i can teach anyone to do what i do every day, so knowledge isn't an issue. and my money partners put up the money so my students don't have to use their own. >> so, our viewers don't have to have their own money to invest or qualify for a loan or anything like that? >> no. i already have the money in place. they just need to come to my free event. >> okay. scott, now, people watching this are probably thinking, "what's the catch?" >> definitely. >> you know, i mean, how much of the profits are your money partners keeping? like, 50%, 25%? >> nope. try less than 5%. >> come on! are you kidding me? >> no, i'm serious. less than 5%. and that only comes out of your profits after each deal is done, not up front, out of your pocket. >> nothing out of your own pocket. okay, that is incredible. so, let me get this straight. your money partners only make money once your students have made money. >> that's exactly right. >> and you're already doing this with people around the country right now, right? >> absolutely. my money partners have already funded thousands of re

try to do the work, do the best work you can do.it leaves an ingredient for the opportunity to be successful. charlie: let me ask some of the songs and what comes to your head first. "broken halos." what inspired that? chris: my cowriter, mike henderson, was reading a keith richard's biography, i think, and keith referred to, he was speaking of friends he had lost to drugs or whatever, who left the world before they should have. he had called them broken halos. we were talking about that one night when we were supposed to be writing songs, and it kind of became that song. now, what i really think of when you read that title, was recorded that song on the day a guy i grew up with passed away. he died of pancreatic cancer. that is what i think of when you say, what do i think of. i got the phone call and we recorded the song. charlie: you got the phone call and you recorded the song. chris: yeah. charlie: you can feel the emotion in the song. chris: yes. that is why we asked me what do i hear when you read the title, i go back to that

i do not do evidence. as we came upon that, we shared it with the bureau. >> i appreciate that you do not do evidence. unfortunately, that is what i do. evidence.word the good news for me, a lot of my colleagues on the other side worde aisle use the evidence as well. there is more than circumstantial evidence between collusion between russian interference and the donald trump campaign. if it is more than circumstantial, by necessity, it has to be direct. democrat colleagues on the other side of this committee also used the word evidence, that he has seen evidence of collusion between the trump campaign and russians. three different members of congress from the state -- state and state using the same word, which is evidence. tradecraft is your vernacular. theand i both know what word evidence means. we are not getting into whether you corroborated, examined, cross-examined. we are not getting and how you tested and probed. it is a simple question. between the exist trump campaign and russian state actors? m

david: do you put your foot on the brakes to stop it or do you get away from doing that?ary: i do when i'm driving with my children. [laughter] or riding, i should say. it is kind of a trained response. it is so smooth. when you are riding in a vehicle and you come up to an intersection, you look up and the light is yellow. you have to make a decision. are you going to pick up the pace and go through or come to a stop? the autonomous vehicle has sense of exactly when the light turns yellow, knows they can maintain speed or stop. that's one of the benefits of autonomous vehicles. they are processing all the information around them actually more safely than we can as drivers with all the different things we are taking in. david: other phrases that come out. one is ridesharing. what is ridesharing? mary: when you are -- it is similar to a cab. you are looking to get a ride from someone. ridesharing versus car sharing is you will have the use of the car, whether it is a day or an hour or a month. we are participating -- we have a stake in lyft. we are participating in ridesha

what do you have to do to get those rates? if you don't do that cash flow attacks which is a consumption tax bin you have to go in and within the domestic tax base to take those things the way to lower the rates that is the trade-off in the conversation we're having right now. >> so what is one example?. >> i don't want to negotiate to the media of you will have to do more base broadened within the economyordd that is a trade deficit.trade mckewon not tax the trade deficit bin you have to get that from within the country.country. >> what about base broadened? imitate the way the loophole for the lower rate. >> with your adventures of president trump?. >> [laughter] you told me one time that he referred to you?.p >> i took it -- to act as a compliment i don't think it was meant that way. we're different people. [laughter] ina midwest guy, a devout catholic, small town, i live on the block i grew up on. we're just very different people but you get to learn and to know and work with a lot of people. >> what is the best quality?.

do and they can do. we don't do that. we have no way of doing that. we're not driven by providing people with work. that's mondragon. we're driven by making money, so we don't want these people, but it's very dangerous. they want an education, and t they got one, o now they want the job, but we don't have the jobs. how do you solve this problem? as and bs and cs and harvards and the local community college because it allows us to say, "we got jobs for you, you, you, but not for you and you and you, but that's not because of anything wrong with the system. it's because of you. you went to blehh school. . you got a buhhh grade at a blehh school, so don't blame the system. it's you. you didn't work hard enough, you didn't go to enough school. you didn't take that extra course. you didn't take the princeton prep to get your sat scores up. buh buh buh buh buh." you know the horrible routine, but the cruelty is you're blaming the individual for a failure of a system to make use of its resources, of its people,

buffett: i said, "what do i do with this money?"e said, "investing it is about assigning the right use for the money." i did not want to go to college. my dad wanted me to go to college. i had $175,000. i thought that was all i would need to live the rest of my life. david: did you ever run into that guy again? mr. buffett: he needs protection now. david: when you had your first annual meeting, how many showed up at that? mr. buffett: we had about 12. you have to count my aunt katie and my uncle fred. david: any advice to a young investor who would like to emulate you? >> would you fix your tie, please? david: most people would not recognize me if my tie was not fixed. let's leave it this way. all right. ♪ david: i don't consider myself a journalist. nobody else would consider myself a journalist. i began to take on the life of being an interviewer even though i had a day job of running a private equity firm. how do you define leadership? what is it that makes somebody tick? ♪ david: i appreciate it. thank you. alright, well. right,

but i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. let's go to work. this is "the profit." ♪ in 2010, christina stembel planted the seeds for farmgirl flowers, a unique e-commerce florist located in san francisco. originally a farm girl herself, christina first got the idea while working at stanford where she saw firsthand how much businesses spend on floral arrangements. christina: get some of these. don't just put the pale ones in. lemonis: researching the industry further, she realized how much florists rely on imported flowers. and that their huge selections often lead to lots of waste. and that's when she decided to start a streamlined daily delivery service that exclusively uses american flowers. christina: that looks gorgeous, kim. lemonis: while farmgirl generates millions in revenue, other online start-ups are hot on its heels. and christina needs more than just money to stay ahead. there are plenty of opportunities to make a floral e-commerce business grow into a national presence, not only in the residential sector but also in the commercial

, we do. so with this continuous negotiation that is as good as it will get. it is the necessary attention for. >> what to often. >> with that was what church was trying to describe it when they say things that should be legitimate. >> this is the last question . [applause] >> i do look at fascinating chapters we have not covered 20 percent of what is in the but - - the book and gift itself is trivial but it is not at all timothy snyder 20th century historian in yale written on the history with the first well-known book and the grim history of the lens between stalin and hitler it is what you crave another country's he has another book that is equally grim the same part of the world at the same time. those that we wrote rapidly and is giving away what he does is list 20 things you can do if you feel it is possible to the ft - - of the authoritarian derive to be a tribute to good causes? it is of very good. >> one of my province moments of brightest instance occurred to weeks ago when the head

i do my for free. host: do you think president obama is right to do this? are you ok with the former president? caller: yes, i believe it's ok for him to take the fee, but i disagree. what he should do is take the money and donate it to a charity. host: what about cal thomas's opinion in today's "washington times" that perhaps congress should consider reducing payments that a former president money hehe amount of or she makes an speeches afterwards? caller: i read with that. it should -- i agree with that. it should be capped. host: larry, good morning. caller: thank you, c-span, and all the things you do for us. i am agreeing with what the democrat individual before me said. just because you can do something doesn't mean you have to do it. the previous president was saying this was not right and too much fees and all that, but you don't have to take it. your time is the most critical aspect when you get to retirement. in my case, i just retired. i startario is when getting social security, if i make over a certain amount, then i'm going to start losing thi

okay, what do we got? okay, watch this. do the thing we talked about. what do we say? it's going to be great. watch. remember what we were just saying? go irish! see that? yes! i'm gonna just go back to doing what i was doing. find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. >>> the louisville metro department of corrections jail books an average of about 120 new inmates a day. men and women accused of crimes that range from minor to heinous. the reactions to being in jail run an equally wide gamut. >> [ bleep ] all of these bitches in this [ bleep ]. you got a problem with me i'll go to the hole every rip, every rip, i don't give a [ bleep ]! >> mary lohden serving time for a theft conviction has just returned to the jail for violating home incarceration rules after she tested positive for alcohol. >> it ain't nobody on drugs! this is sober! this is sobriety right here! >> officers removed her from a dorm due to disruptive behavior. >> excuse me? excuse me? >> but, now, even in the single person cell, she's gotten into a conflict with a neighbor. >> bitch, just do

do you think about that? >> i do think about that. there's this passage in the big book of alcoholics anonymous, and it says, i will not regret the past, nor close a door on it. and that i will see how my experience can benefit others. what i know is that i couldn't take back the years that i traveled in and out of the criminal justice system, but i could stop another woman and support her to not go back. don't have the power to bring my son back. but i could support another woman to get her child back. and that's what i do. so, you know, that's sort of the relief and satisfaction, you know. there's times when i have eight or ten little children running around those homes. and i know that i've been -- we've been able to get those children back with their mothers. so that's the sort of satisfaction that's mended with the loss of my one child has multiplied into 300 children. and there's enough love and support for all those 300, you know. brewing up out of me. >> tell me, i don't want to color this question deliberately. but since you

i'm just doing what i'm doing. ms.al: even as producers, you are being told no all the time. we were just talking about "the irishman," those projects took a long, long time. it's where -- still, we talk about being lucky -- hoping "irishman" goes 100%. even as we sit here. megan: even at your level, and the work that goes into it. ms. rosenthal: when he says you got to keep -- it's every day. what are we going to do? a lot of times it's like sisyphus pushing a rock up a hill. megan: that's journalism. ms. rosenthal: you get told in this business no more than you get told yes, no matter what position you think somebody perceives you as being in. you get told no more than yes. get told yes, no matter what position you think somebody megan: what do you think is the thing we may not be seeing in terms of the next disruption to entertainment or the next thing? the next wave of distribution or the way consumption are bringing stuff to the audience in different ways? is it virtual reality? what's the next big thing? ms. rose

you can do that? we can do that. then do that. can we do that? we can do that.e first stock index was created, as a benchmark for average. yet a lot of people still build portfolios with strategies that just track the benchmarks. but investing isn't about achieving average. it's about achieving goals. and invesco believes doing that today requires the art and expertise of high-conviction investing. translation? why invest in average? >>> president trump rolling back regulations he says will save the coal industry but some analysts say not so fast, there's no way coal is coming back. jackie deangelis traveled to coal country to get some answers. wow. >> that's right. the miners told me they had no choice but to vote for donald trump and they think that he's going to deliver. still, the analysts will tell you coal is dead in the water anyway. that's because of demand, destruction, domestically and international an internationally and because of the switchover to natural gas. they say rolling back regulation levels the playing field to make coal a real competitor a

so the question for you is, where do you want me to stand, what do you want me to do? let me know and i will be here. sam: thank you so much for all of your leadership. mrs. obama: thank you. congratulations on a wonderful year. so proud of you all. thank you. [applause] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2017] ontvturday at noon eastern tv," the twitty 17 colby military writers' symposium. -- the 2017 colby military writers' symposium. in the recipient of this year's colby award and his book waging war, the class between presidents and congress, 1776 to isis. watch the 2017 colby military saturday atposium noon eastern on c-span two's tv."k >> sunday on "q&a," the comparisons between presidents donald trump and andrew jackson. think he represents the positive values that jackson represented. he certainly represents some of the negative values that jackson represented, but i think i would tell president trump that if h

lemonis: do you still work here? grace: i do. lemonis: do you get a paycheck? grace: i do.ce: i know why, marcus, but you need to ask him! lemonis: why is he keeping you away from me? i have, and he won't tell me. grace: it would be foolish of me, and i think it would be also crossing some lin-- trust -- we're talking about trust. lemonis: with him? grace: all right. the details are this. he's got a wife who does not, for some reason, trust her husband. he and i have never crossed that line, ever. they're making me a problem in their marriage. lemonis: yeah. grace: that's interfering with my livelihood. lemonis: so, wait a minute. grace is a current employee, and dave has kept her away from me for what? because he's having problems at home? whatever it is that's going on, dave's been dishonest about it, and it's made grace's life miserable, through no fault of her own. do you love this place? grace: i do. i have a really great relationship with all of the employees. lemonis: on a daily basis, who should run the business every day in your mind? grace: myself and kevin. lemon

people do die. beam do get stabbed. people do get raped. certain ways to get respect. >> parker's desire for respect is what landed him in confinement. he and three others brutally attacked another inmate. >> he lost a lot of blood so that's why they had to airlift him out. he never did nothing to me, at all. i had nothing against him. i had no right to do what i did. >> mchellon has dedicated himself to teaching parker a better way to do time. >> he's more than like a son to me, you know. but at the same time i know i'm not, he has his own mother, he has his own father. but right now he's more or less in my care. i'm concerned about him in the sense that he tends to get influenced by his friends, you know. i told him, i said you don't even have to go there, you know what i'm saying? >> while mchellon has become a surrogate father of sorts to parker he says his multiple prison stays have cost him his relationship with his own children. >> right now i'm not in contact with any of them. i miss them all, i really do. so if any influence comes

what do you think he is trying to do? gen.to build himself as quickly as he can a deterrent that will enable him to stay in power and to continue the legacy passed on to him from his father and his grandfather. the challenge for this is, this is the crisis to prevent a madman in many people's eyes from getting a nuclear capability that can actually reach the united states. this is a very real threat, and it is one that confronts president trump uniquely. i don't think any president has ever had that particular prospect. yes, they were developing nuclear programs, yes, they had some delivery means. but if they get an intercontinental ballistic missile and can get it miniaturized, put a nuclear device on it, that is a significant threat to the u.s. the president may be confronted by that most difficult of decisions. ♪ david: what political leaders you most admire? gen. petraeus: i am a great fan of teddy roosevelt. the man in the arena speech has always captured me. the credit belongs to the man in the arena whose face is marred

and i did do that.the people who were your friends and people who weren't your friends? painful lessons. tell me about the women in your life, because there seems a sense in which, you say in the book, you have measured women by your mother? is that right? i have a wonderful mother, a great mother. i don't measure women by my mother, but i have a woman and my mother who is a terrific woman. and i've been married to two very nice women, but itjust didn't work out. and i think part of that, one of the negatives to success is that there are lots of obstacles thrown in your way in terms of relationship. first of all, time. but even your own mental psyche. i mean, my thing is, i'm thinking about deals, and i'm thinking about these great buildings all over, you know, that i'm doing, i'm building the largestjob ever approved by the new york city planning commission on the west side. you know, that's a thought process. there's a lot of things that i'm doing and building. and think about that, maybe, as opposed

but i really do. go out and do it without waving the banner of women's liberation. and if you look at the really successful women, those are the ones that are not had to wave that big banner. they've just gone out and done it. i mean, well, see, iwould rather address that question sometime later because at this moment, umm, i have a very good relationship with ivana. i think i have a very good relationship with marla, but i will be able to tell you in a month or two. we'll find out. you've stressed the importance, though, of the prenuptial agreement, even though you say it's a vicious and it's an ugly document, and people who sign it are 50% more likely to divorce than those who don't. but yet you stress that this is the key to a happy marriage? prenuptial agreements are ugly, vicious, terrible documents that you have to have. i mean, it is, umm, if you are getting married, and if you are a person of substance, a man or a woman of substance, you have to have a prenuptial agreement. and the reason is t

>> i do. i do.the best world series ever. >> it was. so with barry just a chance to be around the best. i see the power with the yankees have built over so many years. barry with starwood, the story is incredible. and you get a chance to learn from people like barry. >> amazing. so -- >> he didn't teach me baseball. >> it wasn't like a two-way street. >> what role -- i mean, will -- i know you know warren, too. will the alex rodriguez company 30 years from now look like berkshire? or will it be real estate? where will you be? media? what else is, you know, on the horizon for you. >> that's a great question. you think about five year plans and they never work out. you take it one day at a time. you spend time with the smartest people you can in the world. >> well you're here today. i think that's -- >> surround myself -- exception for today. but you know -- >> you've seen the show i guess. >> i like kind of the private equity style of investing where you kind of take it where opportunity takes you. o

do you process that, or do you dismiss it early? steve: no, i process it. i do dismiss it often. lemonis: are you confused sometimes, when you come in, what your role is? steven: yeah. yeah. lemonis: so, when i think about your financials, it does look like a labyrinth of debt and mortgages and bank revolvers and -- steve: right. lemonis: there's $1 million in debt, not enough working capital to sustain any sort of downturn. fixing up the machinery in the buildings -- -that's $1.3 million. -steve: correct. lemonis: so, the product to me -- and i showed you yesterday, when i look at the detail of a chair and i notice the fold... esteban: yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. lemonis: ...i am crazy about the details. steve: okay. lemonis: and i'm adamant that there's clarity for steven. and so my offer is very simple. i'm willing to put up $1.5 million. that's a lot of money, right? steven: absolutely. lemonis: and so for the $1.5 million, i would want 45% of the business... full financial control, and i want to be able to have 100% say on his path without any question from you. i'm in ves

do you think that i've been adequate police adult? what do you think. >> i do.isperception because the only individuals that will be covered without paying higher premiums are those who do not maintain continuous coverage. neil: what does that mean? can you explain that to me? i've had that, too. does that mean there's a possibility you don't get coverage? >> no. the ahca guarantees coverage for anyone that signs up in an open enrollment period. it is only those individuals that try to game the system to stay out of the system and insured when they are healthy and tried to enroll when they get sick. what ahca does with the macarthur amendment if it enables the states to charge those people more money. it only seems fair to me and insurers will not come into the market unless they think they'll be fairly treated. that's why this is absolutely critical to pass today. neil: it wouldn't be again like it is in maine where they have such a high-risk pool, but the individuals don't see those individuals don't pay more that somehow the status handling. it's not that sim

i do not envy you. you've been asked to come before this committee to explain the unexplainable and defend the indefensible. as a thing my colleagues on this site have pointed out especially senator warner and senator van hollen. the president sent his campaign promising work as he was standing with them.he promised middle-class, was today with this budget is a perfect summary of all the ways those promises have been broken. his promise not to cut medicaid is broken.promise not to have social security programs, broken. jayapal, broken in this budget. two focus tax cuts on the middle class, not the rich, broken. and his promise to provide quote - insurance for everybody. well that was better, it has not only been broken is pretty much shattered. so a lot of promises broken and we are all looking forward to seeing how you explain this. but i do want to say i'm very led to see it is not just democrats but republicans who are already coming out and rejecting this budget. fortunately, we are able to reach a

host: do you have a question or comment? do as far as a comment. the republican party for years and years attacked the obama program and finally get into power and they perpetuate this scam of not having a plan. it seems no one is talking about .he fact it seems like we have been dealing with this for eight years and no one is talking about that. guest: they don't have the power to repeal it, but they don't have the power. they would need 60 votes in the senate. bailey have 52. there are not eight democrats who will repeal it. correct in that the republicans did not have a plan ready to go because as is seen, republicans are themselves divided about what to do. there are conservatives that want to repeal it and start over. there are moderates who want to fix it and there are people in the middle who want to repeal as much as they can. the president made all kinds of promises about how everyone will have insurance. thing about health care, it is always a trade-off when you have some people and will hurt others. hurt as fews to people as possible. wh

i do not regret that.while i would do it again, i would change a few words that were cruder than they needed to be. >> so he did not let the jokes, just the language. again, i don't care! it is jokes, words. if you don't like it don't listen! i hope one day those other guys might say the same thing for me. see stephen colbert is afforded something i will never have. liberal protection.if your heart is in the right place, and mine is always in the wrong! then you can say what you want as long as your job matches the assumptions of your peers. i will never demand an apology but one will be always demented for me. it is painfully obvious that if i made the same joke about president obama i would be marched into the atlantic with - around my neck. that is okay, i will defend those who may never defend me. because i am a nice guy and there are -- [applause] >> andrew, have you ever been in a situation like this before? does this infuriate you? >> everybody is a sissy. it's fine, i am cool with it. this is all t

what do you think he will do? >> i think he probably supports the maximum pressure and engagement. >> you don't see any clash? as scott said, that seems to be the consensus. >> it depends on how he implements the budget. both presidents have said enough things which appear to open interpretation on any number of things. on say the alliance, moon has said i am america's friend, the alliance is the bedrock of korean diplomacy or democracy and he wants to strengthen the alliance. you say that sounds like a conservative. but he has also said things like he wants to negotiate the agreement with not only the united states but china and how do you negotiate with a country that is putting frrth -- it frank he wants the transfer quickly and when that was done before it caused a great deal of angst in south korea. he wants to increase south korean's independent and having the missile defense system not integrated you can see it as maintaining a strong relationship with the united states but he wants to reach out to north ko

states have to do it. families have to do it. businesses have to do it.y goodness, my church has to balance the budget, or we cease to function. there is a disconnect between the american people and the government where we do not lay out a path to balance when you talk about the financial impact of that, madam chairman, what you look at as we go forward every single year we talk about more and more of our money going to pay interest payments on the debt. i don't know the exact numbers, but at some point in the near future we expect to be paying more money for debt than we do for defense. and that worries me. i was in -- not this room, but i was in the old budget room when i saw the chairman of the joints chief of staff sit in front of this committee and say he thought the greatest threat to the nation was the national debt. countries rot from within. that debt is part of that rot and that's what we're trying to address in this budget. >> i appreciate that. i appreciate you putting it in context as well, that we would look at our students in high schools a

that's true. >> what do we do about that? >> we don't have press conferences, and we do -- >> you don't mean that. >> just don't have them unless i have them every two weeks or i do them myself. we don't have them. i think it's a good idea. first of all, you have a level of hospitality -- hostility that's incredible. it's very unfair. sarah huckabee is a lovely young woman. you know sean spicer. he's a wonderful human being. he's a nice man. >> is he your press secretary today and tomorrow? is he there tomorrow? will he be there tomorrow? >> he does a good job, but he gets beat up. >> will he be there tomorrow? >> he's been there since the beginning. >> jesse: kimberly, what do you think of the president's assessment of his team? >> kimberly: there's a disconnect. if you want to be fast and do communications with president trump, you've got to be someone he wants to spend time with. you've got to insist of getting in front of pod dumb and -- pod dus and talk to him and have five or six minutes with him before you get out ther

what do i do to bonuses, what do i do to hiring people and that uncertainty is creeping through the system. give us an effective date, i don't care if it's january 1st or july 1st. give us a date that says, look, whatever we do will be effective this date. >> i said the asymmetrical risk is to the upside if it's 2017. i love kevin's idea. if it's going to be in 2018, tell the markets that it is retroactive to 2017. again, that's an incredibly positive thing. in a fundamental environment that looks overwhelmingly positive. whether you're talking about europe, whether you look at the numbers we saw here this morning in employment, earnings, things look solid. you're going to have days like we had yesterday and it's based a lot upon what mario was talking about. i would urge everyone to wait and see how everything shakes out. you have friday coming, you have the weekly algorithm models that will take place at the end of the week. you don't have to hit the buy button right now. let's see how it plays out. >> what do you make of the drop in rates? the ten-year yield goes under 2.2. financials a

you cannot do that. of president is in the midst trying to push through a health care bill that is an absolute humanitarian catastrophe waiting to happen. 24 million people could lose their insurance and rates could go up. they thought they were going to get this done in february. they thought they were going to be able to tie this thing up and move to the next priority. they haven't stopped over and over because of the legislature in interesting ways it is responding because people are rising up and saying if you vote for this monstrosity we are going to vote you out. it has taken a lot longer to get this through the house of representatives and that means it is stuck in the senate right now because republicans editors know there are consequences for voting for something in you made. balances that are built in a legislature that are also responsible for the people is holding for the time being. there are these other places where the checks and balances are not there. that is what we are going to talk ab

>> i do. ( laughter ) >> stephen: so, is there any way trump can win you over? >> well, at this point, he's got to go big: get swallowed by a whale, build me an ark, sacrifice one of his children-- oh, and a good one, too. not eric. ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: nice talking to you, god. if it's okay with you, i'm going took back to my show now if that's cool. >> you do you, stephen. i'll just be up here playing with my fidget spinner. this thing helped me quit smoking. >> stephen: god, everybody! we've got a great show for you tonight. kevin spacey is here. but when we come back, i'll be right here. stick around. the toothpaste that helps new parodontax. prevent bleeding gums. if you spit blood when you brush or floss you may have gum problems and could be on the journey to much worse. help stop the journey of gum disease. try new parodontax toothpaste. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ we all drive, some cats just know how to roll. you know that feeling you get when you ride? it's like that, for your mouth. the

i do it the other way around. how do we get the work done? we'll then put the organization structure in place to support that. so we need a lot of creative thinking. we need to hear from you. this is going to inform how this turns out. i want to emphasize to you we have no preconceived notions on the outcome. i didn't come with a solution in a box when i showed up. i came with a commitment to look at it and see if we can't improve it. and i know change like this is really stressful for a lot of people. there's nothing easy about it, and i don't want to diminish in any way the challenges i know this presents for individuals, it presents to families, it presents to organizations. i'm very well aware of all of that. all i can offer you on the other side of that equation is an opportunity to shape the future way in which we will deliver on mission, and i can almost promise you, because i have never been through one of these exercises where it wasn't true, that i can promise you that when this is all done, you're going to have a much more satisfyi

now they've got them set up, what do you do with them?e slot. >> right. >> dan draws the straw. >> it was nice knowing you dan. enjoyed your videos. >> there is a key piece of protective gear they wear that is miss. >> a cup. >> they don't realize it until afterwards no goggles. here goes dan. it almost looks like a speaker cone here? >> yes. >> he now starts to rebound as all the mouse traps start to fly up. it looks like most of them went off from the outside in. >> he's on the inside, so i'm thinking maybe he got a couple of snap snaps. >> i'm thinking the freeze frame is upside down should be like his profile picture. >> they got it. it worked. >>> it's time to give away another ipad mini. >> to enter you'll need a buzz word and be 21 years old. >> head on over to rightthisminute.com. >> enter on twitter, facebook or both. enter on each every day. >> let's reveal friday's buzzwabuzz word, it's sword. >> enter friday's buzz word sword. >> good luck, >>> ashley sets up game night to share some news. >> wendy's not catching on. >> you go

people are not willing to do.egan: let's talk about one story i heard about you, that is before you bought the patriots in 1994, you had been a season ticket holder for 23 years. since 1971. the first time you bought the season tickets, it was $1000. and your wife, when you came home and told her you had spent $1000 on season tickets for the patriots, that she was not too happy about spending that money. robert: you have done a lot of homework. >> [laughter] robert: no. we were a newlywed couple, and i was passionate about football. i loved it. we had four young sons, and it was something i loved to do with them. megan: flash forward to 1994, and the owner at the time wanted to move the team. and you already owned the rights to the stadium, and you fly to st. louis and you say before you go, and this audience might not know this, you said before you went you thought the team was worth $115 million. robert: i was passionate about buying the patriots. you have a greater chance of being a starting quarterback in the

able to do that.ble to do that. we have a populous in we have a populous in afghanistan who supports our afghanistan who supports our presence there. presence there. the overwhelming majority of the the overwhelming majority of the ethnic groups, of the tribes, ethnic groups, of the tribes, appreciate what we stand for and appreciate what we stand for and look to the united states for look to the united states for leadership. leadership. so to the extent that you -- so to the extent that you -- either of you, both of you can either of you, both of you can give us correct and helpful give us correct and helpful information about how to move information about how to move past what most people describe past what most people describe as a stalemate to me is very, as a stalemate to me is very, very helpful. very helpful. miss whelan? miss whelan? >> senator, i think we are >> senator, i think we are actually actively looking at actually actively adjustments to the approach in afghanistan right now. i expec

normally the teachers do it.s year, we were lucky enough to have omni cable, actually come out. >> okay? >> and they worked with our student, to help create a secondary logo. so, this is their main logo. and this is their secondary one, that is used internally. >> okay. >> so this logo will be replaced by one of these. >> so all of the students design their own particular logo, what they thought was the best, over here, some of the student, what went into the design? >> well, basically, when omni logo came over, we decide to use a dobee illustrate or colors? >> yes, then we previous monday we had went to go see them, then we are in a contest we'll see who is the winner. >> you guys pick the winner. drum roll please the winner is? >> roberto. >> boom, roberto. (applause). >> roberto, cool. that's great. now, roberto's going to get a prize. and on top of that, omni cable has made a donation to the school, and the amount of what, two # 250 bucks? >> we made donation for $250 on behalf of each student in the class. >

what do you think?>> a whole lot of questions, and questioning the relationship that this president, already fraught relationship that this president has with the fbi and the intelligence community, two, not to put it simply, this raises a lot more questions, and something that i think is going to be continued as blake mentioned to be asked in the groving today. this is a very sears russ allegation i think. neil: obviously what the president is trying to say, he had it with the leaks. that has been more of his concern, his administration concern sense taking office, not so much the alleged russian ties to the election but more to the point, how all this stuff gets leaked out. whether you like what the president is saying, dislike it do the constant attacks on intelligence agencies and wondering how the information gets out hurt him? it can't be just coins denial he cancel ad planned voice to it fbi headquarters slated for today, right? >> right. heard from the acting fbi director, mccabe yesterday, in t

how do you feel about that? how do you see that?here need to be more space for men at my -- i don't know how to take that question. you know, at such as a time as i were hiring, i would consider male applicants as i would be legally bound to do, but, yeah, i feel like so much of the rest of the world is not the way my space is, you know, i feel like things are good. things are good. actually the conference that i run so far has been in the neighborhood of like 55 people. so i run a small conference for feminists who are interested in careers and entrepreneurship. and it has occurred to me, there comes a certain size where i think that, you know, i will open that conference and say, like, sure, dudes come at it, if you really want to attend a conference on this topic. but, yeah, i think right now i'm really excited to just carve out a little space. >> have you ever caught yourself expressing internalized sexism toward another woman? and this goes across the panel. i know if i stop and think about it, there are moments, not often, but

-- you know, you have to do what you got to do, and i got to do what i got to do. >> okay. >> all rightpled not guilty. however, i did find you guilty. what i'm going to do is i'm going to give you ten days punitive segregation, however, i'm going to give you credit for the one day you served and probate the remaining nine until may 12th. >> okay. >> this concludes case number 00826. >> if lashbrook stays trouble free, he will remain out of segregation. >> i don't agree with the findings. politics are politics within here. >> case closed. >> for this month. >> yeah. >> we'll see him again. >> uh-huh. >>> coming up -- >> he grabbed me by my hair, flung me into the dining hall and started to beat the [ bleep ] out of me. >> lashbrook and his father try to come to terms with the past. >> and i still cry. i still ask for forgiveness. it releases a cooling sensation in your mouth and throat. zantac works in as little as 30 minutes. nexium can take 24 hours. try cool mint zantac. no pill relieves heartburn faster. ♪ to err is human. to anticipate is lexus. experience the lexus rx with advance

you do?ll, i think what you do is next step, let's have an honest conversation about this. let's figure out how to do this with some democrats and republicans to make the changes that have to be made. you've got to get rid of the current system, because it is not working. in health care, on moving forward, you do need to have this process called reconciliation, so in a way, you have to do it before you get to tax cuts. although i do think the tax reform, you're right, is a great opportunity to get the economy a shot in the arm. >> neil: do they have to be paid for fully? >> you and i talked about this before. it has to be based on a dynamic score. you need to know what the actual behavioral changes will be. you can have real tax relief. build into the baseline, what we know will continue, including bonus deappreciations. you can have significant tax relieve withore relief. >> neil: rob portman, senator from ohio. >> thanks, neil. >> neil: you've seen this, everybody has, across the planet. th

i think we can do both and we should do both. i think china, as a great power can handle that criticism on the one hand while they're dealing with this important critical international security issue on the other. >> thank you. obviously, we're trying to approach the north korean issue with a comprehensive strategy, diplomacy, military action, military preparedness certainly. one aspect is information warfare. my sense, and i'm not the expert, you are, but kim jong-un is paranoid about his own people and what information they're getting. do you think we're making a sufficient effort to get information into north korea through various means so that we can begin to bypass the dear leader and go to the people and that could create pressures on him to forestall his nuclear ambition? >> i believe we're making an effort. i'm not with the totality of that effort. but i do believe that people in north korea revere kim jong-un. and i believe that the idea that somehow we could -- or that somehow they could rise up against kim jong-un, if

that is not your doing. your doing is to represent our country, if confirmed, in china, and must take steps to make sure that our constitution is not violated. that is, that the trump enterprises are not given favors by the china regime in order -- so we're interesting in how you would defend against that particular challenge. >> i look forward to your thoughts on how you can elevate the current state of play between the united states and china, your thoughts on how to move the situation forward on human rights, and what you hope to achieve if confirmed as our ambassador to the people's republic of china. thank you. >> thank you, senator cardin. with that your entire written testimony without objection will be entered into the record, so don't feel that you have to go through all of it. if you can summarize some comments in about five minutes, that would be great, we welcome you here. we thank you you for your willingness to serve in this capacity and look forward to your comments. >> thank you. i'd like to

>> do i think we're doing enough? i think -- i would like to see a special -- an independent investigation. i do not think that putting it in the hands of the more partisan house and senate committees is enough. >> okay. bianna, david french, chris kofin kofinis, thanks to all three of you for joining us. appreciate that. >>> quick break. on the other side, will they have the votes? to republican house member s wh initially came out against the obamacare replacement plan, they have changed course. they're for it. it is changing the math. republicans have a real chance of getting this thing through the house but it will still be very close if they do. we're going to break down exactly where things stand at this moment. stat is next. >>> plus we're getting our first look at what the obama presidential center will look like. the former president just unveiling renderings of the center and the library that's going to be built on chicago's south side. >> we should not be afraid of wanting more people here and we estimate t

what does he do with that? what does apple do with that?e probably gonna double. but dad, you've got... ...allstate. with accident forgiveness they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. it's good to be in, good hands. >> neil: apple is one of those companies whose earnings are closely monitored. probably a $215 billion cash forward to brag about. the fox business network on what that could mean. that's a lot of money, charles. >> it's mind-boggling. $250 billion. they are debt in 2013 was 17 billion. last year, 79 billion. more dividend hikes, and more buyback. many people are frustrated that perhaps -- >> neil: wondering about the performance of some of the technology names. google, facebook, amazon. they are the ringleaders here. how was the rest of the techworld? >> it's doing pretty well. nasdaq, 172 companies hit new two week highs. there are a lot of names who aren't household names who are doing better than those high-flying names. all of the names you have on the screen right now, we knew a

what do we have to do?we have to recognize exactly what it is that they are doing. you know, the russians are famous for using what's known as a gray zone attack, which means, you know, if you can sum up their motto, it's to do everything they can to disrupt the current order. so they'll use military, political, psychological, and economic attacks. we saw it in the way that they tried to influence the elections in the u.s., the way they tried to influence the elections in france. you know, the military aspect is part of it and the psychological part of it as well, as in the, you know, how they just claim that they're going to now for the expulsion of those 35 diplomats. it's all part of postering on behalf of putin to give some sort of leverage that he would like to be able to use in the near future like the g20 summit. gerri: andrew, to you. is it posturing, or are you more concerned about something else going on here? a possible attack across the globe. what's the endgame here? >> no. i think ben's absolu

that's a tough issue, with you who do we do that individually or by county or by region in a way to do that. that's why reporting is so important for our farmers. the census is so important for our farmers and producers to make sure we have accurate data so we can make good, wise actual decisions on. >> thank you, mr. secretary. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman, and thank you, mr. secretary. mr. secretary, it was very good to hear you talk about feeding the world. that's very different from the president's budget which is cut almost every single feeding program or zero them out. so i'm hopeful that you will win. i am, as well, concerned about my ranking member about rural development. it's indicated until the reorganization plan that there would no longer be an undersecretary.. it was going to be elevated in some way. i'm not sure how that is, except because the undersecretary reports to you now. so i'm not sure what that change will be. we will see how it goes when we move forward. you've been really busy in a few short weeks. this is a major reorganization. so i'm just going to b

i believe we must do better and if we work together we can do better i look forward to hearing from the national advocate today in learning more from her experience with taxpayers in the agencies. i think you are holding this hearing today and i thank you for your service. >> thank you and i look forward to working with you on irs reforms. other members opening statements will be made part part of the record. nina olson, from the irs is here. i mentioned to her earlier i met with a group of cpas from florida. your organization was well thought of. also last week prepares here in washington i asked about your organization. they give you high marks. i don't want to to get a big head but we do believe in continuous improvement. we appreciate you being here today, the subcommittee will receive your written statement made part of the formal hearing record. you have five minutes to deliver your oral remarks. you may begin. >> chairman, ranking member and members of the subcommittee, thank you for inviting me to testify today regarding the operations of the internal revenue service and offer s