development of cinematography and announcing that dovzhenko from the center is quite destructive doshkinonounces the goals of the competition, that is, once again the leading path to nowhere, and i am very curious to which institution people will apply to the one that is the dovzhenko center, which is now a successful film archive, a museum institution, or will it be some kind of entertainment center like his thinks preschool e-e is deprived of heritage cinema, it is currently unknown from the announcement of the competition, so the competition looks like another bubble that doshkino is trying to hide its main motives , now the actual center is working without e-e general director because a month ago after the preschool farce, she was changed to andrii alfiorov, a famous film critic . andrii still hasn't started his duties, he is an employee of the center, and now the executive director of the center performs the duties of the head, that is, the institution continues to function, but without a head and the governing body, and the governing body decided on the new year, when there is a tas

lawyer who only yesterday had the opportunity to familiarize himself with the case of a, and since doshkinomitted its objections to the entry of two persons into the case, the third parties of one of these persons are me, since i believe that my interests will be violated in the case of reorganization and the judiciary gives the right to this, that is, the preschool appeals. that is, he wanted it and the lawyer asked for more time than yesterday, he had the opportunity to familiarize himself with the materials of the case . a month we will, that is, the preliminary hearing to be continued, and only after a month we will be able to stop and go to the hearing in substance, but the main thing is that what conclusion can we draw from this despite all statements, the reorganization order has not been stopped, not canceled, it continues to operate, although it already appears to be null and void, given that its terms have been missed or have already passed the terms that were prescribed in the order. and in its legal essence, it is not correct , therefore, a lawsuit for recognition it was illegal