he took the subway to downtown manhattan.it is hard to imagine a goldman partner taking the subway now, but he was a senior partner, and on the subway, he came up with who should be the treasury secretary during the eisenhower administration, and eisenhower had never heard of him, and he got the job, and he was a good secretary. paulsonn, corzine, and all went into government service, and part of the reason is they believe in it and they may get a priority, and you have your time at goldman sachs. you have your time making millions of dollars, and then they want you up, and they want you out. most of the guys are sort of forced out after a period of time, which may be one of the reasons lloyd blankfein is talking about leaving, and then they want to give something back, some talking about philanthropy. if you want to be the secretary of treasury, guess what, you do it. it is not something you campaign for, but if you get asked, you do it. tavis: last year at goldman sachs? >> i do not think if we can count that high. they gav

christine he was definitely wrapped up at the downtown manhattan courthouse we did hear statements fromthe members of the russian consulate here in new york as well as the wife of constantine you're schenkel make a couple of statements basically the results of this first day of trial was jury selection which took an entire five rounds to decide some hearings lasted for almost four hours definitely a tough tough hearing for a man who's already been awaiting his trial secure cough for almost ten months and with the consulate that constantine your show is really not feeling well and one of the reasons for that is because he has serious health issues for which pill specific goals that he needs to make him feel better are not legal in the united states so certainly a complicated case and the judge has said that it might take from three to four weeks for this trial to wrap up for our close or look at what this case is really all about let's now go to our report. a legit tons of cocaine a pilot snatched up and brought to a foreign prison and a wrong fax number this is a case of constant senior

and in those days it wasn't, god forbid, the loss of downtown manhattan.it was the, it was nuclear winter. it was giving the earth over to the insects. who would do fine, thank you. that was what we defined ourselves by. and that's profoundly religious. it's apocalyptic. it's saving the earth by destroying it. and that is our religion to this day. we have yet to dismantle this system or this way of thinking which is the only reason that 800 billion to a trillion dollars can go uncriticized, unquestioned as our defense budget every year even in this era of savage budget cuts. it's the only reason we still have thousands and thousands of nuclear weapons. and when we get a president who's determined to shrink the arsenal, he finds it politically impossible to do it. that is our religion, not judeo-christian muslim. our religion is nuclear weapons. >> i was going to just expand that a little bit and say, also, given what you just described the monothree i didn't mean of judeo-christianity and islam are all equally prone to the excesses of that kind of fallout,

week the administration was willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars terrorists in downtown manhattan but oppose spending to modify crime victims the the person who harmed them with the release. it's against this backdrop of the tough budget decisions that we must address the issue of the cap along with duplication overlap and fraud and grant programs yy strongly support pushing more money out to the victims and victims' support programs which is the money from the people convicted of a crime i believe we need to take a hard look at other grant programs. we need a comprehensive new view of grant programs or review where savings can be achieved. they support michael's for review and she states in written testimony, quote, we need rigorous evaluations of the victims service programs to learn what works and what doesn't. so i agree in light of the fact that in the last ten years and funded by the department of justice in fact in the last ten years the inspector general has reviewed 19 grants of funding for victims programs. of the 19 the inspector general found 15 it could have won suppo

the administration was willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to try a terrorist in downtown manhattan but opposed spending 7 million to notify crime victims that the person who harmed them will be released. it is against this backdrop of tough budget decisions that we must address the issue of the voca cap along with duplication, overlap and fraud in grant programs. while i strongly support pushing more money out to the victims and support groups which is the money from the people convicted of a crime, i believe we need to take a hard look at other grant programs. i think we need a comprehensive review of grant programs to review where savings can be achieved. i would note the testimony of mary lou leary from the department of justice supports my call for a review. she states "we need rigorous evaluations of victim service programs to learn what works and what doesn't work." i agree, especially in light of the fact that in the last ten years, the inspector general has found serious problems with many of the individual grantees funded by the department of justice. the inspector general