president o'brien: commissioner dooley? commissioner dooley: i was wondering about the part of the legislation that says it's 10:00 p.m. for the first year and then they can apply to be open until midnight. my only hesitation with that is that i feel like midnight is heading toward late night again and i would feel that some of the neighborhood residents will feel like it's easier to accept if it's strictly 10:00 p.m. i just wondered why you had that kind of gray zone there. >> it's up until 10:00 p.m. commissioner dooley: but it says after the first year it can be extended till midnight. >> well, i think based on good behavior, i was looking for an incentive in the fact that it could be renewed but we were looking to incentivize. that's something that, you know, you think would somewhat counteract, i think, the corpus of this and i'm open to that. commissioner dooley: or at least maybe allowing districts to keep the line at 10:00 while others would be o.k. with continuing until midnight. >> all right. so duly noted. i'll k

commissioner dooley: is that a lifetime benefit? >> as written, yes. help savings accounts work the same way. that money is held in trust by a bank. it is yours in perpetuity, regardless of where you live. commissioner kasselman: i have to follow up on that. what about members of healthy san francisco that leave the city? >> if a medical reimbursement is established for an employee and that employee moves, it does not matter if they reside in san francisco or another county. that account is still eligible to be withdrawn by that employee. they can go online in any state or county they live in and pulled down the information and submit a form for reimbursement respective of the county they live in. commissioner kasselman: and the hillary ronen -- healthy san francisco portion of your program? >> that is only available for individuals who reside in san francisco. if they move outside of the county but are still working for that employer, what will happen is that any future deposits on behalf of that employee will be subject to a newly created -- will be

commissioner dooley? commissioner dooley: i will be brief. i attended the meeting about the cvs pharmacy is, and

>commissioner dooley: no, you. >> you are talking about the medical reimbursement account. commissioner dooley: i just wanted to know how many complaints have been filed for violation. >> i think you want matthew. >> won distinction or confusion is which agency is responsible for what function. essentially it is the office of labor standards enforcement that enforces this requirement. one of the methods for meeting the requirement is to speak to tangerine at healthy san francisco. in the three years the law has been in place, we have initiated a little over 300 enforcement investigations. there are different ways to look at bat. we have received hundreds of inquiries and have worked with employees and employers informally to ensure that employers are meeting the requirements of the law and employees are getting the benefits that are required. some complaints do not rise to the level of investigation. with respect to the enforcement law -- enforcement arm, between 304 hundred cases have been opened during this process. commissioner clyde: how long does it take to be reimburs

president o'brien: commissioner dooley? commissioner dooley: i know that they will review those criteria, so we are looking forward to maybe making some changes so that we will not have to keep dealing with these dates. we will deal with it in the beat -- the c.u. process, but i want to thank you because they do not think that process is working very well. president o'brien: commissioner o'conner? commissioner o'conner: what is the location? supervisor mar: it is across from the old alexandria theater. commissioner o'conner: the second is that i just want to show my appreciation that you listen to the voice of the small district -- small-business in your commissioner area. thank you. president o'brien: commissioner? commissioner: i believe that petco did impact is small independent pet stores, and i am very sensitive to predatory pricing by large companies that can offset their higher costs of doing business in san francisco with their lower-cost operations and other jurisdictions, so it is really not a level playing field,

commissioner dooley? commissioner kasselman? commissioner o'conner? commissioner riley? all commissioners are present. commissioners, item no. 2 will be continued until later in the meeting. enemy number 3, approval of the april 11, 2010 meeting minutes, explanatory dowmpts draft april 11, 2010 meeting minutes. president o'brien: do we have a motion to approve the minutes or do we need a minute to study it? >> i need a minute. president o'brien: o.k., we'll give one sec. is everybody o.k. with it?

o'brien: i will later, but i want to give the other commissioners -- commissioners -- commissioner dooley: i wanted

commissioner dooley? commissioner kasselman? commissioner o'conner? commissioner riley? all commissioners are present. commissioners, item no. 2 will be continued until later in the meeting. enemy number 3, approval of the april 11, 2010 meeting minutes, explanatory dowmpts draft april 11, 2010 meeting minutes. president o'brien: do we have a motion to approve the minutes or do we need a minute to study it? >> i need a minute. president o'brien: o.k., we'll give one sec. is everybody o.k. with it? could we get a motion? >> i motion to approve the minutes of the april 11 meeting. >> second broon. president o'brien: any objections, seeing none, approved. secretary: item 4 will be continued until the next meeting. item 5, general public comment, allowing members of the public to comment generally on matters within the commission's purview and suggest new agenda items and there will be public comment taken after each item on the agenda. president o'brien: do we have comments from anybody on matters not on the agenda? seeing none, public comment closed. secretary: commissione

at our best at the moment but we're still among the leaders of the group tough questions with mr dooley island and where gary head and the fate of a blaze at the european finals will be decided in these matches. while saying in russia and after signing brazil legend roberto carlos russian premier league side and she have now brought in hungary winger but last year's at the twenty four year old left sided midfielder joins from dutch giant p.s.v. eindhoven and a four year deal for an undisclosed sum thought to be around ten million euros and apparently second in the league ships the forty four times in hundred fourteen appearances with e.s.p. and this is the awareness. last week for me manager steve mclaren is heading back home the fifty year old is taking up the reins at second to nottingham forest after a successful time at episode twenty in the netherlands and a less or specialist time i've also played in germany a three year deal at forest was confirmed just a day after the championship club dismissed coach believe davis carroll. was famously sacked as england boss four years ago afte

commissioner dooley: thank you. i also want to add my support in congratulations to the small businesses for sticking to your guns and sticking together. i also wanted to comment on the side that as far as i have been apprised, the city attorney -- the legislation has been fully vested for legality. pet could challenge this early in the game. that is not -- petco challenged this early in the game. that is not really an issue and should not be taken into consideration. i want to add that some of what we are looking at today is just a lack of the updating of our planning code. i think that is really, in the future, where we should, as the small business commission, focus a lot of attention -- reviewing how formula retail, for example, works in the code. does it work right now? have there been changes? right now, the cu for formal retail only requires discussion of any impacts for just a few blocks, but we all know these large companies' financial effect is much broader than just what it used to be when those codes wer

second point was to address commissioner dooley's comment about the time. having experienced putting on shows, i think for the nature of this legislation, 11:00 -- like 10:00 is too early but 12:00 might be too late. 11:00 sounds about right, when a lot of people want to come and see a performance start around 10:00. like you'll have somebody go on before at 9:00 and somebody go on at 10:00 and 11:00 should be fine to end by but that could be addressed further down the road. supervisor mirkarimi: i think we can do that as this advances to the board of supervisors. i think that's very reasonable. president o'brien: commissioner riley? commissioner riley: thank you, again, for sponsoring this legislation. and i think it's a great idea to lower the application from 1700 to 385 and renewal at $139. i'm curious why $385 and $139. supervisor mirkarimi: this, believe it or not, took the largest amount of time with the city attorney and planning department and entertainment commission, we have to be be absolutely precise about the science as required by law to affi

. >> commissioner dooley? >> no. >> commissioner o'brien? >> yes. >> commissioner clyde? >> oh, this is hard. i'm going to say no. >> commissioner kasselman? >> yes. >> commissioner o'connor? >> abstain. >> commissioner yee riley? that motion carries, -- >> commissioner riley has not responded yet. commissioner riley: not yet. i'm thinking. i have a little problem approving something without seeing all of the facts. >> pardon me. that motion does not carry. >> commissioners for a point of clarification, are you interested in revisiting supervisor farrell's legislation once -- >> yes. >> so we're not -- i just want to be very clear in terms of we're not supporting, you're not recommending -- or the vote doesn't carry to support it at this point, at this time, but we do want -- the commission does want to revisit supervisor farrell's legislation once the economic report is in? >> yes. i appreciate that, director. the clarification is we're not voting down this measure because we think it's not a good measure to support. we're voting it because we don't know enough facts abo

presidential debate for the republican party last night joining me now are teddy dooley of the george washington university college republicans and jack hunter the southern avenger gentlemen thank you so much for being with us tonight great to be here are you getting so for fans of ron paul we were it was quite exciting to see that he was not a bookend on this debate actually placed just to the right no pun intended of mitt romney but today you said that you you were pro quite surprised by bachmann's performance i think it's our first performance in debate i don't want to say that you know someone won a debate because these aren't really debates anymore but she certainly got the most out of it yeah i think the did she did she had the best starting to debate with her announcing that she filed the paperwork on the debate last night really got people riled up i was personally surprised that use the audience able to be engaged with her as much as she got people up and moving and you see that loud and definitely a supportive movement not only there but from members of our college republica