team of administrators or lawyerss and not go do get copies printed but filed an appeal against the dpwrder that recommended the denials and conditional approvals as an agent of park merced where they held a hearing on december 17th of 2015 i was arrears of the hearing and great they took a step into the community that was an issue the past but dpw involvement in handling this public input in and the ability of the tenants and residents to participate fully other than the 3 minute mark there are several concerns with request the park merced development but the permits are before you today so i do have housekeeping items one of the maps that i referenced in any belief was inadvertently left out a burn in 2008 and 2009 that was included in the eir so i have that for you all if you want to look at that. >> we're fine. >> all right. i'll put it on the overhead. >> could a i get this presentation on the monitor please it this - okay. good. >> oil start with new documents that kind of came across any desk this is a tree disclosure statement from the planning department signed by robert actual

we have been in conduct with dpw, this is-never heard of this before, this is a [inaudible] that dpw [inaudible] the idea is prove you get a car safely into the driveway. dpw indicated they were okay with it. update on forestry they have given the go ahead for reduction in the tree well so dpw basically said we can go ahead with the offset. this is somewhat new to this point and had a [inaudible] they provided detailed report and that conclusion it is okay to [inaudible] tree well by 4 feet without damaging the tree. so, hopefully that gets us back to where i think you would like us to be which is concentrateing on the project. apologies for this mistake. the good news is it forced us to engage with dpw and make sure they were okay with the offset. the property originally back when the nomination for historic district [inaudible] 1976 [inaudible] two stories and basement stripped and stuccoed by [inaudible] we don't know when it was stuccoed but guess 40's would be the best guess i think. there we see the house next to the -behind that tree is the house. it is actually smaller than t

you asked was what would you propose we would propose so work on this plan together with dpw but the percentages that dpw expressed the tra sustain represents about 29th percentile should be the percentage that a palm would be given in this strip so we- the important thing the overall concept has to work we want a rent-controlled place to come to as a community and be inviting so the city's priority to get us out of our cars and go to a place that is inviting so what we propose we work on this plan but the percentages that the vote represents ♪ plan thank you >> thank you next item, please. >> hi good evening kathleen part of sundown association i'm here to support what was said precisely we can have all canopys and properly represent what the community voted, and, secondly, there was an boundary that limited did voting we thought that was arbitrary from listening to n judah and didn't include kirkland and shopped an iving street that whole time we don't understand the procedures people didn't. could the meeting and the other folks did and thirdly, with all due respect to the merchan

he'd give a debut dpw did not finish this treatment.still unknown other developers of liberation's and the running of utility lines to the new law. until this is completed were not able to meet with the developer. >> testifier: bureau street and mapping does not review proposed street for drive street garage ice. the only agency that does that is you guys. dpw doesn't check to make sure this treatment is that you can get your car in. if it's not you then who? this is the pratt street the steepest street in the city. that's the house that doesn't have the garage. if so steep you can get a carton. that's what they're proposing. so if you want to build a garage but no access this is the test case. this is the proposed project. it's a 10% slope in the diagram. the buildings are 87 feet apart. only 25. so when you look at the package that's not a bad street you can drive up that you can't. this is what you will have to drive all. it's steep. you need 4 wheel dr. the plot to extort the made a 12 foot vertical put under drop the slope from 36

you asked was what would you propose we would propose so work on this plan together with dpw but the percentages that dpw expressed the tra sustain represents about 29th percentile should be the percentage that a palm would be given in this strip so we- the important thing the overall concept has to work we want a rent-controlled place to come to as a community and be inviting so the city's priority to get us out of our cars and go to a place that is inviting so what we propose we work on this plan but the percentages that the vote represents ♪ plan thank you >> thank you next item, please. >> hi good evening kathleen part of sundown association i'm here to support what was said precisely we can have all canopys and properly represent what the community voted, and, secondly, there was an boundary that limited did voting we thought that was arbitrary from listening to n judah and didn't include kirkland and shopped an iving street that whole time we don't understand the procedures people didn't. could the meeting and the other folks did and thirdly, with all due respect to the merchan

the working with dpw and the fire department to address all these issues.gain, they will be addressed at the project sponsors at every much interest in the safety not only themselves their workers and the neighborhood as the dr requesters. as to the claim of being out of scale, as you know the bernal heights special use district makes it impossible to develop a mansion. there's a height restriction is based on grade. he reduces the size of the project. there is a mandatory mass production. that's part. in this case it was exhibit a project sponsor made changes in the design is requesting planning me changes in the design at the request of the east slope design review board. whether not complied with the review boards comments, if you look at the table contents, what they require, crewcut, check street trees, check it entry treatment, check. side arts, treat with treatment, check your façade elements, check. colors and materials, check. the only comment made in the dr request by the design review board after 5 meetings was some additional design articulation

>> i get someone from cal osha and dpw can explain that in more detail. thank you. >> mr. mccarthy. >> james mccarthy, the crane unit from cal osha. >> what is cal osho's role in crane safety and what jurisdiction do you have oppose today the jurisdiction the city has? >> cal osha jurisdiction begins with employee safety and have to have a employer employee relationship to become involved. >> if you raise the microphone a little bit? >> do you need me to repeat what i said? >> no, sir >> the responsibility of cal osha crane unit is assure the crane is particular tower cranes are provided, erected, operated, climbed and dismantled according to the manufacturer recommendation but existing title 8 reguless formulated as a result of the accident in 1999. >> can you tell us about what that failure was? my understanding is that was a nob nab crane that was being jacked up at the time it failed, but in so far as all this comes from that failure 27 years ago, maybe you can tell us about what we learned from that. >> you are absolutely correct. that was a jacking operation which me

private in the sense it is to yours without dpw order or order from other agencies for her to do withhat she will. what she is ask ing for us is limited flexibility around that outdoor space and will ask you to remind the applicant again to let us know as the city in advance about what the intentions are and also obey whatever fire code, it isn't open yet, july is the intention for the space, but there were be a learning curve and the fire department will in fact i hope give you a occupancy. i will press on the fact so we know and she is aware of the safe amount of people to have in the space. >> so i have questions for you. um, with regard mendellplaza, and the public garden bun err but mendell plaza in particular, if we grant you this permit and somebody calls you and says, we want to use it next weekend, are you using it? we want an event from 5 in the afternoon to 8 at night, will you respond to those people so others will be able to use mendell plaza when you are not? >> absolutely >> i would consider making that a condition of the permit. >> absolutely. >> okay, so if you don't

we have been in conduct with dpw, this is-never heard of this before, this is a [inaudible] that dpwinaudible] the idea is prove you get a car safely into the driveway. dpw indicated they were okay with it. update on forestry they have given the go ahead for reduction in the tree well so dpw basically said we can go ahead with the offset. this is somewhat new to this point and had a [inaudible] they provided detailed report and that conclusion it is okay to [inaudible] tree well by 4 feet without damaging the tree. so, hopefully that gets us back to where i think you would like us to be which is concentrateing on the project. apologies for this mistake. the good news is it forced us to engage with dpw and make sure they were okay with the offset. the property originally back when the nomination for historic district [inaudible] 1976 [inaudible] two stories and basement stripped and stuccoed by [inaudible] we don't know when it was stuccoed but guess 40's would be the best guess i think. there we see the house next to the -behind that tree is the house. it is actually smaller than the

this is sponsored by dpw and mr. up dak is here. and we will turn the mic over to you. >> thank you chair farrell. so this item seeks approval of relocating the material assessing lab to 2000 oak dale, that is a property owned by 1030, polk associates lt and our apoll guapology being different than the name that owns the property, and that is controlled by matthew as the general partner. the materials pesting lab was actually formally located in city hall. if you can believe that. or not. then, it was moved to this current location, at 2099 kearny or the noerlth point plant, that is puc, property. and in order to make way for a new hydraulic pump project at v and they have respectfully requested the public works relocate this operation and so we have been engaged in that process. and so i am joined by both puc and public works officials who can address any questions that you might have about both of the nexus and the reason for the move as well as why this location works very well for public works. if you have questions? >> this ite

dpw has a emergency route for the city. none of in12 inch hose will go over the emergency routes and that is when the undergrounds thing will happen if it was a emergency route. on the emergency route the city published you won't have to go over the hose. they make a ramp for it that a fire engine could go over. is it realistic? probably not t. is a big ramp. they sell it and can put big rig jz semis over it and if we perch ths system we will puchs the ramps. the first is lay the hose out and put the fire out so the ramps are put in at a later time but they make a ramp for it. the disadvantage is we have a 5 inch system that we have ramps for it and is easier to cross 5 inch hose than 12 inch. would the fire fighters be busy fighting fires, yes but we have volunteers trained in san francisco so if the system was purchased we would like at training all the volunteers how to put the ramps out and work with the fire department so they are useful in a situation like this. let me back up. i want to make it clear, the fire depart

private in the sense it is to yours without dpw order or order from other agencies for her to do withll. what she is ask ing for us is limited flexibility around that outdoor space and will ask you to remind the applicant again to let us know as the city in advance about what the intentions are and also obey whatever fire code, it isn't open yet, july is the intention for the space, but there were be a learning curve and the fire department will in fact i hope give you a occupancy. i will press on the fact so we know and she is aware of the safe amount of people to have in the space. >> so i have questions for you. um, with regard to mendellplaza, and the public garden bun err but mendell plaza in particular, if we grant you this permit and somebody calls you and says, we want to use it next weekend, are you using it? we want an event from 5 in the afternoon to 8 at night, will you respond to those people so others will be able to use mendell plaza when you are not? >> absolutely >> i would consider making that a condition of the permit. >> absolutely. >> okay, so if you don't respond

department of public works we have hundreds of million dollars of backlog we're currently working with dpw to do a comprehensive assessment of the facilities of our true needs the grond has been huge and an overview of our budget 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 this is the second year we've convened a budget committee some members with us we're grateful for their participation and worked well to have a budget committee from all clarifications as well as areas in the department to come up with different ideas about priority tigdz your needs and that has so far been worked well in relation to the budgeted continued the key priorities and this is something i'm proud of because there's been times we don't agree huge priority by all facets of the department including the administration and fire commission and the presence of the fire commissioner hartman and of the 798 tom o'connor is here all the rough lean economic years question made sacrifices we're all in it together unified asking for doing everything we can to talk about the vehicle replacement plan a plan that went into place in 2009 and passed

i request that dpw notify the planner that the sponsor should file an application for assessing the tree's thickness, and chris altman of trees company said on the phone the tree is alive and healthy and cutting in the way they want to would kill it or cause it to fall over. >> thank you. >> joseph. >> hello. so the proposed -- i actually wanted to point out here on his architecture design you see here on the drawing he's got an adjacent window here -- >> sir, i'm sorry to interpret interrupt you and please speak into the mic. >> >> the upstairs window has an adjacent window here. on the design there is no window here and two other windows on my building here. the proposal is actually build a bathroom adjacent from the upstairs bedroom which would eliminate privacy. i don't know if the owner has claimed it would be an opaque window and what capacity and if it would open. we worked with the owner and last time we were in correspondence with him was december 29 and we informed him and objected to the entire third floor and shared information about his health and concluded and said we could r

i would like to note all of our now interim executive director, as well as the dpw staff person working with our project now both have no intention of needing to spend $360 million to finish phase i and both with state today that they believe they can finish phase i with just about 260 million of that 360 million increase, thereby saving a hundred million for phase ii. this slide shows our myriad and various funding sources. we have a federal grant, we have multiple fta grants, we have sales tax from san francisco and san mateo, bridge tolls, a federal tifia loan, land sales and tax increment. this shows how we get to the 247-250 million need. the difference between the 2013 budget and the mtc recommendation is the 360 million. a parcel s sale will close within the next month or two and provide approximately 160 million, which gives us a net shortfall of 200 million. however, we had previously anticipated receiving about 194 million in cfd special tax proveeds. the city has updated those projections and they have come down to 146 million that's expected to be received during the constru

i say a dpw truck and dpw nearby t. is a concerning film so you need to watch it. they are talking it down and stepping on the poles and did use a knife. it is disconcerting. >> i'll work with director hicks to investigate it. >> especially on a rainy night >> anyone who does center concerns or witnesses to the incident on thursday on shot pep wole 415-553-1145 for any witnesses. anything further on this matter colleagues? call the next item >> 4 bocc directors report. report on orks cc activities squu nouncements. director hicks will give a update on sb 1286 and presentation of occ reports, summaries of caizs received, mediation of complaints, sustained complaints march 2016 and companion reports. >> good evening director hicks. >> if you have some brief announcements to make before going into the other agendized items the first the occ is conducting a independent investigation of thursdays officer involved shooting. the occ investigator assigned is in the audience and that is jason waechter. i was speaking to about investigator jason waechter who is sitting out w

department of public works we have hundreds of million dollars of backlog we're currently working with dpw to do a comprehensive assessment of the facilities of our true needs the grond has been huge and an overview of our budget 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 this is the second year we've convened a budget committee some members with us we're grateful for their participation and worked well to have a budget committee from all clarifications as well as areas in the department to come up with different ideas about priority tigdz your needs and that has so far been worked well in relation to the budgeted continued the key priorities and this is something i'm proud of because there's been times we don't agree huge priority by all facets of the department including the administration and fire commission and the presence of the fire commissioner hartman and of the 798 tom o'connor is here all the rough lean economic years question made sacrifices we're all in it together unified asking for doing everything we can to talk about the vehicle replacement plan a plan that went into place in 2009 and passed

i say a dpw truck and dpw nearby t. is a concerning film so you need to watch it. they are talking it down and stepping on the poles and did use a knife. it is disconcerting. >> i'll work with director hicks to investigate it. >> especially on a rainy night >> anyone who does center concerns or witnesses to the incident on thursday on shot pep wole 415-553-1145 for any witnesses. anything further on this matter colleagues? call the next item >> 4 bocc directors report. report on orks cc activities squu nouncements. director hicks will give a update on sb 1286 and presentation of occ reports, summaries of caizs received, mediation of complaints, sustained complaints march 2016 and companion reports. >> good evening director hicks. >> if you have some brief announcements to make before going into the other agendized items the first the occ is conducting a independent investigation of thursdays officer involved shooting. the occ investigator assigned is in the audience and that is jason waechter. i was speaking to about investigator jason waechter who is sitting out w

i say a dpw truck and dpw nearby t. is a concerning film so you need to watch it. they are talking it down and stepping on the poles and did use a knife. it is disconcerting. >> i'll work with director hicks to investigate it. >> especially on a rainy night >> anyone who does center concerns or witnesses to the incident on thursday on shot pep wole 415-553-1145 for any witnesses. anything further on this matter colleagues? call the next item >> 4 bocc directors report. report on orks cc activities squu nouncements. director hicks will give a update on sb 1286 and presentation of occ reports, summaries of caizs received, mediation of complaints, sustained complaints march 2016 and companion reports. >> good evening director hicks. >> if you have some brief announcements to make before going into the other agendized items the first the occ is conducting a independent investigation of thursdays officer involved shooting. the occ investigator assigned is in the audience and that is jason waechter. i was speaking to about investigator jason waechter who is sitting out w

is a less much less details and complicated implementation for the management they're using and for dpw i don't know the name the product but a product from a company at excel a it is another product i'm not sure of the name. >> commissioner walker. >> just to clarify the project was stopped because the list of requirements had to be agreed on it keep on changing like a moving target we decided to stop all this assessment of where we are at and what is happening including a timeline sort of the recommendations of how to get back to our original process here and planning has gotten online with their data didn't include an attachment to ours it is really sort of their test case with all their requirements and in process we decide at one point to go live and workout the kings we've not gone live with all the rest of the data that is on our end so we're hoping to capture and blend to the issue of the other departments using a similar or compatible program will it make it definitely with planning they'll be sharing the same database so far as the port not that i'm aware of any and dpw i've h

is a less much less details and complicated implementation for the management they're using and for dpw i don't know the name the product but a product from a company at excel a it is another product i'm not sure of the name. >> commissioner walker. >> just to clarify the project was stopped because the list of requirements had to be agreed on it keep on changing like a moving target we decided to stop all this assessment of where we are at and what is happening including a timeline sort of the recommendations of how to get back to our original process here and planning has gotten online with their data didn't include an attachment to ours it is really sort of their test case with all their requirements and in process we decide at one point to go live and workout the kings we've not gone live with all the rest of the data that is on our end so we're hoping to capture and blend to the issue of the other departments using a similar or compatible program will it make it definitely with planning they'll be sharing the same database so far as the port not that i'm aware of any and dpw i've h

this is sponsored by dpw and mr. up dak is here. and we will turn the mic over to you. >> thank you chair farrell. so this item seeks approval of relocating the material assessing lab to 2000 oak dale, that is a property owned by 1030, polk associates lt and our apoll guapology being different than the name that owns the property, and that is controlled by matthew as the general partner. the materials pesting lab was actually formally located in city hall. if you can believe that. or not. then, it was moved to this current location, at 2099 kearny or the noerlth point plant, that is puc, property. and in order to make way for a new hydraulic pump project at v and they have respectfully requested the public works relocate this operation and so we have been engaged in that process. and so i am joined by both puc and public works officials who can address any questions that you might have about both of the nexus and the reason for the move as well as why this location works very well for public works. if you have questions? >> this ite

i would like to note all of our now interim executive director, as well as the dpw staff person working with our project now both have no intention of needing to spend $360 million to finish phase i and both with state today that they believe they can finish phase i with just about 260 million of that 360 million increase, thereby saving a hundred million for phase ii. this slide shows our myriad and various funding sources. we have a federal grant, we have multiple fta grants, we have sales tax from san francisco and san mateo, bridge tolls, a federal tifia loan, land sales and tax increment. this shows how we get to the 247-250 million need. the difference between the 2013 budget and the mtc recommendation is the 360 million. a parcel s sale will close within the next month or two and provide approximately 160 million, which gives us a net shortfall of 200 million. however, we had previously anticipated receiving about 194 million in cfd special tax proveeds. the city has updated those projections and they have come down to 146 million that's expected to be received during the constru

it was funded by dpw.i just think that although there is a lot of great intentions i have an amazing project in my district, the muni substation, which is a bright on the filmore. i would like $2.5 million to rehabilitate the station and make what has been promised to the community for so many years, but i realize there are so many projects in in the city and so much to do and challenges to getting everything that we want done in a timely manner. it's not to say that i wouldn't support this project through the process in the process. i have supported funding for this project in the past, but with our budget process coming up i do think it's more appropriate to include a project of this nature in the budget process and not as a supplemental at this time. so unfortunately, i can't support the supplemental. thank you. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you. when we had this discussion at the budget committee, we actually continued this item for a week, in the hope that supervisor avalos would be able to have a discu

i say a dpw truck and dpw nearby t. is a concerning film so you need to watch it.hey are talking it down and stepping on the poles and did use a knife. it is disconcerting. >> i'll work with director hicks to investigate it. >> especially on a rainy night >> anyone who does center concerns or witnesses to the incident on thursday on shot pep wole 415-553-1145 for any witnesses. anything further on this matter colleagues? call the next item >> 4 bocc directors report. report on orks cc activities squu nouncements. director hicks will give a update on sb 1286 and presentation of occ reports, summaries of caizs received, mediation of complaints, sustained complaints march 2016 and companion reports. >> good evening director hicks. >> if you have some brief announcements to make before going into the other agendized items the first the occ is conducting a independent investigation of thursdays officer involved shooting. the occ investigator assigned is in the audience and that is jason waechter. i was speaking to about investigator jason waechter who is sitting out wit

private in the sense it is to yours without dpw order or order from other agencies for her to do withhat she will. what she is ask ing for us is limited flexibility around that outdoor space and will ask you to remind the applicant again to let us know as the city in advance about what the intentions are and also obey whatever fire code, it isn't open yet, july is the intention for the space, but there were be a learning curve and the fire department will in fact i hope give you a occupancy. i will press on the fact so we know and she is aware of the safe amount of people to have in the space. >> so i have questions for you. um, with regard to mendellplaza, and the public garden bun err but mendell plaza in particular, if we grant you this permit and somebody calls you and says, we want to use it next weekend, are you using it? we want an event from 5 in the afternoon to 8 at night, will you respond to those people so others will be able to use mendell plaza when you are not? >> absolutely >> i would consider making that a condition of the permit. >> absolutely. >> okay, so if you don

of item number 8 specifically on attachment 1, the third item, subject the too the condition before dpw puts this project out to bid that a little bit further consalitation with the community relative to the streetscape design be addressed. i discussed that with staff so would like to add that condition and then approve the item. >> that is a motion? >> yes, sir. >> is there a second? second by commissioner breed. okay, any other comments or questions, colleagues? yes. >> through the chair, commissioner peskin where believe the contract has been advertised so if quee can condition it on prior to award of a contract. >> i will accept that change to my motion so prior to award. >> okay, commissioner breed that is a second? revised motion is made and seconded. seeing no other comment, any public comment on item 8? seeing none public comment is closed. commissioner peskin made a motion to amend, can we take that motion without objection? without objection the amendment is adopted. take item 8 same house same call? without objection that is the order. >> item 9 allocate $10,975,410 in prop k

>> i get someone from cal osha and dpw can explain that in more detail. thank you. >> mr. mccarthy. >> james mccarthy, the crane unit from cal osha. >> what is cal osho's role in crane safety and what jurisdiction do you have oppose today the jurisdiction the city has? >> cal osha jurisdiction begins with employee safety and have to have a employer employee relationship to become involved. >> if you raise the microphone a little bit? >> do you need me to repeat what i said? >> no, sir >> the responsibility of cal osha crane unit is assure the crane is particular tower cranes are provided, erected, operated, climbed and dismantled according to the manufacturer recommendation but existing title 8 reguless formulated as a result of the accident in 1999. >> can you tell us about what that failure was? my understanding is that was a nob nab crane that was being jacked up at the time it failed, but in so far as all this comes from that failure 27 years ago, maybe you can tell us about what we learned from that. >> you are absolutely correct. that was a jacking operation which me

of item number 8 specifically on attachment 1, the third item, subject the too the condition before dpw puts this project out to bid that a little bit further consalitation with the community relative to the streetscape design be addressed. i discussed that with staff so would like to add that condition and then approve the item. >> that is a motion? >> yes, sir. >> is there a second? second by commissioner breed. okay, any other comments or questions, colleagues? yes. >> through the chair, commissioner peskin where believe the contract has been advertised so if quee can condition it on prior to award of a contract. >> i will accept that change to my motion so prior to award. >> okay, commissioner breed that is a second? revised motion is made and seconded. seeing no other comment, any public comment on item 8? seeing none public comment is closed. commissioner peskin made a motion to amend, can we take that motion without objection? without objection the amendment is adopted. take item 8 same house same call? without objection that is the order. >> item 9 allocate $10,975,410 in prop k

at bryant and embarcadero, rec and park at the innovation hanger and one thing at sfmta to go to the dpw parking lot to use for staff. >> thank you very much missing megan's colleagues anything further anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed and send to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> item 3. >> resolution retroactively authorized the department of technology to accept a gift if sister could with $350,000 to provide free wireless to the internet in san francisco. >> mr. robin. >> i'm bryan with the demg it accepts a gift from cisco wifi assess points those will be deployed on market street and sue park and herman plaza the intent of those didn't see is they represent a new technology for wifi that allows better management to multiple users in the use area. >> a gift to enable us to do. >> colleagues, any questions okay. we'll move on to public comment on item 3 anyone wish to comment okay seeing none, public comment is closed colleagues can i get a motion. >> move with the positive recommendations to the board.

i would like to note all of our now interim executive director, as well as the dpw staff person working with our project now both have no intention of needing to spend $360 million to finish phase i and both with state today that they believe they can finish phase i with just about 260 million of that 360 million increase, thereby saving a hundred million for phase ii. this slide shows our myriad and various funding sources. we have a federal grant, we have multiple fta grants, we have sales tax from san francisco and san mateo, bridge tolls, a federal tifia loan, land sales and tax increment. this shows how we get to the 247-250 million need. the difference between the 2013 budget and the mtc recommendation is the 360 million. a parcel s sale will close within the next month or two and provide approximately 160 million, which gives us a net shortfall of 200 million. however, we had previously anticipated receiving about 194 million in cfd special tax proveeds. the city has updated those projections and they have come down to 146 million that's expected to be received during the constru

legislation a group that took on a role of the custodian we'll monitor the care and upkeep and work with the dpw to do actually repair other needs if this should arise we're very excited about this this is a project that we talked about and advocated for since 2003 we hope that the engineering plaque will be part of eventually come on excelsior walk of familiar simple other walk of fame and the boasting trail we have much to celebrate and we're proud of the work that supervisor avalos has done to support our efforts to support that history our neighborhood has had very many people in this - over the past years and many more to come to be deferring for plaques like this this is particularly cbos close to our hearts because of the work in the community to support jerseys legacy and community what with the meaningless of the amphitheater and many projects we are grateful to supervisor avalos in 4e7 us get historic street names like china and india are part of that walk of fame so thank you and hope this passes. >> thank you. i also want to thank you for working so many years as well as our voluntee

. >> now the dpw urban planning program so see how the garden community. >> so i grew up on a farm inir force base we picked the foods open the trees and share with other families and as i drive around san francisco i see any trees with apples or mrumdz and lemon trees i can see the food going to waste and brought that idea back to the department many of the trees where the fruit would go to waste we origin or crop and pick other fruits and delivery this to food banks or shelters to people who need them. >> i'm here with nang wong hello nang. >> hello. >> i need to understand house this gleaning work. >> we come and harvest like for example, we'll come over here this is the lemon and plug it like this. >> (laughter). >> made that good, good and ease. >> the trick is how not to hurt the branches. >> like the thing. >> i'm so excited about this. the people are so passionate about where the food goes to the private property owners give us the food they're happy that no of a t is going to waste >> oh. thank you. thank you. again job aura natural >> (laughter). >> from backyards to back lo

this is sponsored by dpw and mr. up dak is here. and we will turn the mic over to you. >> thank you chair farrell. so this item seeks approval of relocating the material assessing lab to 2000 oak dale, that is a property owned by 1030, polk associates lt and our apoll guapology being different than the name that owns the property, and that is controlled by matthew as the general partner. the materials pesting lab was actually formally located in city hall. if you can believe that. or not. then, it was moved to this current location, at 2099 kearny or the noerlth point plant, that is puc, property. and in order to make way for a new hydraulic pump project at v and they have respectfully requested the public works relocate this operation and so we have been engaged in that process. and so i am joined by both puc and public works officials who can address any questions that you might have about both of the nexus and the reason for the move as well as why this location works very well for public works. if you have questions? >> this ite

of item number 8 specifically on attachment 1, the third item, subject the too the condition before dpw puts this project out to bid that a little bit further consalitation with the community relative to the streetscape design be addressed. i discussed that with staff so would like to add that condition and then approve the item. >> that is a motion? >> yes, sir. >> is there a second? second by commissioner breed. okay, any other comments or questions, colleagues? yes. >> through the chair, commissioner peskin where believe the contract has been advertised so if quee can condition it on prior to award of a contract. >> i will accept that change to my motion so prior to award. >> okay, commissioner breed that is a second? revised motion is made and seconded. seeing no other comme, any public comment on item 8? seeing none public comment is closed. commissioner peskin made a motion to amend, can we take that motion without objection? without objection the amendment is adopted. take item 8 same house same call? without objection that is the order. >> item 9 allocate $10,975,410 in prop k f

pedestrian fatalities and the hit and run at a meeting one individuals from the project manages from dpw or mta said they couldn't tell the contractor to start at one end i substantially talked to detrimentally that said he if think that will be a problem to have them start at the eastern side and move in that direction any other comments or questions on this item okay. i'll i mean, we'll go to public comment first, i'd like to ask commissioner peskin i think there are several options so with that he'd like to move the package of prop k to the full board. >> yeah. to the full board. >> full commission. >> thank you any other questions or comments seeing none, okay open up for public comment okay anyone wish to comment on item no public comment is closed. and on item 6 and the house has changed a roll call. >> on item 6 commissioner avalos commissioner breed commissioner farrell absent commissioner peskin commissioner tang the item is approved all right. item 7 please. item 7 the bike sharing update on informational item. >> thank you. we have emily staple ton. >> from mode. >> good morni

pedestrian fatalities and the hit and run at a meeting one individuals from the project manages from dpw or mta said they couldn't tell the contractor to start at one end i substantially talked to detrimentally that said he if think that will be a problem to have them start at the eastern side and move in that direction any other comments or questions on this item okay. i'll i mean, we'll go to public comment first, i'd like to ask commissioner peskin i think there are several options so with that he'd like to move the package of prop k to the full board. >> yeah. to the full board. >> full commission. >> thank you any other questions or comments seeing none, okay openp for public comment okay anyone wish to comment on item no public comment is closed. and on item 6 and the house has changed a roll call. >> on item 6 commissioner avalos commissioner breed commissioner farrell absent commissioner peskin commissioner tang the item is approved all right. item 7 please. item 7 the bike sharing update on informational item. >> thank you. we have emily staple ton. >> from mode. >> good morning

pedestrian fatalities and the hit and run at a meeting one individuals from the project manages from dpw or mta said they couldn't tell the contractor to start at one end i substantially talked to detrimentally that said he if think that will be a problem to have them start at the eastern side and move in that direction any other comments or questions on this item okay. i'll i mean, we'll go to public comment first, i'd like to ask commissioner peskin i think there are several options so with that he'd like to move the package of prop k to the full board. >> yeah. to the full board. >> full commission. >> thank you any other questions or comments seeing none, okay open up for public comment okay anyone wish to comment on item no public comment is closed. and on item 6 and the house has changed a roll call. >> on item 6 commissioner avalos commissioner breed commissioner farrell absent commissioner peskin commissioner tang the item is approved all right. item 7 please. item 7 the bike sharing update on informational item. >> thank you. we have emily staple ton. >> from mode. >> good morni