dorsey. mr. --call on you are recognized for five minutes. >> a powerful force for good. drastically improve information whether it is connecting americans to jobs, getting critical updates to people in times of crisis, or helping a parent find and answer questions like how can i get my baby to sleep for the night? at the same time, people everywhere can use their voices to share new perspectives, express themselves, and reach broader audiences than ever before. wherever you are a barber in mississippi or a home renovator or building a successful business right from your living room. the internet has been one of the most important equalizers. information can be shared and knowledge can flow from anyone to anywhere. the same low values to entry also make it possible for bad actors to cause harm. is toompany whose mission make information universally accessible and useful, google is deeply conscious of both the opportunities and risks the internet creates. i'm proud of the information services

you know derrick dorsey? our customers. he's like, when was the last time you were at the house? and i told him, you know, i was there friday or whatever it was. >> they also asked if he knew anything about kim. even then, he said he had no idea why police were so interested in the dorseys. >> she was very sweet, very nice. you know, she'd always, you know, i only saw her a couple of times. >> one of them was that friday. he had been called to the dorsey home to fine-tune the entertainment system. while he was there, he noticed a chill between the husband and wife. >> i remember just she walked -- she would walk by and say, hey, guys, i'm headed to the gym. and i said, okay. we'll see you. and derrick didn't say anything to her. i thought that was weird. you know, i was like, you don't say bye to your wife? but i guess he was more interested in getting his electronics fixed, i guess. >> yeah. because something must have jumped out at you. first of all, you don't even know this couple very well. >> right. kind

dorsey, who the hell elected you.ew that his fire would be reserved for twitter, julia, and not facebook, which obviously has much different trends in terms of what gets highest engagement it's interesting ted cruz four years ago was decrying what he called new york values, today praising the "new york post" as something founded by alexander hamilton. >> it's interesting, because cruz actually said that of those three companies, he thinks facebook is the one that is at least making an effort around free speech. but he did warn, ted cruz warned that he was going to be going after twitter in a tweet he tweeted about the fact that this was going to be a showdown between him and jack dorsey and it did not disappoint in terms of his specific attacks on dorsey for being partisan in the types of content it pulled down. what's been interesting interest this is despite all of the other issues going on, i think twitter has been more in the cross hairs and i think it has really come down to that "new york post" article about hun

dorsey? >> we can give a more exhaustive list but again, we don't have an understanding of political ideology of our accounts. >> i'm not asking for an exhaustive list. i'm asking for a single example. one individual, one entity. >> we have taken action on tweets from members of the house for election -- >> can you identify an example? >> yes. two democratic congresspeople -- >> what are their names? >> i will get those names to you. >> great. mr. pichai, how about you? >> senator, i can give specific exams but let me step back. we don't censor. we have moderation policies which we apply equally. to give you an example -- >> i get that. i use the word censor as a term of art and i defined that term. again, i'm not asking for a comprehensive list. i want a name. >> we have turned down ads from priorities usa, from vice president biden's campaign. we have had compliance issues with the word socialist which is a left-leaning publication. we can give you several examples. for example, we have a g

dorsey and mr. pichai can any of you and in that order zuckerberg dorsey and then pichai can you name for me one high-profile person or entity from the liberal ideology who you have censored in what particular action you took? >> senator ican get you a list. there are certainly many examples that your democratic colleagues object to win a fact checker might label something as false. >> i get that. it is want to be clear and is asking if you can name for me one hype profile person that you have censored. understand you were saying their complaints on both sides but i want one name of one person or one entity. >> senator i need to think about it but there are certainly many on both sides the aisle and people think we are making content moderation decisions. >> i think everybody agreed they could identify that maybe 10 more conservative examples. what about you mr. dorsey? >> we can give a more exhaustive list. again we don't have an understanding. >> i'm not asking for an exhaustive list. i'm asking f

dorsey.n he starts you will hear, moments ago we were showing you the three stock prices on the screen, all of them down. here is i believe jack dorsey. >> thank you, members of the commerce committee for the opportunity to speak with the american people about twitter and section 230. my remarks will be brief so we can get to questions. section 230 is the most important law protecting internet speech. removing section 230 will remove speech from the internet. section 230 gave internet services two important tools, the first, provides immunity from liability for users content. the second, provides good samaritan protections for content moderation and removal, even of constitutionally protected speech as long as it is done in good faith. that concept of good faith is what is being challenged by many of you today. some of you don't trust we're acting in good faith. that is the problem i want to focus on solving. other services like twitter earn your trust. how do we insure more choice in the mar

griff, twitter's ceo, jack dorsey, said the lack of explanation was unacceptable. twitter backed off and said we'll allow hacked material as long as it's not posted by the hackers, put a warning on it. it took two days to apply that to the story. hotchow much of a black eye is s for at whic twitter. >> if jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg wanted to limit people wanting t to look at the story, it ended up amplify it. twitter revised the story,

let's focus on zuckerberg and dorsey. of them defending section 230 and warning that big changes could lead to big changes on free speech for the internet. you would expect, all three ceos, but certain zuckerberg and dorsey, are planning to make the pitch tomorrow. if they were peeled of section 230 were to go through -- if a repeal of section 230 were to go through, suddenly they would lose that legal protection, they would be liable for the things that people post. as a result, they would have to be more cautious about what people post. this whole argument depends on the idea that publicans are feeling that too much is coming down and now these companies will try to counter this argument and say, repealing this will do the exact opposite of what you want. quotes fromng some their prepared remarks, dorsey saying that we should be mindful that repealing section 230 will result in far more removal of online speech and create severe limitations on our ability to remove harmful content online. zuckerberg saying something sim

dorsey? >> we did not find those to violate our terms of service, we consider them -- which is part of the speech of world leaders in concert with other countries. speech against our own people or countries own citizens we believe is different and can cause more immediate harm. >> very telling information. >> senator cantwell you are recognized. >> we are referring to a colleague senator peters because of the timing and situation for him. >> senator peters are you there? >> i am here, you are recognized for seven minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman and ranking member cantwell appreciate your deferral and we certainly appreciate the consideration a great deal, i also want to thank each of our panelist here today for coming forward and being a witness and appreciating your schedule so we can have this hearing my question is for mr. zuckerberg and i want to start off by saying how much i appreciated our opportunity last night to speak at length on a number of issues and i told you last night i a

dorsey, who the hell elected you?rtha: joining me now, someone at the center of this controversy. rob amari, the "new york post" editor. good to have you with us tonight. so you heard jack dorsey there. he says it's very easy. thanks for being here. very easy for you to get back in to the twitter account for the "new york post." all you have to do is delete the original post and say you can put the same exact material back up. what do you say to that? >> i say that sounds like high tech racketeering. we're being blackmailed the way an old mob boss would do as we would say on the cover of tomorrow's paper. you can find it at nypost.com right now. nice paper you got there. be a shame if you couldn't reach your two million followers on our platform. at a time when we know from the testimony today that neither twitter nor facebook have any evidence that this was in fact hacked material as they initially ascertained. lawmakers pressed mr. dorsey, they said, what evidence dow this is hacked? we know it's not hacked. it's a

so, yesterday, bad news and erroneous news from jack dorsey bass jack dorsey who runs twitter says all they have to do is go and log back in. that's not true. look at the cover of "the new york post." says blackmail. they are saying delete the story, steve. delete the story and you can have your account back. "new york post" is not caving. steve: well, it was such a back and forth between the senators on the commerce committee and jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg who embarrassing could not figure out how to join the zoom call which is funny when he is a guy who runs facebook screen left there and the screen right runs google. nonetheless, the way when jack was asked about why are you censoring the "new york post" story it. looks as though you are trying to protect the bidens. he said no, you know that "new york post" story people can share it. that was not true. brian: not true. steve: then he said if the "new york post" simply goes online and deletes the original tweet, and then posts it again, it will work. but the senators, particularly ted cruz, he was having none of it. it just loo

this is ted cruz going after jack dorsey who, by the way, was so arrogant.rogant and condescending and lied? >> yes. lou: i'm told we don't have it yet, so let's turn, if we may, to biden story. what do you think will be the impact? >> oh, i think -- lou: what do you think will be the impact? >> the impact of hunter biden, i think, is going to be quite huge. i know that the mainstream media's trying to avoid this story, but there's no way to avoid the fact that there needs to be a criminal investigation. and this is the reason why we have seen such failures both in the fbi and in the department of justice. we really need criminal investigations and criminal probes into this. look at what they did to the trump administration, going after members of the campaign in 2016 for foreign agent registration act violations when hunter biden never even filled out a fara in recent years and was working with the ukrainians as well as the chinese government. so i think there's going to be a lot more in the near future. lou: sara carter, as always, great to have you with u

ceo jack dorsey calls the move unacceptable. >> critics slamming one nature's choice to host a townhallrump. >> why on earth would nbc agreed to do that? this is an outright embarrassing ratings ploy. jillian: facebook and twitter censoring users from sharing the new york post story on hunter biden's email. >> when called out on inject horsey says communication labs on the issue, unacceptable. carley shimkus has the details. there are often communication lapses or the like. >> essentially communication companies but like you said you posted the tweet from jack dorsey, companies communication on the front wasn't good but they limited the story because it went against a hack the materials policy but twitter not the only company to take action against the story. in the stone, facebook spokesperson posted tweet anything while i will intentionally not linked to the new york post i want to be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by facebook's third-party fact checking partners. in the meantime we reducing its distribution on our platform. stone has worked for a number of top d

>> we ought to send these results to jack dorsey we looked at in our survey a bunch of industries andsked americans how much they trust them social media ranks dead last we asked specifically what is your confidence, a great deal or quite a bit in these industries. restaurants doing good it's not too bad compared to what it was in '08 and '09 look at social networking. taking a look at the impact they have on the american election. 68% saying it's mostly negative, 11% say positive, and 14% say they don't know. this is what we call in the polling business flat data not that it's not interesting, it's flat that any area has a net impact 70% of men, 67% of women only the older than 65 group, they have a less negative view there but only because they're in the don't know camp but most americans across all political spectrums, across gender, age, don't have -- very little trust the good part of this for me, there's somebody for the -- people that hate more than the national news media. >> yeah. steve, this reminds me of that old yogi barea quote, nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded

not in the hands of jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg.well, thanks for being with us, as always. good to see you. >>> up next, the trump campaign says china joe has a lot to answer for. we'll take up a few of those questions with former congressman jason chaffetz. stay with us, we're coming right back. on a formula only found in preservision. if it were my vision, i'd ask my doctor about preservision. it's the most studied eye vitamin brand. if it were my vision, i'd look into preservision. only preservision areds2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the nei to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. i have amd. it is my vision so my plan includes preservision. keeping your oysters growing while keeping your business growing has you swamped. (♪ ) you need to hire i need indeed indeed you do. the moment you sponsor a job on indeed you get a shortlist of quality candidates from a resume data base so you can start hiring right away. claim your seventy-five-dollar credit when you post your first job at ind

not in the hands of jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg., thanks for being with us, as always. good to see you. >>> up next, the trump campaign says china joe has a lot to answer for. we'll take up a few of those questions with former congressman jason chaffetz. stay with us, we're coming right at fisher investments, we do things differently and other money managers don't understand why. because our way works great for us! but not for your clients. that's why we're a fiduciary, obligated to put clients first. so, what do you provide? cookie cutter portfolios? nope. we tailor portfolios to our client's needs. but you do sell investments that earn you high commissions, right? we don't have those. so, what's in it for you? our fees are structured so we do better when you do better. at fisher investments we're clearly different. that's why i get up in the morning! i have a secret method for remembering all my hr passwords. my boss doesn't remember approving my time off. let's just... find that email. the old way of doing business slows everyone

jillian: jack dorsey calling the company's communication lapse on the issue unacceptable.s with the details. >> reporter: ceo jack dorsey said the company made a mistake in not explaining why they were blocking the story but that doesn't mean he thinks the company was wrong to block people from posting the store. twitter released more posts saying they took action because it included images that had private information like email addresses. they cited that hacked material policy. facebook limited the hunter biden exposÉ, the story is eligible to be fact checked by facebook, third-party fact checking partners, in the meantime we are reducing its distribution on the platform. and new york post editor posted a tweet that this is a big tech information coup that is a digital civil war. senior policy analyst had this to say earlier in the show? >> thank goodness jack dorsey actually stepped up and put his personal feelings about donald trump aside to hold accountable his own company for a decision that the silencing and censoring the media. we have first amendment rights and pa

i did mention jack dorsey, he has rescinded that do not retweet this story. he's allowing people who read the stories and the biden, e-mails. who was communicating with whom, but as john indicated, it's probably too late for that. we will have more. 's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa >> all right. as we've been saying, excuse me, the president is off to michigan later on today, a state he won a little more than 10,000 votes. right now the polls show it's a bit more of a challenge for him this go-round. again, who knows? we'll know in a little more than two weeks. michigan senator democrat debby stabenow joins us. thanks for taking the time. how are you doing. very good to have you. your sense of these polls and whether they're accurate.

dorsey pushed square into launching bu launching bitcoin trading ahead of 2018.also dedicated a team for crypto innovation. they've had a great year p since the march low, it more than doubled they hit a high -- the highest level since september 19th today. it's on track for its best week since july anl us analysts tell me it's thanks to them hedging from money printing from central banks and a hedge heading into an uncertain election season. back to you guys >> all right thank you, kate. >>> take a look at shares of zoom much continuing their trend higher today after they initiated the stock with a buy ra rating saying the company can tun to deliver outsized revenue growth it is the biggest gainer on nasdaq 100 year to date beating out tesla for the spot you can see ut there up nearly 3.5% when i was in high school, this was the theater i came to quite often. ♪ the support we've had over the last few months has been amazing. i have a soft spot for local places. it's not just a work environment. everyone here is family. gonna go ahead and support him, get my hair

not right he let me break this down yes he's right that section 230 is critically important jack dorsey talked about at this hearing as well section 23 who has allows the internet to create all of this vibrancy that it is created is because of the protections and that yes yes yes i agree 100 percent but our tech companies are violating the spirit of section $230.00 when they act as publishers and remove content that they don't like especially in the process that they've been using which is a no matter what some says jack dorsey says or mark zuckerberg says it is very clear that certain kinds of content by moderators and fact checkers is remove some of it for political reasons some of it because of special interest groups but it is removed not based upon any clear criteria regardless of where you find yourself there is no clarity in this process and that becomes a problem section 230 is needed but tech companies should not have a right to it simply because of the fact that they exist and miles now we know that the d.o.j. has launched its air to trust case against google that is over anti

is that something you want to ask jack dorsey about, too? you know the difference between what is true and what is right and wrong and what is untrue. you may not be able to source everything that media outlets source. i'm just wondering if those, to you, are in different categories. conspiracy theories and things that don't have the kind of sourcing we would hope for in a new york post article. >> listen, i believe in free speech. i agree with john stuart mill who said, "the best cure for bad speech is more speech." i'm not here asking for anyone to censor bernie sanders or aoc or some socialist. i think with they are doing is ridiculous, but i would much rather engage on the substance, the mets, the facts, so people tweet crazy stuff, fine. let speech occur. it's very different from something that is a criminal threat, there are exceptions for that, but in terms of -- we don't need silicon valley behaving like the star chamber and censoring to make sure only the political views the agree with are the only things allowed to be said. >> harr

i had dinner with jack dorsey, i had lunch with jack dorsey two years ago and we talked about this.labama, right? why don't you have some conservatives in on these things so you get a more balanced approach and not skewed so badly. on top of that they donated millions dollars to oust president trump and post on their own blogs how much they distain the president, conservative ideas, some don't like religion. they wear it on their sleeves and seeped into their business practices and it is not fair. >> trace: move to politics talking about politics right there. move on to more politics. melania trump on the campaign trail for the first time in a year. she is going after joe biden. listen and i'll get your response. >> joe biden's policy and socialist agenda will only serve to destroy america and all that has been built in the past four years. >> trace: does it help to go after joe biden saying he wants to raise your taxes, saying that the left is going to hold joe biden hostage? what do you make of that, charles? >> he does want to raise your taxes. that's not hard at all. i think if

dorsey, how does a claim by chinese communist that the u.s. for covid remains up two months without a fact check and a tweet from the u.s. president about mail-in ballots gets checked immediately >> first and foremost, we did label the tweet. we consider receiseverity of of harm we have taken action against world leaders all around the world including the president. we did take action on that tweet because we saw it, we saw the confusion and we labeled it accordingly. >> you are speaking of the president's tweet? >> yes our goal is to provide more context so people can make a decision for themselves. we've created these policies enforcing them and things we can do faster. we believe the policy was enforced in a timely manner. yet, you seem to have no objection to a tweet by the chinese communist party saying the u.s. army brought the epidemic to wuhan? >> we did. we labeled that tweet. >> it took you two months to do so, is that correct? is. >> i'm not sure on the time frame i can get back to you on that >> you'll get back to us on how a tweet

not in the hands of jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg.ll, thanks for being with us, as always. good to see you. >>> up next, the trump campaign says china joe has a lot to answer for. we'll take up a few of those questions with former congressman jason chaffetz. stay with us, we're coming right this is decision tech. find a stock based on your interests or what's trending. get real-time insights in your customized view of the market. it's smarter trading technology for smarter trading decisions. fidelity. our retirement plan with voya gives us confidence. yeah, they help us with achievable steps along the way... ...so we can spend a bit now, knowing we're prepared for the future. surprise! we renovated the guest room, so you can live with us. oooh, well... i'm good at my condo. oh. i love her condo. nana throws the best parties. well planned, well invested, well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement. ♪ ♪ lou: the "lou dobbs tonight" quotation of the day is from my book, "the trump century," about the silicon valley execu

dorsey, does twitter have the ability to influence elections?n't believe twitter has any ability to influence elections? ofno, we are one spectrum communication challenges. >> you are testifying that twitter when it silences people, when it sensors people, when it blocks political speech that has no impact on elections? >> people have choice. >> not if they don't hear information. if you don't think you have the power to influence elections, why do you block anything? >> we have policies that are focused on making sure that more voices on the platform are possible. andee a lot of abuse harassment which silences people and has them leave the platform. dorsey largely maintained his cool but did not make the most convincing argument about actions that twitter had and has not taken. -- all ofrberg also them agreed to return for another round of questioning. the big question is, why is this happening six days before the election? why did this need to happen today? democrats made a point of talking about it. it was really pretty fascinating because co

coming your way at the top of the hour big tech bosses appearing before the senate, jack dorsey in the seat forgetting to shower or shave over blocking a new york post report on hunter biden. we will talk to two of the senators who are at the hearing who were outraged and fired up. julio gardner of florida, rick scott of florida, dorsey making it clear twitter will not unlock the new york post account unless the delete the tweet on hunter biden which is proving correct. the media still avoiding recent regulations from hunter biden's business partner, trey gowdy knows the law and joey jones knows the military. also on deck, kayleigh mcenany live from the white house, mike huckabee playing the role of former governor, herschel walker talking about the president's chances in the african-american community and more, charles payne on our money and what is going on in the market and dave ruben. see you soon. >> with these ballots, who is sending them, who is receiving them, who was signing his him, the only way is massive fraud. >> people trying to mess with the votes openly encouraging supp

i watched jack dorsey yesterday being interviewed by the senators.r he wants. he is censoring, i will probably get censored because of this. he is censoring conservative voices and he is promoting joe biden, who is a, the most corrupt politician maybe in the history of the country and his running mate, who is the most liberal person, woman other than bernie sanders. this is what this guy is promoting. he will not mention tony bobulinski. i don't know if you saw the interview on tucker carlson was -- maria: yeah, i did. >> was astounding how corrupt joe biden is. nobody seems to care. these people on twitter will not put it out there. it is disgusting. maria: i know. it and we're five days from a presidential election. the american people are being told they can't know about this stuff. i mean, you know, many celebrities throw their support to the democratic party. only a few for republicans. yet those who do come out as republicans receive backlash. the mobs are the loudest voices in the room. i've been trying to tell the truth about what happened in

i want to play this interchange between him and jack dorsey.e was pressing jack dorsey on flagging president trump's tweets but not very violent threatening tweets by one of the iranian leaders who threatened israel. let's listen. >> it's strange to me that you flagged the tweets from the president but haven't hidden the ayatollah's tweets on holocaust denial or calls to wipe israel off the map. >> we don't have a policy against misinformation. we have a policy against misinformation in three categories, which are manipulated media, public health, specifically covid, and civic integrity and election interference and voter suppression. >> so somebody denying the murder of millions of people or instigating violence against a country's head of state is not categorically falling in any of those three misinformation or other categories twitter has? >> not misinformation. liz: not misinformation. michael, i look at this and i think to myself these guys are in trouble when it comes to figuring out how to please rational people who are wondering why, y

dorsey the ceo of twitter said, that was a mistake. we were wrong to do that. if the "new york post" will go through a couple of hoops they can retweet that and post it. here's one thing that was telling to me. twitter and facebook said they had no information or nor basis to claim this hunter biden was the result of russian disinformation. that was an answer to a question by senator ron johnson. it debunks what we are hearing. >> bill: i thought what dorsey said if the "new york post" deletes a particular tweet, they will reopen the account. but isn't that the tweet that contains the story about hunter biden in the first place? >> senator? >> i think they are standing on ceremony. i think they will let the story out. the main thing is they admit this is not a matter of russian disinformation. i hope the mainstream media will look at that testimony and be more forthcoming like the fox news channel has been and let the american people hear the story. hear about the computer and the tweets and the testimony that your channel on last night. >> bill: the question i

so is this right, was that right, what do you think >> first thing i would say is i love jack dorseyecause he always seems so surprised that he is the ceo of twitter he wanders in like five minutes late saying what is going on here i was supportive of the initial steps. all it did was slow the spread of reporting and give the truth time to tie its shoes. so you can argue about whether straight up blocking the links is worse than providing context around them, but we've seen in the past that when twitter tries to add konlg texcontext, a put summary that lot of people miss. so i think it remains to be seen whether there is a better policy >> i know people were trying to apply different context and maybe come to conclusions over what might be the facts in story. but if you are going to start slowing stuff down selectively doing it on certain publications about certain politicians and not others is likely to get you in trouble >> likely to get you in less trouble if you block full access to the story what happened with in new york post thing, the piece comes out and we're not sure exactl

twitter's ceo jack dorsey later admitting it was, quote, unacceptable.eaction to the fallout. claudia? >> reporter: well, arthel, in fact, the media giants excuses for blocking those bombshell stories have changed. facebook canceled and, essentially, censored the story before they even found anything wrong with it. spokesperson andy stone, a former democratic operative, said, quote: while i will intentionally not link to the new york post, i want to be clear that this story eligible to be fact checked by facebook's third-party fact-checking partners. in the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform. twitter took it a step further, banning links to the story altogether and freezing the accounts of the new york post, president trump's campaign and white house press spokesperson kayleigh mcenany. facing a backlash, ceo jack a dorsey commit admits, quote: straight block of urls was wrong, and we updated our policy and enforcement to pick. our goal is to attempt to add context, and now we have capabilities to do that. still, twitter refuses t

jack dorsey, sundar pichai and mark zuckerberg of facebook will appear voluntarily.ulation it will include more against dorsey, zuckerberg's name is being floated, too. they will fact check it. what is interesting, subpoena, not voluntary participation anymore. the central question with two weeks to go until the election is controlling messaging on the platforms, some sort of breach, that is what everyone is trying to get to. you have elizabeth warren advocating and donald trump has said for different reasons. one is financial power and scope and once is ce censorship. the pandemic slowed this down. today, you have news thgoogle i being sued by the department of justice, does it monopolize search responsibility? big battle over companies that will continue on into 2021 and depending who has the white house, we'll see how this goes. >> neil: thank you very much, jacky. names to keep track of there, senator tom tillis joins us, he sits on the judiciary committee, among others, recovered from positive testing of the covid-19. senator, how you feeling now? >> i feel grea

kaiser report thanks for having me max happy to be here big news and big calling we got the jack dorsey company square in out this week that they bought 4709 bitcoin worth about 50000000 dollars for their treasury what does the company statement tell you in regards to the reasons for buying because this is obviously in the wake of micro strategy and michael saylor doing this is this the beginning now of the 4 trillion dollars worth of cash sitting on a corporate america's balance sheet being looked at and possibly other c.e.o.'s following suit with a fair missing out or a full mo in the corporate space here yes it is but i would also highlight that this actually began a very long time ago which is that in 2013 slash 2014 fortress investment group became the 1st publicly traded company to hold big client on their balance sheet and i remember because i'm an accountant and i read financial statements and that was interesting to me because i was also a big corner. and then it's fun out in it became no regrets you know that. galaxy so it's it started a very long time ago but it did it at the

politically engaged idealism which you know came out in the spat between brian armstrong and jack dorsey as well it's a thread the that goes through a number of different interrelated narratives but i've rambled on long enough max let's go back to the fortress comment you made there so fortune as being essential a money management farm and big coing is seen as an asset a new asset a financial asset it's not. it's not you know much of a stretch i would say for them to consider putting some big coin on the books that was understandable but what what what sell what michael saylor has saying is that he had a choice to make he and his board want was to buy back stock boost the price boost executive stock option value at the set the what's being done across the board in corporate america. principal apple the biggest of all or buy bitcoin so it pivots on what they believe the fed is up to and it seems to may and based on michael sales comments they believe that the fed is that an inflection point where the inflation genie is about to come out of the bottle and all the stock buybacks in the worl

kennedy: and jack dorsey replied milton.least someone and america gets to speak freely to jack dorsey. is it all talk or can lawmakers still save our speech from the internet police? join me now on the fox news channel he's development twitter coming no longer says is steve hilton, welcome back my friend. >> that is not true i did not know that. >> let's try try to message you. jena make you mad? >> that is a terrible accusation, terrible accusation candy. this interview is over. i am not having it. [laughter] 's kennedy: i know what i should apologize your to sue me for defamation like everyone else in my life. so, steve hilton, this is what i do not understand. you've all these republican senators who are so mad at twitter, google and facebook. but then you have elizabeth warren who promises to take a jackhammer to their companies and dismantle them for the antitrust violations. who is more of a grave threat to big tech? >> you know the truth is, i don't think either of them are. i don't there ever going to get their act t

in fact jack dorsey, i just read, he lied to senator cruz.news that the "new york post" put out at the time they could not. so the "new york post" has called out jack dorsey once again. the man lied under oath. will there be any accountability with jack dorsey, what he did today? charles: i don't know. i really wish i could give you an answer for that. but i think we all kind of know to your point, they're very powerful. they have gotten away with a lot of this which emboldened them even more. deneen, thank you very much. always appreciate it. we're watching a selloff here in the markets for you. the question now, will the biggest publicly traded companies, most of them reporting earnings tomorrow, will they come to the rescue? we'll handicap the results an potential wall street reaction next it's about the humans. fun loving, fast paced humans. this human that human or these humans. it's about getting more than health insurance and a partner who listens and acts. humana calls it human care. it's about offering a range of medicare advantage p

of joe biden and his son hunter's business dealings was limited and outright blocked in twitter, dorseyrying to lessen the outrage from twitter tweeting today straight blocking of the urls was wrong and we updated our policy enforcement to fix our goal is attempt to add context and now we have the capable need to do that. twitter has changed its rules associated with hacked materials, the new york post story on ukrainian connection to the biden family can now be shared, i did it for my twitter account today, the one about chinese connections to the family is still blocked, it's not enough for president trump campaign advisors. >> they are being very selective as to what they are deciding as to which content to approve or fact check or not and obviously when it comes to the new york post it's a reputable paper with twitter that endowed up deciding they were going to have to fact check it and not allow for any of our accounts to share this information, it's a double standard. >> this might be the straw that prompts the change to the immunity that the social companies enjoy. >> i'm glad we

will mark zuckerberg and jack dorsey testified? ben: that seems certain.aid they could agree to testify voluntarily or be subpoenaed. if they don't agree to be testified voluntarily, they are already scheduled to be testifying on privacy and the liability shield under section 230. so no matter what, jack dorsey and mark zuckerberg will be testifying once again here in washington, d.c.. twoy: so we are expecting major ceo hearings next week. we just spoke to senator marsha blackburn, who is on both committees. is there were republican versus republican turf war going on here? why are we seeing so many different and uncoordinated actions? ben: it seems like a turf war. roger wicker, chairman of the commerce committee, told reporters today they have these issues in hand and the judiciary committee can do what they want, but they should understand with these issues are. what you are seeing is a ramping up of washington scrutiny not only on the range of issues in section 230, antitrust, privacy, but thet you want, companies are trying to help jill biden on nove

this political risk story that is out there, it was jack dorsey of twitter who really took the brunt of it yesterday from republicans in congress. what do you see in twitter's future. >> yeah, you bring up a good point. i think that gets to the dichotomy of twitter. i personally love twitter, and i hate twitter and i think that's somewhat is the problem with their -- we brought up the point about being able to monetize for users. they have. the other point keeping growing users. i go back and forth with twitter. here is the problem with twitter. one, there was no twitter out there i would have access to so little information. you hardly ever, for example, on the covid thing, if you just read the mainstream media you would think we have the bubonic playing going on. twitter, at least experts on twitter that give you the other side, if none other i can read what scott atlas is saying. the positive. the negative about twitter it, becomes so political sometimes, it is like the tower of babble out there. it is so polarizing. some of these other companies we talked about, you can talk abou

jack dorsey is a fan of cryptocurrency, thinking it could be used more widely in the future. anna covid 19 cocktail anybody drugs,tail of antibody president trump saying he's going to try to make it free for folks at hospitals. that is not backed up by science, but a bit of an advertisement there, so their shares are higher. in supporting the idea that things are calming down a little the fear index for the s&p 500 is well off september highs. perhaps we will go into the election season and things will calm down just a little bit, at least that's the story on the day. knows.well, who i'm not sure i would bet on it. you will be watching, thank you so much, lou burks abigail doolittle. talks,some of the debate our democratic nominee joe biden, his campaign rejecting a proposal from president trump's camp to push back the second and third presidential debates by a week after the president said he wouldn't participate in a virtual event. biden campaign officials saying trump's erratic behavior does not allow him to rewrite the calendar and pick the date of his choosing. we're joi

senator ted cruz ripping into jack dorsey over claims the platform censored in new york post story about joe biden's alleged emails. >> who the hell elected you, put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report and what the american people are allowed to hear, why do you persist in behaving as a democratic super pac silencing news to contrary political beliefs? >> center for an american security fellow will join us later this hour to react. todd:.is star justin turner beings investigated for celebrating with his team after being tested positive for covid-19. he held game 6 of the new york series in charge of the field after the dangers -- dollars won and he violated protocol and, quote, but everyone he came in contact with at risk at los angeles county urges fans to attend large celebrations in quarantines get tested. >> 10 minutes after the hour, joe biden's brother dodging fox news questions about his family's alleged business dealings. >> why did you and hunter biden want joe biden to meet with tony be? >> what are you talking about? please stop bothering me. >> exclusive con