>> it is reported as dpa's case so it's dpa's case and find it. it's not ied's funding. >> you don't have the ability to disagree or agree? >> we do. it's just a matter of how extracts. so it's tracked via dpa because it's coming throughthe dpa pipeline . a complaint is made dpa finds sustained by our policy failure and it comes out through the regular pipeline and the chief has the opportunity to go ahead and take action and review it just as you would any other case. it's not counted as an ied case because we didn't initiate it. it was initiated and discovered and found by dpa. >> okay. so these seven that were failures, did the department not agree with dpa on any of the seven? >> that i'd have to go back and look at the individual cases but i don't have any knowledge of any cases where regarding training failures that we've gone back and said we don't agree with. >> that would be good to know because i think the chief is very dedicated and committed t consistency . so i think that would be good to know whether or not the department , where dpa

three or more dpa complaints in a 6-month period. four or more dpa complaints in a 12-month period and any six or more indicators in a 12-month period. so there are several thresholds that can be met to trigger an e.i.s. alert. let's talk a little bit about trends. so we have a lot of data to cover. we're in quarter two and the indicators are that there's a 25% decrease in total number of indicator points from year to year. so we went from 485 in quarter two in 2020. there's a decrease of 60% from quarter two. there is a decrease of 30% of total number of uses of force indicators covering the same time periods and then there is a decrease of 31% of dpa cases of comparison to 2020. so if we want this to trend, we want it to trend down and the numbers support that. the total is broken down by what is triggering the alerts. officer involved discharge will trigger the alert. 27 alerts were triggered by use of force. eight by a combination of factors. 0 with four or more dpa complaints. 0 is a good number. so by far the largest portion. t

three or more dpa complaints in a 6-month period.or more dpa complaints in a 12-month period and any six or more indicators in a 12-month period. so there are several thresholds that can be met to trigger an e.i.s. alert. let's talk a little bit about trends. so we have a lot of data to cover. we're in quarter two and the indicators are that there's a 25% decrease in total number of indicator points from year to year. so we went from 485 in quarter two in 2020. there's a decrease of 60% from quarter two. there is a decrease of 30% of total number of uses of force indicators covering the same time periods and then there is a decrease of 31% of dpa cases of comparison to 2020. so if we want this to trend, we want it to trend down and the numbers support that. the total is broken down by what is triggering the alerts. officer involved discharge will trigger the alert. 27 alerts were triggered by use of force. eight by a combination of factors. 0 with four or more dpa complaints. 0 is a good number. so by far the largest portion. the tea

but we have to remember this is dpa.aels and may have relatives that live in this community. so they wanted the juror ss to know this suspect about whether you like this person or not like this person or is a good person or not. this is about personal accountability. when a person commits a crime n this case when three people commit a crime, they have to be held accountable. that's it the law. i think the prosecutor wanted to just drive that point home, particularly given what we saw yesterday with respect to the defense's closing argument and their efforts to try to paint these defendants as some kind of duty-bound, service-oriented individuals, particularly travis, who was just serving his community. the prosecutor wanted to present a different narrative. >> you're outside the courthouse and seeing what the atmosphere is like. how the community has been responding to this. are people talking about are you picking up on a reaction to some of these very overt racist statements we have heard from the defense team? these c

directly, website sfgovtv.org/dpa. i believe that concludes my presentation. i'm available if anyone has questions. >> president cohen: thank you. >> clerk: commissioner hamasaki? if you like to make public comment regarding d.p.a. report please dial star 3 at this time. vice president elias, there's no public comment. line item 6 is commission report. commission reports will be limited to a brief description of activities and announcements. commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for a future commission meeting. commission president's report, commissioner's reports and commission announcements and scheduling of items identified for consideration at future commission meetings. >> vice president elias: we had a productive meeting with the chief and staff. we hope to have ready for the full commission the first or second week of december for approval. that's what i have to report this week. any other commissioners have anything to report. we'll start with commissioner hamasaki? >> commissioner hamasaki: i

supervisors threatening to suspend border patrol, dpa, atf and worker solidarity warns the nation cannottion, religious or medical exemption to this requirement. to be frank, it is because people believe this is a federal overreach. >> similar feelings at the federal bureau of prisons and tsa. up to 40% of their workforce is not fully vaccinated. the big fight is over exemptions. agencies are threatening to dismiss those who don't get the shot even if their exemption is under review. >> based on the conversations that i have with people every day, they are not going to compromise themselves or their beliefs and they are telling me they will either resign or retire or face the disciplinary action. >> so for an administration that calls itself the most transparent in history it is not. every federal agency, bill, that we asked refused to tell us how many of their employees were vaccinated or how many requested an exemption. pretty simple, something they've been preaching and they won't reveal. >> bill: stay on it. thank you, william. i know you will. >> the policies of critical theory in g

directly, website sfgovtv.org/dpa. i believe that concludes my presentation. i'm available if anyone has questions. >> president cohen: thank you. >> clerk: commissioner hamasaki? if you like to make public comment regarding d.p.a. report please dial star 3 at this time. vice president elias, there's no public comment. line item 6 is commission report. commission reports will be limited to a brief description of activities and announcements. commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for a future commission meeting. commission president's report, commissioner's reports and commission announcements and scheduling of items identified for consideration at future commission meetings. >> vice president elias: we had a productive meeting with the chief and staff. we hope to have ready for the full commission the first or second week of december for approval. that's what i have to report this week. any other commissioners have anything to report. we'll start with commissioner hamasaki? >> commissioner hamasaki: i