former clinton ally doug schoen is now calling for a special prosecutor to investigate hillary clinton. >> this new revelation tonight on the e-mails that it probably involved gross negligence, it strengthens my call and that of others for a special prosecutor to look at that, comey, the gross negligence, to look at the e-mail deal more generally, to look at uranium one, the dossier, all of it. because at this point what we know is getting more and more troubling. elizabeth: we're going to get to that with governor mike huckabee, but let's get to the gubernatorial races in virginia and new jersey. neil cavuto will pick up these races live at 8 p.m. eastern time. he's going to have special coverage of the results. in virginia, let's get to adam shapiro live on the ground. adam? >> reporter: as you've said, this is a race that the entire nation is keeping an eye on because the stakes are great not only for republicans, but for democrats, and polls will close here in just under two hours. as you take a look at video of ralph northam, the lieutenant governor, the democrat who had a command

doug schoen.gree with him about comey because no single person did more to screw up the 2016 election than james comey. there are so many questions about his actions at so many stages. the truth is whatever side of the political divide you're on, america will never heal the divisions of the 2016 election until james comey is investigated, prosecuted and frankly if necessary it goes to jail for what he did because there are so many deep questions about his role that have left everyone on all sides suspicious of his motives and his actions. >> sandra: steve, let's look at those words again. grossly negligent he wrote. a couple months later used the words she was extremely careless with that classified information. that's a clear softening of the language. judge andrew napolitano this morning clarifying there is no difference legally in that terminology but clearly there is a difference to you and i in that language. >> that's exactly right. and all the way through what you see from comey is this dan

doug schoen, go. >> i was going to say in john f.hink it was '62 -- in '86 when we had bipartisan tax cuts we had a massive cut in rates. why is everyone getting so timid about doing what's right, reasonable and responsible for the economy? trump is sounding like a scared liberal democrat. it's ridiculous. >> great point. stuart: you got to president trump. look what you've done. [laughter] now you have to move from new york city to florida. >> exactly. and can i get a one-way ticket. [laughter] stuart: i'll buy it for you. >> thank you. stuart: sorry, doug. herb london is with us, president of the london center for policy research. okay, you've researched this. so you tell me, do we get real growth? no, you're shaking your head. >> it seems to be -- i do not like the idea of attempting to engage in class warfare. it seems to me that you want to get a tax cut for some of the rich. after all, they put that money back into the market. these are the investors. they have something to do with economic growth. we want to get to 4% growth i

doug schoen is with us and peter kiernan is still with us.onna brazile. first to you, mr. schoen, becaus you are still a democrat. >> i am. stuart: you've been in presidential politics for many, many years. >> true. stuart: donna brazile just said that hillary lost because of the russians, the hack of the dnc and trump's toxic message in three key midwestern states. that's why hillary lost, according to donna brazile. and you say? >> i say most, if not all of that, is wrong. i would say she lost because she was hillary clinton. she was too far left, she didn't have a jobs message in the midwest, and to blame the russians, the hacking, jim comey, i think what democrats and clinton have done rather than engaging in self-examination is an exercise in failure and futility. stuart: okay. hold on a second, doug. peter, you're a money guy. you analyze the market and the economy. did you get anything out of that interview with donna brazile on the financial front? >> no, nothing on the financial front. frankly, she's a compelling presenter and a comp

matter of a power against waiting to strike north korea so i think the west should be really kind to doug schoen his death. increase unprecedented an incredible heightening of tension by united states japan and south korea in stone of opting for diplomacy and also even accepting the proposal that has been proposed by russia and china that is double freezed and united states and south korea and japan has not really move forward so that is what really needs we need to pay attention to you. commenting on the test president trump said that quote he will take care of it it's pretty vague what do you think he will do. i think that has been has been taking she so you will take charge of would i not but i think my guest and he's still not going to call for and diplomacy i think she will do exactly what it has been doing increasing tension and selling more weapons and the more rounds of all war games one hopes that he finally realized that his approach is not working and it's time for our diplomacy and more than eighty percent of the korean support diplomacy and many renowned things a respect a lot more

how is doug schoen is handling this? you hear him he keeps talking about kitchen table issues. remaining silent or is he going after them? >> is not remaining silent as much as the national figures. he walks a fine line because roy amore has been a polarizing figure. if you look at his numbers, roy moore received more votes than every democrat combined in our primary. you walk a fine line how much we poked at him, are you alienating more people you're attracting? leland: elusiveness first set up out of the primary had an enormous company would even call it a hill, mountain in the polls. "the new york times" headline, alabama thought he had been enough scandal, then came word more. pretty well researched and thorough article appeared in sure covered a number of scandals they talked about. the question is this. how much more can alabama take? other other victims or alleged but as you are hearing about that or maybe not ready to come forward but as we get closer to the election, might be willing to put their name out there? >> you always hear things and there's always discussion.

bruce, media reporter for the hill joe concha, former clinton pollster and fox news contributor doug schoen and american conservative chair matt schlapp. i'm going to start with you, joe, from the hill. why the difference? what happened between when bill clinton was accused and everyone saying gee, this is a private matter. let's just let by gones be by gones and these women can't be believed today. >> judge, there is an old saying if you abandon your principles for convenience they are not your principles. they are your costume. in other words principles are only principles when they are exercised at times of inconvenience. now, when members of the left leaning eminent domain or politicians like senator gillibrand speak out about this, it rings hollow because the time to speak out was either in the 1990s when president clinton was in office or during the 2016 campaign when his wife was running and she ran a narrative back in the 1990s and each last year dismissing his accusers. you had to do it. to do it now it means nothing because the clintons don't mean anything to them anymore. they do

former clinton poster and fox news contributor doug schoen and american conservative union mag matt schlappm going to start with you, joe from the hill. why the difference? what happened between when bill clinton was accused and everyone's saying, gee, this is a private matter. let's just let by gons be by gons and the women can't be believed today? >> there's an old saying, if au bandon your principles for convenience, they're not your principles. they'reier your costume. in other words, principles are only principles when they're exercised at times of inconvenience. so now when members of the lef left-leaning media or politicians like senator jillbrand speak out about this, it rings hollow, because the time to speak out was either in the 1990's when president clinton was in office or during the 2016 campaign whether his wife was running and she ran a narrative back in the 90's and even last year dismissing his accusers. you had to do it then. to do it now it means nothing because the clintons don't mean anything for them anymore. they don't have any more use for them anymore. >> ok, so do

here's a point to that i made last night, i think that you know more about the d clintons, you know doug schoeny well, but the reality is that you have -- i took the time and i interviewed them. i interviewed them, you have the second interview that juanita brodrick gave, and nobody wanted to pay attention in the media. in the campaign it was brought up, oh, that is old news. is it really when you are saying that the women's champion in the world coming to take money from countries that abused women? she says that women have a right to believed, but she never comments on the women that i have accused her husband, is that hypocritical? >>>> yes, it is. she suffered for it. if you look at the female turned out, even what happened in the democratic primaries where bernie sanders won 18-29-year-olds and 80% by a 6-1 ratio, you know that she was hurt by her brand of feminism, and the things that she was saying did not ring true. again, i'm going back to what tomi is saying, it is really different to have been married to somebody who rape -- >> sean: did you believe the interview last night? >> it is

however, in terms of what doug schoen said, the substance of those cases, of course they should be investigatedis there a difference between, grossly negligent and extremely careless? no. but the tone is different. because the court has said, you prove espionage, failure to safeguard state secrets, by showing gross negligence. david: yeah. >> there san email, that pam brown and catherine herridge, our wonderful intrepid colleagues found which an fbi agent is saying, complaining to the boss, you're telling to find intent. we don't have to find intent. we only have to find gross negligence. david: to prosecute. >> correct. david: right now we have several hillary scandals bubbling to the surface. >> yes. david: we have this one. we have the emails. we have the trum dossier she claims she has nothing to do with it. she has a lot of control over the party. uranium one. of all the scandals involving hillary clinton which deserves most attention? >> i think on its face uranium one is the worst because it involves so much money. the frank justra, friend of her husband, bundled, do you know the number?

let's bring in doug schoen former adviser to president clinton and fox news contributor and josh holmesd to measure how to react to something like this tragedy which has been rocking new york city and everything else and opened up a larger debate in the country and i think he's been leading on it. i know it's not something everybody wants to hear but it's a debate we need to have. >> sandra: let's further listen to the president on migration and the lottery. let's listen. >> sure. >> we're going to get rid of this lottery program as soon as possible. he came in through the diversity program, as you know. we're going to stop that. we're going to as quickly as possible get rid of migration and go to a merit-based system. >> sandra: what's the argument for the merit-based system the president's calling for? >> i don't have an argument against it. i'm for it. it raise as a larger question. i'm a democrat but i'm not here to advance the argument of the democrats versus republicans i think we're here to talk about protecting national security. as terrorists come they don't ask party identific

he's fit to be tied, by the way, his name doug schoen.ate, you live and work in new york city -- >> i do. stuart: -- and because you can probably no longer deduct state and local taxes, the amount you pay is going to go straight up. >> i'll be close to 60% because we still have the medicare tax at 3.8%, thereabouts, that plus 39.6 plus 13% state and local, then you add in payroll taxes and health care charges, why should i be in business, and why should i be in new york? this really discriminateds against us -- discriminates against us who create jobs, earn money and, frankly, live in states that are blue not red. so i'm really adamant. stuart: i do think we should remember that it is the democrat party that has insisted at almost every turn on raising taxes; federal, state, local. democrats want those taxes up. don't blame republicans for this. you blame democrats. >> stuart, this is a republican proposal with no democratic support. so i think it's fair, obvious and clear -- stuart: democrat taxes which you can no longer deduct. >> i adm

doug schoen and jonah goldberg. i'm a bit confused today. i've known her for a long time. i thought, doug, she owned up to the debate issue a year ago now it seems like she is backtracking on this. what are we left to believe here? >> i don't know what to believe. i know the democratic party itself rots from the head down. they won a big victory. it was in large part a repudiation tuesday of donald trump but for today let's be clear. hillary clinton tried to rig the nomination financially and in terms of message. donna brazile has acknowledged giving debate questions. last night she was saying she was leaking inappropriately to bernie sanders and to martin o'malley. and then you got bernie sanders who had quit the primaries before california and was negotiating for speaking fees and airline seats. i'm really disgusted. i think you have to clear them all out. >> bill: sounds to me she is all over the board. jonah, weigh in on what you heard from last night. >> it seems to me that festty vus is here a little early this year. donna is settling some scores. i agree with doug sh

[applause] >> sandra: doug schoen is a former advisor to former president bill clinton and charlie hurt the washington times. charlie, to you first. the president was not holding back there. i think that's safe to say. >> indeed, safe to say. reminded me of his old campaign appearances during the campaign where he would go out and of course washington reporters, political reporters, they look at this and think it's sort of a scrambling mess. but the guy really is -- he is a lot more strategic than i think people give him credit for and i think that it's hard to look at the stock market today and look at unemployment and not think that it isn't sort of paying off. he really is racking up a lot of victories that everyone predicted would never happen. >> sandra: doug, he has taken a lot for the rise in the stock market. a moment of truth on tax cuts. the gop facing that moment of truth. fair to say that? >> absolutely. look, the problem is that despite the record economic growth, the earnings, this is a republican congress, as the president rightly said, that controls all levers but they h

peter kiernan said it, doug schoen said it. today is november the 21st. all the rest. [laughter] our time is up, but we leave you with that thought, 24,000 by christmas. neil. neil: thank you, my friend. we are looking at these markets running up here again on expectations we probably will see a tax cut. more though today, i should stress, and as stuart has indicated on growing optimism of the pace of better than expected earnings. we are just about wrapped up, and they show growth about double what the consensus was. so closer to 10% year-over-year than the roughly 5% that was largely anticipated. and that doesn't account for the surprises that we saw on the upside with technology. we're going to get into that and into the prospect of what happens now with those tax cuts because so much of this seems to be built on optimism. that's what we're going to see. goldman sachs does have a report out that factors them in and factors them out, and either way the markets continue to advance. we've got market watcher heather with us and dow jones news wire editor glenn holm. hea

sandra: let's bring in our panel, fox news contributor and former advisor to president bill clinton doug schoen matt schlapp. can you weigh in on what the conversation is today on capitol hill? >> yes, sandra. a lot of scared elected officials because if the new standard is that if there is a credible charge of sexual abuse or harassment against somebody, if that can expel you from the senate, we could potentially have the biggest turnover in the senate we've ever seen in the history of our country. that standard a lot of office holders will not be able to meet it. this is causing a lot of concern and chaos and something the country is going to have to deal with in the legacy of bill clinton. >> sandra: it is really interesting when you mention the standard, doug. what al franken's ethics probe would look like. if the franken case goes before the committee and makes it to a vote it will reveal what each senator on that committee believes what the standard is or should be. a very important time in history for this discussion. >> that's right, sandra. at the same time, in the franken case we do h

i want to bring in doug schoen. senate and tax cuts. >> sure. stuart: you don't think it goes through. >> no, i don't. stuart: why? >> with ron johnson yesterday having -- stuart: i'm sorry to interrupt you -- >> please. stuart: -- but ron johnson this morning says -- >> he is for it if it's fixed. >> right. stuart: yes. he'll vote for it if it is fed, and he's looking -- if it is fixed, and he's looking forward -- [audio difficulty] >> they're going to be able to fix it in a way that satisfies him. the other, we have three other moderates, susan collins, we have john mccain, we have others -- because the reason i focus on them is the getting the potential to get rid of the public option. i'm sorry, not the public option, the mandate of coverage in the health care bill. i'm not sure they're both going to go for it, and if we lose two votes, stuart, we don't have tax reform in the senate. stuart: who's "we"? you're a democrat. >> we are america. i focus on the country. i'm not for it because i want with rates down, t

let's bring in doug schoen, former advisor to president bill clinton and fox news contributor and chrisford. editor and chief for the daily caller news foundation. happy thanksgiving to both of you. listen, in terms of who benefits and who gets the short end of the stick, is the house tax bill black and white or is it up for interpretation, doug, i'll start with you. >> well look, the republicans would have you believe it's up for interpretation but on the most simple, straight forward level when you cut the corporate rate from 35 to 20% and bottom line the individual rates stay at or about the same with some taxpayers getting a bit of a break and others like in states where the deductibility of state and local taxes will disappear potentially seeing taxes go up, i think this is a plan that is skewed for the rich and it is, i think, wishful thinking to believe that it will get passed by christmas. >> chris, how do you see it? >> the main goal of tax reform for the trump add min is station. to fix the corporate tax rate. and they said congress and senate figure out how to get it through