>> good morning, supervisors, my name is douglas yeyepp. i have lived in san francisco for 50 years. i would like to limit my comments and rivers to items 5 and 6. item five, i am opposed to the mta having the ability to issue revenue bonds. i think it is common knowledge, especially among long-term residents of san francisco, that the mta has been deficient in doing its basic functions, so if you are deficient and cannot do the basics, why are we giving you new authority? in regards to $170 million, it is pretty obvious, given the current economic conditions, public agencies are supposed to be downsizing. $170 million seems like an awful lot of money in regards to so- called downsizing. the city can finance the debt in other ways. in my opinion, if a project is worth financing, it should be done privately, and if you cannot privately finance it, it usually brings up red flags that may be the project has certain problems, so you have to go through other means, like those participation certificates, which i consider to be a bit of a wall str