. >> then also in the specific case of sites that are directly dph, it's important of course on our end, we should educate our providers that they are obligated to inform clients who need sign language support, that those services are available to them. at no cost to the consumer, to the client. and also, you know, from the client's perspective, if the provider is saying that they can't offer you service because they don't have an asl interpreter or what not, i think it's important for the client to actually let the provider know that you, the provider, are obligated to provide this service to us. and so you know, it's kind of a two-way street. we on the administrative side, we should certainly be educating our providers that they're obligated to provide the service. and also on the client's end, i think it's important to always make sure that you advocate for yourself, just in the sense of letting the provider know that it's not an option of whether or not we provide you service. it's your right -- or my right as the consumer, as the person who needs the asl interpretation to have it.