my name is douglas robbins. i represent the fisherman. wharf community benefit district. you have our briefs and you have the copy of our briefs down below which contain multiple declarations. what is significant about tonight is not what she said or her attorney said but what her attorney did not say. first it says she actually did operate for the continuous 6 months or longer and there is no evidence in the records below here or tonight that she did not break that rule. that is not in controversy. instead you have ten declaration from ten different witnesses saying they had never seen her operator her operate within the previous 6 months. in fact there is no evidence at any point that she did in fact operate. even miss lewis has said she did not operate ever except to hand out flyers. that is not operation of a business. to answer your question, this may in fact be evidence of abandonment of the business to the extent to which even miss lewis cannot testify to you tonight and say she ever operated the business. that evidence isn't in the record. second, what i also was