and the reorganization that the state cinema wants to arrange with the dovzhenko center . the dovzhenko center does not agree, and the representatives say that it is very similar to liquidation . they present arguments, for example, that the order states that there you can fire a large number of people, why is not yet clear, and by the way, the signature in this order is not the head of the state cinema, but her first deputy , yulia shevchuk, and here, too, disputes arose as to whether this signature is correct or not. and the question is to the film fund, i will remind you that the dovzhenko center is a large fund that preserves ukrainian cinema classics on film and needs to be preserved and looked after, and the very concept of a legal fund does not exist in our country yet, this year it has to be adopted somehow, and that is why there is also a dispute. how so, the dovzhenko center actually performs the functions of a film fund, but the term and concept of the firm fund is not yet in our legislation, let's listen to the argument of the lawyers of the defendant and the p

such a term should be done by the end of this year , if everything goes well, but in fact, the dovzhenko centerhe functions of the film fund and also the teams of lawyers argued about whether the dovzhenka center itself can call itself a film fund or not, and also the representative of the state cinema a also asked the representatives of the dovzhenka center what they say they represent more the interests of a natural person, of course, they meant honcharuk and part of the team who do not agree with the decision on reorganization, and they say that they must represent the legal entity , the company, and not someone's private opinion. today ended well, not that it's nothing, but there will be another meeting again, it was postponed to may 4, and now i think that representatives of our film community will come to this meeting again . observation that all these meetings are turning into some kind of tragicomedy from my point of view, and because even the judge herself is laughing and ironic because, for example , the desire of the representatives of the state to drag out the process is so obvious

situation in the regions, about the consequences of enemy strikes, we will also talk about the dovzhenko centerhe case of its reorganization, stay with us for more

i think that people can see for themselves what happened to the dovzhenko center. motivated team has been unable to work for almost the third year. because the center is being liquidated , a transparently elected head is not being appointed, and the ukrainian cultural foundation and the supervisory board in which the way it was formed, what decisions it made, and what the ukrainian cultural fund is doing now. well, last year, i submitted several projects that passed the first stage of selection for the decree, and i didn't even get an answer about what's next with these projects, and the ucf announces a new competition, so what about the old ones? projects, people from all over ukraine wrote this application, it is very painstaking and difficult work , that is, it is some kind of disrespect for people and lack of understanding of the cultural sphere, if we are once again touching on the topic of museum evacuation, that is the minister justifies the failed evacuation by anything other than his own responsibility, the irresponsibility of the local leaders of the regio