how do we do it? it's tough. good news is, i'm not a diplomat, i am a cyber security guard -- guide. what you do to deter a nation that does not have as much to lose when they do cyber attacks. i thought about this when john podesta was compromised and his email leaked. could we hack putin and take his emails and post them? probably but how many media companies in russia would cover got posted? we have a free press but they probably, not as much. so they win. it is hard to figure out, when r frdom of the press and ith dependence on i.t. and the way we do commerce and business, it is just an unfair playing field. it is a difficult equation. this is what happens when you do treaties. when you have a dialogue of bilateral dialogue between nations. you can take a number of intrusions per month and reduce them. you're reducing the cost, burden and distraction on u.s. business. it is worthwhile to do. this is based on, used to see 70 to 80 attacks against china against u.s. companies each month. after a treaty, we had

what do we do? sec. pompeo: refer to the 12 structural changes we hope the iranian leadership will undertake. a fair reading of any of those would be nothing more than asking iran to be a normal country. the same thing we ask of elgin and others. sen. leahy: they rejected them. what do we do? sec. pompeo: we put pressure on them. we execute diplomacy, we do our best to gain allies. we have allies across the gulf states, out other parts of the world. we will be meeting at the foreign minister level. i will be meeting with my counterparts in brussels to develop a path forward. he right theys were weeks away from building a nuclear weapon? sec. pompeo: i don't want to get into details of intelligence, but we have publicly said they have a capacity in 12 months, to be precise. sen. leahy: thank you. we have health incidents involving u.s. personnel in cuba and china. in cuba they refer to them as attacks. in china, when the same thing seems to have happened they were called incidents. in cuba, a level three

what do you do?eed expedited removal and make sure detention facility are humane and the kids are taken care of. we agree with this on the baseline. instead of using this moment to correct the mistruths you said i want to say one thing. maybe it will come pet the democrats to action. the lifers of cuevas and mickens and we saw their parents at the "state of the union" with tears in the eyes. they lost the teenage daughters walking in a neighborhood in long island. that should not happen. those are u.s. citizens and if the laws were enforced they would be here today. start working with us and stop demonizing the administration. >> i agree but there are no infants committing crimes in the united states. if you want to talk to callous reaction to what they are doing look at what president's former campaign manager did. he mocked a kid separated from her parents -- >> melissa: we are out of time. thank you. we'll be right back. >> thank you. i have type 2 diabetes. i'm trying to manage my a1c, then i lea

then do things improve or do they get worse what do you do if are you a ceo, some yahoo out there hasber off the wall? do you sit and wait for that to ca play out or call that person and say this is whacky >> do you think this is unrealistic? >> not totally unrealistic i do think you got to think about after this goes into effect as i say, there will be forecasts. and whether that will make things better or worse, i think remains to be seen >> larry, i think you are also somebody in a position who was a ceo, who had some power and authority to do it i think a part of what the business roundtable is doing with this is trying to provide cover to smaller companies and ceos who don't have the same sort of ability. if they pull in, it's not giving quarterly earnings guidance, it's going to look like they have something to hide. >> i suppose, that will always be the case whether you do this or don't do this >> right >> so i think it's directionally chec correct. i think the after math is unzblern maybe a little idealistic >> i'm surprised both these guys are fought idealistic i have reserva

so what do you do?> this is why we called you. >> when's the last time you guys had a staff meeting? >> we don't have them. >> i been here three years. there's been one. >> no staff meetings. how do you know what's going on? >> you don't. when the [bleep] hits the fan, that's when we learn about it. >> this--it's like--this is like the definition of insanity. how many total employees here? >> 17 employees. >> if the business does go out, that's 17 people that are on the street, and you guys lose-- >> a lot of money. >> i think bill, he doesn't even sleep at night. >> who's bill? >> bill gary's my partner. he's the one who handles all the financials and does all the book work. >> the one that doesn't come. >> he's not coming. >> and why didn't he were to be here again? >> they're business consultants themselves, and they just felt that it would be-- >> i'm not a consultant. i write checks. >> right, they're consultants. >> there's a big difference between me and them. >> yeah, i know. >> so what they wou

do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do ♪ ♪ do do do do do iguanodon ♪ [ cheers and applausedo do do do ♪ >> jimmy: there you go. those are "the tonight show" hashtags. to check out more of our favorites, go to tonightshow.com/hashtags. we'll be right back with john travolta. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ the line between work and life hasn't just blurred. it's gone. that's why you need someone behind you. not just a card. an entire support system. whether visiting the airport lounge to catch up on what's really important. or even using those hard-earned points to squeeze in a little family time. no one has your back like american express. so no matter where you're going... we're right there with you. the powerful backing of american express. don't do business without it. don't live life without it. did you do anything for your birthday? well...best...birthday...ever!! not much. just stopped paying too much at verizon and switched to sprint's unlimited 55+ (vo) the new unlimited 55+ from sprint. for people with hearing loss, two lines for only $35 per month per line. visit sprint

but rudy is doing a very good job actually. doing a good job. reporter: he said being a porn star is not respectable work. president trump: i won't disagree with him on that. reporter: [inaudible] president trump: i can't hear a word he said. reporter: was dennis invited to north korea? president trump: no, he wasn't. i like dennis. dennis was a great rebounder and he wasn't relatively speaking that -- so that tells you. there is a rebounding, there is a genius for that. dennis rodman was a great rebounder. one thing we are speaking about -- thinking about, speaking about sports stars. the power to pardon is a beautiful thing. you have to get it right. you have to get the right people. i am looking at muhammad ali. but those are the famous people. one way it's easier and people find it fascinating. but i want to do people that are unfairly treated like an alice where she comes out and there's something beautiful. what i am seeking to do, we have a lot of people in the nfl, in particular, but in sports leagues they're not proud enough to stand fo

he's doing what jesus would do and st.l would do and what moses taught the people of israel and he's reminding, i think, us americans of our most cherished principles. welcome to the immigrant. >> what do you say to the lawmakers? i know you're not a politician, but if you want to find a solution here, when the bishops go down there, if they're going to extend their love, their also going to wind up addressing a problem. they say this is the law. they came here illegally. and what they need to do is stop which is why the attorney general said the christian thing to do is tell them to come only legally. >> no. if i understand correctly, chris, there is such a thing as discretionary implementation. you have a prudent judgment. they can use discretionary prudence not to implement a law that would take a baby from a mom. that's prudence. that's charity and justice. >> to people who say they're christians who say i like it, because it's her fault, she shouldn't have brought that kid her. she broke a law and took a chance. she's

i do not know what we do with whites. politicians have never had issues with making policies and hoping the country goes with them. they make the policy and the country follows. i think there are a lot of things we pay for all the time that passes by that may be unpopular that we do so i do not see what this cannot be another of those. >> your challenge to me was a little different, about how we get to class-based affirmative action in college admissions. there are obstacles. right now, according to william bowen, the biggest preference is given to athletes. second most important was under minorities. third was legacies, the children of alumni. i have a book called "affirmative action for the rich." it is outrageous. they get a 20 percentage point increase. low income students got no bump up whatsoever. so the universities do not consider class in admissions. so the question is, how do we go about getting change on that issue? i do not think universities are going to do much on their own because they have incentives for r

>> no, i think things will change, there's nothing i can say, all i can do is do what i can do. we have to stop the nuclearization, and do other things and that's an important thing. at a certain point, hopefully you can ask a more positive question or make a statement. not much i can do now. at a certain point i believe he is going to do things about it. i think they're one of the great winners today, that large group of people you're talking about. ultimately, they're one of the great winners as a group. yes, sir. go ahead. >> would you ever consider removing sanctions without significant improvement in the human rights situation? >> no, i want significant improvement. i want to know it won't be happening. again, once you start that process, there will be a point at which even though you won't be finished for awhile because it can't happen scientifically or mechanically, but you're not going to be able to go back. once we reach that point, i'll give that very serious thought. yes, go ahead. you first. >> mr. president, did you also discuss the cost of denuclearization and how

we try to do what the public school education would do. recreational activities, spiritual care for these children, downtime for them. this is their home. it is really a home for the hildren. this is their house. their bedrooms are their bedrooms. as you will see, you will see the children and the smiles on their faces. t is just fantastic. the staff we have here, we just have a tremendous passion for working with these children. e see them as our own. we maintain boundaries and we follow policies and guidelines. but the passion that is there in working with these children, ensuring that they are safe, ultimately reunifying them with their family. >> how long is the maximum time somebody would spend here? >> right now we are averaging 42 to 45 days. it is not an extended-stay. the average length of stay is etween 42 and 45 days. >> there are some occasions where children do not have anybody to go back to. those situations, the legal service provider can help identify if they qualify for some type of legal relief and ove on to refugee cente

so the challenge is how do we make sure we do both? we're committed to trying to do both. and i think we've struck the right balance so far. reporter: [inaudible] -- specifically about the president's criticism of the fbi. he has over the last year or so attacked the credibility of the fbi. do you think that doj i.t. report now validates his criticism? mr. wray: again, i'm not going to comment on any other person's opinions, no matter where they're communicated. what i am going to do is talk about the opinions that i think matter. the opinions to me that matter are the opinions of the people that are relevant to our work, day in, day out. all across this country. we have 37,000 fbi employees. agent, analysts and staff. and scores of task force officers that work with them. and every day, every day all around this country and around the world, those people are having to make important decisions that protect lives. the opinions of the people that they have to engage with on that work, those are the opinions that matter to me. that's what i'm focused on. as far as the report

what do we do? >> president hillis: well, one, there's stuff that could be done without an ordinance, so, you know, we talked about if you remove pop outs from not having notification, there's improvements to the process that are not -- that are not needed. the legislation is not needed. your common residential expansions can be done, that process improvement that we talked about could be done without -- without legislation. so there were a couple pieces, i think of code changes that folks asked for. commissioner melgar, which i agree with, asked for 311 notification be at 30-days, and notification of the pop out -- to keep notice of the pop out, although improvements to the planning department's process for pop outs. >> so i think categorizing the notice for -- standardizing the notice for 30 days is standard. the process change that you're talking about, the internal process change to send the notice out, sort of without sending it upstairs to a planner to sit in their cue and all of that, there's

our companies are doing great, we are doing great, our military is rebuilding. we have a lot of great things going. we are going to straighten out trade. trade will be easy. and other countries understand. when i talk to them they look at doors, this is in closed and they essentially say we cannot believe we have gotten away with this for so long. it is like you guys cannot believe you have gotten away with it. i want everybody to watch. we have such a great country right now at this level, i do not think we have ever been on an economic scale, you look at the numbers, 3.8%, we have the lowest numbers of unemployment that we have had is at 50 years? i think it's 50 years, right? we have some of the best economic numbers we have ever had as a nation, and that goes a long way. we're building something very special. just remember, twice the size of -- our economy is twice the size of china. great meeting today. i think it is a great start. >> what is on the agenda? president trump: a lot of relaxation, a lot of work. we have a lot of calls set up. i am negotiating

such a situation and hope that after the election do we do with the window of opportunity we lose will be. your growth and one of your articles recently that the e.u. . needs to undergo fundamental reforms to strengthen its clout in global interactions and i think. interactions these require a certain speed of reaction which the e.u. seems to be lacking it also requires a degree of tactical maneuvering and i think ideological open this which has never been a strong side of the e.u. or maybe it has been to its advantage by the e.u. how it seems to be very ideological when it comes at least from the russian perspective when it comes to democracy promotion in defending its values and so on and so forth so. pretty doc sickly there seems to be. that kind of global interaction requires both a spine and a flexibility do you think europe at this point of time. is the i don't think the so do see sticking to democracy and human rights issues all of this is difficult. international law this is not ideologically issue this is defacto this is our core does this is in our heart our jeanne think we h

there's nothing i can say all i can do is do what i can do. we have to top the denuclearizati nuclearization, and at a certain point maybe you'll be able to ask me a much more positive question but not much i can do right now. at a certain point i believe he's going to do things about it. i think they are one of the great winners today, that large group of people that you're talking about. i think ultimately they'll be one of the great winners as a group. yes, sir, go ahead. go ahead. >> reporter: would you ever consider removing the sanctions without significant improvement in the human rights situation? >> i want to know it won't be happening. and, again, once you start that process there will be a point at which even though you won't be finished for a while because it can't happen scientifically or mechanically but you won't be able to go back. once we reach that point i'll that serious thought. yes, go ahead. >> reporter: mr. president, did you also discuss the cost of denuclearization and how north korea will foot the bill while the cripp

now do you get more news do you trust the media? but it can. there is a full new landscape here when we started in this business and in the face of a little more than 5s. we have gone from a president held an average of 23 news conferences per year to today with a president who averages ten tweets her day. many directed institutions including the press. he wants to reach the people directly. going from all of us the same way to have breath and depth of analysis to the democratization and those paid on this search engine and newspapers online sites that we may of what we thought of as professional journalists 25000 newsroom jobs were lost in the past and some neighbors would say that's a good thing those that went overwhelmingly with henry and journey from. where conversation one centered on pain does it tell you why you should care? from a landscape dominated in places we never would have called journalism. that could've been in all day p.m. vanessa be divided up in a couple of part so how do we arrive and where do we go in the future? i expect

i won a lot of trophies and medals. >> jimmy: i bet you do. do you hang onto those?i hang onto the memory of winning them. >> jimmy: you don't have them? >> i think my dad has them. they're everywhere, but i think my dad has a lot of them. >> jimmy: that's a good sign in your life when you don't even know where your trophies are. it's like, i've got so many trophies, they are meaningless now. >> no, it's not. i love to talk about it. i do want to bring it up. did you know i ran track? >> jimmy: are you competitive with alex? >> so competitive. in every way. it's like something inside of me, i'm competitive. when we work out, i'm like, i can beat you. i'm not laughing. in my mind. >> jimmy: and do you beat him? >> you know, he -- we never, like, challenge each other side-by-side. if we go to ucla, we're doing the stairs or something, you know, in my mind, i'm like, i'm killing it. here's the thing, he just doesn't even entertain my delusions. i'll say it, babe, i feel like i can beat you. and he's like -- [ laughter ] no reaction. at least be like, come on, you can --

so we do do outside fundraising and we have a fiscal that does that. so we try to leverage some of those dollars to be able to support our community partners as they engage with us. and then we do try to raise additional funds with partners. sometimes we don't get money for ourselves. like, programs that are not ours but that we benefit from, for instance, this youth internship program is actually funded through dcyf through a series of partners, we just help with the training. and there's some things -- the one thing that we're trying to get funding through with the outside partners is the partnership with stanford to actually do the evaluation of our city departments and the process of incorporating a racial equity lens. >> supervisor stefani: is stanford going to absorb that cost or the general fund is to absorb it? >> there's no funding for it right now and i have been seeking funding. >> supervisor stefani: what's the amount that you are seeking? >> so they are looking at $100,000 for like a two-year study. >> supervisor stefani: a second question

could do i agree with everything this administration is doing? i do not. but it makes cheer what the world would look like if we had a better s.e.c. that's why i took this job. >> i'm sure you're aware, you saw the article in the post this weekend in which he seemed to tie executive interest into not just neglecting the long term interests of the companies. so they could cash out but in some cases, putting it in jeopardy by arranging loans with the cheap interest rates we do have. therefore really putting it at risk to continue paying on the loans. do you think we should do more to make it more trans apparently? when you walked the the research, should we not make that data more trans apparently? and insist it is reported in a way that's more easily understood? >> first, to be clear, the data we presented today is not the agency's date. a it is my office's data. it is like me and five hard working people who wanted to dig in. they're here today and i wanted to say they're doing the hard work. absolutely, we should be lining light on it. as a practice, when

let's do more.'s do more on the issues that -- >> first, he has fothe power to pardon, not the senate, not the house. >> but the underlying issue, people who are in jail for low-level drug offenses and get huge sentences, you care about that? >> i do, but it should be done on the basis of fairness to all the people that way, not because alice johnson knew a kardashian and she happened to see the president. what other presidents have done, democrat and republican, they have the justice department review it, they say, here are my criteria. so let's say the criteria is, small amount of drugs, you shouldn't be 20 years in jail. everyone should have an equal chance. not someone who kim kardashian whispers in his ear about. >> and yet, at least it's one. why not congratulate him about that? >> it ought to be fair. american people want fairness, not just who has connections, who knows someone who's an elite person. >> but every president pardons. >> no, no one has done it -- >> -- low-level drug offenders,

what do you do here? eva: what everybody needs me to do. i'm the office assistant.onis: well, where will i find tom and nancy? eva: in the back. lemonis: she actually -- hold on a second, pause that for a minute. the conversation was much longer than that, by the way. amber: well, we had -- you know, we have to say a lot in 43 minutes. lemonis: i know, but there's moments where you cut out content that you just don't find interesting but that other people would learn from them. amber: do you remember back to what you learned that was so fantasc from her that you'd like to tell us? lemonis: no, i don't. amber: okay. so, you'd like to prove a point. you can't really prove it. lemonis: probably, yeah. amber: okay. all right, let's keep playing. ♪ eva: this is where everything takes place. they outfit here. lemonis: and so are they made here, too? eva: no. they're actually built from steam up in our georgia factory, and then they're delivered down here. so, they pretty much come to us like an empty house, and we install everything. lemonis: i'll find my way. it's just o

to do it. and i would add one other thing. when we passed voter id in missouri, we actually increased accessibility to the ballot. we actually have individualized individuals that would have been turned away that were allowed to vote on the new law. i understand illinois doesn't work as well as missouri, but in missouri we can secure our ballots and make sure every registered voter can participate and their voices heard. >> thank you. i think we can also do automatic voter registration and make sure everybody has access to vote. but let me also say i think you need to know this. i work very closely with the election officials. in fact, i think it's true. everybody should volunteer. i volunteered in clark county on the election site when i was assistant county manager. i want to convey the election officials in nevada have told my office that dhs has been great to work with. extremely helpful. generous with their services and knowledge. so thank you for that. i really appreciate it. one of the t

we have to do this. and at rest on congress to do it. doing what is a holdup because everybody blames the other side of the aisle. some even say that the president is doing this to put pressure on you guys that you can't keep it as a political issue but you have to sit down and make a deal. how do you respond? >> you can always lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink and the thing that you are seeing over and over and over again is democrats refusing to a knowledge of their part of the problem. president obama actually initiated this response by not upholding our laws and that's facilitating this entourage of unaccompanied minors and families coming into this country. so from that standpoint, it has to be a basis in regards to give-and-take. and every said they would actually pay for the wall. they want nothing to do with that wall. they went to go pass go collect $200 and get their way. >> melissa: how do you get past that? it's about sitting down and trading some of the things that you want for some of the things that you d

i'll let you do the inviting. let the press do the inviting. but we have to do something about immigration in this country. for 50 years and long before that it was a disaster. but over the last 20, 25 years, it's gotten worse. every time they write a rule or regulation it makes it worse, not better. we have to solve this problem. we have to hire thousands of judges. no country in the world is hiring judges like that. they hire border people but you can't come into the country. mexico, by the way, is doing nothing for us. nothing. they have the strongest immigration laws. they can do whatever they want. they can keep people out of mexico. 2,000-mile journey up mexico. they walk through mexico like it's walking through central park. it's ridiculous. mexico does nothing for us. so when people say, why are you being so tough with nafta -- and i am being tough because it's a terrible deal for the united states. mexico's making $100 billion a year off us and the horrible nafta deal. and i am being tough. one of the reasons i'm being tough, because t

or what they should be doing. the offices are inspector general are incredibly large, you saw -- over 14,000 employees, some of them are large and some are one or two people. or some are under 10, so, there is definitely not a one-size- fits-all solution to these questions. there are different pressures that come in what agencies you are overseeing and what size you are -- it is a tough issue to tackle, we will not solve it. it would be worth -- i appreciate the fact we are discussing it, i very much appreciate having the symposium. introducing this panel, the interesting thing about this panel, to me, all of us myself included our former or current employees of the legislative plant -- branch. it is not unusual, the other panel was the same as well. these three panels represent some of the outside stakeholders that play a crucial role in coordinating with ig's, highlighting the work of ig's and doing similar oversight that inspector generals do. i would be interested to hear your perspective and also insights the

how do you do what you do, and stay true to you. >> i have walked into the unique challenge and opportunity to be the first woman of color to run the feminist press. when i came in i thought i had 22 board members, some include my founder of people at the helm of the sport before i was born. what's been great about it is that they have been very supportive about me being me. that's been a great part of this experience. these conversations i've had about vision are things i want to do. for example were doing and across borders campaign. we wanted to highlight that were investing in immigrant writers and very beginning. i wanted us to have a strong message to say the last two prizewinners have been immigrants in right now immigrants have been threatened in this country and dangerous ways. we need to show solidarity. the board has been excited and supportive of that. even though i've had people who are longer-term supporters who said what does that have to do with feminism i think it has everything to do with feminism. but, for me it's been wonderful to know that although there are different w

greg: jedediah, do you know why he's doing this? >> i do not.oing to tell you i use reusable dishwasher bpa straws and i was afraid you were going to yell. greg: i just might. you're not welcome here anymore. >> i do like straws and i think there is a difference. if you drink something and i was told by the doctor to drink water and i don't like to drink water. if you drink a water with a straw it goes down easier and the audience knows it is true. they are all nodding. straws are important. [applause] thank you. greg: here's the thing that boggles me, tyrus. tyrus: i'm sorry, something bothers you. greg: they pick straws so they can focus on the us because the real plastic problem is from other countries so now it is america and their straws not indonesia or china or the philippines but this is another thing to hang on us when it is not our fault. tyrus: clearly, he was at gunpoint by his wife. [laughter] number one, number two, tom brady is a saint. here's the thing -- strasse been around for a long time and i happen to know that there are bio

do i have a motion? >> so moved. >> commissioner mazzucco: do i have a second? >> second. >> commissioner mazzucco: any comment regarding the booking in absentia regarding ddo 509? hearing none, public comment is closed. all in favor? next line item. [agenda item read] com >>ssioner mazzucco: thank you. any general public comment? come forward. ev h are you? [inaudible] >> commissioner mazzucco: good. >> i'm happy to see that the atute of limitations will not apply to discipline of the officers in the 2015 racist text message scandal, but as i've raised repeatedly at bias task force, i'm unclear on whether the officers in the second racist text message scandal, the one that broke in march 2017, have they been disciplined? [inaudible] >> i know you can't answer the question, but i just wish that at some point, you could share that with us. also, as i've raised before, what is the status of implementation of the grand jury report on fatal officer involved shootings that came out in june of 2016? that -- the grand jury said that you shouldhave concurrent investigat

>> i do. and certainly, one thing i want to recognize is when we do these audits they are very trans parents and open to the public. and that's something that you cannot put a value on par transparent choik. >> and thank you for supporting the secure elections act in your testimony. and i think you must be hard to be used as an example of illinois that they got that close. >> yes. >> but it must make it more of a concern in your state. >> certainly. it hits home. >> very good. and are people aware of it, do you think? >> oh, yeah. i mean, our voters come to us, and we are lucky in illinois because we can tell a strong story, we start at the end of the behave a piece of paper that every voter looked at. choik. so worst case scenario, full attack with melt down of systems, we can recreate a system tried and true. if we were able to talk that way nationally, this would be probably the last hearing of this sort we'll have. i mean, it's very effective narrative. >> and do voetdeters get worrie abou

we don't do sweeps, we don't do raids. we do targeted enforcement operation, which means we go look for a specific person, specific location, based on a lot of intelligence and criminal investigative work. we know what we're l for and hopefully where they are going to be. we're not locking down a neighborhood. we're not doing roadblocks. it's difficult. it creates a lot of work, first of all, in the targeting and intelligence investigative work trying to locate this person. because they don't want to be found. they are in a country illegally and if they are a criminal they are more likely they dot want to be found. it's a lot of work. what it does is put my officer at great risk. when we arrest somebody in the county jail, we know they don't have weapons. the alien is safe, the neighborhood is safe, officer is safe. when you release them we have to find them. i got a lot of attacks when alifornia -- california better hold on tight because they are going to see more agents than they have ever seen. that is a fact. it wasn't

do we operate it or do we contract with a bank? >> we're contracting with a local cdfi. >> supervisor ronen: oh, same with the dlf? >> that's being managed by the mayor's office of housing and community development. >> supervisor ronen: so in a way, we do have a bank, but in a very small way. so with our dlt program, i guess we didn't have to go through all the regulatory burdens or benefits? i would all say benefits of creating a bank. we were able to do this program without that -- i see. >> yeah. so part of -- really, the main part of starting a bank is especially deposits. if you're only doing loans, you're a commercial lender, which it's a much less regulatory burden. >> supervisor ronen: so even if we're just accepting deposits from ourselves? >> it's an open question, i'll say, and maybe that can be lafco's number one job. we have some legal opinions that have -- that vary about whether you just accept deposits from yourself, are you a bank or are you not? >> supervisor ronen: interesting. very interesting. so in terms of ou

we do do work in arizona but our base is in california. had 40 people out in the desert putting water in california. where we're based here in san diego. and donald trump's rhetoric is hateful. he started his campaign attacking me. i was born in san diego and i'm 100% proud to be mexican, of mexican ots. he said i was a criminal and a rapist. not only saying this we're animals. hate words lead to hate actions. we've seen a raise in height crimes. even though less people have been crossing than the last 40 years. nowadays there's a rise in the detentions, the deaths out on the border. it's a horrific situation. donald trump without a doubt is pure evil. no country of the americas has a law besides the united states, a third of the 2,000-mile border has a wall. that has caused 11,000 deaths since 1994 and the republican congress of back then. no other country in the world separates children from their parents. that hasn't happened in this country since the time of slavery and this this world since the time of the nazis. and those are groups

what do we do with the feedback? do they turn it over to us, and are we hearing great things from our principals about food quality? >> so i think there's a collective desire to improve the quality of our food and the taste. i think that's an ongoing process, and we recently had a conversation with a group of principals who asked to talk about the food and wanted to request that we have more diverse -- diverse -- i mean menu items that appeal to a greater diversity of taste, so we're working with revolution foods to respond to that and will continue to work on that piece. so when they do the taste tests, i personally haven't seen the feedback forms, but i know that they engage with the leadership team and student nutritious services, and they make decisions about which items to put on the menu, and that's a monthly review process. but i'm going to follow up and make sure that kind of moving forward, there's a -- the focus on the kind of metrics and holding accountable for change is something that, you know, i can dig

out what we do with them. they're not ways for those members to become full americans. that is still a debate pending. we will have a larger conversation with dreamers. are in a full force economy. a lot of the middle-class wages, particularly industrial economy, they are both very precarious right now, and are not necessarily going up and have not for long time. there are concerns about what you do with industrial jobs. industrial production is way up. mexico has a piece of that in canada. our industrial platform is robust in this country. portable we did we canada and efficient toke it compete with the rest of the world. this is how we created the north american production platform. up until now, from 1980, we produce prices many goods as we used to. but we use a quarter less workers. that is a problem. mostly automation rather than trade. mexico and canada were part of the same platform. mexico is part of our third largest partner behind china and canada. it is the second destination for exports. china send

so they were hired to do a specific job, and they're doing none of that job, instead doing 100% union work but getting paid for the job they were hired to do. of these 100% people on official time, who is doing the work that they were hired to do? >> well, it is unknown. potentially new hires would have to be made to do their work, over time assignments would have to be given to employees who are not on official time, but due to the lack of reporting, potentially their jobs were not met and potentially the work was not done. >> mr. gilson, would you agree to that? >> there's an early federal aviations authority case which said that whatever time was negotiated the agency -- or used the agency was obviously obliged to get its work done. >> so with the va for example of those who are involved in 100% official time, we have nurses, addiction therapists, pharmacists, physicians, have people who are very important to the care of veterans not doing the job they were hired. 100% of their time going to unions. this is very disturbing to me. mr. gilson, something you said in your testimony, i

do not hear his -- do not hide his testimony. >> the testimony, mr. chairman, from transcribed interviews can be used for hearing purposes. >> released the interview to the american people. >> the transcript will you release to the american people at the appropriate time. >> we are under the impression that these hearings and transcript are not to be quoted. >> the chair has ruled. struck also, agent admitted that before and during -- agent struck admitted that before and during the same year he sent many text messages about donald trump, text messages we already established. [indiscernible] is the gentleman finished? again, agent struck sent many text messages about donald trump. we've established and agreed that those reflect hatred and biased toward donald trump. i reviewed with agent struck and he confirmed he was in fact the person that sent these technologies -- these text messages but talked about stopping trump from becoming president, talked about impeaching him as the president and talked about protecting the country from him and from an ins

that is why i do what i did, do.re importantly, if the caller has specific information, please contact us. i think we have a hotline for you to call. it is one thing to say everybody is correct in afghanistan, but it is my job to prove specific orple still specific money moved of that money or did specific things, because i am required by courts of law to do that. we have put in jail over 100 people. these are u.s. citizens, these are afghan citizens, these are u.s. military and contractors. that is based upon rule of law. give me fax. or any of thects many people listening and or watching on tv have specific allegations, then contact us. we will follow up. we do that based upon people in afghanistan giving us information and people here in the united states. just saying boldly that everybody in afghanistan is corrupt is ok. it makes you feel good, but it doesn't help us do our job. now, we have saved the taxpayers over $2 billion. that is $2 billion that we made cases on and recover that money for the u.s. taxpayer.

everybody wants to do it. we want to do it more that they do.f they come to the table, instead of playing politics, we could do it very, very quickly. so, welcome to the third meeting of the national space council. i want to begin by recognizing our great vice president, mike pence, who has been so involved. for, i want to thank you --r incredible leadership to commitment to leadership in space. i also want to thank secretary wilbur ross, secretary shall, .irector mulvaney where is he? congratulations. you better do a good job or i will say "you are fired" in two minutes. [applause] we have a lot of support. you have loved this right from the beginning. he was in congress, he did a good job, but this was his love. right? so good luck. secretary wilson, general dunford undersecretary thompson. deputy secretary shanahan and acting deputy secretary grady for being here today. we are honored to be joined by congressman robert and dana rohrabacher. stand up congressman, please. thank you. thank you very much. [applause] and, a special welcome to a st

to moan or name doing doing. doing doing. fair doing doing me. doing being. you know just your own ding ding. ding ding. ding ding so i got a dollar they thought they were doing doing. as he's doing mop over a bit of doing it today as the dean is ding ding. ding ding ding ding. on the amount of pay legs at the mo it is not a matter of you did a man u.t.d. only about them problematic he got to see is it. the more blue the reason he is outside is the only speed interest like so as you know. they were told to see. to lose it people felt almost too hot elizabeth. had remained the intersection of reality and comedy and post revolution tennessee our. mission to entertain educate and provoke debate through satire how weapon of choice. and internet look at what inspires one of today's year's most popular comedians to make people laugh. miten is yeah hang on al-jazeera. new possibilities. medical facilities they got that either way he declared a state of emergency several weeks ago gripping documentaries can discover a wealth of award winning programming from around t

do we let?ake its crse. exactly. so that's sort of the dilemma. and claire -- >> jimmy: interesting. >> wants to go to the island. >> jimmy: i want to show everyonebr clip. here ie dallas howard in "jurassic world: fallen kingdom." take a look at this. >> proximity alert. something's coming. >> where does that tunnel lead? >> well it connects to the rest of the -- park. >> claire, it's the t-rex. it's the t-rex. >> will you stop? it's not the t-rex. probably. >> probably? ♪ >> deep breaths, franklin. [ screaming ] >> see? not a t-rex! >> how is this beyou know whater? [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: bryce and i are doing something fun with "jurassic world" when we come back. stick around, everybody. come on back. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪listen up and i'll tell a story♪ ♪about an artist growing old♪ ♪some would try for fame and glory♪ ♪others aren't so bold ♪the artist walks among the flowers♪ ♪appreciating the sun ♪why do you only do that only?♪ ♪but is it really so wrong? ♪why do you o

i start doing that every day, i thank god every day for everything i do have and if i do make mistakes i ask him to forgive me and to move on and learn and we have to start fighting for the american people in this country and like you just said the constitution and the flag and so i fell in that hole too and i've got to say this has only made me stronger and i'm working harder than ever for my community of ventura county, please go to vote and join the cause. this is for the american people and future of this country and i believe that at the end of this turmoil, things are going to work out and we're going to be a better nation because of it. titian tokyo do you see what i'm saying about both sides and it is both sides because it's unnecessary for people to go after jim acosta like that a reporter just trying to do this job. >> absolutely. trish: completely unnecessary and disgusting what they're doing to the dhs employees or to sarah sarah huckabee sanders and people getting up and going to work every day and yes maybe they have a different set of beliefs they interpret policy differ

as we do this, as i said, we listened to those military leaders and said, what do we need to do? we took the first step. this is a multistep process to rebuild our military, but i know we can do it. we had 6,600 requests from members about what they saw in their districts and overall what the needs were and we tried to meet those needs in every way possible. they're very aware of what's necessary and the votes are there. we expect to have a good, strong support in this, looking at job bases as well as military strength. i think those that voted for it will be proud of it too. any questions? >> we'll give you that opportunity. >> good morning. mr. scalise: we have another busy week at the capitol addressing a number of issues important getting this country back on track and addressing serious problems. as ms. granger talked about, this military bill is important to or security and defense and a bill we will be whipping later today. i look forward to a strong vote, frankly, it's a bill that everybody should be voting for because it meets one of our basic constitutional responsibili

so many people that are probably doing the things i was doing, doing this and this and this. we can't cancel anyone. kind of unproductive. >> happy to be here, can't wait to read your book. >> especially in mainstream media. and azalea banks, for not being a good example for a black woman and there have been ongoing conversations about what it means to rise up and achieve success. what does it look like and why can't we be accepting about what it means to be a successful blackoman a woman of color? >> it is funny because, how do i get dragged into this conversation for people who savings like i am tired of every black female comedian having a white name and talking about their hair and upper middle-class background and i am of the mind that there is space for all of us. not fair to tell people to be one type of black or one type of gay or one type of whatever and the goal is to have space where everybody to be who they are. because of it, not in spite of it. it is unfair to say they represent black women in a way, to make everybody happy, is it repeated? i would say the same

i really do.y, is getting closer to a european situation where we might allow andodify refugee camps within the united states of america, and we might incentivize that, i and i think that's a mistake. >> go ahead. >> i will agree with that. i'm happy that we're not separating families anymore, don. but i'm very worried that we're going to have ongoing family detention centers. that is not good. we don't want baby jails, but we don't want babies jailed with their parents. i'm not congratulating the president today, i'm not congratulating steve or anybody who defended this policy. the president lied and lied and lied. and let's not forget, he still has 2,500 children that he's holding hostage. he will not -- he and his government will not promise to reunite these kids with their parents. there's no process for doing that. this executive order, whatever the heck it is, does not apply to them in any way, and we are hearing from lawyers, we are hearing from advocates, we are hearing from parents themse

do alleviate that? guest: most importantly, do not separate children from parents except one that is in the best interest of the child. that is primarily when children are undergoing abuse from their parents or caregivers. there are other aspects where alleviation can occur, but frankly, the most important thing is to not do this. this is a choice being made and we wrote a letter across the board to everyone saying, this is wrong. seriousong-term consequences and it should not occur. what other steps can be made in the short term? guest: at a minimum, to try to ensure the children know where their parents are, that they have contact with their parents, not visited the border to see what is happening but we need to make sure there are a lot of social workers there to be able to give care and making an environment where the children feel secure. the most important thing is to have contact with the parents and their families to provide a secure environment. host: our guess is with the john hopkins school o

and they're doing it for ratings and profit and doing it knowingly in my view, doing a great, grave disserviceso added he feels the mueller investigation is the most important of his lifetime. so -- >> so -- >> i have a lot of thoughts about this. >> and you're willing to share? >> well, i even wrote a book about this called "the man that wakes up". >> now available in paperback. >> because like ralph peters, i too was upset about the blurring of lines between propaganda and journalism. so ralph now -- colonel peters feels he can speak freely now that he is there. i think some would say what took you so long? there's been a blurring of lines. i don't know is that viewers knows the primetime hosts he takes exception with and the great reporters. we hope to be able to talk to him about that. >> the word he used that is the most damning is knowingly. that things are being done knowingly and deliberately to spread information that in some cases the truth is questionable, shall we say. >> yeah. not everyone there is following the rules of journalism. if you're not, you don't have to adhere to the t

do any of you remember this? >> the president alone can fix it with this flick of a pen by signing an presidential order. >> have a heart. take that pen and do a way with this horrible policy of yours. >> we won't intentionally separate children from their parents. we will not do that. we are better than that. >> mr. president, i'll lend you my pen. you can fix it yourself. >> he apparently had a pen, several of them, he changed his mind. he did everything his opponents and critics wanted him to do. >> president trump hasn't taken care of the problem not by any stretch of the imagination. >> he has taken infant children hostage. he took them from the arms of their parents. >> over 2,000 children, babies, who have been torn from their parents arms. >> what the president is doing to these kids some 2,400 who have been and are being traumatized by his actions. >> do you ever think of that skit you said if you sign this you would be off his case. he signs it and you are on his case. >> you would have to be of a certa

democrats have nothing to do with this. we do not control the house or the senate. republicans, the administration controlled the presidency and as we see, the senate. they can do what they want. i do not understand the logic and how they are bringing the democrats into this. you talked about things that you would not accept. i am wondering. there is obviously some issue with the time it takes to go through proceedings. very,ct that the numbers a large number of them never bothered to show up for their removal proceedings at all. rep. nadler: is not terribly difficult. they will be charged with a misdemeanor. it is not terribly difficult to keep track and make sure that they show up. instead, everybody is being thrown in jail and kids get taken away. this is abuse. this is human abuse on a large level. they should not be incarcerated or detained at all. stephen: let me press you on specifics. what would that look like? i think we are talking about the criminal system but also the immigration detention system, where the president asked for more detention beds to keep

if it does, what do we do about it? on the other hand, the data goes to cara which is over at [inaudible] for the robotic capabilities but my point is to your question the answer is yes, we're great working relationship with the department of defense and have our nasa up to now looking side-by-side with the folks at the j spock feeding data to our centers to make sure that our assets are protected. i anticipate that we continue as general hyten has said that if we when we moved today were commerce is at the helm of space situational awareness and traffic and they will keep the catalog because they need to for their own purposes so it's possible that nasa will continue to have our personnel at the j spock. no decision has been made and maybe we could take the data from the dod and combine it with commercial data over it commerce and ultimately get a better integrated space picture at a different agency not that that would necessarily happen but it could. if it did happen, we want our folks over at commerce and keep them