these include working with dph and others to have proposals for subacute care in san francisco. this is a level of care by a patient that does not require the level of acute care but that he requires more care than the nursing is able to provide. no other facility provides this level of care. the second is to continue these efforts at all of the campuses. currently, st. luke's has the staff. integrating the staff will help insure that all patients regardless of insurance status have equal class -- equal access. third, continuing to actively participate in the partnership, the community benefits partnership is a coalition of dph, hospitals, clinics, and others that assess committee meet and assess resources to meet that need. they also shopping required to have secure services to hospital patients. and this includes the agreement where there are services to chinese hospital patients. this is culturally and linguistically appropriate services that are representative of the divorce population and thick with national standards. and i wanted to get back to you on the supreme court de

eligible contracts unless projects must contract to provide services that are reviewed and funded by dph and hsa. they go to the access points, giving the city the ability to prioritize those individuals that have long histories of heavy use of city services. the first loss disbursement is made -- once approved, it is made when the building is placed in service. thereafter, disbursements are made at the beginning of each fiscal year after the city's budget is approved. the loss program budget is monitored by both the service agencies, as well as the mayor's budget office. local operating subsidy creates an operationally feasible project that is then able to leverage other state, federal, and private funding. and i think i mentioned that in order for other resources to consider our applications eligible, we have to show that it will cash flow for a time span of 20 years, and that is where the subsidy comes in. it is the city's intent that, to the greatest extent possible, other non-city resources replace lost assistance whenever such resources are available. recipients of losp must agree

local operating subsidy program, and it should have added at the beginning that we have staff from dph and hsa here to answer any questions you might have, as well as the sponsor from mercy housing. and like to give you a few facts about the arlington. the request is for $9,354,007 for the local operating subsidy which is the operating contract that will carry the project through for 16 years. mercy housing is the sponsor and will own and manage it. construction completed -- will be completed in september of this year. after construction, there will be 153 units. each unit will have a bath and a micro refreshments center. starting with 80 units in 2012 and working up to 129 units over time, the additional unit24 will be subsidized by another dph funding source. tenants will be homeless individuals referred by the program who are high users of the public health system who may be mentally ill, a chronic substance abusers, and/or living with hiv or other disabling medical illnesses. this is just to tell you that this project was able to leverage $10 million in state funding, $12 million i

. >> charlie morimoto, dph. ideal of a public safety issues. what i will be talking about, i think it has been about a decade i have been working on this specifically. a large amount of homicides and the department was asked to get involved in regard to services. i want to be clear today, we will be talking about the intervention peace. i am not talking about all the other services and things that need to go into place, prevention, but this is really the intervention model. i wanted to let you know, over the past decade of examining, going out two homicides myself, i think i have got to over 50 now, identifying what we needed. as barbara mentioned, we moved staff. we did not have the allocation and money to do that. 2006, the crisis response came. one of the things, even when i initially looked -- because i want to build on the strength of what is happening in the back. people were looking for singular solutions and a quick fix to things. when i came in, there had not been dialogue between the departments and the community's most impacted, even

and i noticed turley is here from dph. he has been a great -- charlie is here from dph. he has been a great partner in our outreach for a long time. we recently had a motorcycle accident over the weekend and the burning of a person on guerrero street. both were very shocking. not only did we do out reached in the community, but in mission statement as well, as the officers have feelings, too. what are your results in homicide in 2012? in district 11, there have been 11 homicides this year. six of those were committed in the horrific tragedy on how street. another was a murder/suicide pact very sad, an elderly couple. however, that does count as a homicide. subtracting the six, which i do not believe is indicative of the street violence which i believe we do hope to impact. i will ask commander loftus to comment on those cases. i do not want to say something that will jeopardize them. last year, there were four homicides. this year, absent the six, there have been five. one is always more than we want. when you say 11 vs four, it sounds like a tremendous increase >. super

ultimately, it would save money in terms of -- dph is facing serious issues, but the cost of the system elsewhere -- it would be much greater his people can access the vital services that people need. thank you. [applause] >> good evening, everyone. i am, -- for the elderly. thank you, mr. mayor for your local hiring policy so as to provide more opportunities for san francisco job seekers. thank you to be office of economic and workforce development for funding in the house in the academy. there is still something missing, however. we know the government-funded work force development for dislocated workers, low income, and youth. actually, a lot of it goes to the use. but where and what goes to the senior workforce? we on the seniors are the most reliable of force in the community. unfortunately, seniors are neglected in the allocation of workforce development funding. i want to urge the city officials to emphasize funding for senior workforce development, so that seniors can retain the dignity and maintain their health, physically and mentally, so that seniors can become self-reliant,

this question goes back to dph.by the way, i am a fan of taft and i note that the work they do for the neighborhood and the city at large is important. in the stand the importance of our medical respite in sobering center. i was wondering if you could speak more about what you planned to do. clearly, at the time the sole source contracts made sense. even if bid out competitively, there was a chance the contract would stay with the same provider, just given the kinds of expertise and things that we do being unique, but i was curious, moving forward the board has always expressed support for these programs, as seen through several budget cycles. but could you go further into ensuring that kind of uniformity? >> i would like to confirm your z as this very flexible partner in delivering services to homeless citizens. also, you might appreciate that our challenge to help the homeless is an ever evolving process and not stagnanta as a practice, doing the same thing over and over. so, in the last few years we have come to

homicide or they get a indication that it is a critically wounded victim, then they will contact our dph the spot coord is thent. call, the person is who did and they are already taken to san francisco genehe res do is call the medical social worker to determine what is the status of tha they will contact the response coordinator. and then i wanted to put there, when somebody is wounded in coming out of the hospital, they may be engaged with wraparound projects or trauma recovery centers for cor crn's s they are getting discharged. this is the activation peace. they will assess or determine the level of the response that needs to occur. how many staff do we need to send out? they will activate the crisis response team. they will either respond to the crime scene or general hospital. what they will do is follow where everybody has been taken. they will also contact me crn -- the crn coordinator. supervisor avalos: crt does work with families? where does that occur? general hospital, more than one? >> we follow the victim and the families. it is a variety of things. sometimes they are nego

they said if dph or mobile crisis was able to offer three to four mental health workers on the scene, that would provide some sort of day consoling buffer in that time period. they also said that having the crn and community front line workers there is great, but with the absence of trained clinicians, it is not as and tactful. another solution the staff came up with was 4 dph to issue an rfp for organization working directly with those impacted with ptsd. a lot of times, nonprofits like us are not funded at a high level. as a result, we do not have the capacity to have a mfw on staff. if we were able to access mental health services for a long term period, it would be impeccable in the long run. they also said, in 2002, supervisor avalos, there was a boxing program at one of the gyms. we know that boxing is something of a pre -- antidote for dealing with anger or other problems with young people. we encourage you to see if there is any way to bring the program back or access the old equipment. lastly, perpetrators of violence are also victims of violence. as we look into that, when w

the way dph defines a person might be different from another department. when they develop these matrices that measure trends over time, they are not getting -- it is good information, but our information, we are putting in the effort to make sure -- it is a definitional issue. enough to make you care your hair out. we have been working on getting these definitions consistent across departments. >> thank you so much for the great work. i would like, to conclude, to call up chief still to give some closing remarks before opening up for public comment. >> thank you very much for having the hearing today and giving us the opportunity to highlight some of the really great things going on in san francisco, as well as some of the challenges, and point out, this will be on the website at the end of the day, a report of the san francisco adult probation. basically the first six months of realignment and impact on our department. we have provided copies. our next report will be at the 1-year mark. we hope to have collaborative information from all of the department

we participate in dpw clean and green program and we will raise the bar higher -- dph clean and green program and we will raise the bar higher. we will push the envelope on what makes the shot green. we parked our car is within our shop -- the cars within our shop. i will be able to maintain my customers because the new building is half a mile from its current location which is used for small business in san francisco. i will be able to provide necessary services to an area that is not saturated unlike some parts of the city where you have five or six shops on one block. because of a centralized -- location and it borders burma heights -- bernal heights. i currently employs six full- time employees and when i open the shop that will go tutan and based on business -- it will go to ten. bringing business will bring customers to other existing business. my employees and myself will support local small business and the local community. i served as vice president as -- of the rewachand association. i coached baseball and soccer and basketball and i overall enjoy being involved in the commu

necessarily a clear day to day, i was wondering if dph could help me propose an amendment to put these funds on reserves to make sure that they come back with an update moving forward. in can be a reasonable amount. i understand you want to test out the new program and have time to come up with the standards. i want to make sure that we move forward with having a competitive bid process. is there a dollar that you feel comfortable putting on the budget reserves so you can come back to the committee and update us on the process moving forward? >> we are in agreement with your request. can we get back to you with the amount put on reserve? supervisor kim: maybe we can skip over to the next item and ask you to let us know. the board just wants to hear back from you some time before the end of the year, how things are going and if you anticipate it soon. you have the ability to have a marker. a can be any level, we just want to know what the department would be most comfortable with. >> madam chair, because there is no funding before you, i would suggest to carry out the intent of the prop

supervisor chu: we have a representative from dph. >> i'm with the hiv prevention section and this is implement a national aids strategy established by president obama in 2010. san francisco is one of falsities to be fortunate to be awarded this grant and this is the second year of the grant. san francisco is considered a leader in the nation on hiv and this is to help us implement a national strategy locally. the funds will help us implement some high impact, innovative strategies and -- including expanding hiv testing to populations at risk for hiv in san francisco, particularly at the san francisco municipal st the clinic and to make sure folks have access to knowing their hiv status. this would provide linkage to care for those provided -- for those with hiv in the city. as a side note, i'm here on behalf of the acting director who is currently at the international aids conference in washington d.c. i am happy to answer any questions. supervisor chu: i believe there is no budget analysts report on this item. are there members of the public to wish to speak on item number four? see

supervisor chiu: i want to thank dph as well as dbi. the three systems really move this forward for the community. obviously we all care about this. thank you. supervisor mar: grace? >> good afternoon, supervisors. thank you very much. we appreciate the intent and the motivation behind this ordinance. yes, we would appreciate more out reach. we appreciate how important and significant it is. the cost of construction and th. will support the legislation. -- we support the legislation. thank you for your time. i am looking forward to talking to staff. thank you. supervisor mar: so, seeing no other public speakers, public comment is closed. supervisor chiu? supervisor chiu: a couple quick comments. i want to thank the members of the public who commented on this. we have been reaching out to different departments. the more we do that, it can only be helpful. i had a conversation with the head of the rba dimension there were concerns about whether we were impacting the rain water retention mandate, and i want to make clear impacts all progra

one of the things that we have been talking with the dph is doing an assessment, a snapshot of everyone who stays in the shelter. i know that has come up about getting a health and that -- health assessment, about getting a better understanding of that population as well. with our shelters and those services, it is important to get a picture of the types of services that we actually need. we are happy to work on seeing if there is a way to expand some of that public health assessment that we can do. i am interested in the idea about pet ownership in the buildings. rebecca is the director of animal welfare and control. her favorite story was that there were able to adopt a pet from the animal shelter and it is the first time that he started leaving his sro regularly, to walk his pet. and allow him to integrate into the neighborhood. that is an important idea as well and we can also build resources there. i will mention a couple of other things. we are working on some senior floors. it is not just for seniors, but it impacts some older women living in the sro buildings. i said how physica

you ever heard about the great work that dph does.frastructure through community and neighborhood centers, domestic violence, homelessness, areas of financial education, those areas that were to ameliorate the root causes of violence. -- that work to ameliorate the root causes of violence. you know some of the work that we do true compass point, to the california community loan fund, after our staff, three bta capacity building that we can offer to different organizations. mostly for district 11, the third prong that we offer is community building and can be been efforts, some most recently over the past three years or so with the support of your office, supervisor avalos. we have been utilizing general fund dollars that we have been able to -- that you have been able to secure for our office to initiate a planning process, creating a cohort of community groups that now include up to 32 groups, subha rhys providers, neighborhood organizations -- service providers, neighborhood organizations, which has become an ongoing community colla

we will work with other agencies such as dph. we already work with these agencies. some of these cases you may know about are those like to our car wash -- tower car wash, where we went after them for there longstanding business practices that denied a full and fair wage to there employees -- their employees. i anticipate that by dedicating one attorney and one legal assistant to coordinate this effort will result in better communication, better use of city resources, and my hope is this small investment will have brought in additional penalties that will fund and expand the program, similar to what we have done with our existing resources in our code enforcement efforts through the last five fiscal years. i just come back to saying this, supervisors. we find what we do. i continue to be willing to do it. i think there is nothing but false savings if you cut those positions. that money is not going anywhere else. i can guarantee it will lead to accountability, because if i am wrong, which i don't think i am, i too will have the opportunity to judge me by the results

you have dph. you have the police department somewhere else. you have this cbo's and then somewhere else, the crn's. in my very short time of being supervisor i have observed that the burden sadly rests on the shoulders of the people affected. i can give a quick example. i know there was one time -- you know, you have women who are resident managers at housing authorities where the victim lived where the perpetrator lived. they're racing around making sure everything is ok. you bring in the healing circle to maybe do something and then you bring in the cren and then you find out that they do not have the ability to pay for the funeral and there is grieving and they're traumatized and all of this stuff. i found that sometimes -- what we have found is because there are so many turf and neighbor of lines -- neighborhood lines, a lot of people will not lead to access the services they need. we have instances where people are living in the housing authority sites that are impacted. to the extent that we can coordinated -- and we have in the past wit

whatever confidentiality restrictions exist, but i hope everyone from cpmc and the mayor's office and dph can understand that st. luke's remains open and a viable hospital, not to even know that can happen, so when do you anticipate that there will ever be adequate or complete information or if there is a renegotiation, when that will be presented. >> supervisor, i regret this. we only have had the information for a short while, and when we got it, our first action was to do that. we believe that the exact terms do not work anymore, and we need to negotiate them. we are doing that, and we expect to negotiate. we do not know the exact letter of it, but this will come out during the period of a hospital, which is the period of closest danger, which is when this is being discharged, that we would have this for a number of years, and that is what we are driving for. i think certainly, absolutely, before the next hearing of this board, and i think potentially before that, we would be able to brief you before that, but at the latest, the next time we are before you. >> this would still be based

. >> -- supervisor wiener: dph be an obvious choice, i was just curious. supervisor mar: thank you so much to president chiu, and all of the various urban farms and gardens that participated in this. i think that the seven overarching goals are important for the one-stop shop, july 1, 2013. the garden resource centers across the city are expanding efforts looking at surplus properties from different districts and places. by highlighting the different gardens and farms within the city. i know that the alliance has identified sites within each of our districts. i also know that the waiting list for the community garden in my district on 16th avenue near fulton has a huge waiting list. i think it is a good goal that residents seeking plots should not have to wait more than one year or access to apply their other efforts. i am appreciative that the president appreciates the advocates from the alliance that they have made for funding in the position and incorporating as much as possible from different stakeholder groups. i would love to be added as a co-author

the agency also contributed to serve supported housing projects that are part of the dph, hsa, and mayor's office of housing pipeline. they are no longer able to do that. on the neighborhood-based economic development side -- these are all included in the mayor's budget. on the neighborhood-based economic development side, we included approximately $1.6 million in the first year, $1.5 million in the second year relate to work in the mid market, $3.7 million in the second year related to bayview, one in the second year. that difference is due to early funding of the southeast community health facility. approximately $100,000 related to visitation valley. have also included funding for the jobs readiness program. you can see included in the mayor's budget, in the first year, $30 million of general fund support for these programs. second year, $10 million. that is a significant general fund cost. supervisor chu: just to recap, when you talk about the tax increment allocated to enforce obligations, the redevelopment agency could have asked for a higher version for the redevelopment agency but

over the course of the last fiscal year, the probation department referred to dph 293 individuals. based on the risk assessment, they may have needed some sort of level of care, be it substance abuse, mental health, primary services. what i have included in the slide is basic to commission with regards to the numbers on the more high-profile services that we offer. 17 individuals presented with serious mental health illness, and we are talking about very high levels of acuity. individuals on multiple applications -- medications, multiple episodes of suicide attempts. we have 36 individuals placed in a residential treatment. 46 that went to outpatient services. 16 transitioned into our house in. we did receive some resources this past year for this population. we were able to piece together a small spectrum of services, but 72% of all the services provided work through the larger system of care. that involves a range of services. everything from bed bug abatement to tb testing, medication management, the few 5150's that have occurred over the year. a broad range of services that we

dpw, dph, and others to find new ways to address issues such as this while continuing the quest for 101 4th street -- for zero waste. this is the first six months of complaints for this year, and these are the 2011 complaint. about 1000 planes a year that we receive, either the website for our customer service center. supervisor olague: thank you. i would like to hear from regina who will speak to the small business impacts of the convenient zone mandate. >> good morning, supervisors. the state law requires the convenience is on be established, and this is a half mile radius of any supermarket with annual gross receipts of $2 million more. in the event that there is no recycling center or that the supermarket does not provide the means of buyback or redemption, then all businesses that sell crv products are required to buy back and provide reduction in their stores. so businesses do have an option if they do not want to do -- provide for in th-store redemption. they can be relieved of this obligation. it is about a total of 50 two thousand dollars a year. currently, san francisco has 53