really in all of the debate it pops up like the dormouse in the tea party and he says no i don't thinkthat we should say no cruel and unusual punishment. and he sits down so sometimes the debate are not about the high-minded things we pictured in the bill of rights, but i think people -- it helps you be amazed that it's turned out so well. >> even at the beginning when the justices wrote a circuit in the early years they gave them grand jury charges and the judges love to say how advanced a society we were because we had in the bill of rights no cruel and unusual punishment and what that meant was that we did have the death penalty. we didn't draw and corner people >> at once the 18th century was a society where the standard of what is via went to us today wasn't the same standard. they beat apprentices, parents beat children that still goes on today unfortunately. certainly slaves were beaten. the kind of a poor answer -- outpourings is in a different standard and this fellow really spoke for the 18th century when he said some people just need to be wiped what's face it. >> could you