why do they want to reform - reform the dovzhenka center by creating three at once from one institutionn dovzhenka of the center is its main function is to store archives. now we can watch an excerpt from this excerpt. so if you go to the youtube channel ukraineira, you will see videos of a film about dovzhenka, which i ... they shot and there is a huge number of these films that are in special archives. so now you will be able to see them. each of these boxes that you will see now contains a film of films that dzygav was playing or oleksandr dovzhenko, that is, all of our enormous possessions are in these boxes and if these boxes, god forbid they transfer to some other place some other structure of the office. i don't know people who don't know how to do this because specialists keep it, then it will all just die and why did it need to be done because they want to transfer all of this to the scientific center of cinematography of ukraine, this is some kind of institution that almost no one has heard of, it was created in 2011 and has not been functioning since then, and now they say th

will talk with the acting director of the dovzhenka center, necessarily with olena honcharuk, but i will tell you in a few words i'll tell you what happened today and why the film community was terribly upset. well, because the dovzhenko center actually announced a threat to the entire film fund that will be collected there. see it, there are more than 10,000 names of different films, objects, units. yes, preservation, that is, all the ukrainian cinema that we know may disappear somewhere because they want to transfer it to some completely incomprehensible organization, which is called a dormant organization. we will also talk about it . but the fact is that the head of the state cinema, maryna kudyrchuk, unlike her predecessor pylyp ilenka, practically does not communicate with the press. it is almost impossible to get an interview. well, many representatives of the cinema and the media support this on the fact that she is not competent and that is why she is afraid to give interviews because she will not be able to answer a-a number of questions by the way . she has already had sca

interesting and very valuable materials, the possibilities allegedly want to take it away , so dovzhenka of the archiving centers question definitely worries everyone who knows about dovzhenka, the center knows about the work performed by ivanka zelenka together with the team, of course there should be such a center, i will allow myself because i fell a little out of the information space. whose surnames are mentioned in connection with the reorganization of the dovzhenka center, for example, from uh, it's not pavel sushka, i heard that he took care of this issue, but he's not aware of it and doesn't know the events where, let's say, the last ones that happened ah and now just as the essence of the question arises, it happened, so i just wanted to ask you how you evaluate this conflict in general, because i will just remind you that initially the dovzhenko center welcomed the decision to bring the state cinema under the ministry of culture, because it was allegedly the ministry of culture that limited the development of the dovzhenko center a now it is announcing that the center wants to liquidate the state cin

, the dovzhenka center, which became a cultural institution, which is like a magnet that attracts the cinema community, and not only the cinema community, and suddenly, right now now an order is being issued on the reorganization of the essentially disbanding of the dovzhenka center how can it be dispersed now by the ministry of culture which does not react in any way, the same documents are being signed, we have now created a petition i call on everyone who me now chug doesn’t see but hear to sign the petition in support of the dovzhenko center. we also created an actor’s petition er, in which we indicate the impossibility of cooperation with russian actors now because um yes, i have some conscious people in russia and it’s the same there too there is khizhakova and uh, human rights defenders who defended sentsova, our sailors , with whom i communicate, but it’s not the right time now . the arrival of russian artists at the ministry of culture on flag day has just been made such slight changes to these quotas where there is a foreign one there it is possible to have an english-la

developers claim that nothing like that will happen, er, we will just make the facade of the dovzhenka centere beautiful, we will not touch it, er, actually speaking, on the lbl left bank website, because in the materials about it, er, there it was indicated that, after all, the journalist talked to er people who worked as developers and are, they said that there were apparently plans to turn the dovzhenka center into some kind of i don't know into a gym or a supermarket , but our task is to squeeze the maximum publicity for this and prevent this. dariosh yablonskyi also says that he is very wary of the cultural cinematographic process in general over the last two years, because he communicates a lot with ukrainian colleagues and is very concerned about the relationship to culture and the state of culture in general, the cultural process in general, let's hear about that as well despite the fact that the ukrainian film heritage belongs to this humanity, the responsibility for its preservation lies with the ukrainian state, which is now so courageously fighting for its right to uniqueness this

in this context, it is the dovzhenka center. you have already said all this to mr. olesya . and i remembered ivan the goat who appeared in the first professional competition in ukraine, then they just started to be held, won this competition, and this is a person who was abandoned with multimillion-dollar debts, what already for what already for a tidbit in kyiv with uh, they sharpened their teeth, in fact, there were different people, he took it and that's all i felt there somehow pulled people who are capable of doing something, restored the center there, an important center where they became, where to go, the people who functioned, where they again began to digitize this film, which was already falling apart there, this one fell apart from time for decades, people were on to sneeze at this center and as soon as a charging person appears who can do something, as always , people appear who want to remove the person. well, you see here on the monitor the ruins of the ruins of the priymachenka museum in ivankovo, a rocket flew there, two rockets, just like the skovor

because well, i am far from thinking that in general, anyone would come to naum to destroy the dovzhenka center, and that more archive the ministry of culture announced that the dovzhenko center had not been informed of the decision since the end of 2021. the ministry is not subject to the ministry of culture. oleksandr tkachenko, the minister of culture, initiated the discussion of the situation with the state cinema and the cabinet of ministers. the negotiation process continues. dmytro suslov is the only news on the public 14 -seat bicycle volunteer vadim monastyrskyi from kharkov plans to ride only 1300 km in such a bicycle ride. he is raising money for an armored car to evacuate soldiers from the front lines. how exactly will oleksandr do it ? vadym monastyrskyi, who moved to novosibirsk, will go on a bicycle tour of ukraine, starting at maidan svobody first after all, you need to take a lot of water, water is life, and if you go without water, you can quickly play with your body, and i must also travel with a ukrainian the flag is nowhere without it until february 4, the man worked as a p

information policy, recommended that the state cinema cancel the order on the reorganization of the dovzhenka-centererefore, it may still be possible . and we, friends, will move on to our next topic about francis is pope francis, who has outraged ukrainians for the first time and many do not understand why he makes such scandalous statements, we will talk about it with a professional, but first let me remind you that in 2019 netflexia is releasing a film called two popes. it tells about the relationship of benedict xvi. and then there was the argentine cardinal horsemery bergholva, who will soon become french. ah , well, this is how their relationship is shown. it's also quite interesting. but francis is portrayed as just some kind of ideal . even when they discussed this rather stormy tape later , well, many viewers did not like such an image, saying that it was similar to some kind of advertising campaign , that they said that it was almost similar to the fact that the vatican i ordered this film to create a super positive image of francis. but what about his image nowadays, at least among ukrain