epidemiologists -- and i look at studies done by epidemiologists and interested parties and i read those epi, dpd, all those things a layman would not know what they are about. they make more sense to me than to others. i would like to comment on a few points that are usually brought up in defense of safety argument. one argument that is often made is almost all of us have all middle wi-fi router in our living room and we sit a few yards away watching tv. well, that router in its a few million watts of radiation. an antenna -- much less six of them -- its power is 200 watts. so, if you walk between the two buildings of the school and the bureau of jewish education, if you put your back against one wall and walk straight to the other building, you will count 11 steps. is about 11 meters or 35 pete. what is the difference between 100 watts and 10 million what? 10,000 times? the distance is, yes -- three times of the distance you were sitting from your router. but the wattage is 10,000 times higher. so, so much for that argument. on safety. secondly, another argument that is made often is we have 20

epidemiologists -- and i look at studies done by epidemiologists and interested parties and i read those epi, dpd, all those things a layman would not know what they are about. they make more sense to me than to others. i would like to comment on a few points that are usually brought up in defense of safety argument. one argument that isft