i worked both with the nec, the nsc and the dpc, right? often i need to because i need to work in the agency and the isn't a mechanism that's set up to deal with certain issues. sometimes there is, sometimes there's not. but i found, i found it very collaborative but i found it really depends on who's leading those policy councils in the white house. i would also, and are they an honest broker or are they basically -- it really depends upon the person. and bondage is goin going to dre their stock or other legal to run an honest process? my experience has been predominantly on this process. at the end of the day if there's disagreement, it's getting reflected to the president. ultimately, the president decide. sometimes you win and sometimes you lose your opinion. is prevails or doesn't but that's the president's prerogative to do that. but i found not 100% of the time but let's call it 85% of the time it's been an absolutely fair process and collaborative try to get to an outcome that we are trying to achieve. now periodically somebody's g

that thethat the work folks are doing under the dpc tutelage will yield more results and will provide more data to more election administrators to deal with the issue. >> he usually says this but i should mention that one of the most productive meetings we had was with the circus attractions with disney -- >> you say that like a question, you know which one it was. true, i just wanted you to say it to her self. it was one of the most interesting things. arectually have people who experts, people who are continually thinking as disney and other organizations with these issues do, how to analyze how lines become complicated and what is the application for people that you put into lines. is that they have a particular locations. so we actually had a meeting at disney in which we looked at line management and heard from disney about the constant effort to innovate and think clearly increase the line experience. and now we have dpc working very hard to continue the study of this effort and seeing what we can do to shorten it. bringingt was an xm of in expertise from other sectors to help u

. >> to replace the filmore, dpcs says art programs will be added in each of the five schools. they argue this will make arts education more robest and but many aren't thrilled. this petition has been circulating on the internet and has more than 350 signatures. jennifer perry signed t. she's the president of the stoddard elementary school pto. >> my kids say to me, mom, what happens if we don't get filmore? will i get to play the violin? will i get to do art? and i have to say, i don't know. >> every year, it's like groundhog day. >> many leaders have tak brian says they passed a resolution, pleading with d.cps meading to keep it alive. >> my child will go from having world class art instruction to art in a cart. >> reporter: the community members keep fighting to keep this iconic center alive. >> now, if this all sounds familiar, that's because it is. in fact, this time last year, they tried to do the same. down for this school year. signatures in a petition. reporting here in northwest, wusa 9. >>> so far as the cost is concerned. this program comes in at $1.6 million. $600,

nsc,ked with the nec, dpc. often i need them to work interagency and there's not a mechanism set up to deal with certain issues. sometimes there is, sometimes there is not. i have found it very collaborative. i found it depends on who is leading those policy councils in the white house. are they an honest broker? it depends on the person and are stuffoing to drive their or going to run an honest process? my experience has been predominantly honest process. at the end of the day, is there it's getting reflected on the president and he ultimately decides and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. your opinion prevails or doesn't but that the president prerogative to do that. it 85% of the time or more, it's been an absolutely fair process and collaborative to try to get to an out come we are trying to achieve. periodically, someone will drive something because either the president has decided already or that someone else, it's their style. sometimes that's needed to drive an agenda for the president. this is w

i worked with the nec, nsc, and dpc. right? often, i need them, because i need to work interagency, and there is not a mechanism set up to deal with certain issues. sometimes there is, sometimes there is not. but i have found it very collaborative. but i found it really depends on who is leading those policy councils in the white house. i would also and -- are they an honest broker or basically -- it depends on the person, and are they just going to drive their stuff or run an honest process. and my experience has been predominantly "honest process." at the end of the day, if there is disagreement, it's getting reflected on the president, and ultimately the president decides. sometimes you win, and sometimes you lose. your opinion prevails or doesn't. but that is the president's prerogative to do that. --ound, not 100% of the time let's call it 85% plus of the time, it has been an absolutely fair process and collaborative to try to get to an outcome we are trying to achieve. periodically, yes, someone will drive something becau