, isn't it? donald trump did not disappear from planet earth, he went into a self imposed exile in florida, where he continues to challenge the election result, what his next attack on the election, continues to undermine democracy at the state level, we know what we would call this in another country? we know joe biden would call it. but when he sees it in america, i'm not sure he sees the same thing. >> you know, he ran as a unifier. joe biden, he said very clearly, that is what he wanted to be. and so, i think you perhaps thinks that he can reach across, or votives by taking this particular stance. might not mentioning trump so that perhaps he would will him away, because we have the strong man, they don't disappear when they -- even if they are voted out,

donald trump is donald trump. he hasn't changed. he's not going to change. it's more interesting to the washington press corps than it is to the general public. was it the wisest thing in the world to say? perhaps not, but he's donald trump and he says these things. the reality is that vladimir putin is a war criminal. i wouldn't trust anything that came out of it. if he had actual evidence that a crime was committed, if any of us had evidence, we ought to present it, that's obvious. the problem is to your point the source would not be a trustworthy source, obviously, but once again donald trump baited you all and you all took the bait. now we're having to, you know, discuss this. >> i'm not going to debate you about whether trump gets too much coverage or not enough. but he is the leader of your party, sir. at the end of the day, whether you like it or not, he's the leader of your party. are you comfortable with leader of your party playing footsie with vladimir putin? >> here's what i know. playing footsie with vladimir putin, the evidence that's come out

that, of course, includes the time that donald trump is actually speaking at the stop the steal rally. but it also covers basically the entire insurrection. when trump supporters at his invitation march the capitol, till the building was finally cleared and secured. if you just step back for a second, it is just impossible to believe what those documents indicate and allege, that no one called donald trump, and he called no one, for more than seven hours, while on national television in front of the eyes of the nation, a violent mob besieged the capitol. of course, in fact, we know that's not true. because there has been extensive reporting on at least two conversations trump had during that time. one call that trump made to senator mike lee of utah, seeking to talk to senator tommy to reveal of alabama, and a call he -- kevin mccarthy. so, these records, the official white house records that were turned over to the january six committee, they are just preposterous on their face. last month, when msnbc news reported on the existence of this gap in the colleagues, they discuss the poss

when you were conducting the impeachment investigation, donald trump was so cognizant of every aspect of it. they were trying to out the missile blower when robert mueller was investigating the campaign ties, we knew every blow mostly because trump and rudy leaked it to reporters covering it. what makes you hope or think if there is any possibility donald trump's inner circle is under investigation by doj? >> well, you make a very good point. and i have been lamenting what i perceive to be at a minimum a very slow methodical investigation and at worst potentially no investigation at all. and it's not because the department of justice, itself, would be releasing information that we would find out about it. it's because as you point out, the defense to trump, bannon, by trump, bannon, all of those associates will be a very vocal, loud and public defense of a political partisan witch hunt. they'll turn this into complete chaotic political game in an effort to defeat the department of justice. so, if they were under investigation by the department of justice, i think we would know about i

of the capital, virginia thomas first publicly said in a friendly interview that she attended donald trump's rally near the white house before the attack on the capitol. she told me a trump friendly interviewer that she left early because it was too cold. imagine the scene, at the thomas dinner table, on the night of january six, when the capital is still under siege, the clarence thomas and virginia thomas not discuss anything that happened in washington that they, on january six? were they watching tv while they were eating dinner, like everyone else in washington and watching what was happening at the capitol? were they talking about what they were seeing on tv? they clarence thomas and virginia thomas discuss what was happening in washington on january six like everyone else who lived through the in washington, d.c.? did virginia thomas not tell her husband at dinner on january six that she was at the trump rally right before the attack on the capital? the clarence thomas not realize at that moment that he could never participate in any supreme court cases involving generous except? a ye

donald trump understands who putin is.d the other day. >> right, absolutely. of course, working with foreign leaders to yield results. look, talk is cheap, and it's pretty prevalent in washington d.c., as you well know, howe wisconsin. the bottom line -- howie. the bottom line is russia didn't invade under donald trump's administration because he knew that had they been aggressive, like north korea, for example, they would have been met with swift, decisive action from our standpoint. howard: gotta that answer -- >> you can say what you want to about the relationship with foreign leaders, but we were safer, the world was safer because of donald trump. howard: well, we appreciate you views, hogan gidley. that debate will, of course, continue. >>> why ukraine is being called the tiktok war and how the app's disturbing images are having a real impact. ♪ because every day matters. and having more of them is possible with verzenio. the only one of its kind proven to help you live significantly longer when taken with fulvestrant

he said that donald trump actually made the ukraine invasion more possible. y of military aid to ukraine in 2019 as he pressured president zelenskyy for dirt actually made the invasion more likely. he said you still have people in the united states who think the dnc server is there, that hunter biden is missing hundreds of dollars there and to the extent there was a natural environment created made it much more natural for putin. do you agree with that? >> he must have been listening to some of my interviews. i worked as the european affairs director and it's consistent. i think that's right. he did make it a lot easier. he offered the opportunity, this notion this would be a low cost operation that the right, the republicans donald trump would be in his corner and undo or weaken the ability for joe biden to impose costs and i think that's really one of the major things in the week before this war a temperature check for vladimir putin that what was critical to the green light to conduct this war but that's been the case for frankly years. i mean, putin saw th

you look at david perdue who's been endorsed by donald trump.think in georgia specifically, i'm talking specifically to your state here, greg, does a trump endorsement help or hurt or do we still not know? >> the jury is still out on that question. but i think georgia's the biggest test of trump's influence in the entire nation. not just by the fact that he's endorsed seven candidates here but by the fact that he is endorsing candidates in very tough battles where his word and his loyalty and the loyalty to trump among the republican party will be very much tested. this is seen as somewhat of a rescue effort for david perdue, who is trailing governor kemp by as you just saw double digits in some polls and struggling in fund-raising. with the georgia primary less than two months away, perdue is under immense pressure to gain some sort of traction and donald trump is his best bet right now. that is his ace card. he's played it and he's playing it over and over again. he's got nothing else really to lose in doubling down on donald trump as much as

switch today. >> donald trump's legal troubles are catching up with him again. e former guy and his adult sons are scheduled for depositions later this spring, in a civil lawsuit, accusing trump of misleading investors. meanwhile, trump himself is suing hillary clinton over the election. he actually won, claiming she, quote, orchestrated a militia's conspiracy in the hopes of destroying his life, his political career and rigging the 2016 presidential election. that case against clinton clearly nonsense, but there is growing evidence of trump's own coup attempt. including a statement from congressman moe brooks, saying trump, asked him to remove president biden from office and quote, rescind the election results. and in text messages now turned over to the january six committee, clarence thomas's wife told trump's chief of staff not to concede the presidency. joining me now to discuss, msnbc contributor, jill wine-banks. she is the co-host of the hashtag sister podcast. the former republican congressman david jolly florida keys. the national chairman of the serve

do you think she recused herself from lawsuits that involve donald trump or any executive order of donald trump's pending before this supreme court? no. this is a hypocrisy of the left. >> sean: i look at the double standard. ginni thomas sent out a text. hunter biden made millions and millions and millions of dollars. joe lied about knowledge of these business deals. there is no comparison. by the same standards are now being applied as it relates to joe and hunter. if hunter's last name happened to be trump like yours is, that would be an even bigger problem, wouldn't it? >> i couldn't even begin to imagine, sean, if my last name was trump. it would be a very different situation but i think we need to take a step back and look at this january 6 committee and be very clear about what this is. this is basically the last-ditch attempt for the democrats. this is their hail mary at this point. and jenny thomas makes that incredibly clear. the democrats have utterly failed the american people. it's because of their policies and because of their leadership, that's a very generous term to apply

you have also said that hard donald trump been re-elected in l donald trump been re—elected in 2020,nato. how do you think things would have panned out now because you are saying the unity seems to not be making any kind of difference? ii seems to not be making any kind of difference? , ., ., , difference? if trump had one things would be worse, _ difference? if trump had one things would be worse, the _ difference? if trump had one things would be worse, the russians i difference? if trump had one things| would be worse, the russians would already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago. already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago-— already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank ou six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you for— six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us on _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us on the i thank you forjoining us on the programme and sharing your thoughts

el gobierno de joe biden anuncia que pondrÁ fin a la medida del ex presidente donald trump que ampliasiÓnexportaciÓn express de inmigrantes aumenta la lista vez garrapatas que puede ser letal. se reportan hospitalizaciones y por ahora no hay un tratamiento para la enfermedad. comienza la ediciÓn nocturna. locutor: Éste ese noticiero univisiÓn ediciÓn nocturna con patricia janiot y leÓn krauze. leon: amigos, buenas noches. comenzamos hoy con la triste imagen de este homenaje emotivo, simbÓlico que en ucrania le dedicaron a los mÁs de 100 niÑos que han muerto durante estas cuatro semanas de intensos ataques, bombardeos rusos. la plaza central de leÓpolis se llenÓ de sillas y carrero las vacÍas en honor a los niÑos muertos. habÍa tambiÉn juguetes, ositos de peluche. el alcalde le pidiÓ a la gente que compartiera esta imagen para denunciar y recordar el terrible precio que el pueblo de ucrania estÁ pagando por esta guerra que es injustificable. hay nuevas imÁgenes satelitales que muestran al ejÉrcito ruso excavando y construyendo lo que parece ser zanjas de tierra alrededor de su equipo m

he was a key witness in the first impeachment of donald trump, and he joins me now. much. so grateful to have your expertise in the midst of this. let me ask you this, first of all, just on this narrow question on the story that we're falling right now on the nuclear plant. the possibility of, in the midst of this conflict and combat to create some sort of safety order to prioritize putting the fire out, getting safety personnel in. >> absolutely, chris. this would be high priority. you noted that there was some progress on the humanitarian orders when two sides got together earlier today on the border between belarus and ukraine. they made some progress on these court orders. this would be an obvious place for them to agree. to move back, to pull back from the hostilities at that point, and allow the firefighters to move in there and contain the fire. >> you worked in this part of the world. you are the awesome master of ukraine at different points in different administrations. did you think we would be at this point, or this committed shock to you? >> total shock,

or doj general but a girl reading the newspapers trying to do what merrick garland is doing on donald trump and looks very, very little. looks like the mob boss m.o. that michael cohen testified to, that everyone that looked at trump testified to, and talked about has so far had the impact of convincing people inside doj that the opposite of the bill barr justice department, the opposite of a politically corrupted doj is to not go near the current president's political adversaries. do you think that's a possibility, likelihood or too i recally -- too early to tell? >> between too early to tell and likelihood. i think there are political forces within and without beginning to be exerted and i think merrick garland is trying to navigate that and in many cases not that well. because of the nature of this case, the nature of the individuals involved, the underlying question for me, i would suppose a lot of people is if there is no offense here that is worthy of your review and action, then tell me what is. because all the evidence that we have seen and we haven't seen all the evidence, tells us

right now, at the three of us are speaking, there is a rally going on for donald trump in georgia. taylor greene is gonna be giving remarks any moment. we know that representative moe brooks spoke out against trump, only after the former revoked his endorsement. i'm getting a little lost, david. and here's what's really strikes me as i watch that. i think of president biden's speech, a speech to a global audience, talking about democracy. and then, i think about what we are living through here at home, and whether that is these texts from jeanie thomas, whether that is knowing that ginni thomas was coordinating members of the gop caucus, and saying they were not doing enough to support the big lie. there is a message here about the state of democracy that is not just happening somewhere else. it is happening here at home. >> you're exactly right, alicia. joe biden as the sitting president is trying to protect democracy here at home, and to share the values of the west on the world stage. and protect from the encroachment of authoritarianism, and totalitarianism. and donald trump and

what was that like when adam schiff reads to you donald trump. he says murray evanovich is a disaster everywhere. she's been right. he talks about like that is if you personally running the motor pool at the us embassy in mogadishu had personally ruined somalia. what's it like when adam schiff is reading you that to me? yeah, well, so it was a complete surprise obviously to me. i had no idea what was coming and you know when first he announced that he was going to do this understandably. and so there's then there's the anticipation. i mean, what's he gonna say? what's he gonna what is he going to say? what could he say and then the actual tweet itself as you just recounted was ridiculous. it was absolutely ridiculous. and so, you know trying to compose my face, although when i looked back at the video that was played that night of me listening to adam schiff recounting this i mean all of my emotions were there for everybody to see including frankly a little bit of contempt because my eyes rolled i just i couldn't believe that the president of the

it was donald trump who provided ukraine with the game changing missiles.ld trump who warned europe and nato repeatedly about the dangers of russian dependence on -- europe's dependence on russian oil. he was right all along. here with reaction, florida congressman michael waltz along with the author of "the strategy of denial," former trump defense department official, eldridge colby. without the javelins, without the stingers, they've got no shot. are they getting them fast enough? >> well, i mean, as you said, it's already case of somewhat too little, too late but i think it does sound like stuff is getting in their along those as they call them rat lines. but i think what ilhan omar said, these people are standing up other countries, for the life, we need to give them what they need. they can't fight with nurse bats so we should be ensuring that they can get the weapons they need very quickly because in a conventional fight like this, matters of sort of one or 2% can mean a dramatic difference. >> sean: congressman, i'm a new book -- i'm in no boots --

. who's a law professor in california, was sending to donald trump.d to get its hands on these e—mails, to see what eastman was saying about ways to challenge the election results. eastman said he didn't want to share them. he was citing attorney—client privilege, which usually protects communications between an attorney and his client. but that protection doesn't hold up if the discussions are in furtherance of a crime, and what the judge looked at here was at one e—mail in particular. he said that that attorney—client privilege is punctured because it was in furtherance of a crime and it was more likely than not that, in this instance, donald trump and eastman were conspiring to commit a crime, a violation of federal law in challenging the election results. so that was the specific finding here. it's not going to lead donald trump to be indicted necessarily, but it is a judge who is looking at the evidence and saying, "you know, there's a chance that donald trump committed a crime." anthony zurcher on that story for us. let's go back to the news tha

and the breaking news from the prosecutor who resigned over the decision not to charge donald trump in york city. he says trump is guilty of, quote, numerous felonies. we are going to have some expert legal advice after this. ter this nasal congestion, with powerful claritin d, so you can breathe better. feel the clarity and make today the most wonderful time of the year. claritin d. one of my favorite supplements is qunol turmeric. turmeric helps with healthy joints and inflammation support. unlike regular turmeric supplements qunol's superior absorption helps me get the full benefits of turmeric. the brand i trust is qunol. exactly one month ago, the two prosecutors leading the -- investigation into donald trump and his business practices abruptly resigned. those two prosecutors had been leading a case that was centered around the allegation that trump was inflating the value of his assets in order to obtain favorable loans from banks. by all accounts, it was an investigation that appeared to be gaining momentum. according to the reporting at the time, those two very high-profile pro

what we saw for years and years of donald trump being putin's puppet. than that democrats need to take advantage of this and flip the script on them politically because republicans have dominated the national security space for so long. but they have advocated that moral high ground by supporting donald trump for all those years and still continuing to embrace it even after he called putin a genius and savvy and continues to play footsy with putin while putin is killing innocent children. democrats need to use this to their advantage and turn it around on republicans and make people see either you are on the side of democracy or you're not. there is no middle ground here. >> joel, tara brought up madison hawthorn. i have a clip of him i want to play. watch this. >> remember that volodymyr zelenskyy is a thug. the ukrainian government is incredibly corrupt. >> like 90% of the country is with the ukrainians and opposed to putin. when you see a member of congress say things like this, the one thing i want you to know they're outliars in the largest sense p

but i think the key factor that is always appeared may be elusive is proving donald trump's intent. that he knew that what he was saying was fraudulent when he was telling mike pence, you should change the outcome of the election. that he knew that was based on a lie and based on fraud. they document all the ways that he knew that this was false. number one, his own cybersecurity chief and department of homeland security said so publicly. william barr, his attorney general, said so publicly. the director of the office of national intelligence, john ratcliffe, his appointee, said so publicly. successors out the justice department said repeatedly there was no fraud. he had an internal campaign memo for the trump campaign that concluded, there was no fraud. and 61 out of 62 judges all the court cases that were filed across the country, found that there is no fraud. the one case that the trump campaign one was on an unrelated issue related to affidavits. all of that evidence amounts to suggest that donald trump absolutely knew that there was no fraud here. in fact, one judge said, there

donald trump was the first iteration of that. what i fear is that his use of xenophobia and his use of are the rising -- other-izing minorities will be taken to the next level. that is something we have to nip in the bud however we can. we have to make government functional again for everybody. it used to be that in this country, they had a military draft and everyone would have a common experience of the military draft and learned about each other and diversity and so forth. we do not have that now. we are siloing further and further. we have to do whatever we can to bring shared experiences again. a shared common understanding of our joint aspirations. to me, it is getting everyone on the economic ladder climbing upwards, regardless of who you are. that means everyone, regardless of the color of your skin, how you pray, how many letters in your name. that is what i think we have to get back to, asap. >> congressman, does your research so you anything regarding that? >> in line with that, the key thing that has happened with the