they also emphasized once again that from their point of view, this is the destruction of the dovzhenko centerhe national cultural heritage, and they also they mentioned the reluctance of the head of the state cinema, maryna fedorchuk, to have a dialogue, because personally her facebook page is closed, the comments on the state cinema page are also closed, nothing can be done there comment of course, this is an absolutely unacceptable story of such a thing during the tenure when the head of the state cinema was not drinking parylenko. he communicated absolutely freely, in particular, in the social networks of maryna kudarchuk, you are far from always asking for an interview, she rarely gives interviews. unfortunately, we have such a situation eh this situation eh hmm is in general and hmmm there is a different way of ukrainian cultural institutions eh this is enough of such a controversial cultural policy of the last few years which constantly causes concern and criticism for example we can recall one of the most successful cultural institutes and institutions in ukraine in general. it was cal

russian rusticity, russian reality, a cultural institution or a shopping center, the cultural community continues the struggle for dovzhenko center is, in fact, a very proper struggle, now there is another reason for the discussion. len chichenin, tell us about him, he congratulates you. good evening. please, the center continues to be privatized. the institution received a corresponding letter from the state property fund, which was told to prepare documents for the privatization of two buildings at once. one-about-3 thousand square meters, the other in mazhe 6, and i will remind you that on september 5, an order was issued on the reorganization of the dovzhenka center. the dovzhenka center immediately called it a liquidation and declared its intention the state cinema is to destroy this actual institution, which, in particular, stores the archives of our cinema from the soviet period and the already independent period, but already on september 6, the state cinema signed the consent to privatization, and there was a lot of confusion in the film community among people who are simply concerned with ukrainian culture, and sp

first of all, this is a selection also from dovzhenko of the center of ukrainian comedy, starting withykola shpakovsky's skinner, which was filmed in 1929. i will remind you. just in those 20s, we had an incredible development of cinema, which then naturally stopped and the program shows behind two hares for example, a film that we found out relatively recently that it was filmed in ukrainian and not in russian as we are used to watching will be lost diploma, you will be warm, marrying a tramp is interesting to watch and listen to the discussion, taking into account the rethinking of this yes to the duet Štepselya and tarapunkka, well, of course there will be ukrainian gala premieres among them, for example, klondike - this is exactly the film that won not only a bunch of different awards around the world, but also a film that will represent a ukrainian woman - ukraine on e this year's oscar race, this is the center of a story about how imprisoned women wait for children, then give birth to them, and what happens to such children and such women in prison. well, the vision of a bum is a

these money for the war works in this case, you understand, they forgive, well, regarding dovzhenko, the centery say that everything will be preserved, that the archives are not threatened, what is the point of selling and destroying? did not work and who do not have any experience of working with archival materials promoting ukrainian cinema abroad and ukrainian history and etc. as for funding, well, look, it seems to me that not everything here it is so bad in what sense and here maybe you will master me after all and atlantis and the glare they were filmed with the support of the state situation, that is, the current period after february 24 is such a crisis, yes, for ukrainian practically everything has stopped i want to clarify how has the perception of your film changed in this case? in this case, apparently, on international platforms , it is the reflection that is shown until february 24 and after that, i can assume that the question may be a little different. the events that are unfolding here and the questions, of course, they are already arising are formulated in the context of the w