going to a, or, you know, an entity that has a web address that ends in dotcom or one that ends in dotgov, but from a legal standpoint it has significance. the government argued its taxing power also covers the affordable care act mandate, that because those who fail to comply with it will be assessed a penalty which is key to income, collected by the irs along with the tax return. it, therefore, falls under the taxing power and agreed with th theory. the supreme court did not seem so open to it. but -- but the point which -- which jce under the challenger's theory, the government could have a complete takeover of the health care industry and put private insurers out of business, doesn't make sense i incremental step leaving industry in place is not constitutional. >> take a listen to justice ginsburg. she's here having a dialogue with paul clement, representing the 26 states opposed to the law. >> so if congress could see this as a problem when we need to have a group that will subsidize the ones