dph believes the board should not repeal the decision for the revocation because three reasons -- it is illegal not to pay wages. in addition to that, waste of sex york -- wage theft affects your health. income is the strongest indicator of health and disease. it causes stress and the inability to pay housing, food, and health care. the workers at panchita's are being affected. you might argue his finances and help might be affected if we were to close his business. i think the differences that he had many opportunities to prevent his permit from being revoked but he did not take advantage of those. oles has been working with marenco for two years to submit his papers to show that he is in compliance with the minimum wage ordinance but he has not done so. i can name at least three instances where we try to help them comply -- him comply but he has not taken those opportunities. for example, the workers made a complete -- complaint and there was a settlement in 2011 and he did not attend that hearing. on the day of the health department hearing, two days before a issued a notice for h

a look like to call some others from dph. >> good afternoon. i am a clinical psychologist. i oversee the child and adolescent advocacy center. i appreciate given the opportunity to tell you about the work we do with traumatized children and their families. will provide interviews and medical exams for children having been suspected of being physically or sexually abused. this takes place at san francisco general. we do this in partnership with the police department, the district attorney's office, the victim services agency, child abuse services. in addition, we provide mental health services to san francisco children and adolescents who were victims of interpersonal violence including victims of sexual assault, physical abuse, gang violence, and those who have witnessed severe domestic violence and other forms of community violence, including children and youths who were family members of a homicide victim. the majority of the children we see our pork and without resources. violence and poverty go hand in

ultimately, it would save money in terms of -- dph is facing serious issues, but the cost of the system elsewhere -- it would be much greater his people can access the vital services that people need. thank you. [applause] >> good evening, everyone. i am, -- for the elderly. thank you, mr. mayor for your local hiring policy so as to provide more opportunities for san francisco job seekers. thank you to be office of economic and workforce development for funding in the house in the academy. there is still something missing, however. we know the government-funded work force development for dislocated workers, low income, and youth. actually, a lot of it goes to the use. but where and what goes to the senior workforce? we on the seniors are the most reliable of force in the community. unfortunately, seniors are neglected in the allocation of workforce development funding. i want to urge the city officials to emphasize funding for senior workforce development, so that seniors can retain the dignity and maintain their health, physically and mentally, so that seniors can become self-reliant,

my intention is to hold -- uphold dph in this revocation. >> i would concur. i would point out that i've got a presentation at the case here, what you have done over the years, it is laudable in giving him a chance to make the corrections. >> i don't have a lot to atom, but i am inclined to all pull. i think the department's effort to really show great good faith to assist operators such as this one. i think the resources that are spent are probably worth doing and making those efforts because no one wants to put anyone out of business. and the community institution that might be impacted by this.

my intention is to hold -- uphold dph in this revocation. >> i would concur. i would point out that i've got a presentation at the case here, what you have done over the years, it is laudable in giving him a chance to make the corrections. >> i don't have a lot to atom, but i am inclined to all pull. i think the department's effort to really show great good faith to assist operators such as this one. i think the resources that are spent are probably worth doing and making those efforts because no one wants to put anyone out of business. and the community institution that might be impacted by this. the photographs and the report are very compelling. i think we can't allow this. like the president stated, i feel bad for the people that eat their and are not aware of these conditions. president garcia: i move that we all pulled the department of public health -- >> for the reasons stated in the order? president garcia: exactly. >> call the roll, please. >> a motion from the president touphol uphold this revocation. commissioner hwang: aye. commissioner hillis: ay

also impacting the dph decision was help perform. health reform was enacted in march 2010, and takes a multi level approach to increasing the number of people who of access to health insurance. specifically there is the individual mandate which requires all u.s. citizens and legal residents to have health insurance with a few exceptions. for the lowest income individuals, it increases eligibility for medicaid, which is known as metical -- medical in california. for the lowest incomes, it provides subsidies for the cost of health insurance. it helps to allow people to have those subsidies to apply for health insurance and to retain health insurance regardless of pre-existing conditions and the guarantee of renewal. well some of the insurance reforms have been implemented already, most of the provisions i have just described become effective on january 1, 2014. it is anticipated as a result of health reform, 90% of u.s. residents will be insured by 2016. according to the most recent data, approximately 117,000 san franciscans were unin

there needs to be a greater intertwining of partnership between hsa and dph. hsa is about shelter but the ph is about holistic treatment. people are in our system because of their low-income status or inability to be within our resource network. we also see that people are staying homeless because of health issues they have challenges with and we are not addressing those needs. i would like to cpa to do at health assessment of all our shelters. in one night, we know who stays in our shelter. we do not know who was staying there. i am david driven. if we know who was staying in our shelters, what their needs are, maybe we can shift resources around. we do not have a lot but maybe we should be shifting resources to serve the actual need of our clients. this is my last point. when i stayed at next door, i was tremendously struck by the age of our shelter clients. i did not expect our clients to be so much older. i did not see a lot of young people in our shelters, i was one of the few young people there. it is the case that many of we need to figure out how to ad

. >> vice-president, would that be on the basis of the reasons stated in the dph order? vice president hwang: yes. >> when you are ready. >> we have a motion from the vice president to deny the appeal, uphold this revocation on the bases listed in the -- basis listed in the dph order. commissioner fung: aye. president garcia: aye. commissioner hillis: aye. commissioner hurtado: aye. >> the boat is 5-0. the revocation is upheld on that basis. >> item 7 has been rescheduled to april 25, so we will move on to itunes 8 -- to items 8 a and b. both were filed by junel solach, versus the department of building inspection. it protests the issuance on february 14, 2012 to peter fealy living trust, protesting the issuance of an electrical permit and a plumbing permits. -- and a plubming permit. we will begin with the appellant's up -- attorney. >> eunice chang appearing on behalf of junel solbach. this board is to hear appeals if the health and safety of the public will be impacted by the granting of a permit. in this case, we are dealing with a repeat offender, a land owner who h

the dph trained us on how to approach, sides. we just need to come together because weather is bayview, hunters point, if the violence is in the western addition, with everybody being angry, i don't know we have a real problem. let's take the lead on the violence, thank you. >> ♪ make it safe today i know you're always there and i know you always care and you make it safe today ♪ >> lisa for the committee violence. the health program, the full scope metical program. we quickly realized that a lot of community folks don't reach out. all of us can experience, you don't know what it happens -- these are most in need of these services, so i decided to provide most of these services and the school system. the diagnostic criteria to meet is a huge hot topic in the mental-health community right now. they are exposed to violence or experiencing symptoms of,. -- of trauma. if kids are moustaches diagnosed or overlooked, we were put on unheard -- on a meds trial. they are experiencing hyper- vigilant states of being exposed to trauma. and

. >> we have a motion from the president to uphold this 20-day suspension on the basis in the dph order. on that motion -- [roll call vote] thank you. the vote is 3-2. this 20-day suspension is upheld. >> thank you. we will move back to item 5c. the subject property is on judah street. the appeal is protesting the issuance of a letter of determination to tenderloin housing clinic on november 19, 1997, that find no legal nonconforming use of the property as a tourist hotel has been established. at this hearing, the board failed to -- on april 1, 1998, the board voted to continue the matter to await action by the superior court. this case was returned from the college your calendar and with the consent of the party. the president has agreed to give each party five minutes and we will start with the request. >> let me explain to people. both sides -- five minutes is more than a person would ordinarily get, not less. " good evening, commissioners. i am the attorney for the request. unlike the prior two cases, this case does present new facts. these are new facts that command the grant of a

the minimum wage ordinance, which it is12r7b, and the enforcement agency for this ordinance can ask dph to revoke or suspend any permits until the employer has complied with the minimum wage ordinance. they made a referral to the department asking for enforcement assistance for panchita's. since january 2010, we have been working with the owner, mr. marenco, to produce records for an audit with the minimum wage ordinance. due to his repeated failure to produce the required documents, he has incurred penalties. as of today, and he has neither produce the required documents nor has he paid the city the penalties do. -- dued. the director of public health found that the establishment was out of compliance with the permit conditions and revoked the permit to operate. some of days that are not included in the brief that we produced, i found out from the -- updates that are not included in the producer -- brief we produce, and the field enforcement of california conducted an inspection at the establishment and concluded that johnny marenco owes back wages, overtime, and he does not have worke

he talks about cleaning up when he is faced with revocation by dph, but how about all the other years when they were over and over and over again, pointing out what the problems were and ask him to take their problems and show a great deal of leniency. why didn't he do it in years past? >> [foreign language] >> he did clean up, maybe not thoroughly, but the problem is the construction of the city college right next door. all the blocking

in dph, we are looking at initiatives expanding any project, homeless connect, prioritizing domestic violence in shelters, reviewing other practices which we are talking about now, and strengthening the relationship. we have already been proven to ourselves that affects our outcomes. briefly, what is working with other cities, and i think we are really lucky in san francisco to be at the forefront of a lot. we work with the national health care for the homeless, and we care for the homeless, and we are one of the only cities to

in dph, we are looking at initiatives expanding any project, homeless connect, prioritizing domestic violence in shelters, reviewing other practices which we are talking about now, and strengthening the relationship. we have already been proven to ourselves that affects our outcomes. briefly, what is working with other cities, and i think we are really lucky in san francisco to be at the forefront of a lot. we work with the national health care for the homeless, and we are one of the only cities to have a standard of care legislation. but what we do not have the other cities have is a more public health planning model. in new york, it is altogether, looking at integrating homeless services in places like seattle with the public health department has authority to set standards and monitor in the shelter not based on legislation, but on current best practice. other centers using the ditch and resources and correlating that what needs the clients have for activities of daily living. other things that other cities have, new york city has a large overdose prevention program in the shelter

did dph also contract with for- profit entities? >> there were a few. it might have been contracts for specialized services around dialysis care at the hospital with outside agencies. we have a number of it contracts. supervisor kim: you had a number of real-estate contracts as well. in those for-profit contracts, was it almost expected? did you automatically puts in an escalator? >> i think most of those contracts for multi-year contracts. they did have a five-year plan for funding. there was an increase built into those. that is pretty standard. when we would send out a rfp, we will be looking for a five-year contract. in many cases, they would try to build savings into the early years. they would fund the contract at a below market levels for a year or two. >> thank you. i am imagining, there is a lot of conversation around the treatment of the nonprofit contracts versus other contracts. to be fair, some of the contracts with service providers also allow for us to recover or pay them for the actual cost of utilities, for example, those kinds of thing

. -- where does the dph pick up? >> my name is quincy vladim er. >>it hasthis building has fecitd lighted for a number of years. structural soundness is for jerkily concerning. and offices have also stated the building is used as a shield for criminal activity and would like to see reduced. it is used not only as a public urinal, but at least four people to defecate on a regular basis. the department of public works spent a great deal of time and money cleaning that building. it does not make sense the building is allowed to remain under unsafe conditions for so violation and give the building, but the department seems to be very unwilling to use the tools at their proposal to bring the property to code and a reasonable amount of time. an example of this would be $6,000 in fines for apparently no reason. it does not seem to make sense. i want to ask the commission to look into this matter and take aggressive action against the owners. thank you. >> think you for your comments. -- thank you. >> any additional public comment? item #6, appeals pursuan

the dph trained us on how to approach, sides. we just need to come together because weather is bayview, hunters point, if the violence is in the western addition, with everybody being angry, i don't know we have a real problem. let's take the lead on the violence, thank you. >> ♪ make it safe today i know you're always there and i know you always care and you make it safe today ♪